Category: CBSE Class 10

Here we are providing The Book that Saved the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

The Book that Saved the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

The Book that Saved the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
What was Oop’s opinion about the ‘sandwiches’ he had eaten?
Answer:
Oop was forced to eat ‘sandwiches’ and he made terrible faces while chewing. He said that it was not delicious; rather as dry as Martian dust. He remarked that he could not understand how the Earthlings could get those ‘sandwiches’ down without water.

Question 2.
What was Noodle’s version to describe the so-called ‘sandwich’?
Answer:
Noodle hesitantly told Think-Tank that he had ‘insignificant’ information about those ‘sandwiches’. He informed him that he had seen surveyor films of those sandwiches. He had noticed that the Earthlings did not eat them. They used them as some sort of communication devices.

Question 3.
Why was the twentieth century called the ‘Era of the Book?
Answer:
The twentieth century was often called the Era of the book as there were books about everything. Books taught people how, when, where, and why of everything. They illustrated, educated, punctuated, and even decorated.

Question 4.
How Does Think-Tank compare the Martians with the people on Earth? What does he call the Earth mockingly?
Answer:
Think-Tank considers earth ‘ a ridiculous little planet’ ariel intends to put it under his generous rulership. He feels the earth is actually an unimportant place where ugly earthlings, with their tiny heads, reside. He believes the Martians to be a superior race. He mockingly calls the earth ‘Primitive ball of mud’.

Question 5.
What saved the Earth? How?
Answer:
One dusty old book of nursery rhymes saved the earth from a Martian invasion. The Martian could not decipher the meaning of nursery rhymes. Their misinterpretation made the situation comical. They began to believe that the Earthlings had advance technology and were planning to invade the Mars. They called off their mission and even left the Mars isolated to escape to a far-off planet.

Question 6.
What guesses are made by Think-Tank about the books found on Earth?
Answer:
Think Tank first of all announced that the books found on the Earth were sandwiches and to confirm it he forced Oop to eat them. Later on Noodle shared his observation and he declared that he was about to say the same thing. Now he announced that those books were a sort of communication devices.

Question 7.
Noodle avoids offending Think-Tank but at the same time he corrects his mistakes. How does he manage to do that?
Answer:
Noodle avoids offending Think-Tank very meticulously. He never disagrees with his opinion but he does not miss any opportunity to put forward his suggestions no matter even if he does it hesitantly. He always shows admiration to Think-Tank’s intelligence. He never puts himself into the conflicting ideas from his boss.

Question 8.
How did the book change Think-Tank’s opinion about the Earthlings?
Answer:
Think-Tank used to believe that the Martian was a superior race to the Earthlings. But after cracking the so-called code of an old nursery rhyme book, he changed his view about the Earthlings. He now thought that the Earthlings has reached a high level of civilization and planning to invade the Mars. It made him call off his mission.

Question 9.
What does Think-Tank infer on listening to the nursery rhyme, ‘Hey diddle diddle ….’?
Answer:
On listening to the nursery rhyme, ‘Hey diddle diddle…’, Think – Tank inferred that the Earthlings had reached a high level of civilization. It was alarming that they had taught their domesticated animals musical cultures and space technique. He announced that even their dogs had a sense of humour.’ He believed that the Earthlings could launch an interplanetary attack of millions of cows any time soon.

Question 10.
What does Noodle tell Think-Tank about the books?
Answer:
Noodle hesitantly informs Think-Tank that the books were a sort of communication device. He told that he had seen surveyor films of those ‘sandwiches’. He had noticed that the Earthlings did not eat them. They used them as sort of communication device.

Question 11.
How did the relations between the Earthlings and the Martians improve in the twenty-fifth century?
Answer:
Think-Tank attempted an invasion on the earth but got so frightened that he had to leave the Mars. He was replaced by Noodle. Noddle was an intelligent and wonderful person. The Earthlings resumed contact with the Martian. They became friendly and taught the Martians how to read. The Earthlings established a model library in their capital city of Marsopolis.

Question 12.
What did Think-Tank ask Omega to do with the book?
Answer:
Think-Tank thought that it was a sandwich. He said that there were two slices of what was called bread with some sort of filling. He asked Omega to eat the book.

Question 13.
Who is Think – Tank? How did Noodle address him?
Answer:
Think-Tank is the ruler of Mars. Noodle addressed him, “O Great and Mighty Think-Tank, Ruler of Mars and her two moons, most powerful and intelligent creature in the whole universe.

Question 14.
What was the book about? How did Think-Tank interpret the rhymes?
Answer:
They were reading the rhymes book named Mother Goose. When captain Omega and her team were reading and enjoying the rhymes, Think-Tank interpreted them in a different way. He concluded that he was being attacked. He at once asked his people to come back. He decided to evacuate the entire planet of Mars.

Question 15.
What did Think-Tank intend to do?
Answer:
Think-Tank intended to invade the earth. He wanted to control the earth and put it under his rulership.

Question 16.
What did Noodle suggest about the book?
Answer:
Noodle suggested that the book was not a sandwich, it was some device used for communication. Later on, he suggested that the team should eat vitamins to increase their intelligence so that they could read them.

Question 17.
Where did Captain Omega reach with her team?
Answer:
Captain Omega landed on the earth with her team. They found themselves in the Centerville Public Library amidst thousands of books. They thought they were in some sort of storage bam.

Question 18.
Why was the twentieth century called the ‘Era of the Book’?
Answer:
The twentieth century was often called the ‘Era of the book’. In those days, there were books about everything, from anteaters to Zulus. Books taught people how to, when to, where to, and why to. They illustrated, educated, punctuated, and even decorated.

Question 19.
Who tried to invade the earth in the twenty-first century?
Answer:
The Martians tried to invade the earth in the twenty-first century.

Question 20.
What guesses are made by Think-Tank about the books found on earth?
Answer:
Think-Tank’s guess about the books found on earth is that they are some devices meant for communication.

The Book that Saved the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Half knowledge is dangerous. It never helps to achieve success. Discuss how incomplete knowledge can lead to disaster in reference to the lesson “The Book That Saved the Earth’.
Answer:
It is a fact that incomplete knowledge can lead to disaster. Suppose we sit to work on a satellite and able to command only half of the instructions. In that case things would fail and cause disaster. Half knowledge is dangerous and never helps to achieve success. If we are able to apply knowledge fully to any kind of task, we can have self contentment.
We read in the lesson “The Book That Saved the Earth” that the Martians had to suffer. They had the mission to invade the earth but due to incomplete knowledge they misinterpreted the nursery rhyme book.

Question 2.
Rushing to conclusion without going into details may lead to chaos and failure. Elaborate this with reference to the Martian invasion in the chapter ‘ The Book That Saved the Earth’.
Answer:
The Martians were very proud of themselves. Great and mighty Think-Thank regarded as the ruler of Mars was always caught in self praise. He had a quick mind and wishes to attack the earth in a great hurry. Martians misinterpreted the signals received from earthlings book of nursery rhymes and fled away. If they had planned the things decisively things would have been different. In any kind of situation rash decisions would never give results. It is only through knowledge, perseverence.

Question 3.
It is morally incorrect to invade another country/ planet for one’s own benefit. The Martians did not understand the value of peaceful coexistence. How did the book of nursery rhyme save the Earth from the Martian invasion?
Answer:
Great and Mighty Think-Tank believed that the Martians were a superior race so they must invade and put the earth under his generous rulership. He scornfully called the Earth ‘primitive ball of mud’. The Martians did not understand the value of peaceful coexistence and sent a mission to invade the earth. The crew landed in a library and could not make out what the books actually were. It was believed – that the books were a sort of communications device.

Think-Tank asked the member to decipher the code of the ‘sandwiches’. The nursery rhymes were totally misinterpreted and it was believed that the Earthlings had developed an advance civilization and were planning to invade the Mars. The mission was called off and the Martians escaped to a remote place to save their lives. Thus the books saved the earth.

Question 4.
How do the three nursery rhymes frighten Think-Tank in the play, ‘The Book That Saved the Earth’?
Answer:
The rhyme ‘Mistress Mary, quite contrary makes Think-Tank believe that the Earthlings have discovered how to combine agriculture and mining. He thinks that they can grow explosives. The rhyme ‘Hey diddle diddle’, makes him conclude that the Earthlings have reached a high level of civilization: even their animals have musical culture and know space techniques.

He fears that at that very moment, the Earthlings might be launching an interplanetary attack of millions of cows. Oop reads the rhyme. ‘Humpty Dumpty’ and shows him a picture of Humpty Dumpty. Think-Tank concludes that it is his picture and the Earthlings are planning to invade Mars.

Question 5.
How did one old book of nursery rhymes save the world from a Martian invasion?
OR
Who tried to invade the earth in the twenty first century and what saved it?
Answer:
The Martians sent a mission to invade the earth. The crew landed in a library and could not make out what the books actually were. It was believed that the books were a sort of communication device. Think-Tank asked the members to decipher the code of the ‘sandwiches’. The nursery rhymes were totally misinterpreted and it was believed that the Earthlings had developed an advance civilization and mission was called off and the Martians escaped to a remote place to save their lives. Thus the books saved the Earth.

Question 6.
What is Think-Tank’s opinion about the Earth?
Answer:
Think-Tank called the Earth a ridiculous little planet and showed his wish to put it under his generous rulership. The planet Earth was insignificant to him. He believed that the Martians were the most handsome race. He referred to the people of the Earth as Earthlings and mocked their tiny heads.

He showed his desire to invade ‘primitive ball of mud’ called Earth before lunch. But after misinterpreting the book of nursery rhymes he began to believe that the earthlings had developed a more advanced civilization and were even planning to invade the Mars.

Question 7.
Noodle avoids offending Think-Tank but at the same time he corrects his mistakes. How does he manage to do that?
Answer:
Noodle avoids offending Think-Tank, but at the same time, he very cleverly tries to correct his mistakes also. Whenever Noodle had to say something contrary to what Think-Tank said, he would present his thoughts by referring to them as being of no particular importance. In this way he would correct Think- Tank’s errors without making him feel that he was being corrected. Noodle appears to be quite an expert in handling these kind of people.

Question 8.
If you were in Noodle’s place, how would you handle Think-Tank’s mistakes?
Answer:
If I were in Noodle’s place, I would have handled Think-Tank’s mistakes the same way as Noodle does, politely and courteously.

Question 9.
Do you think books are being replaced by the electronic media? Can we do away with books altogether?
Answer:
In a way, yes, we can say that books are being replaced by the electronic media. Most of the children no longer read story books and prefer to watch television and Rufe internet. Although textbooks are still there but they may soon be replaced by electronic vesion. Books have their own utility value because one can read a book at his own pace and a book does not need to be powered by electricity. But as the technology is advancing and newer versions of it are being discovered every day, a time may come when books will become a thing of the past.

Question 10.
Why are books referred to as a man’s best companion? Which is your favorite book and why? Write a paragraph about that book.
Answer:
Books are known to be as man’s best companion. They can make us mentally strong, improve our vocabulary and enhance the horizon of our knowledge. Books can be our guide and best friend. I love to read books, especially the ones that have children as their main characters and the story highlights their psychology and how innocent the children could be.

One such book in Malgudi Days written by a very renowned author R K Narayan. I love this book because the story revolves around the children. The way child’s psychology has been depicted in this book is what gives me pleasure while reading this book.

Question 11.
In what ways does Think-Tank misinterpret innocent nursery rhymes as threats to the Martians? Can you think of any incidents where you misinterpreted a word or an action? How did you resolve the misunderstanding?
Answer:
Think-Tank misinterprets innocent rhymes. He just takes that verbal meaning of the rhymes. He does not bother to go into the depth. It always happens. If we do not try to understand the context in which the words have been used, we shall commit mistakes as Think-Tank has done. I misinterpreted once a word ‘helping’. I took its simple meaning that is to do something in the favour of a person. I resolved this misunderstanding with the help of a dictionary. I found that its meaning is a part of food also.

Question 12.
The aliens in this play speak English. Do you think this is their language? What could be the language of the aliens?
Answer:
I don’t think English is their language. Had English been their language, they would have easily understood the book. Their language could be something else. They must be using language which is completely different from any language of this planet earth.

Here we are providing Bholi Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

Bholi Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

Bholi Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Bholi Class 10 Extra Questions Question 1.
Why was Sulekha nicknamed Bholi?
Answer:
Sulekha was nicknamed Bholi because she was a simpleton. She was mentally slow and anybody could befool her.

Bholi Extra Questions Question 2.
Why did Sulekha start stammering?
Answer:
Sulekha was a baby when she fell down from a cot. Her brain was damaged. She could not speak till the age of five years. She was mentally slow and lacked confidence. That is why she started stammering.

Bholi Class 10 Extra Questions And Answers Question 3.
Why was Ramlal worried about Bholi and not about his other children?
Answer:
All other children of Ramlal were healthy and good looking. Bholi was the only girl who was neither intelligent nor good looking. She was a simpleton, she stammered also. Ramlal was extremely worried about her future.

Bholi Extra Questions And Answers Question 4.
Why did the Tehsildar come to Ramlal’s village? What did he ask Ramlal to do?
Answer:
The Tehsildar came to Ramlal’s village to inaugurate the primary school. He asked Ramlal to set an example for others by sending his daughters to school.

Bholi Important Questions Question 5.
What was Ramlal’s wife reaction?
Answer:
His wife was an orthodox village woman. She was against the idea of sending her daughters to school. She thought that education would affect their marriage prospects adversely.

Bholi Chapter Class 10 Extra Questions Question 6.
Why did she agree to send Bholi to school?
Answer:
She thought that education would ruin the marriage prospects of their daughters but Bholi was a simpleton. There was no possibility of her marriage. So she agreed to send Bholi to school.

Class 10 Bholi Extra Questions Question 7.
Why was Bholi reluctant to go to school with her father?
Answer:
Bholi did not know what a school was like. She had never heard about it. When her father held her hand and told her that they were going to school, she got frightened fearing to be dragged out of the house. So she was reluctant to go to school with her father.

Extra Questions Of Bholi Question 8.
What made her feel that she is going to a better place than her home?
Answer:
Bholi never got attention before that day. She was bathed and given a clean dress. Oil was rubbed into her dry and matted hair. This made her feel that she was going to a better place than her home.

Bholi Class 10 Important Questions Question 9.
Did Bholi enjoy her first day in school? What made her happy on this very day?
Answer:
It was a mixed day for Bholi. She was happy to see the girls of her age. She was fascinated with the colourful pictures on the wall of the classrooms. But when the teacher asked her name she could not answer properly and other girls laughed at her. She cried. But her teacher’s soft words made her happy on this very day.

Extra Questions Of Bholi Class 10 Question 10.
Which incident touched her heart?
Answer:
All the girls were laughing at her. The teacher called her by name in her soft and soothing voice. This touched her heart because she had never been called in that loving way.

Question 11.
“Her heart was throbbing with a new hope and a new life”.
(i) What was the new hope and new life?
(ii) What did she relate the pictures in the school wall to?
Answer:
(i) The new hope was that she would become learned like others. People would listen to her. She would be able to speak without stammering. Now she would not be treated as inferior to others.

(ii) She related the pictures of the school wall with the real things around her. The goat was black like the goat of their neighbour. The cow was just like their Lakshmi. The horse was brown just like the Tehsildar’s horse.

Question 12.
How does she become a masterpiece?
Answer:
The teacher transformed a simpleton girl into a well-behaved and confident girl. Bholi was a foolish and stammering girl. The teacher put in all her hard work in transforming her into a mentally strong and well-educated girl. It was really a masterpiece of the teacher.

Question 13.
Why did Bholi look at Bishamber with cold contempt?
Answer:
Bholi looked at Bishamber with cold contempt because he had demanded 5000 to get married to her. Bholi saw how her father got humiliated; she realised that Bishamber was greedy and exploiting her father due to her look.

Question 14.
Why did Bishamber’s marriage with Bholi not take place?
Answer:
Bishamber’s marriage with Bholi did not take place because Bholi refused to marry a greedy man. She also realised that Bishamber was trying to exploit her father due to her looks.

Question 15.
Why did Bholi’s parents accept Bishamber’s proposal? Give three reasons.
Answer:
Bholi’s parents were always worried about her marriage as she was not beautiful and intelligent. Bishamber was wealthy and did not demand any dowry also. So they accepted the proposal after a little discussion.

Question 16.
Why did Bholi talk very little as a child?
Answer:
Bholi could not speak till she was five, and when at last she learnt to speak, she stammered. The other children would make fun of her and even mimicked her. So she used to talk very little.

Question 17.
How did Bholi react when her father caught her by the hand to take her to school? Why?
Answer:
When Ramlal caught Bholi by the hand to take her to school, she was frightened. She did not know what a school was like. She thought her father was turning her out of the house. She shouted in terror and pulled her hand away from her father’s grip.

Question 18.
What kind of a mother, do you think, Ramlal’s.wife was?
Answer:
Ramlal’s wife’was an uncaring and callous mother. She never showed the affection to Bholi that she deserved as her child. She felt that the girl with pox-marks and lack of sense was a burden. That’s why she sent her to school so that the teachers took the trouble to handle the girl. Even when it was the matter of her marriage, the mother showed no sympathy and consented to get her married to an old and lame man.

Question 19.
Give example from the text to show that Bholi was a neglected child.
Answer:
Due to her physical appearance Bholi was neglected by her parents. New dresses were made for her sisters; the old dresses of her sisters were passed on to her. No one ever cared to mind or wash her clothes. She was sent to school as her mother believed her to be a burden.

Question 20.
Why is Bholi’s father worried about her?
Answer:
Bholi’s father is worried about her as she has neither good looks nor intelligence. He did not know how he would find a suitable groom for her.

Question 21.
For what unusual reasons is Bholi sent to school?
Answer:
Bholi is sent to school because there is little chance of her getting married because of her ugly face and lack of sense. Also her father has to send her to school as the village headman has commanded him to do so.

Question 22.
Does Bholi enjoy her first day at school?
Answer:
Yes, Bholi enjoys her first day at school as she was glad to find so many girls almost of her own age present there. She hoped that one of these girls might become her friend.

Question 23.
Does she find her teacher different from the people at home?
Answer:
Yes, she finds her teacher different from the people at home as the teacher was affectionate, polite and this touched her heart.

Question 24.
Why do Bholi’s parents accept Bishamber’s marriage proposal?
Answer:
Bholi’s parents accept Bishamber’s marriage proposal because if they don’t accept it, she would not be married for the rest of her life.

Question 25.
Why does the marriage not take place?
Answer:
The marriage does not take place because the groom demanded dowry.

Question 26.
Bholi had many apprehensions about going to school. What made her feel that she was going to a better place than her home?
Answer:
Bholi had many apprehensions about going to school. She remembered how their old cow, Lakshmi, had been turned out of the house and sold. When she got a clean dress, was bathed and her hair was properly done with oil, only then she felt that she was going to a better place than her home.

Question 27.
How did Bholi’s teacher play an important role in changing the course of her life?
Answer:
Bholi’s teacher played an important role in changing the course of her life. She was polite and friendly which touched her heart. She encouraged her every time and was affectionate towards her. The teacher transformed her into a confident person who could read, write and speak clearly. This gave her the required confidence. Moreover, teacher’s appreciation and encouragement helped her overcome her own morale.

Question 28.
Do you think the characters in the story were speaking to each other in English? If not, in which language were they speaking?  (You can get clues from the names of the persons and the non-English words used in the story.)
Answer:
No the characters in the story do not speak English. Their original language in Hindi. They use words like Pitaji, Izzat, Tehsildar, etc.

Bholi Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
“Put the fear out of your heart and you will be able to speak like anyone else.” These words of encouragement from the teacher highlight that change of social attitude and encouragement can help a child like Bholi to become confident and face the world bravely. With reference . to the story ‘Bholi’ write how the social attitude towards Bholi made her an introvert. What should be done to help such children to face the world bravely?
Answer:
Bholi was neglected by her parents on account of her looks and lack of intelligence. She used to stammer so the other children made fun of her and mimicked her. As a result she talked very little. It was a daunting task for the teacher to encourage Bholi. The teacher talked to her affectionately and friendly. She assured her if she put the fear out of her heart and she would be able to speak like anyone else.

Through the efforts of years Bholi became a transferred personality. She refused to marry a greedy man who was trying to exploit her father due to her looks. Such children should be constantly encouraged by the parents, teachers and even by the other relations. They must be taught to fight back their handicaps rather to accept it as facts.

Question 2.
What social attitudes are presented in the story, ‘Bholi’? How does Bholi’s teacher help her overcome these barriers?
OR
God created this world but teachers create human beings. How does Bholi’s teacher succeed in changing the course of her life?
Answer:
Bholi was neglected by her parents on account of her looks and lack of intelligence. She was sent to school as her mother thought her to be a burden and let the teachers at school worry about her. Ironically, the teachers transformed her life completely. God created this world but teachers create human beings.

Bholi did not know what exactly a school was and what happened there, in the class when her teacher asked her name, she stammered and began to cry. She kept her head down throughout the class. The teacher was very encouraging and friendly to her and this made her gain confidence to speak.

She started seeing a ray of hope for a new life. After years of gaining education and with the help of her teacher, Bholi turned into a confident girl. She no longer stammered and could speak properly. She even had the courage to refuse marrying the lame old man because he was greedy and asked money from her father to marry her.

Question 3.
“Don’t you worry, Pitajil In your old age I will serve you and mother”. Through this statement the narrator wants to highlight the moral values Bholi imbibed with. Based on the reading of the lesson, what made Bholi aware of her rights and how did she use them?
Answer:
Bholi became an introvert child who lacked confidence. She was neglected and even made fun of due to her appearance and lack of intelligence. Years of education made her bold and confident. She got an aim in her life. When she refused to marry greedy Bishamber, her father became worried. She assured her father not to worry and promised that she would take care of him and her mother in their old age.

She told that she would teach in the school where she learnt so much. During her education Bholi’s teacher made her aware of her rights as well as duties. She faced the challenge of rejecting greedy Bishamber with determination and confidence. Thus she protected her self-respect and integrity.

Question 4.
Education is always a great asset in the life of a woman. How did Bholi, an educated girl free the challenge posed by Bishamber’s greed?
OR
School education turned Bholi from a dumb cow into a bold girl. How did she save her father from a huge expense and become his support in his old age?
Answer:
Ironically, Bholi was sent to school as her mother believed she was a burden and let the teachers at the school worry for her. The teacher showed affection and encouraged her to shed her fear. She was assured by her teacher that she would speak like others one day.

Years of hard work transformed Bholi into a bold and confident young woman. Bishamber refused to marry Bholi due to her appearance and demanded five thousand rupees. Bholi saw how her father was humiliated for no reason. She refused to marry a greedy, mean and contemptible coward. She assured her father that she would serve him and her mother in their old age. She had a mission in her life; she would spread the light of education in her village.

Question 5.
Write a character sketch of Sulekha.
OR
On the basis of your understanding of the story, sketch the character of Bholi.
OR
Write a character sketch of Bholi.
“Bholi’s whole personality underwent a complete transformation towards the end of the story”. Explain.
Answer:
Bholi’s real name was Sulekha but she was called Bholi, the simpleton as she was a backward child. She started speaking only when she turned five but she stammered when she spoke and as a result she was always mimicked or made fun of by the other children. Therefore, Bholi talked very little.

Bholi did not know what exactly a school was and what happened there, in the class when her teacher asked her name, she stammered and began to cry. She kept her head down throughout the class. The teacher was very encouraging and friendly to her and this made her gain confidence to speak. She started seeing a ray of hope for a new life.

After years of gaining education and with the help of her teacher, Bholi turned into a confident girl. She no longer stammered and could speak properly. She even had the courage to refuse marrying the lame old man because he was greedy and asked money from her father to marry her. On seeing her father worried about her marriage, she said that he need not worry as she would teach in the same school where she learnt so much and would take care of him and her mother in their old age.

Question 6.
“Dowry is a negation of the girl’s dignity”. Explain this statement in the light of the story of ‘Bholi’.
Answer:
Initially Bishamber did not demand dowry to get married to Bholi. He was a widower, having children and of the age of Ramlal. But during the marriage ceremony he happened to see the face of Bholi. He bargains if he was given five thousand rupees he will marry the girl. Bholi’s father Ramlal placed his turban at his feet but he refused.

A girl is considered a liability in her own natal home due to prevalence of the custom of dowry practice. Some parents are unwilling to give higher education to their daughter as they have to search for ‘ highly educated boy for marriages and a better educated boy will demand more dowry which creates unnecessary problefn, for parents.

Besides, the boy who receives huge amount of dowry may think of himself as more dignified as having a higher status, greater prestige and more respectful than the girl. Subsequently the girl develops inferiority complex. Fortunately, Bholi refuses to marry greedy Bishamber and decides to serve her parents instead in their old age. ‘

Question 7.
How did the teacher encourage Bholi on her first day in school?
OR
On the basis of your understanding of the story, describe the role played by the teacher in the life of Bholi.
OR
What values did the teacher display in transforming Bholi into a confident girl?
Answer:
Bholi was neglected by her parents on account of her looks and lack of intelligence. She was sent to school as her mother thought her to be a burden and let the teacher at school worry about her. The teacher in the school asked her to tell her name. She stammered -and began to cry.

The teacher showed her affection and encouraged her in a friendly manner to put aside her fear. Bholi somehow told her name. The teacher assured her that she would be able £o speak like everyone else one day. Bholi was surprised. The teacher asked her to come to school regularly. Love and encouragement shown by the teacher brought out drastic changes in Bholi’s personality. Within a few years she became so confident that she refused to marry a greedy man.

Question 8.
‘Love and encouragement make the impossible possible. Explain this statement on the basis of the story ‘Bholi’.
Answer:
Bholi was sent to school as her mother thought her to be a burden. She was neglected by her parents as she was not beautiful and lacked intelligence. The teacher in the school asked her to tell her name. She stammered and began to cry. The teacher showed her affection and encouraged her in a friendly manner to put aside her fear.

Bholi somehow told her name. Bholi was surprised. The teacher asked her to come to school regularly. Love and encouragement shown by the teacher brought out drastic changes in Bholi’s personality. Within a few years she became so confident that she refused to marry a greedy man.

Question 9.
No one is always foolish. Time and circumstances give us intelligence and change out. personality. Explain with reference to ‘Bholi’.
Answer:
Yes, it is quite right that no one is always foolish. Time decides everything. Our maturity and knowledge depend on our experience. Experience is always based on circumstances. Time and experiences teach us different things and make life perfect.

With out experience or practical knowledge all bookish knowledge is in vain. It is never used. There are many such examples in our real life that prove this statement correct. Here I would like to share my own experience about a very simple doctor.

He started his practice very slow in a poor area. Many famous doctors made fun of him. Time passed and gradually he became famous in the neighbouring areas. His treatment was not so costly. Once a very serious accident occurred near his hospital and the people brought the injured person to a costly hospital.

But his condition was very serious and the doctor refused to admit him. Then that doctor took the case and tried his best to save him. At last he succeeded. All were surprised to see and listen to it.

Question 10.
Why did Bholi at first agree to an unequal match? Why did she later reject the marriage? What does this tell us about her?
Answer:
This is a normal practice in India that girls seldom oppose their parent’s choice for a groom. The upbringing of daughters does a kind of mental conditioning which doesn’t give them enough courage to rebel against their parent’s wish. Bholi more or less followed the tradition of being an ideal Indian girl ,and agreed to an unequal match because her mother felt she was lucky to get a well-to-do groom who owned a big shop, had a house of his own and had several thousands in the bank. Moreover, he was not asking for any dowry.

Bholi also heard her mother saying that he did not know about her pox-marks and her lack of sense. If the proposal was not accepted, she might remain unmarried all her life. Later on when the groom bared his greed to everyone, it repulsed Bholi and she opposed the marriage. Unlike her sisters, Bholi is educated and has a mind of her own. She is as independent as any other modern girl of a big city.

On seeing her father pleading and getting humiliated, she decided not to marry him. This tells us that she loves and respects her parents, has self respect and knows what is right or wrong and is able to take a wise decision.

Question 11.
Bholi’s real name is Sulekha. We are told this right at the beginning. But only in the last but one paragraph of the story is Bholi called Sulekha again. Why do you think she is called Sulekha at that point in the story?
Answer:
The word Bholi means a simpleton. Throughout the story she had been a simpleton, hardly expressing her opinion in any matter. The word Sulekha means the person with beautiful sense of letters. In this story this word has a larger meaning. It depicts being a literate, intelligent and mature individual. After her education Bholi has really changed to Sulekha and her assertion during marriage is her announcement to the world that she is no more a Bholi but Sulekha.

Question 12.
Bholi’s teacher helped her overcome social harries by encouraging and motivating her. How do you think you can contribute towards changing the social attitudes illustrated in this story?
Answer:
Bholi’s teacher helped her overcome social barriers by motivating and encouraging her. The same act can be performed by the young generation too. If, we the new generation, identify the social evils, like corruption, dowry, child marriage, unemployment, poverty, gender discrimination and decide to fight against them; it will revolutionise the system. Thus, we can remove all the above-mentioned evils from the society.

Question 13.
Should girls be aware of their rights, and assert them? Should girls and boys have the same rights, duties and privileges? What are some of the ways in which society treats them differently? When we speak of ‘human rights’, do we differentiate between girls’ and boys’ rights?
Answer:
Yes, girls should be aware of their rights and assert them. The girls and boys should have the same rights. There should not be any gender discrimination. But, even today girls are deprived of education, nourishment in food in comparison to boys. No doubt that in rural India there is still a gender bias but the new generation is aware of it. There should be no differentiation in terms of humans rights between girls’ rights and boys’ rights.

Here we are providing Journey to the end of the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas, Extra Questions for Class 12 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-12-english/

Journey to the end of the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas

Journey to the end of the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Journey To The End Of The Earth Question Answer Class 12 Question 1.
How do geological phenomena help us to know about the history of humankind?
Answer:
Geological phenomena helps us to know more and more about the history of humankind as only through it we come to know about the present, past and future of the Earth. How life was then and gradually how it shaped now. Scientists admit that world’s geological history is trapped under the layers of Antarctica.

Journey To The End Of The Earth Question Answers Class 12 Question 2.
What are the indications for the future of human kind?
Answer:
Deplection of ozone layer, Reforestation, melting of glaciers, and the collapse of ice shelves clearly give the indications for the future of mankind that it is not safe if global warming continues, soon this mankind will banish from the planet ‘Earth’.

Journey To The End Of The Earth Extra Questions And Answers Class 12 Question 3.
‘Akademik Shokalskiy’ was heading towards Antarctica, why?
Answer:
‘Akademik Shokalskiy’, a Russian Vessel was heading towards Antarctica with a troop of 52 peoples, to study and research the history of humankind under the guidance of Canadian Geoff Green.

Journey To The End Of The Earth Important Questions Class 12 Question 4.
Name the programme and its objectives.
Answer:
The programme was ‘Students on Ice’ with the motive to give high school students, the educational opportunity to do the study of Antarctica.

Journey To The End Of The Earth Short Questions And Answers Class 12 Question 5.
After reaching Gondwana, what were their reactions?
Answer:
They were highly exicted as they were at a remote area of the Earth where no mankind could sustain and totally peaceful environment existed, a place without trees, billboards and buildings.

Journey To The End Of The Earth Class 12 Questions And Answers  Question 6.
Gondwana existed before six hundred and fifty million years. Explain.
Answer:
Six hundred and fifty million years ago, a giant amalgamated Southern super continent ‘Gondwana’ did indeed exist, centred roughly around the present- day Antarctica.

Journey To The End Of The Earth Questions And Answers Class 12 Question 7.
How is Antarctica, a subject for debate for environmentalists?
Answer:
Antarctica is always a subject for debate for environmentalists because only Antarctica is undisturbed by human beings, whether it would melt, will the Gulf Stream ocean current be disrupted or will it be the end of the world; such many concerned issues are raised for debate.

Journey To The End Of The Earth Extra Question Answer Class 12 Question 8.
How did they reach Antarctica?
Answer:
They travelled over 100 hours in combination of a car, an aeroplane and a ship. In this way, they reached Antarctica.

Extra Questions Of Journey To The End Of The Earth Class 12 Question 9.
What was wondrous about Antarctica?
Answer:
Expansive white landscape and uninterrupted blue horizon and its immensity and isolation was wondrous about Antarctica.

Question Answer Of Journey To The End Of The Earth Class 12 Question 10.
What is the pretty mind-boggling fact, one can observe?
Answer:
By the study of Antarctica, the fact: India pushing north words, South America driffting off to join North America and many others boggle the mind and produce many imaginations.

Journey To The End Of Earth Question Answer Class 12 Question 11.
What types of sounds can be noticed/heard there?
Answer:
The sound of occasional avalanche or calving of ice sheets can only be heard in Antarctica.

Question 12.
Why Geoff Green started to bring only students to Antarctica?
Answer:
Geoff Green noticed that celebrities and retired rich persons visit Antarctica only for entertainment but the students, who are the future policy-makers, took interest and ready to accept the challenge.

Question 13.
Why Antarctica is the perfect place to study nature?
Answer:
Antarctica is the perfect place to study nature be-cause it has simple ecosystem and lack of biodiversity; above all, it is untouched by human beings.

Question 14.
Why the programme ‘Students on Ice’ became so successful?’
Answer:
The programme became so successful because its impossible to go anywhere near the South Pole and not be affected by it. Through this programme, students got the educational opprotunities.

Question 15.
What is photosynthesis?
Answer:
The process of converting light energy into chemical energy by plants is called photosynthesis.

Question 16.
What various expanses did they cross to reach Antarctica?
Answer:
Nine time zones, six checkpoints, three bodies of water and many ecospheres were crossed by them to reach Antarctica.

Question 17.
What are Geoff Green’s reasons for including high school students in the ‘Students on Ice’ Expedition?
Answer:
Canadian Geoff Green started this programme, ‘Students on Ice’ before six years of writing this chapter. The reasons for including high school students were to provide them most inspiring educational opportunities which would make them aware about the depletion of our ecosystem, create an understanding to save our planet as those teenagers still have an ideology to absorb, learn, and most importantly act.

Question 18.
‘Take care of the small things and the big things will take care of themselves: What is the relevance of this statement in the context of the Antarctic environment?
Answer:
Antarctic, because of her simple ecosystem and lack of biodiversity, is the perfect place to study/tell us how little changes in the environment can have big consequences. Single celled microscopic phytoplankton use the Sun’s energy to do the process of photosynthesis. And any obstacle in this process will affect the lives of all the marine animals and birds of that region, the global carbon cycle. Scientists warn and advise to take care of the small things and the big things will fall into plape.

Question 19.
Why is Antarctica the place to go to, to understand the earth’s present, past and future?
Answer:
Only Antarctica on this earth presently is in its purest and original form as it holds in its ice-cores half million-year-old carbon records trapped in its layers of ice. Antarctica has never sustained a human propulation and therefore remains relatively ‘pristine’ in this respect. So Antarctica is the place to go to understand the Earth’s present, past and future.

Journey to the end of the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
How did the writer justify the title journey to the end of the earth?
Answer:
The title ‘Journey to the end of the Earth is quite justified by the writer ‘Tishani Dosi’ through this chapter. A visit to Antarctica thrilled the whole troop and made them realized that Antarctica is the world’s coldest, driest and windiest continent. Their visit seemed to be very fruitful because without reaching there physically, one can’t experience the immensity and importance of Antarctica and its great role in balancing the ecosystem.

Writer found Antarctica still undisturbed by human beings and tried to understand where we’ve come from and where we could possibly be heading; through the deep study of this island. Writer presumed that without controlling the rapidly increasing global warming; we can’t stop the melting of ice specially glaciers and as it is known that Antarctica covers 90 per cent of the Earth’s ice, its sustainment is mandatory. Or in near future, Antarctica would be responsible (if not ceased the global warming) for the ruination of the Earth’s lives and in this way, the end of the Earth would be brought by Antarctica.

Question 2.
Describe the journey to the Antarctica by the Vessel ‘Akademik Shokalskiy’.
Answer:
The journey starts with a troop of 52 peoples under the guidance of experienced Canadian Geoff Green, an educator and adventurer. He started the mission ‘Students on Ice’ to aware the teenagers about the present need of the escapement of Antarctica. Akademik Shokalskiy, a Russian Vessel headed towards the coldest, driest and windiest continent in the world: Antarctica.

Journey began 13.09 degress North of the equator in Madras, and involved crossing nine time zones, six checkpoints, three bodies of water, and at least as many ecospheres. They trevelled over 100 hours in combination of a car, an aeroplane and a ship and finally they reached to view Antarctica’s expansive white landscape and uninterrupted blue horizon where immensity and isolation made them wondorous and tireless.

Question 3.
‘Take care of small things and big will take care of themselves’. What is the relevance of this statement in the context of the Antarctica?
Answer:
The small things are having their own importance at their own place. Small things are combined produce their effect on big things. As phytoplankton are very tiny single-celled plants, but they nourish and sustain the entire Southern Ocean’s food proceedings, s Phytoplankton is the grass of Southern Ocean and 1 through the process of photosynthesis, they convert light energy into the chemical energy and supply food and provide oxygen to all the marine life (animals and birds). So very tiny plants are responsible for the survival of the life.

But global warming can affect the activity of these plants and also the whole ecosystem of the Earth. Sun’s energy is used to assimilate carbon and synthesize organic compounds by these plants. The rapidly increasing depletion of the Ozone layer will surely adversely affect this natural system. By any means, the depletion should be stopped to preserve our ecological balance and save whole mankind and all creatures from extinction. So, opening our eyes, we should take care of little things to care the big things automatically and naturally.

Question 4.
‘A lot can happen in a million years, but what a difference a day makes’. Explain.
Answer:
The author with a troop of 52 peoples visited the Earth’s coldest, driest and windiest continent of the world i.e. Antarctica where she was highly exicted finding the untouched, unhumane land without trees, billboards and buildings. The history of the world started from Antarctica itself and the secret of evolution and extinction can be studied through the study of Antarctica.

There is a prompt need to aware ourselves with this reality that if we’ve to save the mankind from extinction, we need to save the nature and Antartica is the best place for this purpose because it is covering 90 per cent of the Earth’s ice and hiding, under its layers, the mystery of the world. Writer spent two weeks with a group of teenagers under the leadership of Canadion Geoff Green, and after assuming the need of action, said, that a lot could happen in a million years, but what a difference a day makes.

Question 5.
Geoff Green, a Canadian explorer and educator started to include high school students on the expedition ‘Students on Ice’. Explain why?
Answer:
Geoff Green, who, since -the starting, started to include celebrities, retired rich, curiosity-seekers to the Antarctica but they remained unhappy and dis-satisfied and also those men in power and position did not understand the problems facing mankind. They never gave any response in return and didn’t seem worried about the ecology.

Geoffs efforts remained futile and totally time wastage could be noticed. Geoff, then started to inculude the learners, willing persons and school students for the mission and it was also an opportunity for beginners to study more and more about our planet and ecosystem. These youngsters seem ready to absorb, learn and act immediately.

They realize the threat of global warming and can actually do something as they are the future policy-makers and also expected to act and solve the environmental problems. Thus, the expedition/movement started to give its results in a positive manner and people seemed to be aware for global warming.

Question 6.
‘The world’s geological history is trapped in Antarctica.’ How is the study of this region useful to us?
Answer:
The study of Antarctica is useful to us in very mysterious and revealing way. Six hundred and fifty million years ago, ‘Gondwana’ a super continent existed, centred roughly around the present day Antarctica. The climate was much warmer, hosting a huge variety of flora and fauna. For 500 million years Gondwana thrived.

Around the time, the landmass was forced to separate into countries, shaping the globe much as we know it today. A grasp of where we’ve come from and where we could possibly be heading; the evolution and extinction, can easily be understood through the study of this region.

Here we are providing Footprints without Feet Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

Footprints without Feet Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 Footprints Without Feet

Footprints without Feet Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Footprints Without Feet Extra Questions Question 1.
Why were the two boys in London surprised and fascinated?
Answer:
The two boys in London saw fresh muddy footprints appearing on the steps of a house but the barefooted man was not visible. So, they were surprised and fascinated.

Footprints Without Feet Extra Question Answer Question 2.
What did Griffin do inside the store?
Answer:
Griffin broke open the boxes and wrappers and dressed himself in warm clothes. He ate and drank to his heart’s content. In the end, he laid down on the pile of quilts to sleep.

Footprints Without Feet Class 10 Extra Questions Question 3.
What did Griffin do in the shop of a theatrical company?
Answer:
He wore bandages round his forehead and put on dark glasses, a false nose, big bushy side whiskers and a large hat. He attacked the shopkeeper from behind and robbed him of all his money.

Extra Questions Of Footprints Without Feet Question 4.
What was the “curious episode” that took place in the clergyman’s study?
Answer:
One morning, the clergyman and his wife were awakened by noise. They saw no person. They were shocked to find that their money had been stolen from the desk.

Footprints Without Feet Short Question Answer Question 5.
The landlord’s wife was convinced that Griffin was an “eccentric scientist”. What made her think of Griffin in these terms?
Answer:
Griffin remained indoors and did not mix up with others. His habits were strange and his appearance was fantastic. All these things of Griffin made the landlady think that he was an “eccentric scientist.

Footprints Without Feet Question Answer Question 6.
Griffin was rather a lawless person. Pick out instances which prove that he was lawless.
Answer:
He set fire to a house which didn’t belong to him. He tools away clothes without paying for them. He hit a shopkeeper and stole his money.

Footprints Without Feet Important Question Answers Question 7.
What did the scientist do when he became furious? Why were the people in the bar horrified? What happened to the constable?
Answer:
The scientist took off his bandages and spectacles and became headless. The people in the bar were shocked to see a headless man. Griffin hit the constable Jaffers hard and made him senseless.

Footprints Without Feet Extra Questions And Answers Question 8.
How do you assess Griffin as a scientist?
Answer:
Griffin was a brilliant scientist. He invented some drugs and made himself as an invisible person. But he misused his scientific discovery and became a lawless person. Griffin was, thus not a true scientist.

Footprints Without Feet Important Questions Question 9.
Why did the landlord want to eject Griffin? Why did Griffin set the house on fire?
Answer:
The landlord wanted to eject Griffin from his house because his activities were whimsical. Griffin set the house on fire to take his revenge on the landlord.

Class 10 English Chapter 5 Footprints Without Feet Extra Questions Question 10.
Who was Mr Jaffers? What was his surprise?
Answer:
Mr JafFers was a police constable. His surprise was that he was ordered to arrest a lawless person who was totally invisible.

Class 10 Footprints Without Feet Extra Questions Question 11.
Why were they surprised when they opened the room?
Answer:
Both the clergyman and his wife were surprised because the room was empty. They searched everywhere but couldn’t find anyone. Yet the desk had been opened and the housekeeping money was missing.

Extra Questions From Footprints Without Feet Question 12.
What did the scientist do when Mrs Hall confronted him?
Answer:
When Mrs Hall confronted the scientist he threatened her and threw off his bandages, whiskers, spectacles, and even the nose in a minute. The people were horrified to see the headless man.

Question 13.
How did Griffin escape?
Answer:
Griffin began throwing off his bandages, whiskers, spectacles and even the nose. Then he became even more invisible by throwing off all the garments one after another. There followed a male and none knew where he was.

Question 14.
Do you think Griffin’s discovery was of any use to humanity?
Answer:
No, Griffin’s discovery, through remarkable, was of no use to anyone except himself. He began robbing money and other things and even assaulting people after he became invisible.

Footprints without Feet Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
‘Brilliant scientist though he was, Griffin was a lawless person. Does this statement approve the apprehension that science in wrong hands is Devil’s Pandora Box?
Answer:
Griffin was a brilliant scientist. He had discovered a rare drug that could make a human body invisible. This made Griffin an arrogant lawless person. He broke the law more them once but never for a good reason. He could dedicate his discovery to his country but he didn’t do that. His lawlessness made the law helpless. All his actions prove that science in devil’s hand is disastrous.

Question 2.
‘Griffin could use his discovery for welfare of the people but misuses it to take revenge.’ Discuss with reference with the story Footprints without Feet.
OR
Do you think Griffin misused a scientific discovery or he took advantages of his discovery?
OR
Griffin misused his invention, instead of using it for the betterment of the society. Do you think moral values are important along with intellectual abilities? Discuss.
Answer:
Griffin was a scientist who had made a discovery due to which’he could be invisible. But he was rather a lawless scientist, who misused a scientific discovery for his petty, selfish gains. He set his landlord’s house on fire, when he asked him to vacate it. He entered the store invisible, stole clothes and food.

At another shop, he attacked the shopkeeper from behind and ran away after robbing his money. , At Iping, he stole the clergyman’s money from his desk and hit Mrs Hall by throwing a chair on her. He hurled blows on the police constable Mr Jaffers and knocked him down. In this way, Griffin misused his scientific discovery without making benefit to the mankind.

Question  3.
The modem world has created great scientific inventions. But very often these inventions are more misused than used for the benefit of man. Griffin had made wonderful discovery; but be used it for unlawful means. Write a paragraph on “Science is being more misused than used”.
Answer:
Science is being more misused than used. The present time is highly dependent on science and technology. In the 21st century, survival without gadgets and electronics is unimaginable. But there are various instances where science is being misused to create panic and terror in the society.

Scientific experiments on various deadly disease are let out to cause mass destruction. Technology is used more for warfare purpose, to kill and to terrorize. The resulting products of science have been valuable to human society and have greatly raised the quality of life. But they have also led to the growth of means to destroy human society.

Question  4.
“Scientific discoveries have made life easier but insecure.” Explain with reference to the story ‘Footprints without Feet’ written by H.G. Wells.
Answer:
There is no doubt that scientific discoveries have made life easier. Take any sphere of human activity, electricity, telecommunications, electronics, computer, etc, these have totally changed man’s life. We can interact and walk on moon. Trip to Mars is next on our agenda. We can fly like birds. Supersonic planes fly at more than the speed of sound. Wonderful drugs can overcome deadly diseases.lSurgery can replace defective limbs.

Despite all these discoveries, human life is becoming insecure. Weapons of mass destruction are a constant danger. The fear of chemical, or biological warfare looms large. Diseases like AIDS and SARS can destroy human race.

Question  5.
“A lawless scientist is a curse to the society.” Discuss.
Answer:
It is true, that a lawless scientist is a curse to the society. A true scientist uses his discoveries for the good of the society and welfare of the people. It helps the nations to progress. A lawless scientist increases the miseries and sufferings of society. In this story, we find how Griffin misuses his discovery.

He causes pain and suffering to others. He causes destruction. Suppose the nuclear weapons fall in the hands of a lawless scientist, he can cause widespread destruction. He may ruin the achievements of other scientists. That’s why the leaders of the world are worried about chemical weapons falling into the hands of lawless heads of governments or terrorists. If this happens, all the scientists of the world will be doomed.

Question 6.
How did the invisible man first become visible?
Answer:
Griffin was completely invisible until he happened to step in some mud, which caused him to leave footprints as he walked. Two boys noticed these footprints and followed him as long as the prints were visible. Griffin, after getting rid of them, went into a big London store to put on some warm clothes. After the store was shut, he got himself dressed in an overcoat and a wide-brimmed hat. He also put on a pair of shoes. This made him visible to the people who came to work at the store the next day.

Question 7.
Why was he wandering the streets?
Answer:
Griffin was a lawless person. His landlord disliked him and tried to get rid of him. In revenge, Griffin set fire to his house. He had to remove his clothes to get away without being noticed. This was why he had become a homeless wanderer—without clothes and money.

Question 8.
Why does Mrs Hall find the scientist eccentric?
Answer:
The arrival of a stranger at an inn in winter was in itself a strange occurrence. In addition, the stranger had an uncommon appearance. Inspite of Mrs Hall’s repeated attempts to be friendly, he would respond in a closed manner. He told her that he had no desire to talk and wanted to live in solitude. He did not wish to be disturbed in his work. For all these strange reasons, she regarded him as an eccentric scientist.

Question 9.
What curious episode occurs in the study?
Answer:
A clergyman and his wife were awakened by some strange noises in the study very early in the morning. Creeping downstairs, they heard the chink of money being taken from the clergyman’s desk. He and his wife looked under the desk and behind the curtains, and even up the chimney. There wasn’t a sign of anybody. Yet the desk had been opened and the housekeeping money was missing.

Question 10.
What other extraordinary things happened at the Inn?
Answer:
The landlord and his wife were surprised to see the door of the scientist’s room open. Usually it is shut and locked and Griffin becomes furious if anyone enters his room. So they did not want to miss this opportunity. They peeped round the door, and finding nobody inside, decided to enter and investigate. The bedclothes were cold, showing that the scientist must have been up for some time now. All of a sudden Mrs Hall heard a sniff close to her ear. A moment later that hat on the bed suddenly leapt up and dashed itself onto her face.

Then the bedroom chair became alive. Springing into the air, it charged straight at her legs. As she and her husband turned away in terror, the extraordinary chair pushed them both out of the room and then appeared to slam and lock the door after them. Mrs Hall almost fell down the stairs in hysterics. She was, by now, convinced that the room was haunted by spirits and the stranger had somehow caused these to enter into the furniture.

Question 11.
“Griffin was rather a lawless person.” Comment.
Answer:
It is rightly said that Griffin was a lawless person. A person who follows law and order of the country can not think of damaging other’s property. But Griffin set fire to the house and became a homeless wanderer. He also robbed a shopkeeper of all the money he could find. He also stole the housekeeping money from the clergyman’s desk. Griffin also attacked Mrs Hall when she entered his room. All these activities and instances prove that he was not a law abiding citizen.

Question 12.
How would you access Griffin as a scientist?
Answer:
After repeated experiments, Griffin had discovered how to make the human body invisible. This was a big achievement. However, he misused his discovery for personal gains and for hurting others. Thus, though he can be termed as a brilliant scientist, he was not a noble one.

Question 13.
Would you like to become invisible? What advantages and disadvantages do you foresee, if you did?
Answer:
Yes, I would like to become invisible. It would be fun. I would be able to see everyone without being seen. I would be able to enjoy all activities. I may go to movie hall without paying for it. I would also help the police in nabbing the criminals. But being invisible would be a disadvantage also. I will be able to see all but nobody would see me. I will not get any recognition for my work.

Here we are providing Class 10 Geography Chapter 6 Extra Questions and Answers Manufacturing Industries was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-social-science/

Manufacturing Industries Class 10 Extra Questions Geography Chapter 6

Question 1.
What are light industries?
Answer:
The industries which use light raw’ materials and produce light goods like electric fans, sewing machines, television sets etc. are known as light industries.

Question 2.
Name four important cotton textile centres of Maharashtra.
Answer:
The four important cotton textile centres of Maharashtra are the following:

1. Mumbai,
2. Sholapur,
3. Pune,
4. Wardha.

Question 3.
Name two important sugar-producing states of India?
Answer:
The two most important sugar-producing states in India are the following:

1. Uttar Pradesh,
2. Maharashtra.

Question 4.
Name two iron and steel producing plants each of Karnataka and West Bengal.
Answer:

Two iron and steel producing plants of Karanataka are-

1. Vijaya Nagar,
2. Bhadravati.

Two iron and steel producing plants of West Bengal

1. Durgapur,
2. Burnpur.

Question 5.
Name five electronic goods-producing centres of India.
Answer:
Five electronic goods-producing centres of India are the following:

1. Bangalore,
2. Mumbai,
3. Hyderabad,
4. Delhi,
5. Chennai.

Question 6.
What is the annual production of cement in the country at present?
Answer:
The annual production of cement in the country at present is 100 million tonnes.

Question 7.
How many software technological parks are there in India?
Answer:
18.

Question 8.
What is meant by DWT?
Answer:
DWT stands for deadweight tonnage. It is the unit for weighing of an empty ship.

Question 9.
How many dry docks are there in India?
Answer:
17.

Question 10.
How much crude oil is produced by India?
Answer:
India produces about 27 million tonnes of crude oil.

Question 11.
Why are the most of the Jute mills of India located at West Bengal?
Answer:
Most of the Jute mills are located at West Bengal because of the following reasons:

1. Closeness of the jute producing areas.
2. Cheap labour.
3. Banking and insurance facilities.
4. Availability of abundant water for processing of jute.
5. Inexpensive water transport.
6. Desired port facilities for export.

Question 12.
Describe the distribution of shipbuilding industry in India?
Answer:
1. Shipbuilding is a large industry requiring huge capital.
2. In India, at present there are five major shipbuilding centres.
3. These are namely

• Vishakapatnam,
• Kolkata,
• Kochi,
• Mumbai,
• Margmago.

4. All of these are in public sector.
5. The maximum size of ships that can be constructed at Kochi and Vishakhapatnam are 100000 DWT and 50000 DWT respectively.

Question 13.
How does industrial pollution degrade environment?
Answer:
In one hand industries make great contributions in the economic development of the country. On the other hand, industries also increase pollution and degrade environment.

Question 14.
Point out the burning problems of the cotton textile industry?
Answer:
The burning problems of the cotton textile industry today are the following:

• Scarcity of good quality water.
• Obsolete machinery.
• Erratic power supply.
• Low productivity of labour.
• Stiff competition with synthetic fibre industry etc.

Question 15.
In which countries are the Indian cotton textiles mainly exported?
Answer:
India mostly exports its cotton textile in the form of readymade garments. Indian cotton textile is mainly exported to the United States of America, UK, Russia, France, East European countries, Nepal, Singapore and the various African countries.

Question 16.
Why is manufacturing sector considered the backbone of development in India.
Answer:
Manufacturing sector is considered the backbone of development in general and economic development in particular mainly because:

• Manufacturing industries not only help in modernising agriculture, which forms the backbone of our economy, they also reduce the heavy dependence of people on agricultural income by providing them jobs in secondary and tertiary sectors.
• Industrial development is a precondition for eradication of unemployment and poverty from our country. This was the main philosophy behind public sector industries and joint sector ventures in India. It was also aimed to bring down regional disparities by establishing industries in tribal and backward areas.
• Export of manufactured goods expands trade and commerce and brings in much needed foreign exchange.
• A country that transforms its raw materials into a wide variety of finished goods of higher value is prosperous. India’s prosperity lies in increasing and diversifying its manufacturing industries as quickly as possible.

Question 17.
Classify Industries.
Answer:
Industries may be classified as follows: On the basis of source of raw materials used:

• Agio based: Cotton, Woollen, Jute, Silk textile, Rubber and Sugar, tea, coffee, edible oil
• Mineral-based: Iron and steel, cement, aluminium, machine tools, petrochemicals.

According to their main role:

• Basic or key industries which supply their products or raw materials to manufacture other goods e.g. iron and steel and copper smelting, aluminium smelting.
• Consumer Industries that produce goods for direct use by consumers sugar, toothpaste, paper, sewing machines, fans etc.

On the basis of capital investment:
A small scale industry is defined into reference to the maximum investment allowed on the assets of a unit. This limit has changed over a period of time. At present, the maximum investment allowed is rupees one crore. If investment is more than one crore on any industry than it is known as large scale industry.

On the basis of ownership:

• Public sector, owned and operated by government agencies-BHEL, SAIL.
• Private-sector industries owned and operated by individuals or a group of individuals TISCO, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Dabur Industries.
• Joint sector industries which are jointly run by the state and individuals or a group of individuals. Oil India Ltd. (OIL) is jointly owned by public and private sector.
• Cooperative sector industries are owned and operated by the producers or suppliers of raw materials, workers or both. They pool in the resources and share the profits or losses proportionately, such as sugar industry in Maharashtra, Coir industry in Kerala.

Based on the bulk and weight of raw material and finished goods:

• Heavy industries such as Iron and Steel.
• Light Industries that use light raw materials and produce light goods such as electrical industries.

Multiple Choice Questions

Question 1.
Paper is manufactured from :
(a) Wood
(b) Yarn
(c) Cotton
(d) Raw-wool.
Answer:
(a) Wood

Question 2.
One of the following is not an agro-based industry:
(a) Automobile
(b) Silk
(c) Sugar
(d) Edible oil
Answer:
(a) Automobile

Question 3.
The first textile mill was established in 1854 at the following place:
(a) Kanpur
(b) Mumbai
(c) Ahmedabad
(d) None of the above
Answer:
(b) Mumbai

Question 4.
India exports yarn to the following country:
(a) Brazil
(b) Pakistan
(c) Bangladesh
(d) Japan
Answer:
(d) Japan

Question 5.
Jute mills in India are:
(a) 170
(b) 70
(c) 270
(d) 370.
Answer:
(b) 70.

Map Skills

Question 1.
Show the textile industries on the outline map of India.
Or
Locate on the outline map following industries:

• Cotton textile industries
• Jute textile industries
• Woolen textile industries
• Silk textile industries
• Synthetic textiles.

Answer:

Question 2.
Point out following industries on an outline map of India:

1. Iron and steel industries.
2. Locomotives
3. Railway coaches
4. Shipbuilding
5. Automobiles
6. Machine tools
7. Electric gadgets.

Answer:

Question 3.
On an outline map of India show the following mineral-based industries:

1. Cement
2. Fertilisers
3. Defence Equipments
4. Chemicals
5. Heavy electricals
6. Petrochemicals.

Answer:

Extra Questions for Class 10 Social Science

Here we are providing Nelson Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

Nelson Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

Nelson Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom Extra Questions and Answers Very Short Answer Type

Nelson Mandela Class 10 Extra Questions Question 1.
What was the occasion?
Answer:
It was the occasion of installation of South Africa’s first democratic government.

Nelson Mandela Extra Questions Question 2.
Where did the ceremony take place?
Answer:
The ceremony took place in the Union Buildings of Pretoria.

Nelson Mandela Long Walk To Freedom Class 10 Extra Question Answer Question 3.
Why had world leaders come there?
Answer:
The world leader had come there to pay their respect to the newly formed Government.

Nelson Mandela Short Question Answer Question 4.
Who was Zenani?
Answer:
Zenani was the daughter of Nelson Mandela.

Nelson Mandela: Long Walk To Freedom Class 10 Extra Question Answer Question 5.
Who was sworn in as the first Deputy President of South Africa?
Answer:
Thabo Mbeki was sworn in as the first Deputy President of South Africa.

Nelson Mandela Class 10 Short Question Answer Question 6.
What was specific about that system?
Answer:
The system was formed on the basis of one of the harshest,’ most inhumane societies the world has ever known.

Nelson Mandela Class 10 Extra Questions And Answers Question 7.
When was that system eradicated?
Answer:
The system was overturned in the last decade of the twentieth century.

Class 10 English Nelson Mandela Extra Questions Question 8.
How was the new system different?
Answer:
The new system was different because that system recognised the rights and freedom of all people.

Class 10 Nelson Mandela Extra Questions Question 9.
What did Mandela want as a student?
Ans.
Mandela wanted freedom for himself as a student.

Extra Questions Of Nelson Mandela Class 10 Question 10.
What did Mandela realise?
Answer:
Mandela realised that there was no freedom in South Africa for anyone who looked like him.

Nelson Mandela Class 10 Important Questions Question 11.
What was Mandela not unmindful of?
Answer:
Mandela was not unmindful of‘Apartheid’.

Nelson Mandela Long Walk To Freedom Extra Question Answer Question 12.
Why was the Mandela pained?
Answer:
Mandela was pained as the people who laid their lives for this day could not be present to see.

Nelson Mandela Class 10 Extra Question Answers Question 13.
What did he think about freedom?
Answer:
He thought that freedom is indivisible.

Nelson Mandela Long Walk To Freedom Short Question Answer Question 14.
Why did he join African National Congress?
Answer:
He joined African National Congress to achieve freedom for all his people.

Question 15.
What are two enemies of a person?
Answer:
Prejudice and narrow-mindedness are the two enemies of a person.

Question 16.
What does courage mean to Mandela?
Answer:
Courage means to Mandela the triumph over fear.

Question 17.
What was the national anthem for the blacks?
Answer:
The National anthem for the blacks were ‘Die stem’.

Question 18.
Who accompanied Mandela?
Answer:
Mandela’s daughter Zenani accompanied him.

Question 19.
What must the people learn?
Answer:
The people must learn to hate. If they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love.

Question 20.
Who was sworn in as second deputy President?
Answer:
Mr de Klerk was sworn in as second deputy President in South Africa.

Question 21.
What is ‘Apartheid’?
Answer:
‘Apartheid’ is a political system that separates people on the basis of their race.

Question 22.
Who wrote the autobiography, “Long Walk to Freedom”.
Answer:
Nelson Mandela wrote his autobiography “Long Walk to Freedom”.

Question 23.
What is the full name of Mr Mandela?
Answer:
The full name of Mr Mandela is Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela.

Question 24.
Why did the leaders gather in .South Africa on 10May, 1994?
Answer:
The leaders gathered in South Africa to pay their respects to Nelson Mandela.

Question 25.
What roared in perfect formation over the Union Buildings?
Answer:
South African jets, helicopters, and troop carriers roared in perfect formation over Union Buildings.

Question 26.
What could the highest generals have done to the author earlier?
Answer:
The highest generals could have arrested the author earlier.

Question 27.
What were the colours emitted by a chevron of Impala jets?
Answer:
The colours emitted by a chevron of Impala jets were black, red, green, blue and gold.

Question 28.
What did the smoke trail of Impala jets symbolise?
Answer:
The smoke trail of Impala jets symbolised South African flag.

Question 29.
How old was the author at the time of the ‘Inauguration’?
Answer:
The author was in his eighties at the time of the inauguration.

Question 30.
How many years did Nelson Mandela spend in prison.
Answer:
Nelson Mandela Spent twenty seven years in prison.

Nelson Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Where did the oath-taking ceremony take place?
Answer:
The oath-taking ceremony took place in Union Buildings of Pretoria.

Question 2.
What ideals did Mandela set out for the future of South Africa in his speech?
Answer:
Mandela set out ideals for the future of South Africa because he had deep feelings for his country and countrymen. He pledged to liberate all the people from poverty, deprivation and discrimination.

Question 3.
How, according to Mandela, had apartheid policy affected South Africa?
Answer:
Apartheid policy had affected South Africa deeply. It had created a deep and lasting wound in the country and its people. It will take a long time to heal this wound.

Question 4.
What did Mandela think about the oppressor and the oppressed?
Answer:
Mandela thought about the oppressor and the oppressed that both are robbed equally. A mail who takes away another man’s freedom is a prisoner of hatred. In the same way, if his freedom is taken away, they both are without freedom. So both of them must be liberated.

Question 5.
What according to Mandela, is ‘true-freedom’?
Answer:
According to Mandela, true freedom means freedom not to be obstructed in leading a lawful life.

Question 6.
How did ‘hunger for freedom’ change Mandela’s life?
Answer:
In the beginning of his life, Mandela was not aware about freedom. Later, Mandela found that his freedom had been taken away from him. As a student, he wanted freedom only for himself but slowly his own freedom became the greater hunger for the freedom of his people. This changed him completely.

Question 7.
What are the ‘twin obligations’ referred to by Nelson Mandela?
Answer:
According to Nelson Mandela, every man has two obligations in life. The first obligation is to his family, to his parents, wife and children. Secondly, he has an obligation to his country, people, and community.

Question 8.
Could a man. according to Mandela, fulfil these twin obligations in a country like South Africa?
Answer:
No, these twin obligations could not be fulfilled by a man, in a country like South Africa, according to Mandela. It was because a man of dark colour who attempted just to live as a human being was punished and isolated in the country.

Question 9.
What is the meaning of courage to Mandela?
Answer:
According to Mandela, courage was not the absence of fear, but triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear. Mandela learned the true meaning of courage from his comrades in the struggle.

Question 10.
What was unique in the inauguration ceremony?
Answer:
The inauguration ceremony took place in the amphitheatre formed by the Union Buildings in Pretoria. For decades, this had been the seat of white supremacy. Now it was the oath taking ceremony day for South Africa’s first democratic, non-racial government. It was really a unique occasion.

Question 11.
Describe the inauguration ceremony in simple words?
Answer:
It was the day of 10th May, 1994. The first democratic, non- racial government was to be installed. Dignitaries from different countries participated in the ceremony. South African men, women and children of all races were present there.

Question 12.
What promises did Mandela make to his people in the oath-taking speech?
Answer:
In the oath-taking speech, Mandela promised that the country shall not again experience the oppression of one by another.

Question 13.
What did Mandela say about the future of the country in his speech?
Answer:
In his speech, Nelson Mandela said, “I see a bright future of the country. Now no one will experience the oppression by another. It will make much progress. All people shall be free to do what they like.”

Question 14.
How did South African jets, helicopters and troops demonstrate?
Answer:
It was a very special day for all. South African jets, helicopters and troop carriers roared in perfect formation. They flew over the Union Buildings. It was a show of military’s loyalty to the country and its democracy.

Question 15.
What did the generals and police officers do on that day?
Answer:
The generals and police officers were also there. They were in their uniform. They had ribbons and medals on their chests. They saluted Mandela with great respect. Mandela was the first black President of South Africa. Although, many years ago, they might have arrested him.

Question 16.
What were the two anthems sung on the day of oath-taking ceremony?
Answer:
On the day of oath-taking ceremony, the two anthems were sung. ‘Nkosi Sikelel-i-Afrika’ was for the whites and ‘Die stem’ was for the blacks. ‘Die stem’ was the old anthem of the country.

Question 17.
Whose names were particularly taken by Mandela in the inauguration ceremony?
Answer:
In the inauguration ceremony, Mandela announced the names of Oliver Tamboo, Walter Sisulus, Chief Luthuli, Yusuf Dadoo, Bram Fisher and Robert Sobukwes. These men were of extraordinary courage and wisdom.

Question 18.
Describe Mandela’s life journey from a prisoner to the first black President of south Africa.
Answer:
Nelson Mandela did a life-long struggle against the racial discrimination in South Africa. He had to pass many years of his life as a prisoner in the jail. At last the first democratic elections were held in South Africa. His party won 252 seats out of400 and he became the first black President of South Africa.

Question 19.
What is the greatest wealth of a nation in Mandela’s opinion?
Answer:
In Mandela’s opinion, the greatest wealth of a nation is not minerals and gems but its good and honest people.

Question 20.
What difficulties did Mandela face in his life?
Answer:
Mandela had to face many difficulties in his life. He had to leave his house to fulfil his duty to his people. In the prison, he was treated very badly.

Question 21.
Who took oath first in the ceremony?
Answer:
In the ceremony, Mr de Klerk was first sworn in as second Deputy President.

Question 22.
Where did the ceremonies take place? Can you name any public buildings in India that are made of sandstone?
Answer:
The ceremonies took place in the Union Buildings amphitheatre in Pretoria. Hawa Mahal in Jaipur and Fatehpur Sikri are the buildings in India made of sandstone.

Question 23.
Can you say how 10 May is an ‘autumn day’ in South Africa?
Answer:
Tenth May, being an autumn day, in South Africa has a symbolic meaning. In the season of autumn, all the old leaves fall from the tree and give birth to new ones. In the same way, old racial government had given way to the new anti-racial democratic government in South Africa. It was the beginning of a new era.

Question 24.
At the beginning of his speech, Mandela mentions “an extraordinary human disaster”. What does he mean hy this? What is the “glorious human achievement” he speaks of at the end?
Answer:
At the beginning of his speech, Mandela mentions “an extraordinary human disaster”. It was the policy of apartheid in South Africa. People were the victim of racial discrimination. Now they had achieved freedom. They will never be oppressed. It was the end of the most inhuman system of the government. He calls it a glorious human achievement.

Question 25.
What does Mandela thank the international leaders for?
Answer:
Mandela thanks the international leaders for their support for the people of South Africa.

Question 26.
What ideals does he set out for the future of South Africa?
Answer:
Nelson Mandela sets out many ideals for the future of South Africa. He says that all the people will be free from poverty, deprivation and discrimination. They will never experience oppression by others.

Question 27.
What do the military generals do? How has their attitude changed, and why?
Answer:
They obey their masters. They acted under the orders of the whites so far. Today they had shown their loyalty to the democracy. Earlier they arrested Mandela. Today they showed their loyalty to him by saluting him. There was a change in system. The newly elected non-racial democratic government had changed their (military generals) attitude. Now they were not the servants of the whites. They were now in the service of their own people.

Question 28.
Why were two national anthems sung?
Answer:
It was an occasion of installing the first democratic non-racial government which was formed by both the whites and the blacks. Both had their different anthems. In order to give equal honour and recognition both the national anthems were sung.

Question 29.
How does Mandela describe the systems of government in his country
(i) in the first decade, and
(ii) in the final decade, of the twentieth century?
Answer:
In the first decade of the 20th century, the whites erected a system of racial discrimination against the blacks. They set up the most inhumane system of apartheid where the blacks were denied the fundamental right of freedom. In the last decade of the twentieth century, the system was overturned. The policy of apartheid was uprooted from the land and a new non-racial democratic government was installed to ensure equal rights and freedom to all the people of South Africa.

Question 30.
What does courage mean to Mandela?
Answer:
Courage means to Mandela the triumph over fear. A brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear.

Question 31.
Which does he think is natural, to love or to hate?
Answer:
Nelson Mandela thinks that to love is natural, because it comes naturally in our hearts.

Question 32.
What “twin obligations” does Mandela mention?
Answer:
According to Mandela every person has twin obligations. The first obligation is towards his family, parents, wife and children. The second obligation is to work for his people, community and the nation.

Question 33.
What did being free mean to Mandela as a boy, and as a student? How does he contrast these “transitory freedoms” with “the basic and honourable freedoms”?
Answer:
Freedom had different meanings for Mandela at different stages. As a boy, freedom for him meant to run freely in the fields and to swim in the stream. As a student he wanted freedom to stay out at nights, to read what he liked, later he realised that this freedom was an illusion. He found that all the black brothers and sisters were in chains. There was no freedom for a respectful life. Their freedom was curtailed at every stage. He wanted the basic and honourable freedom of achieving his potential of earning his keep, of marrying and having a family. He believed that freedom is indivisible. Everyone has to be free.

Question 34.
Does Mandela think the oppressor is free? Why/why not?
Answer:
According to Mandela both the oppressor and the oppressed must be liberated. Both of them are robbed of their freedom and humanity.

Nelson Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Discuss the scene of the inauguration ceremony? Who took oath in the ceremony? Why is the inauguration called a historic occasion for South Africa?
Answer:
It was the bright and clear day of 10th May, 1994. The inauguration ceremony took place in the Union Buildings amphitheatre in Pretoria. The most famous world leaders and representatives gathered there. The generals and police officers were also there. They had medals and ribbons on their chests. South African jets, helicopters and troop carriers roared in perfect formation over the Union Buildings. First of all Mr. de Klerk, then Thabo Mbeki and then Nelson Mandela took the oath.

The inauguration can be called a historic occasion for South Africa as on this day the first democratic government was installed. It was an end of more than three centuries of the white rule.
Nelson Mandela became the first Black President of South Africa.

Question 2.
What were Mandela’s opinions about the first and last decades of the twentieth century?
Why does he say on the day of the inauguration that he was overwhelmed with a sense of history? .
Answer:
On the day of the inauguration, the speaker’s mind went back to history. He remembered the first decade, when the whites ruled over South Africa and they made a discrimination against the blacks. They built a system of racial discrimination against the blacks. Their behaviour was full of cruelty. They meted out inhuman treatment to the blacks. But now in the last decade of this century, this cruel system was overturned. Now a new system replaced it. It was the first democratic government of South Africa. Now there will be no discrimination on the basis of colour.
That is why, on the day of the inauguration, he was overwhelmed with a sense of history.

Question 3.
What docs Mandela think about the patriots? Can they be repaid?
Answer:
Nelson Mandela thinks that the freedom and democratic government have all come only due to the great sacrifices of thousands of patriots. They were those men who did not care about their lives and died for their people and country. They can’t be repaid. He thinks himself the sum of all those who had sacrificed their lives. Now he regrets that he was not able to thank them. According to Mandela, the policy of apartheid greatly wounded the people. It was hard to recover. It would take much time. These great patriots were Oliver Tambo, Walter Sisulu, Luthuli, Dadoo, Fischer, Sobukwe, etc.

Question 4.
What ideas does Mandela have about courage, love and hate?
Answer:
According to Mandela, he learnt the meaning of courage from his comrades. They struggled very hard for the freedom of the country. They did not care for their lives. They sacrificed everything for their people and country. They did not break before the brutality of the oppressors. They showed their full strength. So Mandela learned courage from them. To him, courage means not the absence of fear but the victory over it. The brave man is one who conquers fear. No man is born hating another man due to colour or religion. Love comes more naturally to the human heart than hate. According to Mandela, both the oppressor and the oppressed are the prisoners of hatred. No one can become happy after taking away other’s freedom.

Question 5.
What ideas did we get about freedom, the oppressor and the oppressed from this lesson? How did Nelson Mandela get hunger for freedom?
Answer:
According to Mandela, both the oppressor and the oppressed need freedom. Not only the oppressed is without freedom, but also the oppressor. He is the prisoner of hatred, only his level of thinking encourages him to snatch others freedom. It is all due to his narrow mindedness. It is an obvious idea that the oppressed has no freedom. Nelson Mandela had hunger for freedom, when he knew that his freedom had been snatched. His idea for freedom was an illusion. He saw that his brothers and sisters were without freedom. His hunger for freedom encouraged him to join the African National Congress.

Question 6.
What differences came in Mandela’s opinion about the meaning of freedom, when he was a little boy and w hen he became young?
Answer:
There were many differences in Mandela’s opinion about the meaning of freedom, when he was a little boy and when he became young. While he was a little boy, the meaning of freedom was to run in the fields and to swim in the streams.When he became young, he realised that his freedom was an illusion. Now he had realised that not only his freedom, but also others freedom had been seized. So he felt a hunger for freedom now. He wanted that all the people of his country should live with self-respect. They must do what they liked.

Question 7.
What are two obligations that Mandela described in this lesson? What was the reason that he was not able to fulfil those obligations?
Answer:
In the lesson, Mandela described two obligations that everyone had to perform.
One obligation is for the family, children and wife and second obligation is for the country and community. But due to apartheid policy in South Africa, Mandela was not able to fulfil his obligation. Although men could fulfil these obligations according to their capacities and abilities. But in South Africa it was impossible for the blacks. When Mandela tried to fulfil them for his family, he was cut off from his family. He was forced to live the life of separation. When he tried to serve his country, he was put into prison. Thus, Mandela was not able to fulfil his obligations.

Question 8.
Nelson Mandela was the hero of South Africa’s freedom movement. Comment.
Answer:
Nelson Mandela was a true hero of South Africa’s freedom movement. His conscience encouraged him to demand a respectful and unique life for all. His soul cleared him about the twin obligations for everyone. He was always determined to fulfil them. He performed his obligations for his family as well as for his community. Although he was prevented from doing so, yet he did not stop and got discouraged.

He became homeless. In spite of all these difficulties he could not change his decision. He had a soul power to challenge the racial system of the white. He did not care the apartheid policy and announced that this policy had created a lasting wound in the country. He fought against it. At last he got success. He became the first black President of South Africa.

Question 9.
India is a country of unity in diversity. Can you explain any type of discrimination in India, on the basis of colour or creed?
Answer:
India is a very wide country. In spite of that India is a country of unity in diversity. There are different religions in it. We can find different dresses, lifestyle and food habits in India. Even then, they all have a pride to be an Indian.

India has a democratic form of government and there is no place for discrimination in this country. But there is some sort of discrimination on the basis of caste or creed. Here people are known by their caste and creed. They have no right to marry freely. Even today caste system has not gone out completely from our mind. But it is good for all Indians that our Constitution has given equality to all. There is no place for discrimination in Indian Constitution

Question 10.
India is a country of unity in diversity—there are different languages, traditions, dresses, castes and cultures. Do you find any sort of discrimination in India?
Answer:
India is a very big country. It has different languages, traditions, dresses, castes and cultures. Even then India has unity in diversity. Its Constitution gives equality to every citizen. There is no place for colour prejudice in it. In India everyone has a right to get education to appear in competitions and to live at any place. There is no discrimination among Indians on the basis of caste, creed and colour. Indians can live in any state and they can marry in any caste. There is no colour discrimination in India.

Question 11.
Nelson Mandela described ‘twin obligations’ for a man. Do you agree with these obligations? Do you think that every person should fulfil these obligations in real life?
Answer:
In this lesson, Nelson Mandela described two obligations for a man. These two obligations are—one for the family and second is for the country. He said that one of the obligations is to work for his family. The other obligation is to his people, his community and his country.

We must agree with these obligations. In fact, we take care of families heartily and never think about country. If we don’t care about our country, it will never prosper. So in my opinion, we must fulfil both these obligations in our real life.

Question 12.
“I was not born with a hunger to be free.” What was the result of his hunger for freedom?
Answer:
When Nelson Mandela was a young boy, he didn’t know anything about freedom. His hunger for freedom began when he saw his people being punished under the policy of apartheid. It was clear to him that his boyhood freedom was just an illusion. Then he had come to know that he and his countrymen had no freedom.

They could not say anything freely. Now Mandela’s hunger for freedom had increased. Although, as a student, he wanted freedom only for himself but after growing up, he started to think maturely about the freedom. He saw that in South Africa everybody’s freedom was curtailed. Thus the result of his hunger for freedom was the freedom of the country.

Question 13.
What does courage mean to Mandela? How did he learn the meaning of courage? What do you get about courage, love and hate from this chapter?
Answer:
In this chapter, Nelson Mandela says that he learnt the meaning of courage from the comrades. They were freedom fighters. They did not care about their lives. He had seen those people who had sacrificed their life for the country.

He learnt that courage was not the absence of fear, but triumph over it. In other words, the brave man is one who conquers fear. In Mandela’s opinion, no man is born to hate another man on the basis of skin, colour or religion. Love comes more naturally to the human heart than from its opposite. Both the oppressor and the oppressed are the prisoners of hatred. They take away each other’s freedom.

Question 14.
Why did such a large number of international leaders attend the inauguration? What did it signify the triumph of?
Answer:
A large number of international leaders attended the installation ceremony of first^democratic non- racial government in South Africa. It was the end of apartheid in South Africa. It was a common victory for justice, for peace and for human dignity. The international community supported the cause of South Africa. It signified the triumph of humanity against oppression, fear and discrimination. Both the oppressor and the oppressed were liberated.

Question 15.
What does Mandela mean when he says he is “simply the sum of all those African patriots” who had gone before him?
Answer:
Mandela’s hunger for freedom forced him to join African National Congress to eradicate the system of apartheid. Before him thousands of the patriots had sacrificed their lives.

Mandela does not take the entire credit. He calls himself simply the sum of all those African patriots who had laid the path towards the achievement of success. He continued the movement started by them. He was only a part of that movement.

Question 16.
Would you agree that the “depths of oppression” create “heights of character”? How does Mandela illustrate this? Can you add your own examples to this argument?
Answer:
Yes, it is true that the depths of oppression create heights of character. Nelson Mandela illustrated this argument by giving examples of some people of extraordinary courage and wisdom. This period of struggle to end apartheid produced people like Oliver Tambos, the Walter Sisulus, Bram Fischers and so on in the soil, of South Africa. Nelson Mandela himself was a product of the same conditions. The hunger for freedom changed his life. The history of India is full of such characters. Mangal Pandey, Bhagat Singh, Chandra Shekhar Azad, Mahatma Gandhi, Lala Lajpat Rai and so on were the people of extraordinary courage produced by the depth of oppression in India.

Question 4.
How did Mandela’s understanding of freedom change with age and experience?
Answer:
Mandela’s understanding of freedom changed with age and experience. When he was a boy, freedom for him was to run freely in the fields, free to swim in the stream and ride the broad backs of slow- moving bulls. Later on he realised that his boyhood freedom was an illusion. He discovered as a young man that his freedom had been taken away from him.

As a student he wanted freedom only for himself which were: freedom to stay out at night, freedom to read what he wanted and so on. As a young man he yearned for the basic and honourable freedom of achieving his potential, of earning of marrying and having a family. With the advancement of age and experience, he felt that not only his freedom but also the freedom of everyone was curtailed. Now he wanted freedom for all his people.

Question 17.
How did Mandela’s ‘hunger for freedom’ change his life?
Answer:
Nelson Mandela was not born with a hunger to be free. With time and experience he discovered that the boyhood freedom was only an illusion. He found that as a young mem his freedom had already been taken away from him. His people and community were denied the fundamental right of living a dignified life.

This made him hungry for freedom. Ha joined the African National Congress. This desire for the freedom transformed him from a frightened young man into bold one, a law-abiding person to a criminal, a family-loving person to a man without a home. This desire forced a life-loving man to live the life of a monk.

Nelson Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the following passages and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
TENTH May dawned bright and clear. For the past few days I had been pleasantly besieged by dignitaries and world leaders who were coming to pay their respects before the inauguration. The inauguration would be the largest gathering ever of international leaders on South African soil. The ceremonies took place in the lovely sandstone amphitheatre formed by the Union Buildings in Pretoria. For decades this had been the seat of white supremacy, and now it was the site of a rainbow gathering of different colours and nations for the installation of South Africa’s first democratic, non- racial government.
(i) Who is T in the passage?
(ii) Where did the ceremony take place?
(iii) Why did the dignitaries and leaders come there?
(iv) Where was the occasion?
Answer:
(i) Nelson Mandela is T in the passage.
(ii) The ceremony took place in an amphitheatre formed by the Union Buildings in Pretoria.
(iii) The dignitaries and world leaders came there to pay their respects to the first democratic non- racial government.
(iv) The occasion was the inauguration ceremony of Nelson Mandela as South Africa’s first Black President in the Union Building in Pretoria, South Africa.

Question 2.
On that lovely autumn day I was accompanied by my daughter Zenani. On the podium. Mr de Klerk was first sworn in as the second deputy president. Then Thabo Mbeki was sworn in as the first deputy president. When it was my turn, I pledged to obey and uphold the Constitution and to devote myself to the well-being of the Republic and its people. To the assembled guests and the watching world, I said: Today, all of us do, by our presence here… confer glory and hope to newborn liberty. Out of the experience of an extraordinary human disaster that lasted too long, must be bom a society of which all humanity will be proud.
(i) Who is Zenani?
(ii) Who was sworn in as the first deputy president?
(iii) Who was sworn in as the second deputy president?
(iv) What was the pledge taken by T?
Answer:
(i) Zenani is the daughter of Nelson Mandela.
(ii) Thabo Mbeki was sworn in as the first deputy president of South Africa.
(iii) Mr de Klerk was sworn in as the second deputy president of South Africa.
(iv) Nelson Mandela pledged to obey and uphold the Constitution. He pledged to serve the people of his country.

Question 3.
“We, who were outlaws not so long ago, have today been given the rare privilege to be the host to the nations of the world on our own soil. We thank all of our distinguished international guests for having come to take possession with the people of our country of what is, after all, a common victory for justice, for peace, for human dignity. We have, at last, achieved our political emancipation. We pledge ourselves to liberate all our people from the continuing bondage of poverty, deprivation, suffering, gender and other discrimination. Never, never, and never again shall it be that this beautiful land will again experience the oppression of one by another. The sun shall never set on so glorious a human achievement. Let freedom reign. God bless Africa!
(i) Who does ‘we’ refer in the first line of the passage?
(ii) What is the privilege that has been explained here?
(iii) What did the people of South Africa achieve at last?
(iv) The word ‘bondage’ means in the passage.
Answer:
(i) ‘We’ refer to the people of South Africa in the first line of the passage.
(ii) South Africa has been given the rare privilege to be the host to the nations of the world.
(iii) The people of South Africa achieved their political emancipation.
(iv) The word ‘bondage’ means slavery in the passage.

Question 4.
A few moments later we all lifted our eyes in awe as a spectacular array of South African jets, helicopters and troop carriers roared in perfect formation over the Union Buildings. It was not only a display of pinpoint precision and military force, but a demonstration of the military’s loyalty to democracy, to a new government that had been freely and fairly elected. Only moments before, the highest generals of the South African defence force and police, their chests bedecked with ribbons and medals from days gone by, saluted me and pledged their loyalty. I was not unmindful of the fact that not so many years before they would not have saluted but arrested me. Finally a chevron of Impala jets left a smoke trail of the black, red, green, blue and gold of the new South African Flag.
(i) What did they see over the Union Buildings?
(ii) What was the occasion?
(iii) What did this symbolise?
(iv) What was Mandela not unmindful of?
Answer:
(i) They saw a spectacular show by South African jets, helicopters, the troop carriers over the Union Buildings.
(ii) It was the occasion of installation of the newly elected democratic government in South Africa.
(iii) The show by the military forces symbolised their loyalty towards the newly-elected democratic government in South Africa.
(iv) Nelson Mandela was not unmindful of the fact that the same army officers who had saluted him, would not have done so many years before. They would have rather arrested him.

Question 5.
The day was symbolised for me by the playing of our two national anthems, and the vision of whites singing ‘Nkosi Sikelel – iAfrika’ and blacks singing ‘Die Stem’, the old anthem of the Republic. Although that day neither group knew the lyrics of the anthem they once despised, they would soon know the words by heart. On the day of the inauguration, I was overwhelmed with a sense of history. In the first decade of the twentieth century, a few years after the bitter Anglo-Boer war and before my own birth, the white-skinned people of South Africa patched up their differences and erected a system of racial domination against the dark-skinned people of their own land.
(i) How was the day symbolised?
(ii) What was the national anthem for the blacks?
(iii) What was specific about that system?
(iv) – How was the new system different?
Answer:
(i) The day was symbolised by the playing of their two national anthems—‘Nkosi Sikelel – ‘iAfrika’ and ‘Die Stem’.
(ii) The national anthem for the blacks was ‘Die Stem’.
(iii) The system had formed the basis of one of the harshest, most inhumane, societies the world has ever known.
(iv) The new system recognised the rights and freedom of all people regardless of the colour of their skin.

Question 6.
The structure they created formed the basis of one of the harshest, most inhumane, societies the world has ever known. Now, in the last decade of the twentieth century, and my own eighth decade as a man, that system had, been overturned forever and replaced by one that recognised the rights and freedoms of all peoples, regardless of the colour of their skin. That day had come about through the unimaginable sacrifices of thousands of my people, people whose suffering and courage can never be counted or repaid. I felt that day, as I have on so many other days, that I was simply the sum of all those African patriots who had gone before me. That long and noble line ended and now began again with me. I was pained that I was not able to thank them and that they were not able to see what their sacrifices had brought.
(i) What type of structure had they created?
(ii) What did they talk about the people?
(iii) Why did ‘he’ remember the African patriots?
(iv) Why was ‘he’ pained?
Answer:
(i) They had created such structure that formed the basis of the most harsh and inhumane societies the world has ever known.
(ii) They talked about the rights and freedoms of people in the last decade of the twentieth century-.
(iii) Nelson Mandela remembered the African patriots for sacrificing their lives for this cause. He said that their contribution can never be repaid.
(iv) He was pained as the people who laid their livesffor this day could not be present to see what their sacrifices had achieved for the country and its people.

Question 7.
The policy of apartheid created a deep and lasting wound in my country and my people. All of us will spend many years, if not generations, recovering from that profound hurt. But the decades of oppression and brutality had another, unintended, effect, and that was that it produced the Oliver Tambos, the Walter Sisulus, the Chief Luthulis, the Yusuf Dadoos, the Bram Fischers, the Robert Sobukwes of our time—men of such extraordinary courage, wisdom and generosity that their like may never be known again. Perhaps it requires such depths of oppression to create such heights of character. My country is rich in the minerals and gems that lie beneath its soil, but I have always known that its greatest wealth is its people, finer and truer than the purest diamonds.
(i) What did the policy of apartheid create?
(ii) What is the greatest wealth of the narrator’s country?
(iii) What was the unintended effect of this policy?
(iv) Name some of the men of extraordinary courage?
Answer:
(i) The policy of apartheid created a deep and lasting wound in the country and its people.
(ii) The greatest wealth of the narrator’s country is its courageous people.
(iii) The unintended effect of that policy was that it created many men of courage, wjsdom and generosity.
(iv) Oliver Tambos, Walter Sisulus and Chief Luthulis.

Question 8.
In life, every man has twin obligations—obligations to his family, to his parents, to his wife and children; and he has an obligation to his people, his community, his country. In a civil and humane society, each man is able to fulfil those obligations according to his own inclinations and abilities. But in a country like South-Africa, it was almost impossible for a man of my birth and colour to fulfil both of those obligations. In South Africa, a man of colour who attempted to live as a human being was punished and isolated. In South Africa, a man who tried to fulfil his duty to his people was inevitably ripped from his family and his home and was forced to live a life apart, a twilight existence of secrecy and rebellion. I did not in the beginning choose to place my people above my family, but in attempting to serve my people, I found that I was prevented from fulfilling my obligations as a son, a brother, a father and a husband.
(i) What are the obligations that every man has in life?
(ii) Why was it impossible for a coloured man to fulfil his obligations?
(iii) How were the people who tried to fulfil the obligations, treated in South Africa?
(iv) What is required to fulfil these obligations?
Answer:
(i) Every man has two obligations, one is to his family and second to his community and country.
(ii) In South Africa if a coloured man tried to fulfil his obligations, he was punished and isolated.
(iii) Those who tried to fulfil these obligations were ripped from their families and were forced to live a life of isolation and rebellion.
(iv) A civil and humane society is needed to fulfil these obligations.

Question 9.
I was not born with a hunger to be free. I was born free—free in every way that I could know. Free to run in the fields near my mother’s hut, free to swim in the clear stream that ran through my village, free to roast mealies under the stars and ride the broad backs of slow-moving bulls. As long as I obeyed my father and abided by the customs of my tribe, I was not troubled by the laws of man or God. It was only when I began to learn that my boyhood freedom was an illusion, when I discovered as a young man that my freedom had already been taken from me, that I began to hunger for it. At first, as a student, I wanted freedom only for myself, the transitory freedoms of being able to stay out at night, read what I pleased and go where I chose. Later, as a young man in Johannesburg, I yearned for the basic and honourable freedoms of achieving my potential, of earning my keep, of marrying and having a family—the freedom not to be obstructed in a lawful life.
(i) In what ways was Mandela free?
(ii) What kind of freedom did Mandela yearn for as a man?
(iii) What did he want as a student?
(iv) What did he learn?
Answer:
(i) Mandela was free to run in the fields, to swim in the stream, free to roast mealies and ride the broad sucks of slow-moving bulls.
(ii) Mandela yearned for the basic and honourable freedom of achieving his potential of earning his life.
(iii) He wanted, as a student, freedom for himself, the freedom of being able to stay out at night, read what he wanted and go out where he chose.
(iv) He learnt that his boyhood freedom was an illusion.

Here we are providing Fog Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

Fog Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

Fog Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Fog Extra Questions And Answers Question 1.
How does a eat behave?
Answer:
A cat is very quiet. It comes quietly and stealthily on its little padded feet. It sits on the haunches and observes the city and the harbour. Then, it moves on silently without making any noise.

Fog Class 10 Extra Questions And Answers Question 2.
How is the fog like a cat?
Answer:
The poet finds the fog like a cat. The fog comes stealthily like a cat. It sits looking over the harbour and city as a cat does. Later, it moves on just like a cat to settle somewhere else. These things prove that the fog’s comparison to a cat is appropriate.

Fog Class 10 Extra Questions Question 3.
How does the fog spread over the harbour and the city?
Answer:
The fog-comes to a city stealthily just like a cat. It makes no noise. It spreads over the harbour and the city and settles over them for sometimes. There, it rises high and moves away. In this way the fog arrives over a city, observes it and then leaves it to move away.

Fog Class 10 Questions And Answers Question 4.
Difficulties come but they are not to stay forever. They come and go. Comment referring to the poem “Fog’.
Answer:
None can deny that fact that after every nightfall, there is sunshine. In other words sorrows follow happiness. Life has many ups and downs. We must all accept that problems as a part of life. We should strengthen ourselves so much that we are able to face them and stand up to solve these problems. We should not get carried away. We should learn that time and tide wait for none.

Fog is also symbolic of darkness but it comes quietly like a cat and goes away. It symbolises that if we are not disturbed by difficulties then life will itself move to lighter side and things will be easy to confront. We should always remember that, we must face all the problems boldly.

Fog Question Answer Question 5.
Write the central idea of the poem “Fog”.
Answer:
The poet Carl Sandburg in his poem ‘Fog’ describes fog as a cat. Fog is treated to be a living creature. Fog comes quietly and stealthily like a cat. Fog sits looking over the harbour like a cat does. Then it moves to settle somewhere else. Just as cat doesn’t settle at one place and in the same way fog keeps on moving and finally vanishes.

Fog Poem Class 10 Question Answer Question 6.
The poet is able to visualize the image of a cat in the fog. Similarly there is an inseparable connection between native and all creations in it. Based on the reading of the poem, write a paragraph on the topic—“God lives in His creations in native”.
Answer:
God is omnipresent and nature is a gift of God to us. Nature has both, the power to sanctify and power to destroy. He makes his presence which provides us with the vital oxygen, the food that grows beneath and above the ground, the water that satisfies out thirst etc. He has made everything and everyone with a purpose and he lives in all of them. Nature cannot exist on its own. It is because God’s reflection falls on each of his creation that we, mere mortals survive and thrive on this planet. Thus, we must always respect, love, and care for all of God’s creations.

Fog By Carl Sandburg Question Answer Question 6.
(i) What does Sandburg think the fog is like?
(ii) How does the fog come?
(iii) What does ‘it’ in the third line refer to?
(iv) Does the poet actually say that the fog is like a cat? Find three things that tell us that the fog is like a cat.
Answer:
(i) According to Sandburg, the fog is like a cat.
(ii) The fog comes on little cat’s feet.
(iii) In the third line ‘it’ refers to the fog that has covered the city and it seems as if it is looking over the city like a cat.
(iv) No, the poet does not actually say that the fog is like a cat. However, he has used cat as a metaphor for describing the fog. He says that the fog comes on its little cat feet, which implies that the fog, like a cat, comes slowly. He also says that the fog looks over the harbour and the city and then moves on, implying that the fog has covered the city and is sitting and looking at it, thereby again comparing it to a cat.

This is reiterated when he says that the fog looks over the city sitting on ‘silent haunches’. This also shows the reference to a cat as a cat always sits with its knees bent. Hence, he has compared the fog to a cat without actually saying so.

The Fog Question Answer Question 7.
You know that a metaphor compares two things by transferring a feature of one thing to the other
(See Unit 1).
(i) Find metaphors for the following words and complete the table below.
Also try to say how they are alike. The first is done for you.

Storm	tiger	pounces over the fields, growls
Train
Fire
School
Home

Storm	tiger	pounces over the fields, growls
Train	Gush of wind	Very fast movement
Fire	Anger	Danger that surrounds both on the basis of their intensities.
School	Gateway	Leads to adulthood and a life of responsibility.
Home	Nest	Provides hospitable, loving environment.

Class 10 English Fog Question Answer Question 8.
Does this poem have a rhyme scheme? Poetry that does not have an obvious rhythm or rhyme is called ‘free verse’.
Answer:
No, this poem does not have a rhyme scheme. It is written in ‘free verse’

Fog Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the following stanza and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
The Fog comes on little cat feet.
(i) Name the poem and poet.
(ii) How does the fog come?
(iii) Who is the fog compared to?
(iv) What is the meaning of the phrase “Little cat feet”?
Answer:
(i) These lines have been taken from the poem ‘Fog’ composed by Carl Sandburg.
(ii) The fog comes stealthily.
(iii) The fog is compared to cat.
(iv) Fog comes stealthily and silently, as a cat. Therefore the arrival of fog is described as if it is coming like a walking cat.

Question 2.
It sits looking over harbour and city on silent haunches and then moves on.
(i) What does ‘it’ refer to?
(ii) Where does it settle over?
(iii) What is ‘it’ compared to?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) It refers to the fog.
(ii) ‘It’ settles over the harbour and the city.
(iii) ‘It’ is compared to the cat.
(iv) The poem “Fog” composed by “Carl Sandburg”.

Here we are providing The Ball Poem Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

The Ball Poem Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

The Ball Poem Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

The Ball Poem Extra Questions And Answers Question 1.
How was the boy’s hall lost?
Answer:
The boy was playing with his ball. The ball bounced and it went down the street. From the street the ball fell into the water. This is how the boy lost this ball.

The Ball Poem Extra Questions Question 2.
How did the boy react after losing the ball?
Answer:
The boy was very much upset after losing the ball. He was filled with sadness, which affected him greatly. Stunningly he stood in a stiff manner, overpowered with grief, trembling and staring down where his ball was lost.

Ball Poem Extra Questions Question 3.
How does the boy ‘Senses first responsibility?
Answer:
The boy loses his ball and gets upset. This was his first lesson in sensing first responsibility. He has the experience of losing something and learning how to cope up with the loss. He understands the nature of loss or what it means to lose something. He now will be more responsible and vigilant to avoid losing something in future.

The Ball Poem Class 10 Extra Questions Question 4.
What do you think the poet means by the following lines?
People will take Balls,
balls will be lost always, little boy.
And no one buys a ball back.
Answer:
We think the poet, in these lines, conveys a great message. Losing ball here symbolises miseries arising out of the losses one suffers in life. In this materialistic world, there is cut throat competition. So losses are bound to happen some day or the other. You have to make up for your own losses. No body else will, do it.

Extra Questions Of The Ball Poem Question 5.
What does the poet mean by “epistemology of loss”?
OR
How important is the learning to “epistemology of loss” for the boy?
Answer:
According the poet, the epistemology of loss is the greatest lesson, the boy is learning. It teaches him to value and preserve his cherished things. It also teaches him to recover from the loss and move on with , his life. When we try to understand what it means to lose something, we are more vigilant to check the further losses. Thus it helps us to be self-reliant and stand up on our own feet.

The Ball Poem Important Questions Question 6.
Why is it important for everyone to experience loss to stand up after it?
Answer:
The poet believes that nothing is eternal. Everyone must experience the loss to help him bear it. It also teaches him how to recover from it and stand up. It will remind him to protect and preserve his possessions.

The Ball Poem Short Question Answer Question 7.
Why does the poet say that ‘Money is external’?
Answer:
The poet believes that money cannot buy each and everything. It can bring just external happiness by buying us possessions but it cannot make a boy recover from his unhappiness due to loss of a loved one or valued thing.

Class 10 The Ball Poem Extra Questions Question 8.
What does the poet say about “A world of possessions”?
OR
Why does the poet call the world ‘A world of possessions’?
Answer:
The poet calls the world ‘A world of possessions’ because man values and is valued on the basis of his worldly possessions. All his feelings and his whole life are dominated by his possessions.

The Ball Poem Extra Question Answer Question 9.
Why is it important for everyone to experience loss and to stand up after it?
OR
There’s always loss and there’s always disappointment. When someone is learning from loss, he is moving towards achievement. Elaborate.
OR
It’s often been said that you learn more from losing than you do from winning. You learn a lot from a loss. It really gets your attention and it really motivates. Described.
OR
Loss is an essential and significant experience of one’s life. Explain.
Answer:
Everyone experiences a loss at some point in one’s life. It might be the loss of a beloved, or a parent or a close relative or even a pet. Humans have a tendency of getting attached to things and the loss of things or people close to heart causes grievance. But one must not let that pull us down. Loss is an essential and significant experience of one’s life. And one must learn to deal with it and move on.

If we keep thinking about it or grieve over that loss, we can never come out of it. It will only affect us psychologically and can have severe consequences. Brooding over a loss will never help in bringing things back to normal. Loss is inevitable sometimes. Once a loss occurs, one must grieve, but only for a short while. Thereafter one must get over it and move on in life.

Question  10.
Write the central idea of the poem “The Ball Poem”.
Answer:
The poet John Berryman “The Ball poem” describes the grief of a boy over the loss of his ball. This loss makes him realise his first responsibility. The poet wants us to understand that in this materialistic world nothing is forever. We will be forced to give up things which we love and even in time of problems, we have to learn to stand up. We have to learn to accept fate of our life.

Question 11.
Why does the poet say, “I would not intrude on him’? Why doesn’t he offer him money to buy another ball?
Answer:
The poet wants the boy to experience the loss. He should learn that it is the part of life. That is why the poet does not want to interfere and wants the boy to be strong and handle the situation himself and does not want to offer him money to buy another ball.

Question 12.
staring down/ All his young days into the harbour where/His ball went…” Do you think the boy has had the ball for a long time? Is it linked to the memories of days when he played with it?
Answer:
Yes, it seems like the boy has had the ball for a long time. When it bounced into the water, all his memories of the days of childhood flashed in front of him. This led to a realization that those moments would not come back, just like the ball. He can buy new balls and can create new similar moments, but those that are gone, and would not ever return.

Question 13.
What does “in the world of possessions’ mean?
Answer:
“In the world of possessions’ means people like to possess all sorts of things in the world. Money is an external thing because it can buy only material objects. It cannot buy everything that one loses or cannot bring back your long lost memories.

Question 14.
Do you think the boy has lost anything earlier? Pick out the words that suggest the answer.
Answer:
No, it seems that the boy has not lost anything earlier. The words that suggest so are, “senses first responsibility in a world of possessions”.

Question 15.
What does the poet say the boy is learning from the loss of the ball? Try to explain this in your own words.
Answer:
The boy has lost his ball while playing. The poet says that from this loss, the boy will learn in his years, what it means to lose something. Thus he will understand the nature of loss or how to face and cope up with losses one suffers in life. This experience of losing something will enable him to learn to be self- reliant and to stand up on his feet in the life where losses do occur, though they might not be important enough to worry about.

Question 16.
Have you ever lost something you liked very much? Write a paragraph describing how you felt then and saying whether—and how—you got over your loss.
Answer:
Last year, our beautiful dog Tommy was lost. All the family loved the dog very much, but I was very deeply attached to Tommy. I used to take full care of him and Tommy would accompany me wherever I allowed him to do so. I felt desperate and upset when Tommy was not traced at all the possible places, where we could find him. I did not feel like eating or going for morning walk. Tommy always used to accompany me when I went for my morning walk, Gradually I reconciled with the situation and consoled myself.

I totally engrossed myself in my studies though I did not feel like playing. I never stopped missing Tommy. Then, one day, when I went to another colony to meet a friend, I found Tommy tied in someday else’s home. When I approached them, they said that the beautiful dog seemed to have lost his way and so they had been giving care to him. I thanked them and returned home happily with Tommy.

The Ball Poem Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the following Stanza and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
What is the boy now, who has lost his ball,
What, what is he to do? I saw it go
Merrily bouncing, down the street, and then
Merrily over—there it is in the water!

(i) Name the poem and poet.
(ii) What has the boy lost?
(iii) What did he see?
(iv) Where did the ball go?
Answer:
(i) This stanza has been taken from the poem The Ball Poem’ composed by John Berryman.
(ii) The boy has lost his ball while playing.
(iii) He saw the ball going down the street.
(iv) The ball went into the water.

Question 2.
No use to say ‘O there are other balls’:
An ultimate shaking grief fixes the boy
As he stands rigid, trembling, staring down
All his young days into the harbour where His ball went.

(i) What does ‘0 there are other balls’ imply?
(ii) Why is the child upset?
(iii) What is he looking at?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) It implies that the loss of his ball cannot console the boy even if he gets another ball.
(ii) The child/boy is upset because he has lost his ball.
(iii) He is looking at the place where his ball went.
(iv) The poem “The Ball Poem” composed by John Berryman.

Question 3.
I would not intrude on him;
A dime, another ball, is worthless.
Now He senses first responsibility
In a world of possessions.

(i) What did the poet decide?
(ii) What does the boy understand?
(iii) What does the “World of Possessions’refer to?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) The poet decided not to interfere and suggest anything to the boy.
(ii) The boy senses his first responsibility.
(iii) It refers to the world where a man is known by his possessions and is continually led by his decision to possess.
(iv) The poem “The Ball Poem” written by John Berryman.

Question 4.
People will take
Balls, balls will be lost always, little boy.
And no one buys a ball back. Money is external.
He is learning, well behind his desperate eyes,
The epistemology of loss, how to stand up
Knowing what every man must one day know
And most know many days, how to stand up.

(i) What does the boy learn?
(ii) What does he think about money?
(iii) Why was the boy upset?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) The boy is learning the epistemology of loss. He learns how to cope up with the loss.
(ii) Money is external.
(iii) The boy was upset because he had lost his ball.
(iv) The poem “The Ball Poem” composed by John Berryman.

Here we are providing For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

For Anne Gregory Extra Question Answer Question 1.
What does the young woman wish?
Answer:
The young woman wishes that she should be loved for herself alone and not for her yellow hair. She says that she could dye her hair in brown or black or carrot coloured.

For Anne Gregory Question Answer Question 2.
Would the young man love her for herself alone?
Answer:
The young man’s desires have been frustrated for want of hope because he has fallen from her grace, he will never love her for herself alone, though he might love her yellow hair.

For Anne Gregory Class 10 Questions And Answers Question 3.
Why is the youth in despair in the poem “For Anne Gregory”?
Answer:
The young man loves Anne. He is attracted towards her external beauty. He feels that young men are in despair because of her exquisite beauty.

Anne Gregory Poem Pdf Question 4.
What did the religious man tell the poet?
Answer:
The religious man told the poet that he found a book to prove that only god could love her for her spiritual beauty and not for her physical beauty.

Question 5.
The poet in the poem ‘For Anne Gregory’ conveys that We should give importance to the inner beauty and not to the physical appearance. Explain with reference to the poem.
Answer:
It is an accepted fact that external beauty is shortlived’but inner beauty remains forever. Inner beauty gives satisfaction and joy. We should thus learn not to accept things at their face value. We should try to. discover the inner beauty and strength of a person, though it is not easy to do so. We should accept the person with positive and negative values.

As the time passes relations are strengthened. In the poem ‘For Anne Gregory’ the beloved wants that her lover should love her for herself not the colour of the hair. She wants to strengthen this fact that inner beauty is more important than external beauty.

Question 6.
Write a paragraph on the topic “All that Glitters is not Gold”. With reference to the poem “For Anne Gregory” written by W. B. Yeats.
Answer:
What we see through the naked eye might not always be the naked truth. Like shining pieces of glass that shine and glitter like diamonds, the way people appear on the outside can be very misleading. We must never judge a book by its cover as there is a possibility that we might be wrong.

Appearances should never be trusted. It can lead us to wrong conclusions. A person may be very handsome or beautiful outside but inside if the character is not good that person’s appearance is of no value. So always try to look beneath the skin because beauty is skin deep. The real beauty lies in the personality of the person, not in external appearances.

Question 7.
What does the young man mean by “great honey-coloured / Ramparts at your ear?” Why does he say that young men are “thrown into despair” by them? ”
Answer:
The “great honey-colored / Ramparts at your ear” refers’to the beautiful yellow coloured hair that falls at the woman’s ear and cover it like a wall around a fort. He says that the young men are “thrown into despair” by them because they look so beautiful on the women that her beauty gets thoroughly enhanced. The young men fall in love with her and feel despair. He says that it is not possible that someone would love her alone and not her yellow hair.

Question 8.
What colour is the young woman’s hair? What does she say she can change it to? Why would she want to do so?
Answer:
The young woman’s hair is of yellow colour. She says that she could get her hair dyed to brown, black or carrot colour. She would change the colour of her hair so that the young men in despair would love her only and not her yellow hair. She wanted them to love her for what she was and not for her appearance such as her hair colour.

Question 9.
Objects have qualities which make them desirable to others. Can you think of some objects (a car, a phone, a dress…) and say what qualities make one object more desirable than another? Imagine you were trying to sell an object: what qualities would you emphasise?
Answer:
Objects have qualities which make them desirable to others. There are many factors that make them desirable such as their usefulness, utility, disability, their price and appearance.

Question 10.
What about people? Do we love others because we like their qualities, whether physical or ‘ mental? Or is it possible to love someone “for themselves alone”? Are some people “more
lovable’ than others”? Discuss this question in pairs or in groups, considering points like the following.
(i) A parent or caregiver’s love for a newborn baby, for a mentally or physically challenged child, for a clever child or prodigy.
(ii) The public’s love for a filmstar, a sportsperson, a politician, or a social worker.
(iii) Your love for a friend, or brother or sister.
(iv) Your love for a pet, and the pet’s love for you.
Answer:
Try yourself in classroom / classroom activity.

Question 11.
You have perhaps concluded that people are not objects to be valued for their qualities or riches rather than for themselves. But elsewhere Yeats asks the question: How can we separate the dancer from the dance? Is it possible to separate ‘the person himself or herself from how the person looks, sounds, walks, and so on? Think of how you or a friend or member of your family has changed over the years. Has your relationship also changed? In what way?
Answer:
Classroom Activity.

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the following stanza and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
“Never shall a young man,
Thrown into despair
By those great honey-coloured
Ramparts at your ear,
Love you for yourself alone
And not your yellow hair.”

(i) Who is the speaker in this stanza?
(ii) Why is the youngman in despair?
(iii) With what are her ears compared?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) The poet is the speaker, he is addressing Anne Gregory.
(ii) The youngman is the lover of Anne. He is in despair because he has seen the white hair of his beloved.
(iii) Her ears are composed with ramparts, which are high, wide walls around a castle or a fort.
(iv) The poem “For Anne Gregory” composed by “W. B. Yeasts”.

Question 2.
“But I can get a hair-dye
And set such colour there,
Brown, or black, or carrot,
That young men in despair
May love me for myself alone
And not my yellow hair.”

(i) Who is the speaker in these lines?
(ii) What colour would she give her hair?
(iii) Why is she ready to do so?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) Anrie Gregory is the speaker in these lines.
(ii) She would give her hair colour brown or black or carrot.
(iii) She is ready to do so because her lover feels that men love her because of her golden hair. She wants to be loved for her inner beauty.
(iv) The poem “For Anne Gregory” composed by “W. B. Yeasts”.

Question 3.
“I heard an old religious man
But yesternight declare
That he had found a text to prove
That only God, my dear
Could love you for yourself alone
And not your yellow hair.”

(i) Who is ‘I’ in the first line?
(ii) What did he find yesternight?
(iii) What does the poet convey in the last three lines?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) ‘I’ in the first line is the poet— W. B. Yeats.
(ii) The poet heard an old religious man declaring that only God could love us for ourselves alone and not our hair.
(iii) The poet conveys that human beings are incapable of seeing inner beauty. They love someone only for the external beauty. Only God can love someone for the inner beauty.
(iv) The poem “For Anne Gregory” composed by “W. B. Yeasts”.

Here we are providing A Triumph of Surgery Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

A Triumph of Surgery Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

A Triumph of Surgery Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

A Triumph Of Surgery Extra Question Answer Question 1.
“I think 1 know a cure for you”. What was Dr Herriot’s ‘cure’ for Tricki?
Answer:
Seeing the miserable condition of Tricki Dr Herriot at once decides to keep him away from his mistress Mrs Pumphrey for a while. So, he suggested that Tricki should be hospitalized for about a fortnight as he had to be kept upder observation.

Triumph Of Surgery Extra Questions Question 2.
Why was Dr Herriot shocked at Tricki’s appearance?
Answer:
Dr Herriot was shocked at Tricki’s appearance because he had become hugely fat. His eyes looked bloodshot and rheumy and his tongue lolled from his jaws. He could walk with difficulty.

A Triumph Of Surgery Class 10 Extra Questions And Answers Question 3.
What was MrsPumphrey’s reaction when Dr Herriot suggested Tricki’s hospitalization?
Answer:
Dr Herriot had made his plan in advance. So when Mrs Pumphrey reported Tricki’s illness, he at once suggested him to be hospitalized for about a fortnight to be kept under observation.

Triumph Of Surgery Class 10 Extra Questions Question 4.
Which two suggestions did Dr Herriot give to Mrs Pumphrey at the initial stage? Did she
follow?
Answer:
Dr Herriot suggested Mrs Pumphrey to cutdown on the sweet things given to Tricki. He asked her to provide more exercise to the dog.

The Triumph Of Surgery Extra Questions Question 5.
What did Mrs Pumphrey do to bring him back to normal health? Was she successful?
Answer:
When Mrs Pumphrey found Tricki weak, she started giving him extra diet between meals to build him , up. She gave him some malt and cod-liver oil and a bowl of Horlicks at night. She never forgot to give him cream cakes and chocolates which Tricki really loved. She was hot successful rather she put her dog in more trouble. He started gaining weight which made fys condition worse.

A Triumph Of Surgery Extra Questions Question 6.
Why did Mrs Pumphery make a frantic call to Dr Herriot?
Answer:
Suddenly Tricki stopped eating. He refused even his favourite dishes and had bouts of vomiting. He spent all the time lying on rug, panting and did not do anything. So Mrs Pumphrey was distraught and made a frantic call to Dr Herriot.

A Triumph Of Surgery Short Question Answer Question 7.
What step did Dr Herriot take to save Tricki?
Answer:
Dr Herriot immediately hospitalised Tricki for about a fortnight as it was necessary to part him from his mistress. Tricki’s only problem was overfeeding which he knew. Tricki needed dieting which was possible only in absence of Mrs Pumphrey. He stopped giving food to Tricki. He was given only plenty of water.

Extra Questions Of A Triumph Of Surgery Question 8.
Why was Tricki an uninteresting object for other dogs at the surgery?
Answer:
When Tricki was brought to the surgery, all the household dogs surged around him but Tricki looked down at the noisy pack with dull eyes and lay motionless on the carpet. So after sniffing him for a few seconds, they found him an uninteresting object and moved away from him.

Extra Questions Of Triumph Of Surgery Question 9.
What evidence do you get from the text about Tricki’s affluent living?
Answer:
Tricki was loved by his mistress. She was very much concerned for him. She was rather blind in love. Tricki lived a more lavish life than any noraml human bring. He had a whole wardrobe of clothes for different weather, raincoat for wet days. Different bowls for different meals, toys, cushions, comfortable bed and what not. He was given rich diet including cream cakes and chocolates which he loved.

Question 10.
Describe the ‘parting scene’ between Tricki and Mrs Pumphrey’s house hold?
Answer:
The -only way to save Tricki was to take him away. When Mr Herriot was about to take him to his surgery for treatment, Mrs Pumphrey started wailing. The entire staff was roused and maids rushed in and out bringing his day bed, night bed, favourite cushions, toys and rubber rings and different bowls.
As Mr Herriot moved off, Mrs Pumphrey, with a despairing cry, threw an armful of the little coats , through the window. Everybody was in tears. It was a sad and tearful parting.

A Triumph of Surgery Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Write the brief character sketch of Mrs Pumphrey.
Answer:
Mrs Pumphrey was a rich but eccentric lady. She was an ignorant kind of person. She had a pet dog Tricki, whom she loved more than anything. Her way of showing love was very different. She overfed Tricki. She showed her concern by giving him rich and extra diet between meals which finally made Tricki ill. She couldn’t bear Tricki doing exercise. She thought that it would make Tricki tired while it was necessary for him.

She pampered her pet which had a wardrobe of clothes for every season, different bowls for each meal, toys and what not. Her way of loving was not normal. But she was also a kind- hearted lady who finally burst into tears while parting with her dog. She had all human qualities as she didn’t forget to thank Mr Herriot at the end.

Question 2.
What evidence do you get of Tricki’s affluent living from the text?
Answer:
Tricki is thoroughly pampered by his mistress Mrs Pumphrey. Dr Herriot is shocked at Tricki’s appearance. He hafe become hugely fat, like a bloated sausage with a leg at each corner. His eyes, bloodshot and rheumy, stares straight ahead his tongue lolls from his jaws.

Mrs Pumphrey explains to Dr Herriot that Tricki must be suffering from malnutrition. So she has been giving him some little extras between meals to build him up, some malt and cod-liver oil and a bowl of Horlicks at night to make him sleep. Above all, he gets cream cakes and chocolates.

To make the things worse he had been doing no exercise. When Tricki is sent to Vet. hospital, the entire staff of Mrs Pumphrey’s house rush to bring his day bed, his night bed, favourite cushions, toys and rubber rings, breakfast bowl, lunch bowl, supper bowl. When Dr Herriot informs Mrs Pumphrey that the little fellow is convalescing rapidly, she begins to send fresh eggSc,and wine to build him up. It all shows that Tricki has an affluent living.

Question 3.
Give a brief character sketch of Tricki.
Answer:
Tricki is thoroughly pampered by his mistress Mrs Pumphrey. He has become hugely fat, like a bloated sausage with a leg at each comer. His eyes, bloodshot and rheumy, stares straight ahead his tongue lolled from his jaws. He is greedy and never refuses food. His mistress gives him some little extras between meals to build him up, some malt and cod-liver oil and a bowl of Horlicks at night to make him sleep.

Above all, he gets cream cakes and chocolates. To make things worse he had been doing no exercise. When Tricki is sent to Vet. Hospital, the entire staff of Mrs Pumphrey’s house rush to bring his day bed, his night bed, favourite cushions, toys and rubber rings, breakfast bowl, lunch bowl, supper bowl. It all shows that Tricki has an affluent living.

Question 4.
“Over-pampering is not only bad for human but also for animals”. Explain this statement in the light of the story “A Triumph of Surgery’.
OR
“Kids or cubs need fondling but too much pampering may harm them”. How far does it apply in the case of Tricki?
Answer:
We all know that children are over-pampered by the parents due to their sentimental attachment …to them. In the story ‘A triumph of Surgery’ a dog Tricki is over-pampered by his wealthy mistress Mrs Pumphrey. She believes that her little dog is suffering from malnutrition so she gives him some little extras between meals to build him up, some malt and cod-liver oil and a bowl of Horlicks at night to make him sleep.

Above all, he gets cream cakes and chocolates. To make the things worse he had been doing no exercise. When Dr Herriot takes the dog to his Vet. hospital, it seems all the items of Tricki’s comfort would be sent with him. Even during his stay at the hospital, Mrs Pumphrey tries to provide him all the comforts. But Dr Herriot deals with the situation cleverly and the dog cures rapidly to return back to his mistress.
OR
Mrs Pumphrey is very fond of her pet, Tricki, she gives him rich diets and even richer caring like having wardrobes full of different weather clothes for him. Tricki has neither fix timings nor control over eating. This makes him greedy and soon ill. His mistress still keep him stuffing despite consistent warnings from the Doctor; soon Tricki comes to trotting, drooping and panting for breath. Finally he had to be sent to hospital for recovery. Only discipline on eating and fun play cure him.

Question 5.
Why is Mrs Pumphrey worried about Tricki?
Answer:
Mrs Pumphrey is worried and distraught because Tricki would not eat anything. He is not even ready to eat his favourite dishes. Tricki has bouts of vomiting and spends all his time lying on the rug and panting. Tricki does not even want to go for walks or do anything.

Question 6.
What does she do to help him? Is she wise in this?
Answer:
She calls the doctor to help Tricki. Yes, her decision is wise. The doctor suggests that Tricki should be hospitalized. She gets upset and wails, but lets the dog go with the doctor.

Question 7.
What does ‘I’ refer to in this story?
Answer:
In this story, T refers to the veterinary surgeon, Mr Herriot.

Question 8.
Is the narrator as rich as Tricki’s mistress?
Answer:
Though not clearly stated, there are instances in the story which suggest that the narrator is not as rich as Tricki’s mistress, Mrs Pumphrey. The narrator is able to provide Tricki with a warm loose box as a bed whereas at Mrs Pumphrey’s house, Tricki has a day bed, a night bed, cushions, toys, rubber rings, a breakfast bowl, a lunch bowl, a supper bowl, a whole wardrobe of tweed coats and perhaps many more things. When he arrives to take the dog with him, Mrs Pumphrey has her entire staff at her disposal to transfer all of Tricki’s belongings to the doctor’s car.

Secondly, on hearing from the doctor about Tricki’s gradual recovery, Mrs Pumphrey sends along two dozen eggs at a time, along with bottles of wine and brandy—all in order to help in Tricki’s speedy recovery. Finally, when she calls upon the narrator to take her recovered dog back home, she comes in a chauffeur-driven “thirty feet of gleaming black metal” (an obvious reference to a limousine). All these instances point to the fact that Mrs Pumphrey lived a luxurious life.

Question 9.
How does the doctor treat the dog?
Answer:
The doctor knew that Tricki was not ill but just overweight qnd restless due to Mrs Pumphrey’s overindulgence in taking his care. So he decided not to give any food to Tricki, but plenty of water for two days. Slowly, the dog started showing interest in hi§-surroundings and began mixing with the other dogs at the surgery. On the third day, the doctor saw Tricki licking the empty supper bowls of the other dogs.

Next day, a separate bowl was kept for him and the doctor was pleased to note that Tricki had run to eat its food with enthusiasm. From that day onwards, his progress was rapid. He did not require any medical treatment and recovered quite well at the end.

Question 10.
Why is the doctor tempted to keep Tricki as a permanent guest?
Answer:
Mrs Pumphrey has started bringing around eggs to build Tricki’s strength. Later, even bottles of wine and brandy began to arrive. The narrator and his partners started enjoying the eggs, wine and brandy meant for Tricki. According to the narrator, those were the days of deep content for him and his staff¬starting with an extra egg in the morning, then the midday wine, and finally finishing off the day with brandy. This is the reason why the narrator is tempted to keep Tricki on as a permanent guest.

Question 11.
Why does Mrs Pumphrey think the dog’s recovery is “a triumph of surgery”?
Answer:
Mrs Pumphrey thinks that the dog’s recovery is “a triumph of surgery” because in two weeks, Tricki had recovered completely and had been transformed into a hard-muscled animal. When Tricki saw her, he leaped into her lap and licked her face. She was so excited that tears started rolling out of her eyes. She declared Tricki’s recovery as a triumph of surgery to express her happiness and gratitude towards the doctor.

Question 12.
What kind of a person do you think the narrator, a veterinary surgeon, is? Would you say he is tactful as well as full of common sense?
Answer:
I think the narrator, a veterinary surgeon, seems to be a practical and tactful person. He knows how to deal with people. He adjusts himself well to the circumstances. He immediately understands Tricki’s problem, Tricki doesn’t suffer from any sort of illness. The main cause of his illness is overfeeding. He takes the dog to his surgery. There the doctor keeps him on water diet and makes him physically active and treats without any medicine. The dog gets well under his supervision and natural environment of surgery.

Question 13.
Do you think Tricki was happy to go home? What do you think will happen now?
Answer:
Yes, Tricki was very happy to go home. When the dog was brought into the surgery, he was ill. But in spite of that the dog got cured in two days without any medication. The doctor provided proper diet to Tricki and regular exercise also helped a lot in his speedy recovery. The dog regained his best health and was no longer restless.
Now, I think Mrs Pumphrey may again go back to her old ways of treating Tricki with love and care or learning a lesson from what she experienced, she may mend her ways and make him an agile and healthier dog.

Question 14.
Do you think this is a real-life episode, or mere fiction? Or is it a mixture of both?
Answer:
This story could be a mixture of both: real life episode and a mere fiction. Mrs Pumphrey is a rich lady and has a pet dog. It is because of her overindulgence that she overfeeds her dog which results in his being overweight and restless. Although her intention was not wrong but excess of everything is bad. This episode can be treated as a fiction for those who do not take things seriously. At the same time it can be called a real life episode for the people who take excessive care of their children and thus spoil their habits.

Question 15.
This episode describes the silly behaviour of a rich woman who is foolishly indulgent, perhaps because she is lonely. Do you think such people are merely silly, or can their action cause harm to others?
Answer:
These sort of people have enough disposable money but are ignorant about results of their actions. They show their excessive love and affection without knowing its consequences to others. Undoubtedly, their intentions are good and they don’t have any sort of ill-will but these actions do more harm than good to the object of affection.

Question 16.
Do you think there are also parents like Mrs Pumphrey?
Answer:
Yes, there are parents who are too much possessive about their kids. Their sense of overindulgence can go either way. There are examples of parents spoiling their children by protecting them in each and every way, thus creating hardships for them later in their life. Also there are examples of parents who are strict and want their child to be disciplined and so unnecessarily put pressure on them to study hard and always follow a standard behavioural pattern.

Question 17.
What would you have done if you were
(i) A member of the staff in Mrs Pumphrey’s household.
(ii) A neighbour? What would your life have been like, in general?
Answer:
(i) If I were a member of the staff in Mrs Pumphrey’s household, my life would have been miserable. But I would have had no option but to follow her orders as for Mrs Pumphrey, her dog was
everything. She loved her dog more than anything in the world. She always overfed him. So I would spend most of my time in feeding Tricki.
I would have helped Tricki by taking him out for a stroll so that he could burn his extra fat.

(ii) If I were her neighbour, I would advise her and tell how her excess love and silly behaviour were doing more harm than good to Tricki. I know she would not listen to me. She would tell me more about her loveliness and attachment to Tricki. I would have no option but to listen to her silly talk.

Question 18.
What would you have done if you were in the narrator’s place?
Answer:
If I were in the narrator’s place, I would have acted the same way. I knew the root of the problem was – her excess attachment to Tricki. She made him sick by overfeeding. Her silly behaviour was causing him more harm than good. I would have kept Tricki away from her for some more time. As a doctor I would have prescribed a strict diet chart. I would ensure follow up and would not hesitate in scolding Mrs Puthphrey for her silly behaviour.

Here we are providing From the Diary of Anne Frank Extra Questions and Answers for Class 10 English, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

From the Diary of Anne Frank Extra Questions and Answers for Class 10 English

Friday, June 12,1942 – Wednesday, June 24,1942

Question 1.
Anne began her diary with the line “I hope I will be able to confide everything to you, as I have never been able to confide in anyone.” What did she mean?
Answer:
Anne Frank, a 13-year-old girl living in Amsterdam, received a diary as a present on her thirteenth birthday. This was the first line she wrote in her diary. Anne admitted that she had loving parents and a 16-year-old sister. In addition, there were about 30 people she could call friends. She had a number of admirers too who were enamoured by her. Anne had a loving family and a good home. However, she lacked that one true friend in whom she could confide her innermost thoughts and secrets. Anne felt that “Paper has more patience than people” and hoped that the diary, would be her one true friend who will not judge her.

Question 2.
How did Anne spend her birthday?
Answer:
On her birthday, 12 June, Anne woke up at six o’clock. She was quite excited about her birthday and curious about the many presents she would receive. She controlled her curiosity until quarter to seven. When she couldn’t wait any longer, she went to the dining room, and a little after seven, she opened her presents with her parents. Then she went to school with her friend Hanneli.

During recess, she distributed home-baked cookies to her classmates. After school, she went to the gym where her friends asked her to choose the game they would play. Anne chose volleyball and played with her friends. Afterwards her classmates danced around Anne in a circle and sang ‘Happy Birthday.’ Anne returned home at five with three of her friends – Use Wagner, Hanneli Goslar and Jacqueline van Maarsen. Her fourth friend, Sanne Ledermann was already there. They all gave her gifts.

Question 3.
Briefly describe Anne Frank’s classmates.
Answer:
There were 12 girls in Anne’s class including her. Betty Bloemendaal was quiet, not very smart but hard¬working. Jacqueline van Maarsen believed she was Anne’s best friend, but Anne disagreed. DQ was nervous and forgetful and always got extra homework as punishment. GQ was the prettiest girl in class but not good at studies. ES was very talkative and kept touching the listener’s hair or fiddling with her buttons. ES and Anne did not like each other much. Henny Mets was a girl of cheerful disposition, but she had a loud voice and a childish manner.

Henny was dirty and vulgar because of her friend, Beppy, who Anne thought, was a bad influence. JR, who belonged to a rich family, was a detestable, sneaky, stuck-up, two-faced gossip and a terrible show-off. J and Anne did not like each other either. Ilse Wagner was a nice and cheerful girl, but she was extremely fussy and grumbled a lot. She was very smart, but lazy. Hanneli Goslar was called Lies at school. Though usually shy and reserved around other people, she shared everything with her mother. She was outspoken, therefore Anne appreciated her a great deal. Nannie van Praag-Sigaar was small, funny and sensible. Anne liked Eefje de Jong who was helpful to her, and very lady-like.

There were 17 boys in Anne’s class whom she held in poor regard. Harry Schaap and Werner Joseph were decent boys. Though Maurice Coster and Rob Cohen were among Anne’s many admirers, Anne found Maurice irritating and Rob an unbearable, hypocritical liar with an awfully high opinion of himself. Emiel Bonewit was a bore while Max van de Velde, though a farm boy from Medemblik, was worthy and outstanding. Sallie Springer, Jopie de Beer, Leo Blom and Herman Koopman had filthy minds. Albert de Mesquita was really smart and had skipped a grade but Leo Slager was not as smart. Ru Stoppelmon was short and goofy, CN did whatever he was not supposed to and Jacques Kocemoot was really funny. Sam Salomon and Appie Riem were real brats.

Question 4.
Why had Anne’s family shifted from Frankfurt to Amsterdam?
Answer:
Anne’s family shifted from Frankfurt to Amsterdam to escape the Nazis who considered Jews as inferior. Hitler and his Nazi party rose to power by suppressing their adversaries. They assumed total control of Germany and set up a totalitarian regime where Jews were persecuted. False arrests, tortures, illegal imprisonments and even murders were commonplace.

Hitler created concentration camps to house Jews where hundreds were exterminated through starvation, sickness, beatings, firing squads and gas chambers. Those who were not killed, even the children, were forced into hard labour. The women were often sexually abused. By the time Anne’s family left Germany to live in Holland in 1933, the Nazi persecution of the Jews had already begun and Hitler had started to re-arm Germany Afor a future war.

Question 5.
What persecution did the Jews face in Holland during the war?
Answer:
In the diary entry dated 20 June 1942, Anne describes how the conditions for Jewish people were very difficult. With remarkable detachment and a seeming lack of emotion, she noted the various restrictions imposed on Jews, including the following:

• Jews had to wear a yellow star to distinguish them from others.
• Jews had to hand in their bicycles, which would be given to soldiers and policemen.
• Jews could not travel by train and were forbidden to drive.
• Jews could shop only in Jewish shops and only between 3:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
• Jews had to stay indoors after 8:00 p.m.
• Jews could not visit the theatre, the cinema or sporting events.
• Jews could not visit Christians.
• Jews had to go to Jewish schools.

Question 6.
Anne mentioned some hardships she had to suffer on account of being a Jew. What is her attitude towards the hardships she faces and towards the people who caused these hardships?
Answer:
The Franks had been living in Amsterdam since 1933 and felt the full impact of German aggression in May,
1940 when the German Army invaded Holland. Once the Nazi invasion and occupation of Holland took place, the Nazis began their persecution of Jews and other minorities through discriminatory laws throughout Western Europe.

Anne did not accept the repression but she did not dwell on the reasons why Hitler was persecuting the Jews.
She was grateful that the ferryman at Josef Israelkade let them ride the ferry, and believed that it was not the fault of the Dutch that the Jews were being persecuted. Her omissions and the brisk manner in which she recorded the treatment of Jews in Amsterdam, helped her maintain a semblance of a normal life. She took the hardships in h,er stride and concentrated on her friends, her school and her family.

Question 7.
How did Anne feel about the laws that restricted the Jews’ freedom?
Answer:
After the Germans invaded Holland in 1940, the laws imposed on the Jews in Germany were extended to the Netherlands. Anne believed the laws to be unjust, but she did not completely understand why the Jewish people had been singled out for this discrimination. Anne felt it was unfair that Jews could not use streetcars, had to wear yellow stars and could attend only particular schools. Nonetheless, she was still optimistic about her family’s safety and felt relatively secure about her future. Anne accepted the restrictions as a fact of life in Amsterdam and she was thankful to the Dutch people for their sympathy, especially the ferryman, who let the Jews ride the ferry because they were not allowed to ride streetcars.

Wednesday, July 1,1942- Friday, July 10,1942

Question 1.
Why was Lies’s result not as good as she wanted it to be?
Answer:
Lies’s result was not as good as she wanted it to be as it wasn’t easy for her to study at home. She had a two- year old baby sister whom she was expected to look after. So she found it difficult to do her homework. As a result, even the tutoring she got did not prove to be of much help. Moreover, Lies’s grandparents, who lived next door, ate with them. In addition, there was a hired girl and the always nervous and irritable Mrs Goslar, who was expecting another baby. Despite all the distractions and chaos at her home, Lies managed to pass the exams.

Question 2.
Who was Hello? What role did he play in Anne’s life?
Answer:
Helmuth Silberberg, known to his friends as Hello, was a 16-year-old boy who was close to Anne at the time her family went into hiding, though they had only known each other for about two weeks at that time. Anne met him at her friend Wilma’s place as he was her cousin. Hello’s parents were in Gelsenkirchen in Belgium, but he was living with his grandparents in Amsterdam. He had a girlfriend named Ursula but found her boring. Hello’s grandmother wanted him to go out with Ursula and thought Anne was too young . for him. Hello, on the other hand, felt that he was in love with Anne. However, Anne wrote in her diary that she was “not in love with Hello” and that he was just a friend. Anne also remarked that she really enjoyed Hello’s company.

Question 3.
Why did Otto Frank talk to Anne about the possibility of their going into hiding on the 5th of July?
Answer:
On 5 July 1942, when Otto Frank and Anne were taking a stroll around their neighbourhood square, he began to talk about going into hiding. When Anne asked him why he brought up the matter, he reminded her that for more than a year they had gradually been storing clothes, food and furniture in their hiding place. They did not want to fall into the clutches of the Germans and wished to leave on their own accord. Moreover, by the age of 16, girls were being called up to concentration camps.

Question 4.
Write a brief note on the call-up notice from the SS for Margot.
Answer:
On 5 July 1942 at 3:00 pm, the postman delivered a registered mail for Margot: an official summons by the SS, the elite Nazi guard. She was going to be sent to a Nazi work camp in Germany. This call-up was not . a complete surprise. There had been rumours in the air for weeks and if Margot didn’t register, the whole family would be arrested.

Question 5.
The letter delivered by the postman brought about a change in Anne. Comment.
Answer:
The letter delivered by the postman calling 16-year-old Margot to the work camp brought the Frank family to a critical juncture. This section illustrates the poignant contrast between Anne’s innocence and the gravity of her family’s situation. Prior to the letter Anne focussed on normal concerns such as grades and her • relationships with boys like a typical teenager. However, the letter of the SS trivialized every other subject.

The seriousness of their situation forced Anne to grow up quickly and understand issues that were much bigger than her small social world. Anne quickly abandoned the trappings of her privileged childhood to react in a crisis situation. When Hello visited that day, she did not go down to greet him as her thoughts were fixed on her family’s safety. She also comprehended complicated reasoning about how to evade capture, such as the fact that she should not pack clothes in her bag, because if they were stopped, the clothes would give them away.

Anne leamt some of the hard truths of the adult world. She was horrified that the SS were calling a 16-year-old girl alone. She had to confront the frightening reality that Hitler’s army did not differentiate between men, women and children.

Question 6.
How did the Franks get through their first day in ‘Secret Annex’?
Answer:
On 6 July 1942, the Franks shifted into their hiding place. When they arrived at 263 Prinsengracht, Miep quickly led them into the annex which was crammed with their belongings. Their living room and all the other rooms were full, of the cardboard boxes that had been sent to the office in the last few months. Mrs Frank and Margot were tired and unhappy, so they lay down on their bare mattresses. But Mr Frank and Anne started the cleaning at once. All day long they unpacked boxes, filled cupboards, hammered nails and straightened up the mess, until they fell into their clean beds at night, totally exhausted. They hadn’t eaten a hot meal all day as Mrs Frank and Margot had been too tired and keyed up to eat, and Mr Frank and Anne had been too busy.

Question 7.
Write a brief description of Mr Frank’s office building.
Answer:
Mr Frank’s office building had a large warehouse on the ground floor, which was used as a workroom and storeroom and was divided into several different sections, such as the stockroom and the milling room. Next to the warehouse was another entrance to the office. Just inside the office door was a second door and beyond that, a stairway. At the top of the stairs, on the second floor, was another door, with a frosted window on which the word ‘Office’ was written in black letters. This office was very large and full of light, and Bep, Miep and Mr Kleiman worked there during the day.

There was a small, dark and stuffy back office which was shared by Mr Kugler and Mr van Daan. This could be reached by crossing an alcove or from the hallway through a glass door. The private office, the showpiece of the entire building, was beyond Mr Kugler’s office at the end of the long, narrow hallway. It had elegant mahogany furniture, a linoleum floor covered with throw rugs, a radio and a fancy lamp. Next to it was a spacious kitchen with a hot-water heater and two gas burners, and beside that a bathroom. A wooden staircase led from the second floor hallway to the third floor.

At the top of the stairs was a landing, with doors on either side.; The door on the left went up to the spice . storage area, attic and loft in the front part of the house. A steep flight of stairs ran from the front part of the house to another door opening onto the street. The door to the right of the landing led to ‘Secret Annex’ at the back of the house.

Question 8.
Briefly describe ‘Secret Annex’.
Answer:
From early 1942, Anne’s parents knew that they might have to hide from the Nazis soon. They prepared a secret hiding place for such an eventuality. Their hiding place, which Anne called ‘Secret Annex’ was located in the upper-back portion of Otto Frank’s office at 263 Prinsengracht. To the left, a narrow hallway opened into a room that served as the family’s living room. Next to it was a smaller room, the bedroom and Anne and Margot’s study.

To the right of the stairs was a windowless washroom. One of the doors in the comer led to the toilet and another led to Margot’s and Anne’s room. Up the stairs was a spacious room that contained a stove and a sink. This served as the kitchen and bedroom of Mr and Mrs van Daan, as well as the general living room, dining room and study for all. A tiny side room was Peter van Daan’s bedroom. There was also an attic and a loft similar to the front part of the building.

Saturday, July 11,1942 – Monday, September 21,1942

Question 1.
What contact did the Franks and van Daans have with the outside world?
Answer:
During their time in ‘Secret Annex’, the Franks and the van Daans had very limited contact with the outside world. Their only means were the hidden radio in the private office and their Dutch friends who brought news of the outside world. Broadcasts from England could be heard on the radio and the Franks and the-van Daans heard the radio every evening after 7.30 pm, when the office was closed for the day.

Question 2.
How did the van Daans and the Franks get along? Which of the family members seemed better able to cope with the close quarters? Why?
Answer:
Though the Franks had eagerly awaited the van Daan’s arrival, the Franks and van Daans did not get along well at all afterwards. In the beginning, Anne frequently argued with Mr van Daan, although eventually they got along. Anne and Mrs van Daan argued constantly and their relationship grew progressively worse. Anne also regarded Peter as lazy and stupid. She was frustrated because the van Daans seemed to be of the general opinion that Margot was the better child. Mrs Frank and Mrs van Daan argued over the use of bed linen and crockery. Otto and Margot were the only ones who were mature enough not to get into arguments like the rest of them.

Question 3.
Discuss the relationship Anne shared with her mother and sister.
Answer:
Anne found her own mother and sister difficult to bear for they were always correcting her and telling her to be quiet. She found her mother’s ideas totally opposite to hers. She states, “Margot’s and mummy’s natures are completely strange for me.” Her disagreements with her mother and sister intensified her adolescent rebelliousness. Her emotions were not typical for a teenage girl, especially one confined to a small space with an anxious mother and quibbling sister.

Question 4.
Compare and contrast Anne’s relationship with her mother to that with her father.
Answer:
Anne’s relationship with her mother was not a strong one. She felt that her mother was partial towards Margot whom she never reprimanded. She felt that both her mother and Margot picked on her. Although, she wrote extensively about her feelings towards her mother, she did not describe as many incidents to prove how her mother deserved her criticism. Anne began to argue with her mother more frequently. She found her mother insensitive. She thought that her father was the only one who understood her and she enjoyed spending time with him. Anne really got along better with her father, mostly because he knew how to handle his daughter’s personality better.

Question 5.
Because of their close confinement and constant association with each other, friction among the residents of ‘Secret Annex’ occured frequently. What were some of the clashes?
Answer:
Anne witnessed a terrible quarrel between Mrs and Mr van Daan over a trivial thing. She was shocked by the fight as her parents wouldn’t have dreamt of shouting at each other in that way. Anne also didn’t think very highly of young Peter van Daan, who seemed to be lazy, a hypochondriac and bore. Mrs van Daan was annoyed by Anne’s constant chatter.

The two women, Mrs Frank and Mrs van Daan, fought over everything, from bedsheets to crockery—Mrs van Daan had removed all but three of her sheets from the comjnunal linen closet and Mrs Frank retaliated by doing the same. Mrs van Daan was also angry that her dishes were being used instead of Mrs Frank’s. Anne had broken one of Mrs van Daan’s soup bowls and was reprimanded by her for being careless. Anne also resented Mrs van Daan’s constant criticism of her behaviour.

Friday, September 25,1942 – Friday, October 9,1942

Question 1.
Write a brief note on Anne and Margot’s education before they went into hiding. Did things change after they go into hiding?
Answer:
In February 1934, Edith Frank, Margot and Anne joined their father in Amsterdam, and the two girls were enrolled in school—Margot in a public school and Anne in a Montessori school. Margot demonstrated ability I in arithmetic, and Anne showed aptitude for reading and writing. Due to the implementation of restrictive and
discriminatory laws imposed by the Germans in the Netherlands after the invasion, Margot and Anne were compelled to enroll at the Jewish Lyceum. Margot did really well. Anne, on the other hand, turned out to be an average student. When they shifted into the hiding place, Otto Frank started teaching Anne in September. Anne worked on her French and learned her verbs. She also worked with her father on his family tree. Later (in October) Bep wrote for a correspondence course in shorthand for Margot, Peter and Anne. Anne had trouble with mathematics, but she loved to read. Her passion was mythology.

Question 2.
Anne’s father said to Mrs van Daan, “As far as the vegetables are concerned, all I have to-say is look who’s calling the kettle black.” Why did he say this?
Answer:
One evening, at dinner, Anne took a small helping of vegetables that she loathed, and took potatoes instead. Mrs van Daan admonished her and insisted she eat vegetables, but Anne declined. Mr frank intervened and upheld Anne’s right to refuse a dish she didn’t like. That angered Mrs van Daan who said Anne was terribly spoiled. When she had finished her tirade, Mr Frank replied that in his opinion Anne was very well brought up as she did not answer back. He then reminded Mrs van Daan that she did not eat beans or any kind of cabbage in the evening because they gave her ‘gas’. So he said, “As far as vegetables are concerned, all I have to say is look who’s calling the kettle black.”

Question 3.
Why did Mrs Frank and Mrs van Daan quarrel?
Answer:
Mrs van Daan was a troublemaker who fought over petty matters. She was piqued that her dinner service— and not that of the Franks’, was put into communal use. Mrs Van Daan had removed three of her sheets from the collective linen cupboard. She continually scolded Anne for her chatter, she also shirked household chores. Her parents always defended Anne fiercely whenever Mrs van Daan criticised Anne’s upbringing. Anne’s mother took this as a criticism of her child rearing skills. This also caused a number of quarrels between the two women.

Question 4.
Anne says “Who would have guessed three months ago that quicksilver Anne would have to sit so quietly for hours on end, and what’s more, that she could?” Elaborate.
Answer:
Anne and her family went into hiding in ‘Secret Annex’ at the back of Mr Frank’s office when Margot received a letter from the SS asking her to report to the work camp. The Franks and the van Daans had to take considerable precautions not to be seen or be heard by anyone other than their ‘protectors’—namely, the workers in the office downstairs. Their daily lives changed drastically. No one in the annex was allowed to walk between nine in the morning and seven in the evening. Once, when the plumber was at work downstairs, they could not run water during the day, nor could they use the bathroom. Once, when the doorbell rang at eight o’clock, all they could think of was that someone was coming to get them.

They lived in constant fear of exposure, as Anne said, like “baby mice.” In one of her diary entries, Anne said that she never would have guessed that, with her impatient nature, she would be able to be quiet for long periods of time. Although, with everyone’s life in the balance, Anne was able to control her edginess until the working hours were over. Life, as they knew it, had changed forever.

Question 5.
Write a brief note on the condition of Jews in the Nazi regime.
Answer:
The condition of Jews under the Nazi regime was miserable. The Gestapo was taking away Jews in droves to the labour camps. Miep recounted that the people got almost nothing to eat, much less to drink, as water was available only one hour a day, and there was only one toilet Said sink for several thousand people. Men and women slept in the same room, and women and children often had to have their heads shaved. Escape was almost impossible. The Jews were also being gassed. The Gestapo even punished by executing leading citizens and innocent people, if they couldn’t find the saboteurs.

Question 6.
The war caused Anne to struggle with her identity as both a German and a Jew. Comment.
Answer:
The war caused Anne to struggle with her identity as both a German and a Jew. Anne’s diary demonstrates the impact the Holocaust had on a single girl, which personalises this sprawling historical horror. Anne became preoccupied with questions about who she was and how her once innocent perspective changed considerably. She initially identified herself with the Germans and said that they were “Fine specimens of humanity…”

Although, Anne lived in Holland since she was four and felt a greater connection with the Dutch, she wrestled with the fact of her German background. However, she immediately refuted her own statement, writing “No, that’s not true, Hitler took away our nationality long ago.” Anne’s words demonstrated her confusion and pain at being persecuted by fellow Germans. She was horrified that the SS would call up Margot alone—a 16-year-old girl.

Wednesday, October 14,1942 – Friday, November 20,1942

Question 1.
Write a brief note on the relationship between Margot and Anne.
Answer:
Margot Frank, Anne’s older sister, was 16 at the onset of the story and 18 by the end. At least through Anne’s eyes, Margot was smarter, quieter, prettier and more mature than Anne. The two sisters didn’t often get along, were not close friends and didn’t confide in each other much. The sisters got on each other’s nerves and Anne appears to be jealous of Margot, because of the special attention and privileges the latter received from their father and the relationship she had with their mother. However, they did share sisterly moments. They talked about tjie future, and Anne asked Margot what she wanted to be when she was older, though Margot remained mysterious about her plans.

Question 2.
What happened the day a worker came to fill the fire extinguishers?
Answer:
Nobody had warned the Franks or van Daans that somebody was coming to refill the five fire extinguishers in the building. As a result, they did not bother to be quiet until Anne heard hammering on the landing across from the bookcase. Assuming it was the carpenter, Anne warned Bep who was eating lunch that she could not go back downstairs. After working for a while, the workman banged on their door.

Sounds of knocking, pulling, pushing and jerking the bookcase terrified the unsuspecting, frightened little group, and they feared that the workman may have heard something and wanted to check out this mysterious-looking bookcase. Finally, they heard a knock and feared that their hiding place was discovered. But it was just Mr Kleiman. He . said, “Open up, it’s me.” After the man had left, Mr Kleiman had come to get Bep, but had trouble opening the bookcase. It was he who had made those noises that scared them.

Question 3.
Why do you think did the Jewish occupants of the annex not trust the Jewish chemist?
Answer:
The annex’s residents feared the coming of a Jewish chemist in the building as there were people who were complicit with the Nazis, and some of them were Jewish. By this point in time the Germans were rounding up Jews all over Holland. If the Jewish chemist discovered the annex, he could turn them in to the Nazis in return for his own safety. The combination of not being able to trust her own nation and not being able to trust a man of her own religion must have been confusing and embittering for Anne. She truly belonged to no society that she could name. The oppression and psychological torture of the war was visible on all.

Question 4.
How did Anne react to being confined in the annex?
Answer:
At first, the process of settling in and arranging a daily routine took up most of Anne’s time and energy. The strange situation struck Anne as “more like being on vacation in a very peculiar boarding house” than like being in hiding. Fear, of course, was an ever-present reality, and Anne wrote, “It is the silence that frightens me so in the evenings and at night… I can’t tell you how oppressive it is never to be able to go outdoors.” Once the van Daan’s arrived, even trivial matters were enough to result in ‘squabbles.’ As they were confined within a small space, they got on one another’s nerves so much more easily and for non-issues.

Gradually, for Anne, the early excitement of being in hiding, gave way to frustration at being trapped in such close quarters with the van Daans and her own family. Mr Dussel’s arrival was initially exciting for Anne because it brought a change. However, this sense of excitement soured when Mr Dussel told Anne about the persecution of Jews in the outside world. Anne began to express her inability to understand the injustice of persecution and genocide.

Question 5.
How did Mr Dussel reach ‘Secret Annex’?
Answer:
Everything had gone smoothly. Miep had told Mr Dussel to be at a certain place in front of the post office at 11 am, when a man would meet him, and he was at the appointed place at the appointed time. Mr Kleiman went up to him, announced that the man he was expecting to meet was unable to come and asked him to drop by the office to see Miep. Mr Kleiman took a streetcar back to the office while Mr Dussel followed on foot.

Miep asked him to remove his coat, so the yellow star couldn’t be seen, and brought him to the private office, where Mr Kleiman kept him occupied until the cleaning lady had gone. On the pretext that the private office was needed for something else, Miep took Mr Dussel upstairs, opened the bookcase, and took Mr Dussel inside the annex.

Question 6.
The Franks’ ability to prepare the hidden house and survive living there for two years would have been impossible were it not for a group of protectors. Who were the ‘protectors’? Why did they help those in hiding?
Answer:
Mr Kugler—When Jews were no longer allowed to own a business, he assumed management of Mr Frank’s ‘ and Mr Van Daan’s business. He helped them prepare ‘Secret Annex’ and later provided material supplies as well as psychological support. All of this involved extreme risk to him even though he was not a Jew. Mr Kugler is also referred to as Mr Kraler.

Mr Kleiman—He, along with Mr Kraler, had taken over the running of the business. Like Kraler, he too was a Dutch Gentile. He was especially helpful in arranging the logistics of obtaining food. Johannes Kleiman was arrested in 1944 but released because of poor health. He remained in Amsterdam until his death in 1959. Mr Kleiman is also referred to as Mr Koophuis.

Meip—Meip was a young woman who worked in the office of the business. She too helped to secure food and was particularly good at raising the spirits of those in the annex. Her husband’s name was Jan.

Elli—Elli was another young office worker who helped with collecting food. Like Meip, she also helped keep spirits up.

Bep Voskuijl—A worker in Otto Frank’s office, Elizabeth (Bep) Voskuijl, helped the family by serving as a liaison with the outside world. She, like Miep, at times stayed with the family to raise their spirits.

Mr Voskuijl—Bep’s father was very good with woodwork. He made the bookcase that hid the entrance to the annex.
The ‘protectors’ helped the Franks because they were good people and they loved the family. If caught, these people would have been shot as the Germans would have deemed them traitors. Though they feared the Germans, these courageous people did the right thing out of love and humanity.

Monday, December 7,1942 – Saturday, February 27,1943

Question 1.
What was Mr vaii Daan’s previous occupation? How did he make use of it now?
Answer:
Mr van Daan used to be in the meat, sausage and spice business. He proved his usefulness when they got a lot of meat and he turned it into sausages, in order to preserve them for when times got harder. Anne described the lengthy, prudent process whereby the sausages were prepared by him.

Question 2.
What was Anne Frank’s relationship with Mr Dussel?
Answer:
Mr Dussel was a dentist and an acquaintance of the Franks who hid with them in the annex. At first Anne was happy to have Mr Dussel in the annex and found him to be a very nice man. She was not exactly delighted at having to share her room with a stranger, but she was willing to adjust as it meant saving a life.

Anne had heard Mr Dussel got along very well with children, but sadly for her, he turned out to be an old-fashioned disciplinarian and constantly preached long sermons on manners. Anne patiently explained all the rules and timing of the office and annex to Mr Dussel, but he was slow to catch on. He asked everything twice but still couldn’t remember anything that was told to him.

As time passed Anne found Mr Dussel particularly difficult to deal with as she suffered the brunt of his odd personal hygiene habits, tedious lectures and controlling tendencies. He always told her that she made “too much” noise, and kept shushing her even when she turned in her bed at night. He was quite exasperating and egotistical. On Sundays, he would switch on the light at the crack of dawn to exercise for ten minutes. He would then loudly bump into all of the furniture while getting dressed.

Question 3.
Which two festivals did the group celebrate in December in the annex?
Answer:
The group celebrated the Jewish festival Hanukkah and St Nicholas Day. Hanukkah commemorates the re-dedication of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem following the Jewish victory over the Syrian-Greeks in 165 BCE. Saint Nicholas Day celebrates the life of Saint Nicholas of Myra, a fourth-century bishop best known today as the real-life model for Santa Claus. In 1942, Hanukkah and St Nicholas Day nearly coincided—they were only one day apart. On Hanukkah, the group exchanged a few small gifts, lit candles for only 10 minutes and sang the Hanukkah song.

St Nicholas Day on Saturday was more exciting as it was the first time the Franks, Mr Dussel and the van Daans celebrated this festival. Bep and Miep brought a large basket with little gifts for everyone, including an appropriate verse. Anne received a Kewpie doll, Mr Frank got bookends, Mr van Daan an ashtray and Mr. Dussel a photo frame.

Question 4.
What did Anne witness through the window in the front office?
Answer:
Ope Sunday, Anne peered out through a chink in the curtain in the front office. The people passing all walked fast as if they were in a hurry. Those on bicycles whizzed by so fast that Anne couldn’t even make out who was on the bike. The children were dirty with runny noses. She also saw cars, boats and rain. She could see a houseboat across from the office. A captain lived there with his wife and children. He had a small yapping . dog. When it rained, most of the people were hidden under their umbrellas.

Question 5.
Were conditions better as the year 1943 began?
Answer:
The conditions deteriorated. Anne and the others heard sounds of gunfire. At any time of night and day, poor helpless people Were being dragged out of their homes. Families were tom apart—men, women and children were separated. Children returned home from school to find that their parents had disappeared. Women returned from shopping and found their houses sealed, their families gone.

Dutch young men were sent to fight at the front. The children in that neighbourhood wore thin shirts and wooden shoes. They had no coats, no caps, no stockings and no one to help them. Things had become so bad in Holland that hordes of hungry children stopped passersby in the streets to beg for a piece of bread.

Thursday, March 4,1943 – Tuesday, June 13,1943

Question 1.
In what ways had Anne changed over the last few months that she had been in the annex?
Answer:
When they had come to the annex, Anne had been a high-spirited teenager. Although there were many rules and restrictions, she still managed to have fun. She was a typical teenager, struggling to find her own identity. She was somewhat jealous of Margot, her older sister by three years, for most people considered Margot to be more beautiful, talented and intelligent than her. She also resented her overly protective and critical mother. Anne longed to be independent, to do well in. school, to enjoy life and to have friends.

After six months in hiding, Anne changed considerably. While she continued to struggle with the adult residents of the annex, her responses to the arguments took on a different tone. She no longer attempted to excuse her own behaviour or complain about how unfairly she was treated. Instead, she drew parallels between her behaviour and the behaviour of the adults in the annex, and realised what was unfair was to be compared to Margot as they were very different people. She also leamt how to bottle her rage and expressed anger only on the most important occasions. These were all indications that Anne was now more becoming more mature.

Question 2.
What were the shortages that the family was dealing with? How did they plan to deal with them?
Answer:
The family was dealing with various shortages.There were eight inmates in the annex but they had been able to procure only four ration cards. Bread and butter were also in short supply. Their evening serving of bread had been cancelled. They could have bought more food if they had had enough money as the black market was doing a booming business. They had been eating the beans that they had stored earlier, every day. They decided to start eating the canned food that they had stored in th§ attic. Anne outgrew her shoes. They bought a pair of straw thongs for her for 6.50 guilders but they were worn down to the soles within a week so they had to ask Miep to buy something for her from the black market.

Question 3.
What rule did Mr Dussel break? What warning did Mr Frank give?
Answer:
Mr Dussel, the elderly dentist, joined the group in hiding in November 1942. Mr Dussel was terribly careless and disobeyed the rules of the house by writing to his wife, Charlotte who wasn’t in hiding. Not only did he write letters to his wife, he also carried on correspondence with various other people. Maintaining contact with the outside world was dangerous. He could reveal his hiding place to the people he corresponded with. That would endanger not just him, but would jeopardise the safety of the others too. Mr Frank strictly forbade him to write any more letters and Mr Dussel promised not to write to anyone anymore.

Question 4.
Describe the night Peter heard a burglar in the office.
Answer:
On the night of 25 March, 1942, Peter told Mr Frank that there was a burglar in the office. Peter had heard “someone fiddling with the door.” Mr Frank and Peter went downstairs to investigate and returned looking very upset. They heard a noise as if two doors had been slammed shut inside the house. Then all the inmates of the annex gathered in the van Daans’ room and discussed their suspicions.

Once again they waited and waited, but heard nothing. Finally they came to the conclusion that the burglars had run off when they heard footsteps in an otherwise quiet building. In fact, the more they thought about it, the less likely it seemed that a burglar would force open a door so early in the evening. It also occured to them that the warehouse manager at the Keg Company next door might still have been at work, and the sounds he made-were mistaken for noises made by a burglar. It may have been their imagination playing tricks. However, none of them got much sleep that night. In the morning, the men went downstairs to check and it turned out they were quite safe. ‘

Question 5.
What were the main political happenings in early 1943?
Answer:
The year 1943 witnessed major political events. The allied invasion was expected any day now. Churchill had pneunjonia, but was gradually recovering. Gandhi, the champion of Indian freedom, was on one of his hunger strikes. Jews were being taken from their homes and separated from their families, and non- Jewish children were wandering the streets in hunger. Both Christians and Jews desperately wanted the war to end.

On 10 March, 1943, Anne mentioned the bombing of Amsterdam by the planes of the Allies and the firing of the anti-aircraft guns, which disturbed their sleep almost every night. They were so loud and close that Anne often crawled into bed with her father.

The news from the outside world raised and then dashed the hopes of the group. On 18 March, 1943, Anne wrote excitedly that Turkey had entered the war, but the next day, it was announced that they hadn’t. Anne also described a visit made by Hitler to wounded German soldiers, a visit which was broadcast over the radio.

Question 6.
What were the opinions held by the members of the annex regarding the war?
Answer:
Mr van Daan thought the war would not end until the end of 1943.
Mrs van Daan wanted to get false ID papers made regardless of the expense. She was tired of the war and wanted to get out of Holland and Hitler’s regime. She vacillated between converting into a Christian and remaining a Jew.
Mr Frank was optimistic about the outcome of the war and expected the Allies to liberate them any day. Mr Dussel had no firm opinions and made up everything as he spoke. However, he defended his views with determination. Anne considered the war pointless and was horrified by the cruelty and unfairness of it.

Question 7.
On 1 May, 1943, Anne’s entry took stock of their situation. Had it improved?
Answer:
On 1 May, 1943, Anne commented that the only thing that had gotten better was the weather, otherwise their situation was worsening. Their food was inadequate and verged on being inedible. Breakfast was dry bread and coffee. Dinner was spinach or lettuce and small potatoes that were nearly rotten. Their clothes were frayed, not very clean, and way too small for both Anne and Margot.

All their resources were getting depleted. The comfortable life which they had lived before apd even to some extent, in the annex, had declined rapidly. Their former life contrasted starkly with the privations which they suffered now, ranging from a lack of food, to the inability to change their sheets, or even to renew their diminishing stock of underwear. The nightly air raids continued and fear remained an ever-present reality.

Question 8.
How was Anne’s fourteenth birthday celebrated?
Answer:
Anne’s fourteenth birthday fell on 12 June, 1943; the festivities were greatly subdued in comparison to the previous year. Nonetheless, she was happy as she was ‘spoiled’ with sweets. A small celebration was held in honour of her birthday. She received several small gifts, including some new books. Her father also wrote a poem for her, a German tradition that he honoured. It was a special day for Anne and it brightened her spirits temporarily. Anne was particularly happy with the big book on her favourite subject, Greek and Roman mythology.

Tuesday, June 15,1943 – Tuesday, August 3,1943

Question 1.
As their first year in hiding drew to a close, two more disasters struck the group in the annex. Describe them.
Answer:
Mr Voskuijl was supposed to have had an ulcer operation, but he was diagnosed with cancer which was too advanced to be cured, and he did not have long to live. He was one of the group’s best helpers and security advisors. The second blow was that they had to turn in their big radio as the Nazis had imposed new regulations which prohibited the possession of radio sets with stations other than those of the Nazis. The little group in ‘Secret Annex’ had drawn courage from the news they heard on the BBC regarding the victories of the Allies. MrKleiman, though, promised to provide them with a substitute radio soon.

Question 2.
July of 1943 brought Anne and her 54-year-old roommate into a confrontation. What was the source of this row?
Answer:
Wanting to work a little longer, Anne, with her father’s permission asked her roommate, Mr Dussel whether he would allow her to use the work table in their room for an extra hour-and-a-half twice a week, from four to five-thirty in the afternoons while he took a nap, but he refused. Dussel absolutely refused her request without giving any explanation. Anne held her temper in check and asked him to reconsider, but he just insulted her and walked out of the room.

Eventually, she requested her father to intervene on her behalf. Mr Frank supported Anne and asked Mr Dussel to reconsider and Mr Dussel finally gave in. Mr Dussel didn’t speak to Anne for two days and his behaviour was “frightfully childish.” She commented, “Anyone who’s so petty and pedantic at the age of 54 was bom that way and is never going to change.”

Question 3.
Write a brief account of the burglary in the office.
Answer:
On 16 July, burglars broke into the office for real. Peter discovered the theft when he went down to the warehouse next morning. He noticed at once that both the warehouse doors and the street doors were open. He informed Mr Frank, who at once locked the doors and they both went back upstairs.

They had to remain very quiet and not use any water till eleven-thirty, when Mr Kleiman came upstairs. He informed them that the burglars had forced the outside door and the warehouse door with a crowbar. They had stolen two cashboxes containing 40 guilders, blank cheque books and, and all their ration coupons for sugar, which was a big blow for the group in hiding.

Question 4.
How was the war progressing in the summer of 1943?
Answer:
By the third year of the war, everyone in the fighting countries was experiencing shortages and hardships of all kinds. The Allied air raids were increasing in intensity. At night, the residents cowered from the gunfire. They could not light candles or turn on the light. Anne crept into her father’s bed for comfort many times. She wrote, “We don’t have a single quiet night. I’ve got dark rings under my eyes from lack of sleep.” Italy had surrendered. In Holland, the strikes that Anne mentioned were a sure sign that morale was low among the Dutch. The air raids had increased, sometimes as many as two a day. The happiest war news was that Mussolini had ‘resigned’ and the Fascist party has been outlawed in Italy.

Hitler’s ‘guns, not butter’ campaign ensured that food and other necessities were difficult to obtain. There were food shortages, which lead to rationing at the table. Anne commented on the pefrple in the neighbourhood she lived in—the children, she said, were “real slum kids.” She fretted over how “terrible” it was outside—Jews, Gentiles,
women, men—everyone, was miserably waiting for the end.

Question 5.
Mr Dussel and Mrs van Daan were particularly troublesome to Anne. Elaborate.
Answer:
Anne found Mr Dussel particularly difficult to deal with because he shared a room with her, and she suffered the brunt of his odd personal hygiene habits, pedantic lectures and controlling tendencies. He always told her that she made “too much” noise, and kept shushing her even if she turned in her bed at night. He was quite exasperating and egotistical. On Sundays, he would switch on the light at the crack of dawn to exercise for 10 minutes.

He would then loudly bump into all of the furniture while getting dressed. Wanting to work longer hours, Anne asked him if she could use the work table in their room for an extra hour-and-a-half twice a week, but he categorically refused without any explanation. When she asked him to reconsider, he launched a melodramatic, false and insulting tirade against her. Eventually, he gave in at her father’s intervention.

Another time, Anne’s criticism of the characterisation of a book he had recommended led to another attack on . her upbringing and ideas by him and Mrs van Daan.Mrs van Daan and Anne did not get along at all. Mrs van Daan perpetually called Anne spoilt, immodest and tried to force her to eat more vegetables. Once, after a ‘squabble’, Mrs van Daan told Anne’s father, “I wouldn’t put up with it if Anne were my daughter.”

According to Anne, these always seemed to be Mrs van Daan’s first and last words, “if Anne were my daughter.” Understandably Anne wrote in her diary, “Thank heavens I’m not!” Fed up of the constant bickering and insults, Anne frequently mentioned in her diary about how spoiled and frivolous Mrs van Daan was.

Wednesday, August 4,1943 – Thursday, November 11,1943

Question 1.
What were the dangers that the two families faced while in hiding?
Answer:
Anne Frank and her family, along with the van Daans, went into hiding to escape the Nazis. In her diary, Anne listed the dangers the family faced while in hiding. These included air raids and danger of bombings or fire, food shortages, break-ins and the perpetual fear of being discovered. Then an added worry had been that Mr van Maaren, the stockroom manager was not trustworthy, and would turn them in if he found out about the hiding place.

Amsterdam was bombed by the Allies. Despite the falling bombs, they could not leave their hiding place as being seen on the streets would have been just as dangerous as getting caught in an air raid. Food was rationed in Amsterdam and has to be obtained in the black market. Since they were in hiding and did not have ration books, they had to pay a lot more.

Miep Gies, who procured rations for them had to get extra food ration stamps, which at times aroused suspicions. Burglars were also a danger to the group in hiding. Some burglars had broken in once and stolen some of their supplies. Once they believed they heard one in the attic and were afraid that the burglar had heard them and would report them to the Nazis.

Question 2.
What medication did Anne take while in hiding? Why?
Answer:
Anne had resorted to taking Valerian as by the middle of 1943, she was very depressed. Her moods darkened as her frustration and anger increased. She had-plenty of time to contemplate the war and its outcome and her anxiety grew with each diary entry. Her tone was less cheerful and humorous, despite occasional injections of satire or sarcasm. Anne was just a young girl and could no longer pretend to be strong. Anne gave a cynical description of her discovery that hypocrisy rather than honesty was the only way to get along with people.

She had also lost trust in her parents and had to rely more on her own resourcefulness. She took the Valerian drops to fight the anxiety and depression, but that did not prevent her from being even more miserable the next day. She realised that a good hearty laugh would help better than ten Valerian drops, but being in hiding made them forget how to laugh. It had been so long that she had laughed, she sometimes feared her face was going to sag with sorrow and her mouth was going to permanently droop at the comers.

Question 3.
On 29 September, 1943 Mrs van Daan celebrated her second birthday in hiding. How was this celebration different from the first one?
Answer:
The Franks went into hiding on 9 July 1942 and the van Daans on 13 July. Mrs van Daan had celebrated her first birthday in hiding on 29 September, 1942. Though they did not have a large celebration, she was showered with flowers, simple gifts and good food. Mr van Daan gave her red carnations, which were a family tradition.

However, by her second birthday, the two families, and Mr Dussel had been in hiding for more than a year. Their resources were vastly depleted. Also, a year in hiding had taken its toll emotionally. This birthday celebration was “really nothing very exciting.” Mrs van Daan just received some food rations one ration stamp each for cheese, meat and bread, and ajar of jam from the Frank family, and flowers and food from her husband, Mr Dussel and the office staff.

Question 4.
Anne wrote, “My mind boggles at the profanity this honourable house has had to endure in the past month.” Comment.
Answer:
In the beginning, the atmosphere in the ,annex had been very pleasant, but conflicts arose soon. Conflicts naturally arise whenever people with conflicting natures are forced to live in close confines, but it was inevitable in their circumstances as these eight people lived in extremely cramped quarters without any privacy or peace. Added to that was the fact that they were imprisoned in the annex and could not ever step outside it.

They lived in continual fear of being discovered. Food was in short supply and they were running out of money. It was tough on everyone, and the tension increasingly erupted into arguments. Anne had constant arguments with her mother and Mrs van Daan. The adults, too, squabbled among themselves as their already strained nerves easily took offence. Anne observed, “Whatever is said you either annoy sonjeone or it is misunderstood.” The senior van Daans had the most horrible quarrels that led Anne to write that her mind boggled at the profanity the honourable house had to endure.

Question 5.
“Miep often said she envied us because we have such peace and quiet here.” Elaborate.
Answer:
As Anne described more of Miep’s role in keeping the annex running, we get a sense of the amount of work Miep had to do to bring them their supplies in secret. It was a dangerous and difficult job that required a lot of effort, responsibility and care on her part. Also, the people in the annex did not have to witness the horrors outside, they were sheltered from watching the pain and desolation.

Miep’s comment made Anne realise that the people who protected the annex were under just as much stress as those inside. In understanding Miep’s envy of the people in the annex, and that the situation outside was not favourable for any of the Dutch people or non-Jews, Anne exhibited a maturity beyond her years. Nonetheless, Anne also felt that Miep was unaware of the difficulties of their life in hiding, such as the constant quarrelling and frustration at living in such close quarters. Miep did not understand what it was like to be a young girl, trapped in a small attic with a whole world just out of her reach.

Wednesday, Niovember 7,1943 – Saturday, January 22,1944

Question 1.
Who was Lies? Why did Anne dream of her?
Answer:
Lies Hanneli was Anne Frank’s close friend from school. In her diary entry on 27 November, Anne wrote about one of the nightmares where she dreamt about Lies Hanneli who was clothed in rags, her face thin and worn. Her eyes were very big and she accused Anne of deserting her.

This was an accurate description of the appearance of most of the concentration camp inmates, and what Anne did not know was that Lies actually was in a concentration camp.The recurring image of Lies revealed feelings of guilt on Anne’s part. She was constantly aware that she was far better off than most European Jews, including some of her dearest friends.

Question 2.
In the Netherlands, St Nicholas Day is the traditional day to exchange gifts. A year before, there had been a basket of presents. What did they do this year to celebrate?
Answer:
As St Nicholas Day approached, Anne was determined to make something festive out of the occasion. She composed poems for each person with her father’s help. Remembering the previous year’s festively decorated basket, she decorated a laundry basket with cut-outs and bows made of pink and blue carbon paper. Anne and her father put one verse in each shoe and filled the basket with shoes. Anne read a funny poem about how times were hard but that festive ‘spirit’ remained. As each person took out his or her own shoe out of the basket, there was a roar of surprised laughter as inside each shoe was a little wrapped package addressed to its owner.

Question 3.
What did the ‘family’ members receive at Christmas from their protectors?
Answer:
On Christmas day 1943, for the first time in her life, Anne received a Christmas present. The ‘protectors’ Mr Kleiman, Mr Kugler and the girls, Miep and Bep, had prepared a wonderful surprise for the residents of the annex. Miep baked a delicious Christmas cake for them with ‘Peace 1944’ written on top, and Bep provided a batch of cookies that was up to pre-war standards. There was a jar of yogurt for Peter, Margot and Anne, and a bottle of beer for each of the adults. Everything was wrapped nicely with pretty pictures glued to the packages.

Question 4.
Anne wrote on 24 December, 1943, “Moods have a tendency to affect us quite a bit here, and in my case it’s been getting worse lately.” Comment.
Answer:
Anne’s account of her feelings was almost achingly honest in the entry for 24 December, 1943. Anne had been experiencing mood swings. Anne was sometimes ‘on top of the world’ as she realised that her situation was better than that of other Jewish children, but was ‘in the depths of despair’ when she heard of Mrs Kleiman’s Jopie who played hockey, went on canoe trips, took part in school plays and had afternoon teas with friends.

Though not exactly jealous of Jopie, Anne would have liked to have fun with her friends. Instead she and her family were trapped in the annex like ‘lepers.’ She longed to be allowed to breathe fresh air again, to ride a bike, dance, whistle, look at the world, feel young and know that she-was free. She also longed to have a mother who understood her. This futile wish led her to the sad topic of what she considered to be the inadequacies of her mother, and Anne vowed to behave differently when she had children of her own.

Question 5.
Who was Peter Schiff?
Answer:
When Anne was in sixth grade, she met Peter Schiff. Anne had a crush on him and he liked her too. For one whole summer the two were inseparable. At the end of the summer vacation, he went to the seventh grade at the middle school while Anne was in the sixth grade at the grammar school. He would pick Anne up on the way home, or she would pick him up. Peter was the ideal boy: tall, good-looking and slender, with a serious, quiet and intelligent face. He had dark hair, beautiful brown eyes, ruddy cheeks and a nicely pointed nose. Anne loved his smile, which made him look so boyish and mischievous.

However, during the summer vacation, Anne went away to the countryside, and when she came back, Peter had moved and was living with a much older boy, who told him Anne was just a kid, and Peter stopped seeing her. Not wanting to face the truth, because she loved him, Anne clung to Peter till she realised that if she continued to chase after him, she’d become a laughing stock. Years later, he was still the boy she dreamt of and weaved her fantasies around.

Question 6.
What change came oyer Anne regarding the van Daans? What brought about this change?
Answer:
After writing rather antagonistically about the faults of the van Daans, Anne realised that the faults which she saw in them might not necessarily be theirs alone. She wrote that in the discussions and arguments that. happened in the annex the Franks were not always right apd the van Daans were not always wrong.

Anne realised that.her mother was responsible for some of the quarrels and arguments in the annex. Although Mrs van Daan was selfish, stingy and underhanded, yet half the arguments could have been avoided if Mrs Frank had not been so hard to deal with. One could talk to Mrs van Daan and, unless she was provoked, she was quite reasonable.

Thus, it was a very perceptive and mature Anne who wrote, “Until now I was immovable! I always thought the van Daans were in the wrong, but we too are partly to blame. We have certainly been right over the subject matter; but handling of others from intelligent people (which we consider ourselves to be!) one expects more insight. I hope that I have acquired a bit of insight and will use it well when the occasion arises.”

Question 7.
Comment on Anne’s attitude towards their ‘protectors.’
Answer:
Anne was extremely fond of her protectors and was grateful to them for their help and care. While the group was in hiding, they were instrumental in obtaining supplies, keeping them secret and providing moral and psychological support. They brought news from the outside world and Miep and Bep were there when Anne longed for someone to talk to. They arranged for little gifts and surprises on birthdays and festivals, and generally did their best to make the situation of the group in hiding a little more tolerable. Miep and Jan even spent a night in ‘Secret Annex.’

However, Anne could not help but compare her situation with that of non-Jewish people (their protectors, for example) and feel rightfully jealous. Anne was ‘in the depths of despair’ when she heard of Mrs Kleiman’s Jopie who played hockey, went on canoe trips, took part in school plays and had afternoon teas with friends. Though not exactly jealous of Jopie, Anne would have liked to have fun with her friends. Instead, she and her family were trapped in the annex like ‘lepers,’ especially during winter and the Christmas and New Year’s holidays.

Question 8.
Anne wrote, “I sometimes wonder if anyone will ever understand what I mean, if anyone will ever overlook my ingratitude and not worry about whether or not I’m Jewish and merely see me as a teenager badly in need of some good, plain fun.” Comment.
Answer:
In this passage from 24 December, 1943, Anne reminds us that she was just a normal young girl who had been forced into extraordinary circumstances. She willingly made sacrifices and dealt with the restrictions of the annex without much complaint because she knew that she was more fortunate than her friends who had been arrested and sent to concentration camps.

This attitude demonstrated Anne’s remarkable maturity, but it clearly took a toll on her spirit. Aside from wanting to return to the freedom and comforts she had before the war, Anne simply wanted to experience a normal childhood. She did not want to live in a world that placed such significance on where she was from, what her religion was, or whether she behaved well with adults.

She wanted to be in a place where she did not have to worry about whether she would live or whether her friends were suffering. The diary had such emotional impact because we see Anne not as a saint, but as a normal girl with real human feelings and imperfections who fell victim to the tragedy of the Holocaust.

Monday, January 24,1944 – Monday, February 28,1944

Question 1.
Write a brief note on the Dutch Resistance Movement.
Answer:
After the German occupation of Netherlands in May 1940, the German authorities implemented measures aimed at isolating the Jews from the rest of Dutch society. Jewish children had to study in Jewish schools.Jews were forced to wear a Star of David so that they were easily recognisable in public. In July 1942, the German forces implemented a large-scale operation in the Netherlands to transport Jews to labour camps in Eastern Europe. Many Jewish families went into hiding. A fairly active Dutch Resistance Movement came into being, which played a big part in ensuring that Jews were kept hidden. These groups forged identity cards, provided financial support to those in hiding, and also organised hiding places for Jews.

Question 2.
What did you learn about Peter van Daan?
Answer:
Peter van Daan was the only son of Mr and Mrs Van Daan. He was almost 16 when he came to live in the annex. Shy, awkward and Introspective, he did not arouse Anne’s attention until they had been living in the annex for almost two years. Despite her interest in him, Anne realised that, although he was a nice young man, he was weak-minded and lacked character.

He had an inferiority complex and although he was good at English and Geography, he was stupid. He was insecure and wanted affection which was the reason why he always hugged his cat,’ Mouschi, so tightly. Also, he never wanted to change the pictures on his wall as he thought they were his friends. Although Peter did not want to be a Christian, he wanted to hide his Jewish ancestry when the war got over, which disappointed Anne.

Question 3.
Describe a typical Sunday routine in ‘Secret Annex’.
Answer:
The inmates of the annex spent their Sunday mornings scrubbing, sweeping and doing the laundry. While the rest of them slept on Sundays, Mr Dussel was the first one to get up. He woke up at eight and washed himself for an hour, and then prayed for a quarter of an hour in the room he shared with Anne. By nine- thirty, the stoves were lit, the blackout screen was taken down, and Mr van Daan headed for the bathroom.

By ten-fifteen, the van Daans were done with the bathroom and the Franks had their turn with the bathroom. Anne and Margot did the laundry, while Mr Frank used the bathroom, and then Anne or Margot went to the . bathroom. At eleven-thirty everyone had breakfast together after which they went about their chores. Mr Frank brushed the rugs, Mr Dussel made the beds, Mrs Frank hung up the washing in the attic and Margot and Anne did the dishes and straightened up the rooms.

Question 4.
What, according to Anne, were the reasons that made Peter and her so similar?
Answer:
Anne realised that there were a great many similarities between her and Peter. They were both Jews in hiding, fearful for their survival. Both of them, she felt, had mothers who were inadequate. Mrs van Daan was too superficial, liked to flirt and did not concern herself much with what went on in Peter’s head and while Mrs Frank took an active interest in Anne’s life, she had no tact, sensitivity or motherly understanding. As a result, both were vulnerable emotionally and unsure of themselves. Also, both she and Peter struggled in expressing their inner emotions.

Wednesday, March 1,1944 – Friday, March 31,1944

Question1.
Write a brief account of the second burglary in Gies & Co. Why did it leave the inmates of the annex alarmed?
Answer:
When Mr van Daan went to Mr Kugler’s office at 7:30 pm that day, he found the office doors open and the front office in a mess. However, the front door was locked. He remained in Mr Kugler’s office for some time, then switched off the lamp and returned upstairs without worrying much about the open doors or the messy office.

Early in the morning, Peter discovered the front door open and the projector and Mr Kugler’s new briefcase missing. The only explanation was that the intruder had a skeleton key or a duplicate and did not have to force his way inside. This was unfortunate for the residents of the annex, because that person could report them. It would be especially unfortunate if the burglar was one of the warehouse workers.’

Question 2.
In what ways had Anne changed from the time she entered the annex?
Answer:
The flirtatious Anne Frank who had enjoyed the attention of admirers on every street comer, had numerous friends and was the favourite of most of her teachers was completely different from the one who had grown wise within the walls of the annex. She would amuse and entertain her teachers by her clever answers, her witty remarks, her smiling face and her critical mind. She was hardworking, honest and generous. She would never have, refused anyone who wanted to peek at her answers, she was generous with her candy and wasn’t snobbish. However, the Anne of the present wanted friends, not admirers, people who respected her for her character and her deeds, not her flattering smile.

Question 3.
How did the adults cope with growing food shortages?
Answer:
The people who sold them illegal food coupons were caught, so they had just the five ration books they bought on the black-market—no coupons, fats and oils. With Miep and Mr Kleiman being sick again, Bep couldn’t manage all the shopping. The food was wretched and their stock of fat, butter and margarine was over. So instead of fried potatoes, they had hot cereal for breakfast and mashed potatoes and pickled kale for lunch. The kale was old and stinking. Anne sat with a handkerchief sprayed with perfume to avoid the stench ! in the kitchen.

Question 4.
The years in hiding had matured Anne. Comment.
Answer:
Anne had gained a fuller sense of self and a clearer view of her relationship with the people in the annex. She started signing her diary ‘Anne M. Frank’ instead of simply ‘Anne,’ a sign that she perceived as her own coming of age. Anne had matured significantly during her time in the annex, particularly because her family’s time in hiding coincided with Anne’s puberty. In this confined world, Anne developed her relationships with her family.

The close quarters forced her to understand her parents and sister on a deeper level. Anne found in Peter the confidant for whom she had been longing. She became aware of her feelings for the opposite sex, a new aspect of maturity and development as a young woman that changed her entire experience of living in the annex.

Anne’s growing maturity was also evident in the increased gravity of her discussions of her life and the war. For the first time, Anne wrote seriously about the possibility of her own death, especially as her morale worsened. At the same time, she dreamt about life after the war and about her great fortune in having a hiding place.

She had become highly introspective and insightful about her own nature, and began to reflect on her past development and organise it into stages. Anne used her diary like a literary timeline of her inner development, which she analysed and critiqued. This showed her capacity for personal growth and self¬awareness, two important aspects of coming-of-age. Though maturing into a young woman, she still retained a measure of youthful innocence and idealism.

Question 5.
Write a note on the relationship between Anne and her parents while in hiding.
Answer:
Before going into hiding, Anne viewed her parents as any adolescent did—those people who provided the essential things needed to survive, but once they were in hiding, Anne saw her parents as humans, given to vulnerabilities like everyone else. Anne frequently wrote of her difficult relationship with her mother, and of her ambivalence towards her. Anne felt that her mother was partial towards Margot and always favoured her. She accused her mother of being cold and tactless. Mrs Frank called Anne ‘a useless child’ and did not approve of any of her ideas, thoughts, behaviour, attitude etc. She was continuously finding flaws in Anne.

Anne, therefore, never wanted to say her prayers with her mother or follow the rules her mother laid down for her.Later, when she reached the understanding that their differences resulted from misunderstandings that were as much her fault as her mother’s, Anne began to treat her mother with a degree of tolerance and respect.

Anne had a distant and negative relationship with her mother, Anne became very close to her father Otto with whom she organised the annex. It was him that she turned to for solace once the family was in hiding.Sometimes when she was scared by the bombing during the night, she climbed into bed beside her father, who calmed her down and reassured her. Even in her relationship with Peter, while Mrs Frank told Anne to stop meeting Peter as Mrs van Daan was jealous of their relationship, Mr Frank told her to go ahead and spend time with Peter.

Question 6.
Although Anne was not too interested in politics, one entry in March of 1944 described the various opinions of the group. What were the prevailing viewpoints?
Answer:
The ‘protectors,’ Miep, Mr Kleiman, Bep and Mr Kugler often brought news from outside that proved to be untrue or mere rumour. The adults listened to news broadcasts throughout the day. They listened to the German ‘ Wehrmacht News’ and the English BBC as also to the special air-raid announcements. They dismissed German news as propaganda. They believed the news they heard on BBC.

For example, Anne described one scene where they all sat around the radio, listening to a speech given by Winston Churchill. Following the speech, the heated arguments that ensued, horrified and angered her. However, all seemed to admire Winston Churchill and agreed the Germans lied about many things. They seemed to be divided into two groups: the optimists who said the war was going well and who had great faith in the English, and the pessimists who believed the Germans would win in the end.

Saturday, April 1,1944 – Friday, April 28,1944

Question 1.
What were Anne’s hobbies and interests?
Answer:
Anne’s hobbies included writing which she listed first, though she didn’t look at it as a main occupation. Preparing genealogical charts for the royal families of the French, German, Spanish, English, Austrian, Russian, Norwegian and Putch was another one of her hobbies and Anne had made great progress with many of them by reading biographies and history books.

Her third hobby was history, and though her father had already bought her numerous books, Anne longed to go to the public library. Anne also had a great interest in Greek and Roman mythology and her other hobbies included movie stars and family photographs, reading books and studying the history of the arts.

Question 2.
How did the van Daans and the Franks get along? Which of the family members seemed better able to cope with the close quarters? Why?
Answer:
Though the Franks had eagerly awaited the arrival of the van Daans, they did not get along well at all afterwards. However, living together in cramped quarters was not easy for the two families, and was even more stressful because they feared for their lives. Mrs van Daan disliked sharing her sheets and dishes, especially after Anne broke one of her plates. Anne wrote in her diary that Mrs van Daan was a lax housekeeper, leaving leftover food to spoil instead of storing it properly! Mr van Daan was a chain smoker, and suffered nicotine withdrawal when no cigarettes could be found. This made him edgy and jittery.

Mrs van Daan’s flirtatious manner with Mr Frank upset Mrs Frank. Mrs Frank and Mrs van Daan sometimes had loud arguments or ‘squabbles’ which took long to settle. The van Daans quarrelled frequently and loudly with each other too, sometimes picking on Peter. Eventually, the van Daans were forced to sell some of their possessions, such as Mrs van Daans prized fur coat, in the blaq|c market. The van Daans seemed to have a general consensus that Margot was the better child and Anne was spoiled and obnoxious. Otto Frank and Margot were the two mature ones who did not get into arguments like the rest of them.

Question 3.
How did Anne get along with the van Daans?
Answer:
In the beginning, Anne frequently argued with Mr van Daan although they eventually got along better. Anne couldn’t stand Mrs van Daan who she thought was selfish, belligerent and rarely helpful. She was jealous of Anne’s relationship with her son and wanted Peter to confide in her rather than in Anne.

However, Mrs van Daan did have a few strong points. She occasionally could be reasonable and backed down from fights, was generally neat and tidy, and was often easier for Anne to approach than her own mother. Initially, Anne regarded Peter as lazy and stupid. But after a year and a half in hiding, Anne developed a crush on him, and decided that he was very sweet and needed affection, which she tried to give. They spent a lot of time together and exchanged a few kisses.

Question 4.
Write a brief note on the burglary that took place on 11 April 1944.
Answer:
Anne was talking to Peter one night when another break-in occurred. Mr van Daan tried to scare the burglars away by shouting “Police!” but this only drew attention to them. A married couple shone a flashlight into the warehouse and the residents heard footsteps running away. The men ran upstairs and the residents lay on the floor, petrified. Soon they heard footsteps on the stairs and a rattling at the>bookcase that hid the door to the annex.

The noises stopped but someone had left the light in front of the bookcase on. Mrs van Daan worried about the police finding the radio downstairs, and Otto Frank worried they would find Anne’s diary. For two days, they all huddled upstairs, waiting for the Gestapo to come and take them away. The adults called Mr Kleiman and waited in suspense until Jan and Miep came to repair the entrance to the annex.

Question 5.
Write a note on the growing intimacy between Anne and Peter.
Answer:
As her friendship with Peter progressed, Anne admitted to herself that her feelings for Peter were pretty near to being in love. She often went up to his room where they exchanged a few kisses. As they often sat with their arms around one another, and kissed occassionally, their physical relationship was different from the strict moral standards of the time. The love she felt for Peter liberated her from the horrors and deprivations of war. Although Anne and Peter were emotionally more intimate than ever, she admitted with disappointment that she could never marry him as he didn’t have enough character.

Question 6.
Did Anne consider her family lucky or unfortunate to be living in the annex?
Answer:
Anne’s feelings about the annex constantly changed. Most of the time, Anne realised that she and . her family were very fortunate to have a place to hide. She valued the kindness and generosity of her father’s non-Jewish colleagues who risked their lives to provide them with food and supplies. Anne often complained about living in cramped quarters with eight people under severe conditions

she ate rotten potatoes day after day, had no privacy, dealt with clashing personalities, and lived in constant fear that the family would be discovered. Compared to her formerly comfortable, middle-class life, Anne found this a confined, tedious, and fearful existence. Also, when she thought about her Jewish friends and family members who had probably been arrested and sent to concentration camps, she felt extremely thankful to still be alive.

Question 7.
How had Anne changed while in hiding?
Answer:
At first, life in hiding was more of a vacation for Anne. But as the war dragged on and she realised the seriousness of their situation, her fear and depression increased.
Then Anne began to mature, both physically and emotionally. She learnt how to control her outbursts and emotions. She became stoic about her situation. She acknowledged that the happy, carefree existence of her school days would never return. She even criticised her earlier self as being superficial and empty. Meantime, she tried to notice more about life and nature outside. Although she longed to go outside herself, she accepted that it was presently impossible.

She was also resigned to the pitiful living conditions. Since rations were being strictly enforced and prices had increased drastically, their Dutch protectors were no longer able to give the group regular supplies. They often ate rotten potatoes in order to survive. Anne tried to be optimistic and said that she sometimes still enjoyed the meals. She had become an accepting young woman rather than a spoilt child.

Tuesday, March 2,1944 – Wednesday, May 31,1944

Question 1.
How did Mr Dussel celebrate his birthday?
Answer:
The Franks gave Mr Dussel a bottle of wine and the van Daans presented him with ajar of piccalilli – a pickle made of chopped vegetables and spices – and a package of razor blades, Mr Kugler gave him ajar of lemon syrup (to make lemonade), Miep a book and Bep a plant. In return, Mr Dussel treated everyone to an egg.

Question 2
What letter did Anne write to her father? What was his reaction?
Answer:
Anne wrote a letter to her father saying her life had not been easy in the annex. She had been unhappy, despondent and lonely and had to learn to be very independent, without support from her parents. In fact, all she had ever got from them were admonitions not to be noisy. They did not realise she was noisy only to keep herself from being miserable all the time.

Since she had to become older than she really was, she no longer needed their support and could take her own decisions. Her father was very upset by her letter. Two days after she gave him the letter, they finally talked about the letter and they both cried. He told her that it was the most hurtful letter that he had ever received and that he and her mother did not deserve such harsh criticism since they had always loved, protected and cared for her.

Question 3.
Write a short note on Anne’s parents and their background.
Answer:
Both Mr and Mrs Frank came from rich families and told grand stories about wealth and privilege. Anne’s father, Otto Frank, was bom in Frankfurt to very wealthy parents. His father, Michael Frank, was a self-made man who owned a bank and became a millionaire. Otto’s mother, Alice Stem, came from a prominent and well-to-do family. In his youth, Otto Frank led the life of a rich man’s son.

There were parties every week, balls, banquets, beautiful girls, waltzing, dinners etc. After Michael Frank died, most of the money was lost, and after World War I and inflation there was nothing left at all. However, Mr Frank was extremely well- bred. Mrs Edith Frank’s family wasn’t as wealthy, but still fairly well-off. She often told her daughters stories of private balls, dinners and engagement parties with 250 guests.