Prasanna

Here we are providing The Snake and the Mirror Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Beehive, Extra Questions for Class 9 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-9-english/

The Snake and the Mirror Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Beehive

The Snake and the Mirror Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

The Snake And The Mirror Extra Questions And Answers Question 1.
Who narrated his encounter with a snake? To whom? Why did he narrate the incident?
Answer:
The narrator of the incident was a homeopathic doctor. One day, when the narrator and some others were discussing snakes, the doctor was reminded of his own encounter with a snake and he narrated the incident.

The Snake And The Mirror Extra Questions And Answers Pdf Question 2.
When and where did the incident with the snake take place?
Answer:
The incident took place in the narrator’s room after he had taken his meal in a restaurant and had returned to his room at about ten o’clock in the night.

The Snake And The Mirror Questions And Answers Question 3.
Why did the narrator have to light the kerosene lamp on reaching his room?
Answer:
The narrator had to light the kerosene lamp because it was ten o’clock and it was very dark. The room did not have electricity and the narrator had limited money and could not afford a better place.

The Snake And The Mirror Extra Questions Question 4.
Describe the narrator’s room?
Answer:
The narrator lived in a small, poorly furnished rented room infested with rats. It was an outer room, its one wall facing the open yard. The room had two windows and its tiles were supported by gables that rested on the beam over the wall. There was no ceiling. The room was not electrified. Outside the room there was a veranda. The room was meagrely furnished; among the few pieces of furniture, there was his bed, a chair, a table with his medical books, usual accessories, a kerosene lamp and a mirror on it.

Snake And The Mirror Extra Questions Question 5.
What circumstances prompted the doctor to live in a small, poor house?
Answer:
The doctor had just started his practice and his earnings were meagre. Therefore, he lived in a small, poor house because he could not afford to rent a better and more comfortable accommodation. Besides, he was not married at that time so he could manage in a small rented room until the time he got married.

The Snake And The Mirror Extra Questions And Answers Class 9 Question 6.
The doctor was not a man with many material possessions. Elaborate.
Answer:
The doctor had just started his practice. Therefore, his earnings were meagre. He lived in a small rented room, which was not electrified. He had only sixty rupees in his bag. Apart from a few shirts and dhotis, he had one solitary black coat. His room was full of rats.

The Snake And The Mirror Question Answer Question 7.
Why was the narrator awake despite the lateness of the hour?
Answer:
It was about ten o’clock on a hot summer night when the narrator reached his room. He made his bed and lay down on it, but he could not sleep due to the heat. He got up and went out to the veranda for a little air, but there was no wind. So, he went back into the room and sat down on the chair.

The Snake And The Mirror Short Question Answer Question 8.
What did the doctor do after coming back inside?
Answer:
The doctor sat on the chair and, opening the box beneath the table, took out a book, the Materia Medica. He opened the book at the table on which stood the lamp and a large mirror. At once he was tempted to look into the mirror and he set about making himself look handsome.

The Snake And The Mirror Questions And Answers Pdf Question 9.
“The sound was a familiar one.” What sound did the narrator hear? What did he think it was? How many times did he hear it? When and why did the sounds stop?
Answer:
The narrator heard the familiar sound of movement of some animals on the beam. He thought that the sound was in fear being made by the scampering of rats as always. He heard the sound thrice. After the third time, the sound stopped. This was probably because of the appearance of the snake and the disappearance of the rats

The Snake And The Mirror Questions And Answers Class 9 Question 10.
What were the narrator’s feelings as he looked into the mirror?
Answer:
At that time the narrator, who was unmarried and a doctor, was a great admirer of beauty and he believed in making himself look handsome. He felt he had to make his presence felt by improving his appearance. He began to comb his hair, adjusting the parting so that it looked straight and neat in order to appear more handsome.

The Snake And The Mirror Class 9 Extra Questions And Answers Question 11.
As he looked at himself in the mirror, which two ‘important’ and ‘earth-shaking’ decisions did the doctor make?
Answer:
The doctor made two important decisions while looking at himself in the mirror. The first decision, an ‘important’ one, was that he would shave daily and grow a thin moustache to look more handsome. The second decision the doctor made was an ‘earth-shaking’ one. It was that he had an attractive smile and that he should keep that attractive smile on his face to look more handsome.

The Snake And The Mirror Lesson Questions And Answers Question 12.
What kind of a woman did the doctor decide to marry? Why?
Answer:
The doctor, who had just started his medical practice, decided to marry a doctor with a lot of money and great medical practice. He also wanted her to be fat, so that in case he made a silly mistake and needed to run away she should not be able to run after him and catch him.

The Snake And The Mirror Question Answers Pdf Question 13.
How did the snake land on the doctor’s chair?
Answer:
The snake fell from the roof of the house with a thud. In no time it wriggled over the back of the narrator’s chair and landed on him. The snake slithered along his shoulder and coiled around his left arm above the elbow. To make matters worse, the snake spread its hood out and its head was hardly three or four inches from his face.

The Snake And The Mirror Class 9 Questions And Answers Question 14.
What was the narrator’s reaction to the sight of the snake?
Answer:
The narrator was frightened at the sight of the snake slithering down his shoulder and coiling itself around his arm. He could not breathe for a while. He was frightened, yet he didn’t jump, didn’t tremble, didn’t cry out as he did not wish to make any sudden movement that would provoke the snake.

Question 15.
How did the narrator show presence of mind when he faced with the snake?
Answer:
When the doctor found a snake on his shoulder, he did not jump, tremble or cry out. He held his breath and became as still as a stone. He knew that the snake would get provoked and strike him if he made any movement since the hood of the snake was only four inches away from his face.

Question 16.
How did the doctor feel when the snake coiled itself around his arm?
Answer:
When the snake coiled itself around the arm of the doctor, he felt some pain as if his arm was being crushed strongly with a rod made of molten fire. His arm lost all strength and felt very weak.

Question 17.
What did the writer think of when the snake was coiled around his arm?
Answer:
The doctor felt like a foolish and weak person when the snake was coiled around his arm. There was a distinct possibility of the snake biting him and the doctor thought of the various medicines he had in his room and cast his mind about to think if any medicine was good enough to save him if the snake did bite him. He felt that God had punished him for being so proud and arrogant. The vanity and pride he had moments ago had vanished. He felt helpless and frightened and smiled feebly at his stupidity and ill-luck.

Question 18.
What made the doctor say “Death lurked four inches away”?
Answer:
The snake was coiled around the doctor’s left arm and its hood was spread and just three or four inches from the doctor’s head. He sat motionless as a statue, his body inactive but his mind thinking of a way out anxiously. He knew very well that the snake would get provoked and bite him at the slightest movement and that the bite would well be fatal. This is what made him utter these words,

Question 19.
How did the snake change the writer’s opinion about himself?
Answer:
The writer was proud of being a doctor and a handsome one at that. To boot, he was a bachelor. He was rather vain and arrogant. Coming face-to-face with the snake made him humble. He thought he was only a poor and stupid doctor who should not be proud of his profession.

Question 20.
What thoughts crossed the doctor’s mind when he saw the snake looking into the mirror?
Answer:
When the doctor saw the snake looking into the mirror, he thought that perhaps it too was admiring its beauty or was trying to make some important, actually frivolous decisions like growing a moustache, or, if it were a female snake, using eye shadow and mascara or wearing a vermilion spot on its forehead.

Question 21.
Why did the snake leave the doctor’s arm?
Answer:
The snake left the doctor’s arm because it saw its reflection in the mirror and was fascinated by it. Perhaps it wanted to enjoy its own reflection by having a closer look.

Question 22.
How was the doctor freed of the hold of the snake?
Answer:
The snake happened to look at its reflection in the mirror on the table. It uncoiled itself from the arm of the doctor, slipped into his lap and then crawled towards the mirror. Perhaps, it too got fascinated by its looks like the doctor had a while ago.

Question 23.
What did the doctor do as the snake sat in front of the mirror?
Answer:
When the snake slithered from the narrator’s arm into his lap, crept onto the table and then moved towards the mirror, the narrator at once availed of the opportunity. He changed from a man cut in granite to a man of flesh and blood. Still holding his breath, so as not to disturb the snake, he got up from the chair and quietly went out through the door into the veranda. From there he leapt into the yard and ran for all he was worth to his friend’s house to save his life.

Question 24.
What did the doctor do when the snake was absorbed in looking at the mirror?
Answer:
As the snake was absorbed in looking at the mirror, the doctor and holding his breath, rose from the chair and quietly slipped out of the room. From there he passed through the veranda and the yard and ran as fast as he could to the house of a friend.

Question 25.
What did the doctor do as soon as he reached his friend’s house? Why?
Answer:
Immediately after reaching his friend’s house, the doctor applied oil to his entire body, took a- bath and put on fresh clothes. He did so because the snake had slithered over his back, shoulder and arm. He wanted to get rid of his creepy feeling and any possible ill-effects of a snake’s touch.

Question 26.
Why does the doctor remark that the snake was “taken with its own beauty”?
Answer:
The doctor remarks that the snake was “taken with its own beauty” because it kept looking-into the mirror just like the doctor had done earlier, the snake sat in front of the mirror looking into it. This led him to conclude that the snake was admiring itself as he had done.

Question 27.
What was the similarity between the doctor and the snake?
Answer:
There was a similarity between the doctor and the snake. Both of them admired of their own beauty. The doctor sat on the chair to read his book but forgot everything as he looked into the mirror and admired himself. He was oblivious to his surroundings and realised the presence of the snake too late. The snake too spotted the mirror, and slithered off to look at its reflection. He, too, was so enamoured with its own looks that it forgot reason why it was there, probably hungry and chasing some rats.

Question 28.
Why did the doctor decide to leave the room?
Answer:
The doctor was already unhappy with the poor condition of his room that did not have electricity and was infested with rats. On top of it all his encounter with the snake, that could have nearly killed him, made him decide to leave the room.

Question 29.
What did the doctor and his friends find when they went to remove things from the room?
Answer:
The doctor and his friends found that there was nothing in the room except for a dirty vest. All the other things had been stolen away by some thief.

Question 30.
Did the doctor marry a fat woman as he had wished?
Answer:
No, the doctor did not marry a fat woman. On the contrary, his wife was a thin and lean person who could run very fast like a sprinter.

Question 31.
What did the thief leave behind? What does the narrator feel about it?
Answer:
The thief had left behind his dirty vest. The vest was so dirty that even the thief did not feel like taking it. The narrator found it insulting because it appeared as the thief wanted to tell the narrator that he had a better sense of cleanliness than the doctor himself.

The Snake and the Mirror Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
What kind of room was the doctor living in and why did he decide to leave that room?
Answer:
The doctor was living in was a small, uncomfortable room that was actually an outer room with one wall facing the open yard and two windows. The room was not electrified and he had to depend on a kerosene lamp for lighting. The roof was tiled and had long supporting gables which rested on a beam over the wall. The room did not have any ceiling and it was infested with rats that kept squeaking all the time.

Since his medical practice was yet not well-established, the doctor did not earn much and could not afford a better place. He was not happy with this poor accommodation but it was all he could afford on his meagre earnings. However, it was only after his encounter with the snake that he decided to leave it. The frightening experience left him shaken and he decided not to live in the room any longer.

Question 2.
What kind of a person was the doctor? What kind of a person did he want to be?
Answer:
The doctor had just started his practice. His earnings were, therefore, meagre. He lived in a small rented room, which was not electrified. He had only sixty rupees in his bag. Apart from a few shirts and dhotis, he had one solitary black coat. He lived alone in a house that was full of rats.

On the other hand, the doctor laid great emphasis on the fact that he was unmarried and a doctor. He was a great admirer of beauty and he believed in making himself handsome. He was pleased with his appearance. He decided to shave daily and grow a thin moustache to look more handsome. He also decided to smile more as it improved his appearance.

Question 3.
What kind of woman did the doctor want to marry? Whom did he get married to?
Answer:
The doctor took pride in his handsome looks and the fact that he was a doctor and a bachelor. He had just started his practice and had very little money, wanted to marry a woman doctor who had plenty of money and . a good medical practice. He wanted a fat wife so that whenever he would make a silly mistake and run away from his wife, she would not be able to run behind him or catch him. The woman he married was quite unlike the one he wanted to marry. She was a thin and slender person who could run like a sprinter.

Question 4.
Describe the doctor’s feelings when the snake coiled round his arm.
Answer:
The doctor was petrified when the snake landed on his shoulder. He didn’t jump, tremble or cry out. He sat there holding his breath, turned to stone. He thought his end was near, so he remembered the Almighty and prayed to God for his safety. However, he retained his presence of mind as well as his sense of humour. He forgot his danger and smiled feebly at himself. From admiring himself and vainly thinking of ways of making himself appear more handsome and arrogantly declaring he was a doctor and a bachelor, the doctor thought of himself as “a poor, foolish and stupid doctor.”

He did not have even the medicine to save himself in case he was bitten by the snake. As he sat there, with Death lurking four inches away, the narrator did not panic. With great patience he sat still, on the lookout for an opportunity to escape and as soon as the snake unwound itself from his arm, the doctor got up from the chair and went out quietly, and ran away to his friend’s house.

Question 5.
“I was but a poor, foolish and stupid doctor.” Justify.
Answer:
Initially, the doctor had a very high opinion of himself regarding both his appearance and profession. He laid great emphasis on the fact that he was unmarried and a doctor. As an admirer of beauty, he was conscious of his looks and wanted to look even more handsome. He admired himself in the mirror and combed his hair this way and that and decided to grow a moustache and smile more to look more attractive.

But an encounter with a snake – a cobra – cured him of his pride. When the snake wriggled over his shoulder and coiled itself around his arm, the doctor lost all arrogance and was reminded of the existence of God. Face to face with death, he realised what a weak and foolish man he had been. When he recalled that there were no medicines in his room to cure him of a snake-bite, he regarded himself to be a stupid and helpless person. Thus, the encounter with the snake transformed the doctor from a vain and foolish person into a humble and God-fearing man.

Question 6.
What are the similarities between the behaviour of the doctor and of the snake?
Answer:
Both the doctor and the snake display narcissistic tendencies. Both of them were enamoured by their reflections in the mirror and stared at them as if enamoured. When he looked in the mirror, the doctor was full of appreciation for his good looks. He was a great admirer of beauty and believed in making himself look handsome. He took a close look at his face and decided that he would shave daily and grow a thin moustache to look even more handsome. Then, he looked into the mirror and smiled. He decided to keep smiling as he considered his smile very attractive. As he gazed at himself in the mirror, he was oblivious of his surroundings. He heard the noise of the rats cease, he heard the snake drop to the ground with a dull thud, but he paid no heed and found himself face to face with death.

In the same manner, the snake gazed in the mirror, oblivious of his surroundings. This makes the doctor think , that perhaps it, too, was admiring its beauty or was trying to make some ‘important’ decisions just like him. Perhaps it was a male snake thinking about growing a moustache or a female one deciding to use eye shadow and mascara or wear a vermilion spot on its forehead. Just like the doctor’s obsession with his looks landed him in trouble, the snake too seemed to be “taken with its beauty.” It released its victim to have a better look at itself in the mirror.

Question 7.
This story about a frightening incident is narrated in a humorous way. What makes it humorous?
Answer:
The story presents a contrast between dreams and reality. This contrast has been depicted in a humorous manner. The doctor had meagre earnings as he had just started his practice. He lived in a small rented room, which was not electrified. He had only sixty rupees in his bag, a few shirts and dhotis, and one solitary black coat. His house was full of rats. However, his dreams and ambitions were in contrast to this. He was a great admirer of beauty and he believed in making himself handsome. He laid great emphasis on the fact that he was unmarried and a doctor. Pleased with his appearance, he decided to improve his appearance by shaving daily, growing a thin moustache and always keep smiling.The doctor had thought about the kind of person he would want to marry.

He wanted to marry a woman doctor who had plenty of money and a good medical practice because he did not have any of those. He wanted a fat wife so that whenever he made a silly mistake, he could escape his wife by running away from her. However, the woman he married was thin and could run like a sprinter. When the doctor looked into the mirror, he was full of appreciation for his good looks. He also arrogantly declared that he was a doctor and a bachelor.

However, later when the snake was coiled around his arm, he turned into a stone. He realized that if the snake struck him, then he did not even have any medicines in his room for the same. That was when he thought that he was a poor, foolish, and stupid doctor. This contrast between reality and dreams lends humour to the story.

Question 8.
“I looked into the mirror and smiled”, says the doctor. A little later he says, “I forgot my danger and smiled feebly at myself’. What is the doctor’s opinion about himself when he smiles first and then later? In what way do his thoughts change in between, and why?
Answer:
The doctor rated his looks quite high and smiled at his image when he looked at himself in the large mirror on his table. He was narcissistic and the first time he looked in the mirror and smiled, his opinion about himself was marked by self-adulation. He arrogantly declared he was a doctor and a bachelor. He was vain enough to believe that he was handsome and needed to stay well-groomed. He decided to shave daily, grow a moustache and smile more often.

However, these thoughts changed by the second time he smiles at himself in the mirror. This time the smile was feeble as he smiled at himself. On this occasion, his opinion about himself was marked by humility. By then he had realised that he had been vain, foolish and stupid. His encounter with the deadly snake had exposed his shortcomings to him. In spite of being a doctor he did not have any medicines in his room even for an emergency like a snake-bite. His good looks became immaterial when he came face to face with death and the only thoughts that came to his mind then were about God. The feeble smile indicated his acceptance of the folly and vanity that had so far governed his life.

The Snake and the Mirror Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the extracts given below and answer the questions that follow.

Question 1.
I had my meal at the restaurant and returned to my room. I heard a noise from above as I opened the door. The sound was a familiar one.

(a) Who does ‘I’ refer to in this extract?
Answer:
In this extract, ‘I’ refers to the homeopathic doctor who narrates his encounter with a snake.

(b) At what time did ‘I’ return to his room? Where did he return from?
Answer:
The doctor returned to his room at ten o’clock at night after having a meal at a restaurant.

(c) When did ‘I’ hear a noise?
Answer:
The doctor heard a noise when he entered his room.

(d) What type of noise was it?
Answer:
It was a familiar noise like that made by the rats that lived in his room as they moved about.

Question 2.
The sound was a familiar one. One could say that the rats and I shared the room. I took out my box of matches and lighted the kerosene lamp on the table.

(a) What sound did the narrator hear as he entered the room?
Answer:
The narrator heard a sound as if of the scampering of rats as he entered the room.

(b) Why does the narrator say that it was a familiar sound?
Answer:
The narrator says that it was a familiar sound because there were many rats in his room and their constant squeaking or scampering about had become familiar.

(c) How many times did he hear it?
Answer:
He heard the sound thrice. (He heard it as he opened the door, he heard it again as he sat combing his hair this way and that, and he heard it for the third time when he decided to smile more.)

(d) When and why did the noise stop?
Answer:
The sound stopped suddenly as the narrator after pacing about the room, sat down in his chair. Probably, the rats had seen the snake.

Question 3.
It had a tiled roof with long supporting gables that rested on the beam over the wall. There was no ceiling. There was a regular traffic of rats to and off.

(a) What did the narrator do after entering the room?
Answer:
The narrator lit the kerosene lamp and then made his bed.

(b) Why could the narrator not sleep?
Answer:
The narrator could not sleep because there was a regular traffic of rats to and from the beam and the gables. Moreover, it was warm in the room.

(c) Where did he go and why?
Answer:
He went out to the veranda for a little air.

(d) Why did he return to his room?
Answer:
There was no wind blowing outside too.

Question 4.
I went back into the room and sat down on the chair. I opened the box beneath the table and took out a book, the Materia Medica. I opened it at the table on which stood the lamp and a large mirror; a small comb lay beside the mirror.

(a) Where was he before going back into the room? Why had he gone out of the room?
Answer:
The narrator had gone out to the veranda before coming back into the room. He had gone out for some fresh air.

(b) Why did he take out a book from the box?
Answer:
The narrator could not sleep because it was hot and still, and there was no electricity in his room. So, he took out the book to pass some time reading it.

(c) What objects stood on the table?
Answer:
A kerosene lamp and a large mirror stood on the table. A small comb lay beside the mirror.

(d) What did the speaker do after this?
Answer:
After this, the speaker looked into the mirror that stood on the table and contemplated his looks.

Question 5.
One feels tempted to look into a mirror when it is near one. I took a look. In those days I was a great admirer of beauty and I believed in making myself look handsome. I was unmarried and I was a doctor. I felt I had to make my presence felt. I picked up the comb and ran it through my hair and adjusted the parting so that it looked straight and neat.

(a) Why did the narrator look into the mirror?
Answer:
The narrator was tempted to look into the mirror because it was there in front of him.

(b) Why did he want to make himself look handsome?
Answer:
The narrator, who admired beauty in everyone, wanted to make himself look handsome.

(c) What did the narrator do to make his presence felt?
Answer:
He combed his hair and adjusted the parting.

(d) What two important decisions did the narrator take to improve his appearance?
Answer:
The narrator decided to improve his appearance by shaving daily and growing a thin moustache. He also decided to smile his attractive smile more often.

Question 6.
I was unmarried and I was a doctor. I felt I had to make my presence felt. I picked up the comb and ran it through my hair and adjusted the parting so that it looked straight and neat. .

(a) Explain “I had to make my presence felt.”
Answer:
The narrator decided that he had to create an impact on people by improving upon his appearance or personality.

(b) Why did the narrator feel he had to make his presence felt?
Answer:
The narrator felt he was a doctor, a profession that is much respected in society, and was a bachelor. Therefore, he had to make an impact on society.

(c) What did the narrator do to make his presence felt?
Answer:
In order to make his presence felt, he combed his hair carefully and adjusted the parting.

(d) What do you learn about the narrator from this extract?
Answer:
The narrator was arrogant because of his profession and vain about his looks.

Question 7.
I made an important decision—I would shave, daily and grow a thin moustache to look more handsome. I was after all a bachelor, and a doctor! I looked into the mirror and smiled. It was an attractive smile. I made another earth- shaking decision.

(a) Where is the narrator? What is he doing?
Answer:
The narrator is in his room admiring himself in the mirror.

(b) What discovery did he make about himself?
Answer:
The narrator discovered that he was handsome and had an attractive smile.

(c) What two important decisions did he take? Why?
Answer:
He decided to shave daily and grow a thin moustache to look more handsome and to smile his attractive smile more often. He took these decisions to improve his presence.

(d) What is the narrator’s tone in these lines?
Answer:
The narrator’s tone is vain, but he is also laughing at himself, as he calls the decisions “earth-shaking”.

Question 8.
I got up, paced up and down the room. Then another lovely thought struck me. I would marry.

(a) Where did the narrator get up from? Why?
Answer:
The narrator, the homeopathic doctor, got up from his chair in his room. He wanted to think about improving his presence in society.

(b) Which lovely thought struck him?
Answer:
The lovely thought that struck him was that he should get married.

(c) What sort of lady did he wish to marry?
Answer:
He wished to marry a rich, fat lady-doctor.

(d) What prompted him to make this choice?
Answer:
He would get married to a woman doctor who had plenty of money and a good medical practice as he did not have much money. She had to be fat so that if he made a silly mistake and needed to run away she should not be able to run after him and catch him.

Question 9.
There was no time to do any such thing. The snake slithered along my shoulder and coiled around my left arm above the elbow.

(a) What alerted the narrator to the snake’s presence?
Answer:
The narrator was alerted to the snake’s presence by the sudden silence from the rats above. Also he heard a dull thud as if a rubber tube had fallen to the ground.

(b) What does “any such thing” refer to?
Answer:
The speaker did not have time to save himself from the snake by jumping away or crying out as it had coiled around his left arm above the elbow.

(c) What did the snake do after crawling over the narrator’s shoulder?
Answer:
The snake coiled itself tightly around the narrator’s left arm and spread its hood close to his face.

(d) How did the narrator react to the snake’s presence?
Answer:
The narrator sat motionless as if turned to stone. He could not move or cry out when the snake coiled itself around his arm.

Question 10.
I didn ’t jump. I didn ‘t tremble. I didn ’t cry out. There was no time to do any such thing. The snake slithered along my shoulder and coiled around my left arm above the elbow. The hood was spread out and its head was hardly three or four inches from my face!
It would not be correct to say merely that I sat there holding my breath I was turned to stone.

(a) Why did the author not jump, tremble and cry?
Answer:
The author did not jump, tremble and cry because a snake had fallen on his shoulders. He was both too frightened to move and didn’t want to do anything to provoke the snake.

(b) What did the narrator do as the snake coiled itself round his arm?
Answer:
As the narrator coiled itself around his arm, the narrator sat still, turned to stone.

(c) Did the snake bite the speaker? What distracted it?
Answer:
No, the snake did not bite the speaker. A sight of its reflection in the mirror distracted the snake.

(d) What were the narrator’s thoughts as he looked at the snake?
Answer:
In this moment of fear of death, (he realized the presence of God. God had punished him for being too proud and arrogant.

Question 11.
At my slightest movement the snake would strike me! Death lurked four inches away. Suppose it struck, what was the medicine I had to take? There were no medicines in the room. I was but a poor, foolish and stupid doctor. I forgot my danger and smiled feebly at myself

(a) What does Death lurked four inches away imply?
Answer:
The snake was three or four inches away from the writer’s head with its hood spread out. Since it was a – cobra, its bite would be fatal.

(b) Why did the doctor call himself a poor and stupid doctor?
Answer:
The doctor felt poor because he was facing death and stupid because he realised that though he was a doctor, still he did not have medicines for an emergency like this.

(c) What danger does he refer to?
Answer:
The doctor refers to the danger posed by a deadly snake that had wrapped itself on his arm and was slowly crushing it with force.

(d) Why did he smile feebly at himself?
Answer:
The doctor smiled feebly at himself because smiles at his foolishness and helplessness because just a short while ago he had been arrogantly boasting of being a doctor and a bachelor, but now he was helplessly staring at death.

Question 12.
The snake unwound itself from my arm and slowly slithered into my lap. From there it crept onto the table and moved towards the mirror. Perhaps it wanted to enjoy its reflection at closer quarters.

(a) Where was the narrator at the time?
Answer:
The narrator was sitting in his room, admiring his looks and thinking of ways of improving his looks.

(b) What did the snake do as it landed on the narrator’s chair?
Answer:
It slithered down his shoulder, coiled itself around his arm and spread its hood few inches from his face.

(c) Where did the snake do after uncoiling from the writer’s arm?
Answer:
The snake slid across the narrator’s lap on to the table.

(d) Why did the snake move towards the mirror?
Answer:
The snake moved towards the mirror to have a closer look at itself.

Question 13.
I felt then the great presence of the creator of this world and this universe. God was there. Suppose I said something and he did not like it.

(a) When did the narrator feel the presence of the creator?
Answer:
The narrator felt the presence of the creator when he was faced with death in the form of the snake.

(b) Why does the narrator feel he may have displeased God?
Answer:
He felt God may have punished him for being too proud and arrogant. He realized that he was but a mere human, a poor man, nothing to boast about.

(c) What did the narrator do then?
Answer:
He prayed to God – in his imagination he tried to write words, ‘O God’ in bright letters outside his heart.

(d) What was the result of his realisation?
Answer:
The moment he accepted his true worth God appeared pleased and the snake of its own free will left him and sat on the table in front of the mirror.

Question 14.
There was some pain in my left arm. It was as if a thick leaden rod—no, a rod made of molten fire—was slowly but powerfully crushing my arm. The arm was beginning to be drained of all strength. What could Ido?

(a) Why did the narrator feel a pain in his arm?
Answer:
The snake was coiled around his arm and was crushing his arm.

(b) Where had the snake come from?
Answer:
The snake had fallen from the ceiling of the house.

(c) What had alerted the narrator to the snake’s presence at first? What had been his first reaction?
Answer:
The narrator was first alerted to the snake’s presence by a dull thud. He had disregarded it at first as it being nothing to worry about.

(d) Why did the narrator sit still on the chair?
Answer:
The narrator sat still on the chair because at his slightest movement the snake would have struck him.

Question 15.
It seemed as if God appreciated that. The snake turned its head. It looked into the mirror and saw its reflection. I do not claim that it was the first snake that had ever looked into a mirror. But it was certain that the snake was looking into the mirror. Was it admiring its own beauty? Was it trying to make an important decision about growing a moustache or using eye shadow and mascara or wearing a vermilion spot on its forehead?

(a) What was it that God appreciated?
Answer:
God appreciated the narrator getting the realisation that he had been arrogant and vain and his sincere remembering of God.

(b) What did the snake do as it landed on the narrator’s chair?
Answer:
The snake wriggled over the back of the chair and landed on his shoulders. It coiled round his left arm above the elbow and spread out its hood, hardly three inches from his face.

(c) Where did the snake move its head?
Answer:
The snake moved its head towards the mirror.

(d) Why did the narrator call it the “first snake”?
Answer:
The narrator calls it the “first snake” because this was the first snake he had seen which enjoyed looking into the mirror.

Question 16.
I was no mere image cut in granite. I was suddenly a man of flesh and blood. Still holding my breath I got up from the chair. I quietly went through the veranda. From there 1 leapt into the yard and ran for all I was worth.

(a) What does the narrator mean when he says “I was no mere image cut in granite”?
Answer:
The narrator no longer sat completely still, unable to move as if he were an image that had been carved in stone.

(b) Why had he been sitting turned to stone?
Answer:
A snake had coiled itself around his arm and had spread its hood near his face.

(c) Where had the snake gone?
Answer:
The snake had slithered over to sit in front of the mirror.

(d) What did the narrator do?
Answer:
He left his room and ran off as fast as could.

Question 17.
I was no mere image cut in granite. I was suddenly a man of flesh and blood. Still holding my breath I got up from the chair. I quietly went through the veranda. From there 1 leapt into the yard and ran for all I was worth.

(a) When had the narrator felt like an “image cut in granite”?
Answer:
He felt that he was an ‘image cut in granite’ when he found the snake coiled strongly round his forearm with its hood spread out barely three or four inches away from his face. He was gripped in fear and he could neither move nor breathe properly.

(b) What is the meaning of ‘a man of flesh and blood’?
Answer:
‘A man of flesh and blood’ means a living person with human feelings, and with the strength to move.

(c) What made the narrator suddenly turn into ‘a man of flesh and blood’?
Answer:
When the snake let go its hold on his arm, the doctor came out of the state of shock which had made him numb like a stone. He regained his senses and faculties.

(d) What did the narrator do as soon as he turned into ‘a man of flesh and blood’?
Answer:
When the doctor got over his numbing shock, he got up from his chair, quietly went through the veranda, leapt into the yard and ran as fast as he could.

Question 18.
The doctor replied, “I ran and ran till I reached a friend’s house. Immediately I smeared oil all over myself and took a bath. I changed into fresh clothes.

(a) Why did the doctor run?
Answer:
The doctor ran because the snake that landed on his shoulder had slithered off and he wanted to escape the snake.

(b) Where did the narrator spend the night?
Answer:
The narrator spent the night with his friend at his house.

(c) Why did the doctor smear oil all over his body?
Answer:
The doctor smeared oil all over his body because wanted to erase the venom of the Snake that had landed on his shoulder.

(d) What did he do the next morning?
The next morning he took his friends and went back to his room to check whether the snake was still there.

Question 19.
The next morning at about eight-thirty I took my friend and one or two others to my room to move my things from there. But we found we had little to carry.

(a) What does the narrator mean by the phrase “the next morning”?
Answer:
The narrator is referring to the morning after the evening when he had the frightening experience with the snake that coiled itself around his arm.

(b) Which friend is being referred to?
Answer:
The friend with whom the narrator had spent the night after escaping his house and the snake there.

(c) Why did narrator want to remove his things?
Answer:
The narrator wanted to remove his things as he wanted to leave his house because of the fear of the snake.

(d) Why was there little to carry?
Answer:
There was little to carry because thieves had stolen most of his things in the night.

Question 20.
“No, ” the doctor said. “God willed otherwise. My life companion is a thin reedy person with the gift of a sprinter. ”
(a) Explain “God willed it otherwise”.
Answer:
It was God’s will that the narrator’s wishes would not be fulfilled.

(b) What qualities had the narrator wanted in his wife?
Answer:
The narrator wanted to get married to a woman doctor who was rich and fat.

(c) Why had he wanted those qualities?
Answer:
The narrator had a meagre practice so he wanted a rich wife with a good practice. He wanted a fat wife as he felt that if he made a silly mistake and needed to run away she should not be able to run after him and catch him..

(d) What kind of a person did he marry?
Answer:
The woman he married was a thin and slender person who could run like a sprinter.

Here we are providing The Fun They Had Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Beehive, Extra Questions for Class 9 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-9-english/

The Fun They Had Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Beehive

The Fun They Had Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

The Fun They Had Extra Questions Answers Question 1.
Who are Margie and Tommy? How old are they?
Answer:
Margie and Tommy are students from the year 2157. Tommy is a thirteen-year-old boy and Margie is an eleven-year-old girl. Both are neighbours and good friends who like to spend time together like children of their age usually do.

The Fun They Had Extra Questions Question 2.
What did Margie write in her diary?
Answer:
On 17 May 2157 Margie recorded in her diary about the discovery of a “real” book by Tommy. It was a very old book printed on paper and had yellow and crinkly pages, unlike the telebooks of the twenty-second century.

The Fun They Had Class 9 Extra Questions Question 3.
Where had Tommy found the book? How was it different from the books Margie and Tommy were used to?
Answer:
Tommy found a real book in the attic of his house. The book was at least two hundred years old so pages had turned yellow and crinkly. It was a different from the books Margie and Tommy were used to because they had teiebooks to read from while the book Tommy found was printed on paper.

Extra Questions Of The Fun They Had Question 4.
Had Margie ever seen a real book before? Did she know about such books?
Answer:
No, Margie had never seen a book before till she saw the one Tommy found in the attic of his house. She had only heard about books from her grandfather who himself had not seen any. He too had heard about a printed book from his own grandfather.

Fun They Had Extra Questions Question 5.
What things about the book did Margie and Tommy find strange?
Answer:
Margie and Tommy read telebooks where words moved on a screen. Books were stored in a machine that could store a million books on it and still be good for plenty more. So they found it strange that the words in the printed book remained fixed unlike the moving ones on their television screen.

The Fun They Had Class 9 Extra Questions And Answers Question 6.
“What a waste!” What is Tommy referring to as a ‘waste’? Is it really a waste? Why/Why not?
Answer:
Tommy thought the paper book he found in his attic with words that were printed and did not move was a waste. Once a book had been read, it became useless and must be thrown away because it had the same content.

Yes: Printed books are a waste as telebooks are more accessible. They can be stored in a television and read again and again. They occupy very little space as compared to the printed books and need not be discarded once they have been read. In addition, paper books consume resources like trees from which paper is made and water that is consumed in the process of making paper.

No: Printed books are not a waste as they can be read by many people over and over again and can be preserved for future generations. Moreover, the data in a telebook can be lost or stolen, but in a printed book, the data printed on a page remains for ever.

The Fun They Had Questions Answers Question 7.
What do you think a telebook is?
Answer:
A telebook is a book made available in text on a television screen. Many books can be stored and read in this manner. (The telebook is the author’s imagined version of an e-book as this story was written in 1951, long before their advent.)

Class 9 English Chapter 1 Extra Questions Question 8.
Did Margie like the printed book? Why/Why not?
Answer:
Margie was really excited to see the ‘real’ book Tommy found as it was unlike the telebooks the two were used to reading. It was such a novelty that she recorded the discovery in her diary. As she turned the yellow and crinkly pages of the book with Tommy, she found it quite fascinating, unlike Tommy who found it a waste. In fact, she was really reluctant to stop reading the book and go to study. She wanted to read the book again after school.

Class 9 English The Fun They Had Extra Question Answer Question 9.
Where was Margie’s school? Did she have any classmates?
Answer:
Margie’s school was a room next to her bedroom in her house. No, she did not have any classmates as her school was a customised school, set up exclusively for her according to her level and needs.

Class 9 The Fun They Had Extra Questions Question 10.
What kind of teachers did Margie and Tommy have? How were they different from teachers in the book?
Answer:
Margie and Tommy had mechanical teachers, which were large and black and ugly, with a big screen on which all the lessons were shown and the questions were asked. There was a slot where they had to put homework and test papers and the mechanical teacher calculated the marks in no time. Margie and Tommy’s teachers were different from the teachers in the book as the teachers in the book were men and not mechanical teachers.

Extra Questions From The Fun They Had Question 11.
Why had Margie started hating her school?
Answer:
Margie never liked school. But lately she had come to hate it more than ever because of her poor performance in geography. The mechanical teacher had been giving her test after test in the subject and she had been doing worse and worse.

Class 9 English Beehive Ch 1 Extra Questions Question 12.
How were Margie and Tommy assessed in their subjects?
Answer:
Margie and Tommy were given assignments by their mechanical teachers. They wrote their answers in a punch code they were trained in. Then they inserted their special answer sheets in the slot in the mechanical teacher. The teacher corrected their assignments and calculated their marks in no time.

Extra Questions On The Fun They Had Question 13.
What did Margie hate the most about her school?
Answer:
The part that Margie hated most about her school was the slot where she had to put homework and test papers. She always had to write them in a punch code that she was made to leam at the age of six. The mechanical teacher calculated her marks in no time leaving no time for Margie to relax after submitting the assigned tasks.

Extra Questions The Fun They Had Question 14.
Write a brief note on Margie’s school routine.
Answer:
Although Margie was taught by a large black television screen installed in a room next to her bedroom, Margie followed a strict routine and had regular days and hours for school. She studied from Monday to Friday at the same time every day as her mother thought that young girls learnt things better if they studied them at regular hours.

Fun They Had Class 9 Extra Questions Question 15.
Margie’s mother was very particular about her studies. Justify with evidence from the story.
Answer:
Margie’s mother was very particular about her studies and made sure that Margie attended her tele-school regularly and at fixed times as she felt little girls learned better if they learned at regular hours. She took a keen interest in Margie’s performance and when she felt she was not doing too well in a particular subject, she called the County Inspector to have a look at the mechanical teacher.

Question 16.
Who was the County Inspector? What did he do to improve Margie’s performance?
Answer:
The County Inspector was a technical expert who identified and rectified errors in the functioning of the mechanical teachers. When the County Inspector examined the working of Margie’s mechanical teacher, he found that the geography sector had been geared too quick. He slowed it up to an average 10-years level. He found the overall pattern of Margie quite satisfactory.

Question 17.
Write a brief note on the County Inspector.
Answer:
The County Inspector was a round little man with a red face and a whole box of tools with dials and wires. He was certainly a kind-hearted man and he put Margie at ease by giving her an apple and telling her mother that if Margie was not performing well, it was not her fault, but the fault of the mechanical teacher. He aligned the speed of the geography sector keeping in mind the level of the girl. Before leaving, he patted Margie on the head and expressed satisfaction at her performance.

Question 18.
Why was Margie not doing well in geography? What did the County Inspector do to help her?
Answer:
Margie was not doing well in geography. In fact, her performance was getting worse day by day. Her mother sent for the County Inspector to look into the problem. He told Mrs Jones that the geography sector in Margie’s mechanical teacher was geared up a little too quick for her and that he had slowed it up to the level of an average ten-year-old.

Question 19.
Why did Margie get disappointed after the geography sector of her teacher was set right?
Answer:
Margie’s mechanical teacher had been giving her test after test in geography and her mother had asked the County Inspector to look into it. Margie had hoped that her mechanical teacher would be taken away for some time as Tommy’s had been when it had malfunctioned. But she was disappointed when the County Inspector set the mechanical teacher right there and then.

Question 20.
What had once happened to Tommy’s teacher?
Answer:
Once, Tommy’s mechanical teacher had developed a fault and its history sector had blanked out absolutely. The teacher had to be taken away for repairs and it had taken almost a month to put it in order.

Question 21.
What does Tommy tell Margie about the old kind of school?
Answer:
Tommy describes the old school as a special building where all the children went to study together. Students of the same age-group were taught the same things which by human teachers. These teachers taught various things to boys and girls, gave them homework and also asked them questions.

Question 22.
What was Margie’s reaction when Tommy told her that twentieth-century schools had human teachers?
Answer:
When Margie heard Tommy mention that children were taught by human teachers in the times gone by, she could not believe the truth of Tommy’s statement. She believed that a human teacher could not match the mechanical teacher in intelligence and knowledge. This was because she had been taught by a mechanical teacher and had never seen any human teacher.

Question 23.
Why could Margie and Tommy finish reading the book Tommy found?
Answer:
When Margie and Tommy were reading the book Tommy had found in his attic, Margie’s mother interrupted them and told Margie to go to her schoolroom to study. She even suggested Tommy too went to attend school.

Question 24.
What did the teacher teach Margie when she went to her school?
Answer:
When Margie went to school the mechanical teacher taught an arithmetic lesson on the addition of proper fractions. It taught her how to add the fractions xh and 1/4.

Question 25.
Why was Margie not able to concentrate on the Arithmetic lesson?
Answer:
Margie could not concentrate on the arithmetic lesson because her mind was pre-occupied with the thoughts about the school that Tommy had just described her. She was fascinated by the fact that in olden days all the kids from the whole neighbourhood came, laughing and shouting in the schoolyard, sitting together in the schoolroom, going home together at the end of the day. They learned the same things, so they could help one another with the homework and talk about it.

Question 26.
Why did Margie think that children in olden days had fun while studying in school?
Answer:
Margie attended a tele-school, which was just a machine in the room next to her bedroom and she studied alone unlike the students of the schools in the bygone times. She found her present school much too mechanical, boring, monotonous and demanding, and she hated it. She felt that learning was more fun in those days because hundreds of children had the opportunity of congregating and studying together with the help of human teachers and printed books. Schools were large buildings where students learned the same things, so they could help one another with the homework and talk about it.

The Fun They Had Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
How did Margie and Tommy react to the book Tommy found in his attic? Why?
Answer:
Margie and Tommy were neighbours and friends. They lived in 2157, in an age of technology when going to school meant sitting in a room by oneself, being taught by a mechanical teacher that was adjusted to fit the learner’s mind and reading from a telebook with moving words.

Then on the Then one da7 May 2157, Tommy found an old paper book wit yellow and crinkled pages fn the attic of his house. He shared the exciting news with his friend Margie and together they are wonderstruck, for they had before that never seen or heard about a book that had no screen but only fixed text on pages.

The book was quite different from the tele-books they were used to. As Margie and Tommy read the book, they were amazed by its contents. They discovered that hundreds of years ago schools were huge buildings where hundreds of children went to study and where children of the same age studied together and carried out the same activities and tasks. They were taught by real human teachers with the help of real books.

Question 2.
Describe the old school as described in the book? How did it influence Margie?
Answer:
The book which Tommy found was about school. However, it was not the kind of school Margie and Tommy were used to, but the old kind of schools that were there hundreds and hundreds of years ago. School was a special building and all the kids went there. Children went to these schools to study and were taught by a ‘regular’ teacher, a man who told the boys and girls things and gave them homework and asked them questions.

At school, all children of the same age studied together and carried out the same activities and tasks. Margie thought about the old kind of school. She was thinking about all the kids from the whole neighbourhood came, laughing and shouting in the schoolyard, sitting together in the schoolroom, going home together at the end of the day. They learned the same things, so they could help one another with the homework and talk about it. Margie thought about the old school system and how much fun the children must have had, learning and spending time together.

Question 3.
Write a short note on the school system in “The Fun They Had”.
Answer:
Margie and Tommy are young school going children in the year 2157. Schools and teachers in the twenty- second century are entirely different from the ones in present day. Margie and Tommy’s school is not in a separate special building but a room in their respective houses where the television or the mechanical teacher is placed. Each student has to sit and study alone with the help of mechanical teacher, a large and black and ugly machine, with a big screen on which all the lessons are shown and the questions are asked.

The ‘teacher’ assigns tests to the students and assesses their progress. The speed of the different subject sectors is fixed according to the age level of each student. There is a special slot in the tele-teacher where students have to insert their homework or tests. If the mechanical teacher develops any fault, there are engineers to repair it.

Sometimes the fault may be a major one and it takes long to repair it, as was the case when Tommy’s history teacher developed a snag and it took a month to repair it. Thus, the mechanical teachers and schoolrooms of Margie and Tommy are fully computerised and are completely different from the present day schools.

Question 4.
Do you agree that schools today are better than the schools in the story ‘The Fun They Had’. Give reasons for your choice.
Answer:
Yes: In the story The Fun They Had writer Isaac Asimov talks about the schools of the future. In this future, school is a room in the house where each child is taught by a mechanical teacher and there are telebooks on television screens.

After reading the story, I think that we pupils in the present should be satisfied. I agree an individual teacher for each child can work better and more intensively with the pupil and when the parents set the school time a child can have flexible school hours. If the school(room) is at home, the children do not have to walk or drive so far and this saves time and money.

But on the other hand, we lose an opportunity for social contacts. The most important advantage we have today is we have contact with other kids, in the breaks we can talk to each other and we have fun with them. Pupils solve problems together – very important for the later life and the development of a child. And a human teacher is definitely a better educator than a machine because he knows the problems of humans and children. A machine will never be able to feel like a human. Moreover, a human teacher can provide valuable guidance and values that a mechanical teacher cannot.

No: The Fun They Had by Isaac Asimov is a science-fiction story schooling in the twenty-second century. Margie, an eleven-year-old girl, and Tommy, who is thirteen, live in the year 2157, where school means learning from a machine teacher at home. Both kids have never seen a printed book, because they read telebooks.

The author shows us how school could be in two hundred years, when everything is managed by computers and other technology. In his story, in spite of the advances in technology, the two children are still like kids today. Isaac Assimov shows very clearly the typical behaviour of an eleven-year-old girl and a thirteen-year- old boy, so in his story their characters are not influenced by the technical advancement.

An advantage of a mechanical teacher is that the mechanical teacher can be geared to the mental level of the student. Thus, it becomes easier for the child to understand the lessons. Different styles of learning of students can be addressed using mechanical teacher and technology. Mechanical teachers can analyze the specific mistakes that students make and give instant feedback which would prove helpful for the students.

Question 5.
Do you think Asimov is warning us about the dangers of too much computerisation?
Answer:
In his short story “The Fun They Had” Isaac Asimov depicts the school system in 2157 which is based on technical advancement. Thirteen-year-old Tommy and eleven-year-old girl Margie both study with a computer teacher at home. While the individual teaching can train the personal talents and it is a perfect way to give every child knowledge and information baed on the child’s capacity, but there are some disadvantages, too.

Pupils do not learn like a computer. Learning has to be fun, otherwise the probability of forgetting is higher. Another disadvantage is that there are no social relationships like at school today. Learning with friends at school can be a motivation. Students improve their communication skills and their behaviour in a group. A mechanical teacher cannot give moral values to the children.

I think Asimov is trying to warn us that the school system which is being followed in 2157 is a good way of giving children knowledge and information for jobs, but it is not good at giving ability for interpersonal relationships. In my opinion the disadvantages are more serious than the advantages and I feel this is a warning given by Isaac Asimov that this kind of schooling may not, in fact, be an ideal option for students.

The Fun They Had Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the extracts given below and answer the questions that follow.

Question 1.
“Today Tommy found a real book! ”
It was a very old book. Margie’s grandfather once said that when he was a little boy his grandfather told him that there was a time when all stories were printed on paper.

(a) Who are Margie and Tommy?
Answer:
Tommy is a thirteen-year-old boy and Margie an eleven-year-old girl who live in the twenty second century.

(b) Where had Tommy found the book?
Answer:
Tommy had found the book in the attic of his house.

(c) What is meant by “real book”?
Answer:
The book is “real” as it is printed on paper rather than a telebook.

(d) How had Margie heard of such a book?
Answer:
Margie’s grandfather had told her that he had heard from his grandfather about a time when all stories were printed on paper.

Question 2.
It was a very old book. Margie’s grandfather once said that when he was a little boy his grandfather told him that there was a time when all stories were printed on paper. They turned the pages, which were yellow and crinkly, and it was awfully funny to read words that stood still instead of moving the way they were supposed to-on a screen, you know.

(a) Why were the pages of the book yellow?
Answer:
The pages of the book were yellow because the book was quite old.

(b) What kind of books did Margie and Tommy read?
Answer:
Margie and Tommy read telebooks

(c) What do you think a telebook is?
Answer:
A book that is not printed on paper, but one that can be read on a screen. Words move on the screen for the students to read.

(d) Why did Tommy find the book a “waste”?
Answer:
Unlike their telebooks, the words on the page stayed the same and did not change. He felt when one was through with the book, one would just throw it away.

Question 3.
They turned the pages, which were yellow and crinkly, and it was awfully funny to read words that stood still instead of moving the way they were supposed to-on a screen, you know.

(a) Who are ‘they’ in this extract?
Answer:
‘They’ are Margie and Tommy, the young children who are reading the book.

(b) Which book had yellow and crinkly pages?
Answer:
The book that Tommy found in the attic of his house had yellow and crinkly pages.

(c) What do the yellow and crinkly pages reveal about the book?
Answer:
The yellow and crinkly pages reveal that it was a very old book and had not been lying in the attic for a long time.

(d) What did ‘they’ find funny? Why?
Answer:
The children found the fixed and still words in the book funny because they were used to reading electronic books on the television screen in which the words kept moving.

Question 4.
“I wouldn’t throw it away. ”

(a) Who says these words?
Answer:
Tommy, a thirteen-year-old boy says these words.

(b) What does ‘it’ refer to?
Answer:
‘It’ refers to the television screen of the computer on which Tommy reads books. It has a million books . and space for a lot more.

(c) What is it being compared with, by the speaker?
Answer:
‘It’ is being compared with the paper book that Tommy had found in the attic of his house.

(d) Why would the speaker not throw it away?
Answer:
The speaker, Tommy, wouldn’t throw the television screen on which he read books away because it had a million books on it and it could be used many times.

Question 5.
“What’s it about? ”
“School. ”
Margie was scornful. “School? What’s there to write about school? I hate school. ”

(a) What does ‘it’ refer to?
Answer:
‘It’ refers to the book Tommy found in his attic.

(b) Why was Margie scornful about the book?
Answer:
Margie was scornful about the book as it was about school. She hated her school and felt school would not be an interesting enough topic to read about.

(c) Why did Margie not like school?
Answer:
Margie had never liked her school, but now she hated her mechanical teacher so she disliked school even more.

(d) Why did Margie hate her mechanical teacher?
Answer:
The mechanical teacher had been giving her test after test in geography and she had been doing worse and worse.

Question 6.
He was a round little man with a red face and a whole box of tools with dials and wires. He smiled at Margie and gave her an apple, then took the teacher apart.

(a) Who is ‘he’?
Answer:
He is the County Inspector.

(b) Why had he been called?
Answer:
Margie’s mother, Mrs Jones, had called him because Margie’s mechanical teacher had been giving her test after test in geography and she had been doing worse and worse. She wanted the County Inspector to fix the teacher.

(c) Why did he give Margie an apple?
Answer:
He smiled at Margie and gave her an apple to reassure her.

(d) How did he fix the teacher?
Answer:
The County Inspector found that the teacher’s the geography sector was geared a little too quick. He slowed it up to an average ten-year level.

Question 7.
He said to her mother, “It’s not the little girl’s fault, Mrs Jones. I think the geography sector was geared a little too quick. Those things happen sometimes. ”

(a) Who is ‘he’ and which ‘little girl’ is he talking about?
Answer:
He is the County Inspector. He is talking about Margie.

(b) What, according to him, is not the girl’s fault?
Answer:
According to him, the girl’s continuous poor performances in Geography tests was not her fault.

(c) What was wrong with the geography sector of the mechanical teacher?
Answer:
He finds that the pace of the geography sector has been a bit too fast for the girl’s level.

(d) What does the County Inspector do to correct the fault?
Answer:
The County Inspector took apart the mechanical teacher and slowed it up to an average ten-year level.

Question 8.
“Actually, the overall pattern of her progress is quite satisfactory. ” And he patted Margie’s head again. Margie was disappointed. She had been hoping they would take the teacher away altogether.

(a) Who is the speaker? Whose progress is being talked about?
Answer:
The speaker is the County Inspector. He is talking about Margie’s progress.

(b) Why was Margie disappointed?
Answer:
Margie was disappointed as her teacher was not taken away as she wished for.

(c) Whose teacher had been taken away? Why?
Answer:
Tommy’s teacher had been taken away for nearly a month because the history sector had blanked out completely.

(d) What subjects did Margie and Tommy learn?
Answer:
Margie and Tommy learnt geography, history and arithmetic.

Question 9.
Tommy looked at her with very superior eyes. “Because it’s not our kind of school, stupid. This is the old kind of school that they had hundreds and hundreds of years ago. ” He added loftily.

(a) What does Tommy mean by “our kind of school”?
Answer:
They study in classrooms in their own homes with mechanical teachers.

(b) Why did Tommy call Margie stupid?
Answer:
Tommy called Malgie stupid because she was ignorant about schools of the past.

(c) Whom does ‘they’ here refer to?
Answer:
‘They’ here refers to the students of centuries ago who were mentioned in the book.

(d) How was ‘their’ school different?
Answer:
Their school was a special building that they went to and they learned the same thing if they were the same age. They had a person as a teacher who taught the whole class.

Question 10.
“Sure they had a teacher, butit wasn ’t a regular teacher. It was a man. ”

(a) Who speaks these words and about what?
Answer:
Tommy speaks these words about the schools in the olden times.

(b) Who does ‘they’ refer to in these lines?
Answer:
‘They’ refers to the students from the schools of the olden times.

(c) What does ‘regular’ mean here?
Answer:
Here ‘regular’ means a mechanised teacher like the ones Margie and Tommy had.

(d) What is ‘regular’ contrasted with?
Answer:
‘Regular’ is contrasted with the teachers from the olden days who were real men and not programmed machines.

Question 11.
“A man? How could a man be a teacher? ”
“Well, he just told the boys and girls things and gave them homework and asked them questions. ”

(a) Who feels a man cannot be a teacher? Why?
Answer:
Margie feels a man cannot be a teacher as a man is not smart enough. Moreover, she was used to being taught by a mechanical teacher.

(b) What does ‘he’ refer to here?
Answer:
‘He’ refers to a man, a human teacher of the twentieth century.

c) What job did ‘he’ do?
Answer:
His job was to teach boys and girls and give them work to do at home and ask them questions.

d) Where had the speaker got this information?
Answer:
The speaker, Tommy, had found this information in the old book that he had found in the attic of his house.

Question 12.
Tommy screamed with laughter. “You don’t know much, Margie. The teachers didn ’t live in the house. They had a special building and all the kids went there. ”

(a) Why did Tommy scream with laughter?
Answer:
Tommy screamed with laughter at the ignorance of Margie who thought that in old times the human teacher lived in the house of a student and taught him there.

(b) What did Margie not know? Why?
Answer:
Margie did not know about the functioning of the schools of olden times because she lived in the year 2157 when education had been made fully computerized.

(c) What ‘special building’ does the speaker refer to?
Answer:
By ‘special building’ Tommy means the buildings that housed schools in olden times.

(d) How is the special building a unique place for Margie and Tommy?
Answer:
Margie and Tommy are the students of the year 2157. They are taught at home by mechanical teachers. Their television screen is their school. Therefore, a special building for teaching children is a unique thing for them.

Question 13.
Margie went into the school room. It was right next to her bedroom and the mechanical teacher was on and waiting for her. It was always on at the same time every day except Saturday and Sunday because her mother said little girls learned better if they learned at regular hours.

(a) What was ‘it’? Where was ‘it’?
Answer:
‘It’ in these lines is Margie’s schoolroom. It was next to her bedroom.

(b) Why was ‘it’ next to ‘her’ bedroom?
Answer:
It was next to her bedroom because in the twenty-second century students were taught through a customized education system under where students were taught at home by mechanical teachers.

(c) Why was the mechanical teacher on and waiting for her?
Answer:
The mechanical teacher was on and waiting for her because it was a programmed machine that worked . as per a fixed time-plan and Margie’s mother wanted her to follow a fixed time plan.

(d) Why did Margie not like the mechanical teacher?
Answer:
Margie did not like the mechanical teacher because it was very boring and demanding. She had to sit in front of it regularly at fixed hours.

Question 14.
Margie did so with a sigh. She was thinking about the old schools they had when her grandfather’s grandfather was a little boy. All the kids from the whole neighbourhoods came, laughing and shouting in the schoolyard, sitting together in the school room going home together at the end of the day. They learned the same things, so that they could help one another with the home work and talk about it.

(a) What did Margie do with a sigh?
Answer:
Margie put her homework into the slot of her mechanical teacher with a sigh.

(b) Which school is Margie thinking about in the above lines?
Answer:
Margie was thinking about the old schools of centuries ago as written about in the book Tommy had found.

(c) Where was Margie’s school? Did she have any classmates?
Answer:
Margie’s school was in her home itself. It was right next to her bedroom. No, she did not have any classmates.

(d) How is the school under reference different from the present ones?
Answer:
The present schools were located in the student’s house, where a mechanical teacher taught the student as per the child’s individual capacity. The schools under reference had a separate building where all children of a certain age were taught together by human teachers.

Here we are providing The Ball Poem Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

The Ball Poem Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

The Ball Poem Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

The Ball Poem Extra Questions And Answers Question 1.
How was the boy’s hall lost?
Answer:
The boy was playing with his ball. The ball bounced and it went down the street. From the street the ball fell into the water. This is how the boy lost this ball.

The Ball Poem Extra Questions Question 2.
How did the boy react after losing the ball?
Answer:
The boy was very much upset after losing the ball. He was filled with sadness, which affected him greatly. Stunningly he stood in a stiff manner, overpowered with grief, trembling and staring down where his ball was lost.

Ball Poem Extra Questions Question 3.
How does the boy ‘Senses first responsibility?
Answer:
The boy loses his ball and gets upset. This was his first lesson in sensing first responsibility. He has the experience of losing something and learning how to cope up with the loss. He understands the nature of loss or what it means to lose something. He now will be more responsible and vigilant to avoid losing something in future.

The Ball Poem Class 10 Extra Questions Question 4.
What do you think the poet means by the following lines?
People will take Balls,
balls will be lost always, little boy.
And no one buys a ball back.
Answer:
We think the poet, in these lines, conveys a great message. Losing ball here symbolises miseries arising out of the losses one suffers in life. In this materialistic world, there is cut throat competition. So losses are bound to happen some day or the other. You have to make up for your own losses. No body else will, do it.

Extra Questions Of The Ball Poem Question 5.
What does the poet mean by “epistemology of loss”?
OR
How important is the learning to “epistemology of loss” for the boy?
Answer:
According the poet, the epistemology of loss is the greatest lesson, the boy is learning. It teaches him to value and preserve his cherished things. It also teaches him to recover from the loss and move on with , his life. When we try to understand what it means to lose something, we are more vigilant to check the further losses. Thus it helps us to be self-reliant and stand up on our own feet.

The Ball Poem Important Questions Question 6.
Why is it important for everyone to experience loss to stand up after it?
Answer:
The poet believes that nothing is eternal. Everyone must experience the loss to help him bear it. It also teaches him how to recover from it and stand up. It will remind him to protect and preserve his possessions.

The Ball Poem Short Question Answer Question 7.
Why does the poet say that ‘Money is external’?
Answer:
The poet believes that money cannot buy each and everything. It can bring just external happiness by buying us possessions but it cannot make a boy recover from his unhappiness due to loss of a loved one or valued thing.

Class 10 The Ball Poem Extra Questions Question 8.
What does the poet say about “A world of possessions”?
OR
Why does the poet call the world ‘A world of possessions’?
Answer:
The poet calls the world ‘A world of possessions’ because man values and is valued on the basis of his worldly possessions. All his feelings and his whole life are dominated by his possessions.

The Ball Poem Extra Question Answer Question 9.
Why is it important for everyone to experience loss and to stand up after it?
OR
There’s always loss and there’s always disappointment. When someone is learning from loss, he is moving towards achievement. Elaborate.
OR
It’s often been said that you learn more from losing than you do from winning. You learn a lot from a loss. It really gets your attention and it really motivates. Described.
OR
Loss is an essential and significant experience of one’s life. Explain.
Answer:
Everyone experiences a loss at some point in one’s life. It might be the loss of a beloved, or a parent or a close relative or even a pet. Humans have a tendency of getting attached to things and the loss of things or people close to heart causes grievance. But one must not let that pull us down. Loss is an essential and significant experience of one’s life. And one must learn to deal with it and move on.

If we keep thinking about it or grieve over that loss, we can never come out of it. It will only affect us psychologically and can have severe consequences. Brooding over a loss will never help in bringing things back to normal. Loss is inevitable sometimes. Once a loss occurs, one must grieve, but only for a short while. Thereafter one must get over it and move on in life.

Question  10.
Write the central idea of the poem “The Ball Poem”.
Answer:
The poet John Berryman “The Ball poem” describes the grief of a boy over the loss of his ball. This loss makes him realise his first responsibility. The poet wants us to understand that in this materialistic world nothing is forever. We will be forced to give up things which we love and even in time of problems, we have to learn to stand up. We have to learn to accept fate of our life.

Question 11.
Why does the poet say, “I would not intrude on him’? Why doesn’t he offer him money to buy another ball?
Answer:
The poet wants the boy to experience the loss. He should learn that it is the part of life. That is why the poet does not want to interfere and wants the boy to be strong and handle the situation himself and does not want to offer him money to buy another ball.

Question 12.
staring down/ All his young days into the harbour where/His ball went…” Do you think the boy has had the ball for a long time? Is it linked to the memories of days when he played with it?
Answer:
Yes, it seems like the boy has had the ball for a long time. When it bounced into the water, all his memories of the days of childhood flashed in front of him. This led to a realization that those moments would not come back, just like the ball. He can buy new balls and can create new similar moments, but those that are gone, and would not ever return.

Question 13.
What does “in the world of possessions’ mean?
Answer:
“In the world of possessions’ means people like to possess all sorts of things in the world. Money is an external thing because it can buy only material objects. It cannot buy everything that one loses or cannot bring back your long lost memories.

Question 14.
Do you think the boy has lost anything earlier? Pick out the words that suggest the answer.
Answer:
No, it seems that the boy has not lost anything earlier. The words that suggest so are, “senses first responsibility in a world of possessions”.

Question 15.
What does the poet say the boy is learning from the loss of the ball? Try to explain this in your own words.
Answer:
The boy has lost his ball while playing. The poet says that from this loss, the boy will learn in his years, what it means to lose something. Thus he will understand the nature of loss or how to face and cope up with losses one suffers in life. This experience of losing something will enable him to learn to be self- reliant and to stand up on his feet in the life where losses do occur, though they might not be important enough to worry about.

Question 16.
Have you ever lost something you liked very much? Write a paragraph describing how you felt then and saying whether—and how—you got over your loss.
Answer:
Last year, our beautiful dog Tommy was lost. All the family loved the dog very much, but I was very deeply attached to Tommy. I used to take full care of him and Tommy would accompany me wherever I allowed him to do so. I felt desperate and upset when Tommy was not traced at all the possible places, where we could find him. I did not feel like eating or going for morning walk. Tommy always used to accompany me when I went for my morning walk, Gradually I reconciled with the situation and consoled myself.

I totally engrossed myself in my studies though I did not feel like playing. I never stopped missing Tommy. Then, one day, when I went to another colony to meet a friend, I found Tommy tied in someday else’s home. When I approached them, they said that the beautiful dog seemed to have lost his way and so they had been giving care to him. I thanked them and returned home happily with Tommy.

The Ball Poem Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the following Stanza and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
What is the boy now, who has lost his ball,
What, what is he to do? I saw it go
Merrily bouncing, down the street, and then
Merrily over—there it is in the water!

(i) Name the poem and poet.
(ii) What has the boy lost?
(iii) What did he see?
(iv) Where did the ball go?
Answer:
(i) This stanza has been taken from the poem The Ball Poem’ composed by John Berryman.
(ii) The boy has lost his ball while playing.
(iii) He saw the ball going down the street.
(iv) The ball went into the water.

Question 2.
No use to say ‘O there are other balls’:
An ultimate shaking grief fixes the boy
As he stands rigid, trembling, staring down
All his young days into the harbour where His ball went.

(i) What does ‘0 there are other balls’ imply?
(ii) Why is the child upset?
(iii) What is he looking at?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) It implies that the loss of his ball cannot console the boy even if he gets another ball.
(ii) The child/boy is upset because he has lost his ball.
(iii) He is looking at the place where his ball went.
(iv) The poem “The Ball Poem” composed by John Berryman.

Question 3.
I would not intrude on him;
A dime, another ball, is worthless.
Now He senses first responsibility
In a world of possessions.

(i) What did the poet decide?
(ii) What does the boy understand?
(iii) What does the “World of Possessions’refer to?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) The poet decided not to interfere and suggest anything to the boy.
(ii) The boy senses his first responsibility.
(iii) It refers to the world where a man is known by his possessions and is continually led by his decision to possess.
(iv) The poem “The Ball Poem” written by John Berryman.

Question 4.
People will take
Balls, balls will be lost always, little boy.
And no one buys a ball back. Money is external.
He is learning, well behind his desperate eyes,
The epistemology of loss, how to stand up
Knowing what every man must one day know
And most know many days, how to stand up.

(i) What does the boy learn?
(ii) What does he think about money?
(iii) Why was the boy upset?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) The boy is learning the epistemology of loss. He learns how to cope up with the loss.
(ii) Money is external.
(iii) The boy was upset because he had lost his ball.
(iv) The poem “The Ball Poem” composed by John Berryman.

Here we are providing For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

For Anne Gregory Extra Question Answer Question 1.
What does the young woman wish?
Answer:
The young woman wishes that she should be loved for herself alone and not for her yellow hair. She says that she could dye her hair in brown or black or carrot coloured.

For Anne Gregory Question Answer Question 2.
Would the young man love her for herself alone?
Answer:
The young man’s desires have been frustrated for want of hope because he has fallen from her grace, he will never love her for herself alone, though he might love her yellow hair.

For Anne Gregory Class 10 Questions And Answers Question 3.
Why is the youth in despair in the poem “For Anne Gregory”?
Answer:
The young man loves Anne. He is attracted towards her external beauty. He feels that young men are in despair because of her exquisite beauty.

Anne Gregory Poem Pdf Question 4.
What did the religious man tell the poet?
Answer:
The religious man told the poet that he found a book to prove that only god could love her for her spiritual beauty and not for her physical beauty.

Question 5.
The poet in the poem ‘For Anne Gregory’ conveys that We should give importance to the inner beauty and not to the physical appearance. Explain with reference to the poem.
Answer:
It is an accepted fact that external beauty is shortlived’but inner beauty remains forever. Inner beauty gives satisfaction and joy. We should thus learn not to accept things at their face value. We should try to. discover the inner beauty and strength of a person, though it is not easy to do so. We should accept the person with positive and negative values.

As the time passes relations are strengthened. In the poem ‘For Anne Gregory’ the beloved wants that her lover should love her for herself not the colour of the hair. She wants to strengthen this fact that inner beauty is more important than external beauty.

Question 6.
Write a paragraph on the topic “All that Glitters is not Gold”. With reference to the poem “For Anne Gregory” written by W. B. Yeats.
Answer:
What we see through the naked eye might not always be the naked truth. Like shining pieces of glass that shine and glitter like diamonds, the way people appear on the outside can be very misleading. We must never judge a book by its cover as there is a possibility that we might be wrong.

Appearances should never be trusted. It can lead us to wrong conclusions. A person may be very handsome or beautiful outside but inside if the character is not good that person’s appearance is of no value. So always try to look beneath the skin because beauty is skin deep. The real beauty lies in the personality of the person, not in external appearances.

Question 7.
What does the young man mean by “great honey-coloured / Ramparts at your ear?” Why does he say that young men are “thrown into despair” by them? ”
Answer:
The “great honey-colored / Ramparts at your ear” refers’to the beautiful yellow coloured hair that falls at the woman’s ear and cover it like a wall around a fort. He says that the young men are “thrown into despair” by them because they look so beautiful on the women that her beauty gets thoroughly enhanced. The young men fall in love with her and feel despair. He says that it is not possible that someone would love her alone and not her yellow hair.

Question 8.
What colour is the young woman’s hair? What does she say she can change it to? Why would she want to do so?
Answer:
The young woman’s hair is of yellow colour. She says that she could get her hair dyed to brown, black or carrot colour. She would change the colour of her hair so that the young men in despair would love her only and not her yellow hair. She wanted them to love her for what she was and not for her appearance such as her hair colour.

Question 9.
Objects have qualities which make them desirable to others. Can you think of some objects (a car, a phone, a dress…) and say what qualities make one object more desirable than another? Imagine you were trying to sell an object: what qualities would you emphasise?
Answer:
Objects have qualities which make them desirable to others. There are many factors that make them desirable such as their usefulness, utility, disability, their price and appearance.

Question 10.
What about people? Do we love others because we like their qualities, whether physical or ‘ mental? Or is it possible to love someone “for themselves alone”? Are some people “more
lovable’ than others”? Discuss this question in pairs or in groups, considering points like the following.
(i) A parent or caregiver’s love for a newborn baby, for a mentally or physically challenged child, for a clever child or prodigy.
(ii) The public’s love for a filmstar, a sportsperson, a politician, or a social worker.
(iii) Your love for a friend, or brother or sister.
(iv) Your love for a pet, and the pet’s love for you.
Answer:
Try yourself in classroom / classroom activity.

Question 11.
You have perhaps concluded that people are not objects to be valued for their qualities or riches rather than for themselves. But elsewhere Yeats asks the question: How can we separate the dancer from the dance? Is it possible to separate ‘the person himself or herself from how the person looks, sounds, walks, and so on? Think of how you or a friend or member of your family has changed over the years. Has your relationship also changed? In what way?
Answer:
Classroom Activity.

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the following stanza and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
“Never shall a young man,
Thrown into despair
By those great honey-coloured
Ramparts at your ear,
Love you for yourself alone
And not your yellow hair.”

(i) Who is the speaker in this stanza?
(ii) Why is the youngman in despair?
(iii) With what are her ears compared?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) The poet is the speaker, he is addressing Anne Gregory.
(ii) The youngman is the lover of Anne. He is in despair because he has seen the white hair of his beloved.
(iii) Her ears are composed with ramparts, which are high, wide walls around a castle or a fort.
(iv) The poem “For Anne Gregory” composed by “W. B. Yeasts”.

Question 2.
“But I can get a hair-dye
And set such colour there,
Brown, or black, or carrot,
That young men in despair
May love me for myself alone
And not my yellow hair.”

(i) Who is the speaker in these lines?
(ii) What colour would she give her hair?
(iii) Why is she ready to do so?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) Anrie Gregory is the speaker in these lines.
(ii) She would give her hair colour brown or black or carrot.
(iii) She is ready to do so because her lover feels that men love her because of her golden hair. She wants to be loved for her inner beauty.
(iv) The poem “For Anne Gregory” composed by “W. B. Yeasts”.

Question 3.
“I heard an old religious man
But yesternight declare
That he had found a text to prove
That only God, my dear
Could love you for yourself alone
And not your yellow hair.”

(i) Who is ‘I’ in the first line?
(ii) What did he find yesternight?
(iii) What does the poet convey in the last three lines?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) ‘I’ in the first line is the poet— W. B. Yeats.
(ii) The poet heard an old religious man declaring that only God could love us for ourselves alone and not our hair.
(iii) The poet conveys that human beings are incapable of seeing inner beauty. They love someone only for the external beauty. Only God can love someone for the inner beauty.
(iv) The poem “For Anne Gregory” composed by “W. B. Yeasts”.

Here we are providing A Triumph of Surgery Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

A Triumph of Surgery Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

A Triumph of Surgery Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

A Triumph Of Surgery Extra Question Answer Question 1.
“I think 1 know a cure for you”. What was Dr Herriot’s ‘cure’ for Tricki?
Answer:
Seeing the miserable condition of Tricki Dr Herriot at once decides to keep him away from his mistress Mrs Pumphrey for a while. So, he suggested that Tricki should be hospitalized for about a fortnight as he had to be kept upder observation.

Triumph Of Surgery Extra Questions Question 2.
Why was Dr Herriot shocked at Tricki’s appearance?
Answer:
Dr Herriot was shocked at Tricki’s appearance because he had become hugely fat. His eyes looked bloodshot and rheumy and his tongue lolled from his jaws. He could walk with difficulty.

A Triumph Of Surgery Class 10 Extra Questions And Answers Question 3.
What was MrsPumphrey’s reaction when Dr Herriot suggested Tricki’s hospitalization?
Answer:
Dr Herriot had made his plan in advance. So when Mrs Pumphrey reported Tricki’s illness, he at once suggested him to be hospitalized for about a fortnight to be kept under observation.

Triumph Of Surgery Class 10 Extra Questions Question 4.
Which two suggestions did Dr Herriot give to Mrs Pumphrey at the initial stage? Did she
follow?
Answer:
Dr Herriot suggested Mrs Pumphrey to cutdown on the sweet things given to Tricki. He asked her to provide more exercise to the dog.

The Triumph Of Surgery Extra Questions Question 5.
What did Mrs Pumphrey do to bring him back to normal health? Was she successful?
Answer:
When Mrs Pumphrey found Tricki weak, she started giving him extra diet between meals to build him , up. She gave him some malt and cod-liver oil and a bowl of Horlicks at night. She never forgot to give him cream cakes and chocolates which Tricki really loved. She was hot successful rather she put her dog in more trouble. He started gaining weight which made fys condition worse.

A Triumph Of Surgery Extra Questions Question 6.
Why did Mrs Pumphery make a frantic call to Dr Herriot?
Answer:
Suddenly Tricki stopped eating. He refused even his favourite dishes and had bouts of vomiting. He spent all the time lying on rug, panting and did not do anything. So Mrs Pumphrey was distraught and made a frantic call to Dr Herriot.

A Triumph Of Surgery Short Question Answer Question 7.
What step did Dr Herriot take to save Tricki?
Answer:
Dr Herriot immediately hospitalised Tricki for about a fortnight as it was necessary to part him from his mistress. Tricki’s only problem was overfeeding which he knew. Tricki needed dieting which was possible only in absence of Mrs Pumphrey. He stopped giving food to Tricki. He was given only plenty of water.

Extra Questions Of A Triumph Of Surgery Question 8.
Why was Tricki an uninteresting object for other dogs at the surgery?
Answer:
When Tricki was brought to the surgery, all the household dogs surged around him but Tricki looked down at the noisy pack with dull eyes and lay motionless on the carpet. So after sniffing him for a few seconds, they found him an uninteresting object and moved away from him.

Extra Questions Of Triumph Of Surgery Question 9.
What evidence do you get from the text about Tricki’s affluent living?
Answer:
Tricki was loved by his mistress. She was very much concerned for him. She was rather blind in love. Tricki lived a more lavish life than any noraml human bring. He had a whole wardrobe of clothes for different weather, raincoat for wet days. Different bowls for different meals, toys, cushions, comfortable bed and what not. He was given rich diet including cream cakes and chocolates which he loved.

Question 10.
Describe the ‘parting scene’ between Tricki and Mrs Pumphrey’s house hold?
Answer:
The -only way to save Tricki was to take him away. When Mr Herriot was about to take him to his surgery for treatment, Mrs Pumphrey started wailing. The entire staff was roused and maids rushed in and out bringing his day bed, night bed, favourite cushions, toys and rubber rings and different bowls.
As Mr Herriot moved off, Mrs Pumphrey, with a despairing cry, threw an armful of the little coats , through the window. Everybody was in tears. It was a sad and tearful parting.

A Triumph of Surgery Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Write the brief character sketch of Mrs Pumphrey.
Answer:
Mrs Pumphrey was a rich but eccentric lady. She was an ignorant kind of person. She had a pet dog Tricki, whom she loved more than anything. Her way of showing love was very different. She overfed Tricki. She showed her concern by giving him rich and extra diet between meals which finally made Tricki ill. She couldn’t bear Tricki doing exercise. She thought that it would make Tricki tired while it was necessary for him.

She pampered her pet which had a wardrobe of clothes for every season, different bowls for each meal, toys and what not. Her way of loving was not normal. But she was also a kind- hearted lady who finally burst into tears while parting with her dog. She had all human qualities as she didn’t forget to thank Mr Herriot at the end.

Question 2.
What evidence do you get of Tricki’s affluent living from the text?
Answer:
Tricki is thoroughly pampered by his mistress Mrs Pumphrey. Dr Herriot is shocked at Tricki’s appearance. He hafe become hugely fat, like a bloated sausage with a leg at each corner. His eyes, bloodshot and rheumy, stares straight ahead his tongue lolls from his jaws.

Mrs Pumphrey explains to Dr Herriot that Tricki must be suffering from malnutrition. So she has been giving him some little extras between meals to build him up, some malt and cod-liver oil and a bowl of Horlicks at night to make him sleep. Above all, he gets cream cakes and chocolates.

To make the things worse he had been doing no exercise. When Tricki is sent to Vet. hospital, the entire staff of Mrs Pumphrey’s house rush to bring his day bed, his night bed, favourite cushions, toys and rubber rings, breakfast bowl, lunch bowl, supper bowl. When Dr Herriot informs Mrs Pumphrey that the little fellow is convalescing rapidly, she begins to send fresh eggSc,and wine to build him up. It all shows that Tricki has an affluent living.

Question 3.
Give a brief character sketch of Tricki.
Answer:
Tricki is thoroughly pampered by his mistress Mrs Pumphrey. He has become hugely fat, like a bloated sausage with a leg at each comer. His eyes, bloodshot and rheumy, stares straight ahead his tongue lolled from his jaws. He is greedy and never refuses food. His mistress gives him some little extras between meals to build him up, some malt and cod-liver oil and a bowl of Horlicks at night to make him sleep.

Above all, he gets cream cakes and chocolates. To make things worse he had been doing no exercise. When Tricki is sent to Vet. Hospital, the entire staff of Mrs Pumphrey’s house rush to bring his day bed, his night bed, favourite cushions, toys and rubber rings, breakfast bowl, lunch bowl, supper bowl. It all shows that Tricki has an affluent living.

Question 4.
“Over-pampering is not only bad for human but also for animals”. Explain this statement in the light of the story “A Triumph of Surgery’.
OR
“Kids or cubs need fondling but too much pampering may harm them”. How far does it apply in the case of Tricki?
Answer:
We all know that children are over-pampered by the parents due to their sentimental attachment …to them. In the story ‘A triumph of Surgery’ a dog Tricki is over-pampered by his wealthy mistress Mrs Pumphrey. She believes that her little dog is suffering from malnutrition so she gives him some little extras between meals to build him up, some malt and cod-liver oil and a bowl of Horlicks at night to make him sleep.

Above all, he gets cream cakes and chocolates. To make the things worse he had been doing no exercise. When Dr Herriot takes the dog to his Vet. hospital, it seems all the items of Tricki’s comfort would be sent with him. Even during his stay at the hospital, Mrs Pumphrey tries to provide him all the comforts. But Dr Herriot deals with the situation cleverly and the dog cures rapidly to return back to his mistress.
OR
Mrs Pumphrey is very fond of her pet, Tricki, she gives him rich diets and even richer caring like having wardrobes full of different weather clothes for him. Tricki has neither fix timings nor control over eating. This makes him greedy and soon ill. His mistress still keep him stuffing despite consistent warnings from the Doctor; soon Tricki comes to trotting, drooping and panting for breath. Finally he had to be sent to hospital for recovery. Only discipline on eating and fun play cure him.

Question 5.
Why is Mrs Pumphrey worried about Tricki?
Answer:
Mrs Pumphrey is worried and distraught because Tricki would not eat anything. He is not even ready to eat his favourite dishes. Tricki has bouts of vomiting and spends all his time lying on the rug and panting. Tricki does not even want to go for walks or do anything.

Question 6.
What does she do to help him? Is she wise in this?
Answer:
She calls the doctor to help Tricki. Yes, her decision is wise. The doctor suggests that Tricki should be hospitalized. She gets upset and wails, but lets the dog go with the doctor.

Question 7.
What does ‘I’ refer to in this story?
Answer:
In this story, T refers to the veterinary surgeon, Mr Herriot.

Question 8.
Is the narrator as rich as Tricki’s mistress?
Answer:
Though not clearly stated, there are instances in the story which suggest that the narrator is not as rich as Tricki’s mistress, Mrs Pumphrey. The narrator is able to provide Tricki with a warm loose box as a bed whereas at Mrs Pumphrey’s house, Tricki has a day bed, a night bed, cushions, toys, rubber rings, a breakfast bowl, a lunch bowl, a supper bowl, a whole wardrobe of tweed coats and perhaps many more things. When he arrives to take the dog with him, Mrs Pumphrey has her entire staff at her disposal to transfer all of Tricki’s belongings to the doctor’s car.

Secondly, on hearing from the doctor about Tricki’s gradual recovery, Mrs Pumphrey sends along two dozen eggs at a time, along with bottles of wine and brandy—all in order to help in Tricki’s speedy recovery. Finally, when she calls upon the narrator to take her recovered dog back home, she comes in a chauffeur-driven “thirty feet of gleaming black metal” (an obvious reference to a limousine). All these instances point to the fact that Mrs Pumphrey lived a luxurious life.

Question 9.
How does the doctor treat the dog?
Answer:
The doctor knew that Tricki was not ill but just overweight qnd restless due to Mrs Pumphrey’s overindulgence in taking his care. So he decided not to give any food to Tricki, but plenty of water for two days. Slowly, the dog started showing interest in hi§-surroundings and began mixing with the other dogs at the surgery. On the third day, the doctor saw Tricki licking the empty supper bowls of the other dogs.

Next day, a separate bowl was kept for him and the doctor was pleased to note that Tricki had run to eat its food with enthusiasm. From that day onwards, his progress was rapid. He did not require any medical treatment and recovered quite well at the end.

Question 10.
Why is the doctor tempted to keep Tricki as a permanent guest?
Answer:
Mrs Pumphrey has started bringing around eggs to build Tricki’s strength. Later, even bottles of wine and brandy began to arrive. The narrator and his partners started enjoying the eggs, wine and brandy meant for Tricki. According to the narrator, those were the days of deep content for him and his staff¬starting with an extra egg in the morning, then the midday wine, and finally finishing off the day with brandy. This is the reason why the narrator is tempted to keep Tricki on as a permanent guest.

Question 11.
Why does Mrs Pumphrey think the dog’s recovery is “a triumph of surgery”?
Answer:
Mrs Pumphrey thinks that the dog’s recovery is “a triumph of surgery” because in two weeks, Tricki had recovered completely and had been transformed into a hard-muscled animal. When Tricki saw her, he leaped into her lap and licked her face. She was so excited that tears started rolling out of her eyes. She declared Tricki’s recovery as a triumph of surgery to express her happiness and gratitude towards the doctor.

Question 12.
What kind of a person do you think the narrator, a veterinary surgeon, is? Would you say he is tactful as well as full of common sense?
Answer:
I think the narrator, a veterinary surgeon, seems to be a practical and tactful person. He knows how to deal with people. He adjusts himself well to the circumstances. He immediately understands Tricki’s problem, Tricki doesn’t suffer from any sort of illness. The main cause of his illness is overfeeding. He takes the dog to his surgery. There the doctor keeps him on water diet and makes him physically active and treats without any medicine. The dog gets well under his supervision and natural environment of surgery.

Question 13.
Do you think Tricki was happy to go home? What do you think will happen now?
Answer:
Yes, Tricki was very happy to go home. When the dog was brought into the surgery, he was ill. But in spite of that the dog got cured in two days without any medication. The doctor provided proper diet to Tricki and regular exercise also helped a lot in his speedy recovery. The dog regained his best health and was no longer restless.
Now, I think Mrs Pumphrey may again go back to her old ways of treating Tricki with love and care or learning a lesson from what she experienced, she may mend her ways and make him an agile and healthier dog.

Question 14.
Do you think this is a real-life episode, or mere fiction? Or is it a mixture of both?
Answer:
This story could be a mixture of both: real life episode and a mere fiction. Mrs Pumphrey is a rich lady and has a pet dog. It is because of her overindulgence that she overfeeds her dog which results in his being overweight and restless. Although her intention was not wrong but excess of everything is bad. This episode can be treated as a fiction for those who do not take things seriously. At the same time it can be called a real life episode for the people who take excessive care of their children and thus spoil their habits.

Question 15.
This episode describes the silly behaviour of a rich woman who is foolishly indulgent, perhaps because she is lonely. Do you think such people are merely silly, or can their action cause harm to others?
Answer:
These sort of people have enough disposable money but are ignorant about results of their actions. They show their excessive love and affection without knowing its consequences to others. Undoubtedly, their intentions are good and they don’t have any sort of ill-will but these actions do more harm than good to the object of affection.

Question 16.
Do you think there are also parents like Mrs Pumphrey?
Answer:
Yes, there are parents who are too much possessive about their kids. Their sense of overindulgence can go either way. There are examples of parents spoiling their children by protecting them in each and every way, thus creating hardships for them later in their life. Also there are examples of parents who are strict and want their child to be disciplined and so unnecessarily put pressure on them to study hard and always follow a standard behavioural pattern.

Question 17.
What would you have done if you were
(i) A member of the staff in Mrs Pumphrey’s household.
(ii) A neighbour? What would your life have been like, in general?
Answer:
(i) If I were a member of the staff in Mrs Pumphrey’s household, my life would have been miserable. But I would have had no option but to follow her orders as for Mrs Pumphrey, her dog was
everything. She loved her dog more than anything in the world. She always overfed him. So I would spend most of my time in feeding Tricki.
I would have helped Tricki by taking him out for a stroll so that he could burn his extra fat.

(ii) If I were her neighbour, I would advise her and tell how her excess love and silly behaviour were doing more harm than good to Tricki. I know she would not listen to me. She would tell me more about her loveliness and attachment to Tricki. I would have no option but to listen to her silly talk.

Question 18.
What would you have done if you were in the narrator’s place?
Answer:
If I were in the narrator’s place, I would have acted the same way. I knew the root of the problem was – her excess attachment to Tricki. She made him sick by overfeeding. Her silly behaviour was causing him more harm than good. I would have kept Tricki away from her for some more time. As a doctor I would have prescribed a strict diet chart. I would ensure follow up and would not hesitate in scolding Mrs Puthphrey for her silly behaviour.

Here we are providing Julius Caesar Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Literature Reader, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

Julius Caesar Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Literature

Julius Caesar Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Julius Caesar Short Questions And Answers Question 1.
How do the heavens ‘blaze forth’ the death of Julius Caesar?
Answer:
The heavens sent omens foretelling a major calamity—like Calpumia’s dream of Caesar being murdered, a lioness whelping in the streets, graves opening and dead bodies lying around, warriors fighting upon the clouds and drizzling blood upon the Capitol, horses neighing, dying men groaning and ghosts shrieking about the streets.

Julius Caesar Questions And Answers Icse Question 2.
Why does Calpurnia say Caesar’s ‘wisdom is consumed in confidence’? What does she mean?
Answer:
Calpumia means that though Caesar is wise, he is overconfident. His wisdom is destroyed by his overconfidence.

Julius Caesar Questions And Answers Question 3.
What did Calpurnia dream about Caesar? How did Decius Brutus interpret the dream?
Answer:
Calpumia dreamt she saw Caesar’s statue spout blood like a fountain and Romans came smiling and dipped their hands in the blood. She saw the dream as a warning that danger was imminent. Decius Brutus interprets the dream as a lucky vision. He said it signified that from Caesar, Rome shall imbibe fresh life and great men will earnestly desire relics marked with his blood.

Julius Caesar Question And Answer Question 4.
What are the arguments put forward by Decius Brutus to convince Caesar to go to the Capitol?
Answer:
Decius flatters Caesar into disregarding the fears of his wife. He says that the Senate decided to offer a crown to Caesar that day and if he does not go they may change their minds and mock him for being afraid. They may say that the Senate should be dismissed till Caesar’s wife has better dreams.

Julius Caesar Important Questions Question 5.
Why is Decius more successful than Calpurnia in persuading Caesar?
Answer:
Decius is more successful than Calpurnia in persuading Caesar because he appeals to Caesar’s ambition and vanity.

Julius Caesar Questions And Answers Pdf Question 6.
What is the petition put before Caesar by the conspirators? How does Caesar respond to it?
Answer:
The conspirators want Caesar to recall the order of exile passed against Metellus Cimber’s brother, Publius. Caesar refuses to listen to them and change his mind.

Julius Caesar Question Answer Question 7.
Who says ‘Et tu, Brute’? When are these words spoken? Why?
Answer:
Caesar says these words just after Brutus stabs him. Caesar loved Brutus and could not believe Brutus would do such a deed.

Julius Caesar Question Answers Question 8.
In the moments following Caesar’s death, what do the conspirators proclaim to justify Caesar’s death?
Answer:
The conspirators proclaim that they killed Caesar to free Rome of him and to establish democracy— ‘Liberty, freedom, and enfranchisement! ’

Julius Caesar Questions And Answers Class 10 Question 9.
Seeing the body of Caesar, Antony is overcome by grief. What does he say about Caesar?
Answer:
Antony is saddened that the great conqueror Caesar is reduced to a dead body lying on a small piece of the ground. He expresses willingness to die at the conspirators’ hands while their hands and weapons are still warm with Caesar’s blood.

Julius Caesar Play Questions And Answers Question 10.
Whom does Antony call ‘the choice and master spirits of this age’? Why?
Answer:
Antony calls the conspirators—Brutus, Cassius and the others as ‘the choice and the master spirits of this age.’ He is actually mocking them beneath his pretence of flattery.

Julius Caesar Questions Question 11.
How do Brutus and Cassius respond to his speech?
Answer:
Brutus tells him not to beg for his death at their hands. He says that he killed Caesar for he loved Rome more than he loved his friend. Cassius, on the other hand, appeals to Antony’s greed and says that he will have a say in the new government.

Question 12.
Why does Cassius object to allowing Antony to speak at Caesar’s funeral? How does Brutus overcome this objection?
Answer:
Cassius fears Antony and his ability as an orator. Brutus says he will speak first and tell the citizens that Antony was speaking with their permission.

Question 13.
What are the conditions imposed by the conspirators before allowing Antony to speak at Caesar’s funeral?
Answer:
While speaking of Caesar’s greatness, Antony must not blame the conspirators for murdering Caesar. He must also say that he has been permitted to speak at Caesar’s funeral by the conspirators. Moreover, he must speak from the same pulpit as Brutus.

Question 14.
When he is left alone with the body of Caesar, what does Antony call Brutus and the others?
Answer:
Antony calls them butchers.

Question 15.
What prediction does Antony make regarding the future events in Rome?
Answer:
Antony predicts that Italy will be cursed as civil war shall break out; bloodshed, destruction and dreadful sights will become so familiar that mothers shall smile when they see their infants killed in war, pity will be destroyed due to foul deeds becoming common. Caesar’s spirit shall roam about for revenge, dead bodies will be lying around rotting and stinking and there will be no one to give them a decent burial.

Question 16.
What reasons does Brutus give for murdering Caesar?
Answer:
Brutus says that Caesar was ambitious. Brutus loved Rome and that it stands for more than just Caesar.

Question 17.
Who says, ‘Let him be Caesar’? What light does this throw on the speaker?
Answer:
One of the citizens says this after Brutus’ speech. He has not understood the reasons Brutus has given for Caesar’s murder.

Question 18.
Why is Antony’s speech more effective?
Answer:
Brutus’ straightforward appeal to logic and reason versus Antony’s appeal to emotion through the use of irony, sarcasm and reiteration, is more effective.

Question 19.
At the end of the scene what is the fate of Brutus and Cassius?
Answer:
Brutus and Cassius are attacked by the mob who rush to set fire to their houses.

Question 20.
Why does Calpurnia urge Caesar not to step out of the house?
Answer:
Many bad omens had been witnessed during the night. The watchmen had seen strange sights. A lioness had given birth to her young ones in the streets, graves had opened and ghosts had been heard shrieking in the streets. Fierce battles had been fought in the clouds and the blood of the soldiers had fallen on the Capitol. Calpurnia herself had seen a horrible dream in Caesar was being murdered and Romans were bathing their hands in Caesar’s blood. Frightened by these sights and her dream, Calpurnia urged Caesar to stay at home as these happenings foretold the death of a great person.

Question 21.
Why does Caesar make the following remark, ‘Cowards die many times before their deaths’?
Answer:
Caesar makes the above statement to calm Calpurnia’s fears. Frightened by bad omens and her dream, Calpurnia urged Caesar to stay at home as these omens predicted the death of a great person. Caesar tells Calpurnia that while cowards imagine their death frequently, thus dying in their minds several times over, brave men, refusing to dwell on death, die only once. He cannot understand why men fear death, which must come eventually to all. Caesar maintains that he will not stay at home out of fear.

Question 22.
How does Decius interpret Calpurnia’s dream about Caesar’s murder?
Answer:
Calpurnia, in her dream, had seen a statue of Caesar spouting blood from a hundred places and many Romans bathing their hands in it. Decius told Caesar that Calpurnia had completely misinterpreted her dream.

Caesar’s statue gushing blood in many places and Romans bathing.hands in it signified that Rome would draw reviving blood from Caesar. Great men would come to obtain tinctures, relics and other tokens of remembrance. Caesar would prove to be a source of inspiration for Rome and his achievements would be the source of renewed vitality for the country.

Question 23.
What arguments does Decius provide to convince Caesar to go to the Senate?
Answer:
Firstly, Decius interprets Calpumia’s dream in a favourable light to show that Caesar would be the source of inspiration for Rome. From Caesar, Rome will imbibe fresh life and great men will earnestly desire relics marked with his blood. He then tells Caesar that the Senate decided to offer a crown to him that day, and if he did not attend the meeting, they may change their minds. After listening to these arguments, Caesar dismisses Calpumia’s fears and decides to go to the senate.

Question 24.
What was the petition that was put before Caesar? Why?
Answer:
Metellus approached Caesar to request that his brother, Publius’Cimber, who had been banished from Rome, be granted permission to return. The petition had been put forward by the conspirators knowing very well that Caesar would not grant their request as Publius Cimber was banished by lawful decree and there was no just cause for absolving his guilt. Moreover, Caesar prided himself on being firm on his decisions. Caesar’s refusal would then give them an excuse to assassinate him.

Question 25.
In what manner does Caesar assert the firmness of his decisions when he rejects Metellus Cimber’s petition in the senate?
Answer:
Caesar declares that he is not an ordinary man who is moved by entreaties and appeals. He says that he is as constant as the pole star. Like the pole star, Caesar is unwavering. He tells the conspirators not to try to make him change his mind as he was not like them. If he had been an ordinary mortal, he would have changed his mind. But nothing that they could say would cause him to deviate from his decision.

Question 26.
Briefly describe how Caesar was assassinated.
Answer:
The conspirators urged Caesar to recall Publius Cimber but he rejected their petition. Casca was the first person to stab Caesar. As Caesar refused to recall Publius Cimber, Casca said, ‘Speak hands for me’ and stabbed Caesar from behind. The other conspirators also stabbed Caesar. When Caesar saw Brutus stab him,he gave up the struggle and saying, ‘Et tu, Brute’ muffled up his face in his mantle and died at the foot of Pompey’s statue.

Question 27.
Why does Antony ‘shake hands’ with Caesar’s enemies?
Answer:
Antony realises that as he is Caesar’s friend, his credit stands on ‘slippery ground’. The conspirators may kill
him too, in order to prevent any opposition to their plan. Therefore, he meets the conspirators and professes friendship. Even while he is shaking hands with them, he knows that he is going to avenge Caesar’s death. He knows that with his ability as an orator he can swing the Roman populace to his side. But to do this he must . first be allowed to speak at Caesar’s funeral. Keeping all these reasons in mind, Antony pretends friendship with the conspirators.

Question 28.
How does Brutus justify the assassination of Caesar when he addresses the mob?
Answer:
Brutus tells the Romans that he participated in the conspiracy to assassinate Caesar not because he did not love Caesar but because he loved Rome more than he loved Caesar. -He says if Caesar had been allowed to live, the Romans would have been treated like slaves by him. He had assassinated Caesar in their interests. Caesar had to be killed because he was ambitious and every Roman who loved his country and who wanted to live as a free citizen should rejoice at Caesar’s death.

Question 29.
How does Antony prove to the mob that Caesar was not ambitious?
Answer:
Antony tells the mob that Caesar had brought many prisoners to Rome and the ransom he had obtained for
their release had filled the public treasury. This act showed that he was not ambitious. Furthermore, Caesar had wept whenever poor people had cried in distress. This showed that he was not ambitious, as ambitious people are hard-hearted. Finally, Caesar had refused the offer of a crown at the feast of Lupercal though Antony had thrice offered the crown to him.

Question 30.
How does Antony produce in the hearts of the mob a feeling of sympathy for the dead Caesar?
Answer:
Antony calls upon the mob to get ready to shed tears and shows them the dead body of Caesar. He shows them the many wounds which had been afflicted upon Caesar’s body. Pointing to the wounds, he shows them the ones made by Cassius, Brutus and Casca. He says that the cut made by Brutus was the unkindest one as Caesar loved Brutus dearly and Brutus had betrayed this love. The Romans are filled with sympathy for Caesar and their eyes fill up with tears.

Julius Caesar Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Compare the speeches of Brutus and Antony.
Answer:
Brutus speaks in an arrogant manner and justifies conspiring against Caesar as Caesar’s ambition would have hurt Rome. He seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with ‘Romans,  countrymen … ’ appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome. Brutus declares that his reason for : killing Caesar was his great love for Rome.

Antony focuses on Caesar’s positive traits and cunningly disproves Brutus’ justification for killing Caesar. He starts out by addressing the crowd as ‘Friends’and comes to them as a friend rather than a ruler trying to gain power. He says—“I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.” He disproves Caesar’s ambition with three examples:

• donated the ransom of captives to the treasury
• cried with the poor people
• refused the kingship that Antony offered him thrice.

He appeals to their emotions by showing Caesar’s dead body and appeals to their greed by reading the will.

Question 2.
Brutus makes a number of mistakes that leads to the downfall of the conspirators. What are his mistakes?
Answer:
He allows Antony to speak at Caesar’s funeral despite Cassius’s objection. Antony, with his impassioned “speech, was able to turn the crowd against the conspirators. He does not understand the Romans and kills Caesar for the ideal of democracy as he was becoming too powerful. Romans admire Caesar’s power as he appeals to the logic of the mob. The mob do not understand his reasoning and become easy prey to Antony’s emotional speech.

Characters

Question 3.
Julius Caesar
Answer:
Julius Caesar is a warrior. He thinks that he is above everyone else and an extraordinary man. As a result, he is very arrogant and overconfident and takes very little notice of the people around him. Though he claims to be as constant as the northern star, he is indecisive and easily swayed by others (as in the case of his indecision in going to the Senate). As far as he is concerned, the senators are unimportant and to be spumed out of his way. Common people have a great deal of respect for Caesar and believe that he would be a good and powerful leader who has Rome’s welfare at heart. Caesar is also ruthless and craves power. He believes that everybody likes him and that is why he is surprised when the conspirators attack him.

Question 4.
Calpurnia
Answer:
Calpumia is superstitious. She takes her dream to be an evil omen, which signifies the murder of her husband. She is worried about Caesar’s well-being and repeatedly dissuades him from meeting the Senate that day. She tells Caesar
“When beggars die, there are no comets seen;
The heavens themselves blaze forth the death of princes.”
She loves Caesar and is afraid for him.

Question 5.
Decius Brutus
Answer:
He shows himself to be a clever manipulator who changes Caesar’s mind about going to the Senate.
He flatters Caesar by giving a favourable explanation of Calpumia’s dream—
“Your statue spouting bipod in many pipes,
In which so many smiling Romans bathed,
Signifies that from you great Rome shall suck Reviving blood, and that great men shall press For tinctures, stains, relics and cognisance.’
He plays to Caesar’s ambition when he says—
‘the senate have concluded
To give this day a crown to mighty Caesar.
If you shall send them word you will not come,
Their minds may change. ’
He plays to Caesar’s vanity when he says—
‘most mighty Caesar,/from you great Rome shall suck
Reviving blood, …”

Question 6.
Brutus
Answer:
He is simple and straight-forward. He says—
“I will myself into the pulpit first,
And show the reason of our Caesar’s death:
What Antony shall speak, I will protest He speaks by leave and by permission.’
He is honourable in his intentions when he murders Caesar as is reflected in this speech—
‘Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.”
He is a poor judge of character and allows Antony to speak at Caesar’s funeral without realising that the mob has no brains. He appeals to their logic and as a true democrat he declares that he loves liberty and dignity. Brutus justifies Caesar’s murder, saying—
“As he was ambitious, I slew him.”

Question 7.
Cassius
Answer:
Cassius is very crafty and tactful. He sees through most people and understands what they are truly like. He is also very good at manipulating people. He can see that Mark Antony is not being sincere when talking to Brutus and he can see that Mark Antony does not indeed place his loyalty with the conspirators but is, in fact, determined for revenge. He can also see that Mark Antony does not plan on saying good things about the conspirators at Caesar’s funeral. That is why he tries to bribe Antony—“Your voice shall be as strong as any man’s/ In the disposing of new dignities.” His tragedy lies in the fact that he is in awe of Brutus and allows himself to be overruled by him, despite possessing better judgment.

Question 8.
Antony
Answer:
Mark Antony is a great friend of Caesar and thinks very highly of him. He is a very cunning man and he is able to manipulate people. He cares a lot for Caesar and he wants revenge. Although he can hide it, he has a lot of hatred for the conspirators who have killed Caesar. At first he seems so upset with Caesar’s assassination that he wishes to die too. However, he decides that avenging his death would be a better way.

He is a good judge of character and appeals to Brutus and not Cassius when he pretends friendship with the conspirators. A good orator, he plays upon the emotions of the crowd and ruthlessly sets them on the path of mischief against the conspirators.

Question 9.
The Mob
Answer:
The mob is being referred to as a ‘Hydra-headed multitude’ who possess an incapacity to understand logic. Brutus talks to them of liberty and democracy but as he leaves they say “Caesar’s better parts/Shall be crown’d in Brutus.” They are not democratic at heart and want a hero to worship—“Let him be Caesar.” They are emotional in their approach as they say “Kind souls, what, weep you when you but behold Our Caesar’s vesture wounded?” They are also fickle as their opinion of Caesar keeps on changing between suspicion and respect. Initially they say—“This Caesar was a tyrant.”

Later the same mob says—“If thou consider rightly of the matter, Caesar has had great wrong.” They are
brutal and barbaric when they say—
“We’ll bum the house of Brutus …
We’ll bum his body in the holy place,
And with the brands fire the traitors’ houses.”
They are the deciding element of this play as they turn the action around, swing the tide in Antony’s favour.

Question 10.
Discuss the attention paid (or not paid) to omens, nightmares, and other supernatural events. What do the various responses to these phenomena show about the struggle between fate and humans in Julius Caesar?
Answer:
The supernatural phenomena in Julius Caesar include Calpumia’s dream of Caesar’s statue mnning with blood and the strange sights seen by the watchmen—a lioness giving birth to her young ones in the streets, graves opening, ghosts shrieking in the streets and fierce battles being fought in the clouds with the blood of the soldiers falling on the Capitol. Though Calpumia is upset, Caesar ignores the various omens.

Caesar believes that the omens could apply just as easily to Rome in general as to him personally and he quickly comes to believe that Calpumia has misinterpreted her dream. As the plot unfolds, it becomes clear that these omens had been a warning of events that are to take place. Julius Caesar fails to heed the warning. Tragically, Caesar believes that his refusal to heed these signs proves his strength, courage and indomitable nature.

Though Caesar believes that he is displaying the force of his will by ignoring the warnings and attending the Senate, ironically, it is precisely this action that precipitates his fated death.

Question 11.
Bring out the theme of rhetoric versus power in Julius Caesar.
Answer:
Under the guise of a gesture of friendship, Antony actually marks the conspirators for vengeance. Brutus speaks to the crowd and appeals to the love of liberty in order to justify the killing of Caesar. He also makes ample references to the honour in which he is generally esteemed, to validate his explanation of the deed. Antony likewise wins the crowd’s favor, using persuasive rhetoric to whip the masses into a frenzy so great that they don’t even realize the fickleness of their favour.

The value that can be derived from this incident is the relationship between rhetoric and power. Words serve to move hearts and minds, as Antony cleverly convinces the conspirators of his desire to side with them, “Let each man render me with his bloody hand.”

Question 12.
Why does Brutus join the conspirators? Is it simply a matter of saving Rome from Caesar’s supposed tyranny or does Brutus have something else to gain?
Answer:
When it seems evident to the conspirators that Julius Caesar is headed for absolute power, he becomes a threat to the ideals and values of the Roman Republic. They assassinate Caesar before he can be crowned king. The irony is that Caesar’s death results in civil war. However, the Romans, looking for a hero,to idolise, do not understand why Caesar was killed.

Brutus speaks to the crowd about his reasons for killing Caesar and the fact that he killed his friend “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”, and having given his reasons prepares to depart, the crowd cheers Brutus’s apparent kindness, declaring that Brutus should be Caesar. The value that can be derived from this incident is that when two factions with questionable motives grab for power, chaos ensues and the Republic is never the same again.

Question 13.
Friendship vs Deception is an important theme of Julius Caesar. Comment.
Answer:
Friendship can be defined as a unique blend of affection, loyalty, love, respect and trust between two individuals. There are many friendships that exist in Julius Caesar—between Caesar and Mark Antony, Caesar and Brutus, Decius and Caesar and Brutus and Cassius.

There was close friendship between Mark Antony and Caesar, so when the latter was killed, Antony wanted revenge. He deceived Brutus and the other conspirators by saying, “Friend I am with you all, and love you all” to manipulate Brutus, put his doubts at ease and seek permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus agreed and Antony spoke to the people and used his words to manipulate the plebeians to revolt against the conspirators.

An example of deception, in the play was the friendship between Decius and Caesar. Decius went to Caesar’s house on the fateful day and used the latter’s love and trust for him to manipulate Caesar to come to the Senate.
‘ Another friendship is that between Brutus and Cassius. Cassius loved Brutus and gave in to him against better judgement. The trusting Brutus underestimated Antony and allowed him to speak at Caesar’s funeral, Cassius pulled him aside and said, “You know not what you do. Do not consent that Antony speak in Caesar’s funeral.” Brutus overrode him, leading to their downfall.

Even Caesar and Brutus were friends Bratus betrayed Caesar by being part of the conspiracy. When he stabbed Caesar, Caesar gave up his straggle saying, “et tu Bratus?” before he fell to the floor and died.
This play teaches us that friendship is a very delicate and sometimes a manipulative relationship.

Julius Caesar Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the extracts given below and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
Caesar:
Cowards die many times before their deaths;
The valiant never taste of death but once.
Of all the wonders that I yet have heard.
It seems to me most strange that men should fear;
Seeing that death, a necessary end,
Will come when it will come.

(a) Whom is Caesar speaking to? Why does he say these words?
Answer:
Caesar is speaking to Calpumia. He says these words because she wants him to stay at home as she feels his life is in danger.

(b) What fears has the listener expressed?
Answer:
Calpumia, who is the listener, has expressed the fear that Caesar’s death is imminent.

(c) What is the basis for the fears?
Answer:
The basis for the fears is Calpumia’s dreams of the previous night, which contained unusual sights.

Question 2.
“But here’s a parchment with the seal of Caesar;
I found it in his closet, ’tis his will:
Let but the commons hear this testament—
Which, pardon me, I do not mean to read—
And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds”

(a) Who speaks these words? Where is the speaker at this moment?
Answer:
Mark Antony speaks these words. He was in a pulpit in Rome speaking at Caesar’s funeral.

(b) What are the contents of Caesar’s will that he is referring to?
Answer:
Mark Antony is referring to the section where Caesar had left to every Roman citizen 75 drachmas. Moreover, he willed all his walks, his private gardens and newly planted orchards on the banks of the Tiber to the Romans for their pleasure so that they may walk there and enjoy themselves.

(c) Why does the speaker read Caesar’s will to the citizens?
Answer:
The speaker read Caesar’s will to the citizens to appeal to their greed and sway them.

(d) What is the reaction of the listeners to the reading of the will?
Answer:
As desired by Antony, the listeners turn against the conspirators after the reading of the will.

Question 3.
Caesar:
Nor heaven nor earth have been at peace to-night:
Thrice hath Calpumia in her sleep cried out,
‘Help, ho! they minder Caesar!

(a) Explain: ‘Nor heaven nor earth have been at peace to-night.’
Answer:
There had been a terrible storm at night and the skies had been raging. Calpumia, too, had a unusual dreams at night. Three times in her sleep she cried out that Caesar was being murdered.

(b) What did Calpumia dream of?
Answer:
Calpumia dreamt of the murder of Caesar. She saw Caesar’s statue mn with blood like a fountain, while many Smiling Romans bathed their hands in it.

(c) In what mood does Calpumia speak to Caesar about the events of the night?
Answer:
Calpumia was frightened by the unnatural occurrences the night before and was very anxious about Caesar’s safety. She felt that these portents and omens signified that a major calamity would befall Caesar.

Question 4.
Caesar:
Nor heaven nor earth have been at peace to-night:
Thriee hath Calpumia in her sleep cried out,
‘Help, ho! they murder Caesar! ’
(Enter Calpumia)

Calpurnia:
What mean you, Caesar? think you to walk forth?
You shall not stir out of your house to-day.

(a) What happened at night to make Calpumia feel that Caesar was in danger?
Answer:
Calpumia was frightened by the unnatural occurrences the night before. She had dreamt of Caesar’s murder and his statue running blood at a hundred places. Moreover, the night watchman had seen strange sights. She felt that these occurrences were unnatural and predicted a dire calamity.

(b) What did she want Caesar to do?
Answer:
Calpumia wanted Caesar to stay at home and not go to the Senate.

(c) What decision does Caesar take? Why?
Answer:
Caesar decided to go but because according to him things which threaten him have never had the courage to look him in his face. They would vanish as soon as they saw him because of his power.

Question 5.
Calpurnia:
Caesar, I never stood on ceremonies,
Yet now they fright me. There is one within,
Besides the things that we have heard and seen,
Recounts most horrid sights seen by the watch.

(a) Narrate any two sights seen by the watchman.
Answer:
The watchman saw the graves opening and yielding the dead and saw ghosts wandering in the city.

(b) What does this tell you about Calpumia’s character?
Answer:
We come to know that Calpumia was superstitious and believed in omens and predictions.

(c) What is Caesar’s attitude towards the happenings of the night? What does this tell you about his character?
Answer:
Caesar dismissed the events of the night as natural occurrences. He did not believe that they were predictions of a dire calamity. He was not superstitious.

Question 6.
Calpurnia:
Caesar, I never stood on ceremonies,
Yet now they fright me. There is one within,
Besides the things that we have heard and seen,
Recounts most horrid sights seen by the watch.

(a) Explain, ‘I never stood on ceremonies’.
Answer:
It means that she did not believe in omens and portents.

(b) Mention any two sights seen by the watch.
Answer:
The sights seen by the watch include a lioness whelping in the streets and graves opening and dead bodies lying around; warriors fighting upon the clouds, and their blood falling on the Capitol, horses neighing in fear, dying men groaning, ghosts shrieking about the streets. (Any two)

(c) How does Calpumia’s attitude towards the strange occurrences of the night differ from Caesar’s?
Answer:
While Calpumia is frightened by the strange occurrences of the night and sees them as omens foretelling grave danger to Caesar, the latter is not afraid and regards them as natural occurings.

Question 7.
Calpurnia:
Alas, my lord,
Your wisdom is consumed in confidence.
Do not go forth to-day: call it my fear
That keeps you in the house, and not your own.
Let me, upon my knee, prevail in this.

Caesar: Mark Antony shall say I am not well,
And, for thy humour, I will stay at home.

(a) Where are Calpumia and Caesar at this moment?
Answer:
Calpumia and Caesar are at Caesar’s house at this moment.

(b) Why does Calpumia say, ‘Your wisdom is consumed in confidence’? When does she say this?
Answer:
Caesar was overconfident about his own abilities and therefore he disregarded his personal safety. Despite her entreaties, Caesar was determined to go to the senate.

(c) What is Caesar’s reaction to Calpumia’s fears? What does he decide?
Answer:
Caesar decided to stay at home for Calpumia’s sake and decided to send a message with Antony to the Senate saying that he was not well.

Question 8.
Caesar:
And you are come in very happy time,
To bear my greeting to the senators
And tell them that I will not come to-day:

Calpurnia: Say he is sick.
Caesar: Shall Caesar send a lie?
Have I in conquest stretch’d mine arm so far,
To be afraid to tell greybeards the truth?

(a) Where are the speakers? Who has come to meet Caesar?
Answer:
The speakers are at Caesar’s house. Decius Brutus has come to meet Caesar.

(b) What message does Caesar wish to send? To whom?
Answer:
Caesar wishes to send a message to the senators saying he will not go to the Senate.

(c) Who are the ‘greybeards’? Why is Caesar not afraid of them?
Answer:
Caesar contemptuously calls the senators old men or ‘greybeards’. He is not afraid of them because he is a mighty conqueror.

Question 9.
Decius Brutus:
Most mighty Caesar, let me know some cause,
Lest I be laugh’d at when I tell them so.

Caesar:
Calpumia here, my wife, stays me at home:
She dreamt to-night she saw my statue,
Which, like a fountain with an hundred spouts,
Did ran pure blood: and many lusty Romans Came smiling, and did bathe their hands in it

(a) What did Calpumia dream?
Answer:
Calpumia dreamt of the murder of Caesar. She saw Caesar’s statue ran with blood, while Romans bathed their hands in it.

(b) How did she interpret the dream?
Answer:
Calpumia interpreted the dream to mean that Caesar was in danger.

(c) How did Decius interpret the dream?
Answer:
According to Decius, the dream signified that Rome would revive by drawing blood from Caesar. Great men would come to obtain tinctures, relics and other tokens of remembrance from him. Caesar would prove to be a source of inspiration for Rome and his achievements would be the source of renewed vitality for the country.

Question 10.
Decius Brutus:
I have, when you have heard what I can say:
And know it now: the senate have concluded
To give this day a crown to mighty Caesar.
If you shall send them word you will not come,
Their minds may change.

Caesar:
How foolish do your fears seem now, Calpumia!
I am ashamed I did yield to them.

(a) What argument does Decius put forth to convince Caesar to go to the Senate?
Answer:
Decius tells Caesar that the Senate decided to offer a crown to him that day, and if he does not attend the meeting, they may change their minds.

(b) How does Caesar react to Decius’s words?
Answer:
Caesar dismisses Calpumia’s fears as being foolish and prepares to go to the Senate.

(c) Mention two qualities of Caesar shown by his action.
Answer:
The qualities that are shown by his actions are that Caesar is ambitious, he disregards personal safety and he is not a good judge of character.

Question 11.
Caesar:
I must prevent thee, Cimber.
These couchings and these lowly courtesies
Might fire the blood of ordinary men,
And turn pre-ordinance and first decree Into the law of children.
Thy brother by decree is banished:
If thou dost bend and pray and fawn for him,
I spurn thee like a cur out of my way.

(a) What petition did Metellus Cimber present to Caesar? Why?
Answer:
Metellus Cimber gave. Caesar a petition requesting him to recall his brother, Publius, who had been banished from Rome. The conspirators knew Caesar would not accede to their request and they wished to use it as an excuse to assassinate him.

(b) Give two of the arguments given by Caesar to reject the petition.
Answer:
Caesar said that Publius Cimber had been banished by law and Caesar would not turn the law into child’s play by breaking it. Moreover, Caesar would not be satisfied without a just reason as to why Publius was to be recalled.

Question 12.
Caesar:
But I am constant as the northern star,
Of whose true-fix’d and resting quality
There is no fellow in the firmament.
I was constant Cimber should be banish’d,
And constant do remain to keep him so.

(a) What is the ‘northern star’?
Answer:
The northern star is the pole star.

(b) Why does Caesar compare himself to the ‘northern star’? What is the occasion?
Answer:
Caesar compares himself to the ‘northern star’ because he is unchangeable and unmoved. He does not change his mind and remains unshakeable. The conspirators want him to recall Publius Cimber.

(c) State the comparison made by Caesar between the firmament and the world of men.
Answer:
Caesar compares the firmament and the world of men saying that the sky was decorated with innumerable stars, all shining brightly but there was only one among them which did not move—the pole star.Similarly, in the world of men there were many men who are strong and intelligent but there was only one who did not change his mind and that was Caesar.

Question 13.
Antony:
O mighty Caesar! dost thou lie so low?
Are all thy conquests, glories, triumphs, spoils,
Shrunk to this little measure? Fare thee well.
I know not, gentlemen, what you intend,
Who else must be let blood, who else is rank

(a) Where does the mighty Caesar lie? What is meant by ‘this little measure’?
Answer:
The mighty Caesar lay on the ground at the foot of Pompey’s statue. ‘This little measure’ means this small piece of land.

(b) Who are the gentlemen Antony addresses?
Answer:
The gentlemen whom Antony addresses are the conspirators standing next to Caesar’s body.

(c) Give the meaning of ‘Who else must be let blood, who else is rank?’ Why does Antony say this?
Answer:
It means who is the person to be killed next? Antony wanted to know the intentions of the conspirators towards him and so he said this.

Question 14.
Antony:
If I myself, there is no hour so fit
As Caesar’s death hour, nor no instrument
Of half that worth as those your swords, made rich
With the most noble blood of all this world.

(a) Where is Antony at the present moment? Who is he talking to?
Answer:
Antony is standing next to Caesar’s dead body at the Capitol. He is talking to the conspirators.

(b) Why does Antony declare his willingness to die?
Answer:
Antony feels that if he has to be killed, then there is no time more opportune than the present as it is Caesar’s death hour and no weapon more suitable than the swords of the conspirators, which have been enriched by Caesar’s blood.

(c) How does Brutus respond to Antony’s request?
Answer:
Brutus says that though the spectacle of Caesar’s assassination may appear bloody, the conspirators had no intention of killing Antony. They had killed Caesar only for the general welfare of the Romans.

Question 15.
Antony:
I do beseech ye, if you bear me hard,
Now, whilst your pUrpled hands do reek and smoke,
Fulfil your pleasure. Live a thousand years,
I shall not find myself so apt to die:
No place will please me so, no mean of death,
As here by Caesar, and by you cut off,
The choice and master spirits of this age.

(a) Whom does Antony refer to as ‘The choice and master spirits of this age’?
Answer:
Antony refers to the conspirators as ‘The choice and master spirits of this age.’

(b) Explain ‘bear me hard.’ Which pleasure does Antony tell this conspirators to fulfil?
Answer:
‘Bear me hard’ means the conspirators’ ill-will towards Antony. He tells them to kill him if it pleases them.

(c) How does Antony’s speech refer to Caesar? What does this show about his feelings towards Caesar?
Answer:
Antony calls Caesar ‘the most noble blood of all this world.’ He has a high opinion of Caesar and holds him in great regard.

Question 16.
Antony:
My credit now stands on such slippery ground,
That one of two bad ways you must conceit me,
Either a coward or a flatterer.
That I did love thee, Caesar, O, ’tis true:

(a) When and to whom does Antony speak these words?
Answer:
Antony speaks these words to the conspirators after Caesar’s assassination.

(b) What is meant by the word ‘credit’? Why does Antony’s credit stand on slippery ground?
Answer:
The word ‘credit’ refers to reputation. Antony’s reputation stands on unsteady ground as he was Caesar’s friend and he was shaking hands with his murderers.

(c) What does Antony think the conspirators would regard him as? What effect do these words have on the listeners?
Answer:
Antony thinks that the conspirators would regard him as a coward or a flatterer. Cassius is taken aback by Antony’s direct speech. He asks Antony if they may consider him a friend or a foe.

Question 17.
Antony:
My credit now stands on such slippery ground,
That one of two bad ways you must conceit me,
Either a coward or a flatterer.
That I did love thee, Caesar, O, ’tis true:

(a) Explain: ‘ conceit. ’ Why would the conspirators regard Antony as a coward or a flatterer?
Answer:
Conceit means an idea or a notion. The others would have formed an idea of him as a coward or a flatterer because he was shaking hands with the people who killed his friend.

(b) How is Antony both a coward and a flatterer?
Answer:
Antony is a coward because he did not rebel against or oppose the conspirators. He is a flatterer as he praised the conspirators instead of avenging his friend’s death.

(c) Why has Antony come to make peace with Caesar’s murderers?
Answer:
Antony wants to avenge Caesar’s death and knows he can turn Romans against the conspirators if he is given an opportunity to speak to them.

Question 18.
Antony:
And am moreover suitor that I may
Produce his body to the market-place;
And in the pulpit, as becomes a friend,
Speak in the order of his funeral.

(a) What request does Antony make of the conspirators?
Answer:
Antony requests the conspirators to allow him to take Caesar’s body to the marketplace and to let him speak at Caesar’s funeral.

(b) How does Brutus react to Antony’s request?
Answer:
Brutus agrees to Antony’s request.

(c) Why does Cassius try to dissuade Brutus? What is the consequence of Brutus’mistake?
Answer:
Cassius tries to dissuade Brutus because he thinks that Antony will be able to stir the emotions of the people and turn them against the conspirators. Antony was able to stir the emotions of the people and turn the tide against the conspirators.

Question 19.
Antony: Pardon me, Caius Cassius:
The enemies of Caesar shall say this;
Then, in a friend, it is cold modesty.

Cassius:
I blame you not for praising Caesar so;
But what compact mean you to have with us?
Will you be prick’d in number of our friends;
Or shall we on, and not depend on you?

(a) What is the ‘this’ that Caesar’s enemies shall say?
Answer:
Caesar’s enemies would refer to him as noble.

(b) What does Cassius ask Antony?
Answer:
Cassius asks Antony if they should count him as one of their friends or should they carry on their way without depending on him for friendship or support.

(c) What was Cassius’s offer to Antony a little while earlier?
Answer:
Cassius had told Antony that his recommendations will be as strong as that of any of the conspirators while distributing the powers and benefits in the new government that will be set up after Caesar’s death.

Question 20.
Cassius: (Aside to Brutus)
You know not what you do: do not consent
That Antony speak in his funeral:
Know you how much the people may be moved
By that which he will utter?

(a) What has Brutus consented to?
Answer:
Brutus consented that Antony take Caesar’s body to the marketplace and as his friend speak at the funeral.

(b) What is Cassius’ fear?
Answer:
Cassius is afraid that Antony will be able to stir the emotions of the people and turn them against the conspirators.

(c) How does Brutus quieten Cassius’fears?
Answer:
Brutus replies that he will speak before Antony and explain to the public the reason for the conspirators’
deed, and then announce that Antony has been allowed to speak only with his consent. He believes that the people , will admire his magnanimity for allowing Antony, a friend of Caesar’s, to take part in the funeral, and that the episode will benefit the conspirators’ public image.

Question 21.
Antony:
And Caesar’s spirit, ranging for revenge,
With Ate by his side come hot from hell,
Shall in these confines with a monarch’s voice
Cry ‘Havoc,’ and let slip the dogs of war;
That this foul deed shall smell above the earth
With carrion men, groaning for burial.

(a) Why will Caesar’s spirit be ‘ranging for revenge’? Who will accompany him?
Answer:
Caesar’s spirit will be ranging for revenge as he was brutally murdered by the conspirators. He will be accompanied by Ate; the Roman goddess of mischief and revenge.

(b) What will be the effect of Caesar’s spirit roaming for revenge?
Answer:
The roaming of Caesar’s spirit will result in fierce civil war which would rage over all parts of the
kingdom as Caesar lets loose the horrors of war. Violence and murder would be frequent and terrible sights would be so common that mothers will smile when their children are killed.

(c) Which is the ‘foul deed’ being referred to?
Answer:
The ‘foul deed’ referred to is the murder of Caesar.

Question 22.
Brutus:
Be patient till the last.
Romans, countrymen, and lovers! Hear me for my cause, and be silent, that
you may hear: believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that
you may believe: censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses, that you may the better judge.

(a) Where is Brutus at the present moment? What is the occasion?
Answer:
Brutus is on a pulpit in the market place in Rome. The conspirators have just assassinated Caesar and Brutus is giving the Romans the reasons for the assassination.

(b) What is Brutus’s cause for killing Caesar?
Answer:
Brutus killed Caesar because he feared that Caesar would become a dictator.

(c) What error of judgement does Brutus make while delivering the speech?
Answer:
Brutus misjudges the Roman mob. He appeals to reason but the mob does not understand his logic. This is evident from the speech of the citizen who declares at the end of Brutus’s speech, “Let him be Caesar.”

Question 23.
Brutus:
Good countrymen, for my sake, stay here with Antony:
Do grace to Caesar’s corpse, and grace his speech
Tending to Caesar’s glories; which Mark Antony, 
By our permission, is allow’d to make.
I do entreat you, not a man depart,
Save I alone, till Antony have spoke.

(a) Why does Brutus depart alone? Explain ‘Do grace to Caesar’s corpse, and grace his speech.’
Answer:
Brutus departed alone because he wanted the citizens to stay back and listen to Antony’s speech in honour of Caesar. He wished them to pay respect and reverence to Caesar and listen to Antony’s speech.

(b) What reason did Brutus give for Caesar’s assassination? How did his listeners react to it?
Answer:
Brutus said that he killed Caesar because he was ambitious. His listeners did not understand his logic.

(c) Under what conditions did Antony obtain the permission to speak?
Answer:
Antony was given the permission to speak on the condition that he may speak as highly of Caesar as he wishes but he must tell the people that he did so with permission of the conspirators. He must also not speak any ill of the conspirators.

Question 24.
Antony:
Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.
The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interred with their bones;
So let it be with Caesar. The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious:
If it were so, it was a grievous fault,
And grievously hath Caesar answer’d it.

(a) Explain ‘The good is oft interred with their bones.’
Answer:
The above line means that a man’s good qualities are forgotten soon after his death.

(b) Which two reasons does Antony give to prove that Caesar was not ambitious?
Answer:
Antony tells the mob that Caesar had brought many prisoners to Rome and the ransom obtained by him for the release of those prisoners filled the public treasury. This act of Caesar’s showed that he was not. ambitious. Furthermore, Caesar had wept whenever the poor people cried in distress. This showed that Caesar was not ambitious, as he wasn’t hard-hearted. Finally, Caesar refused the offer of a crown at the feast of Lupercal though Antony had thrice offered the crown to him. (any two)

Question 25.
Antony:
But yesterday the word of Caesar might

(a) How might Caesar’s word have stood against the world?
Answer:
Caesar was a mighty conqueror who conquered many lands. His power and glory had spread all over the world and his word was considered the law.

(b) Who are the people Antony does not wish to wrong? Whom does he choose to wrong instead?
Answer:
Antony does not wish to wrong the honourable Brutus and Cassius. He chooses to wrong the dead Caesar, himself and the common people of Rome.

(c) How can Antony wrong the conspirators?
Answer:
Antony can wrong the conspirators by stirring the mob to mutiny and anger.

Question 26.
Antony:
Let but the commons hear this testament
Which, pardon me, I do not mean to read
And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,
Yea, beg a hair of him for memory,
And, dying, mention it within their wills,
Bequeathing it as a rich legacy
Unto their issue.

(a) What is the testament? Who are the ‘commons’?
Answer:
The testament is Caesar’s will. The ‘commons’ refer to the common people of Rome.

(b) What will the common people do if they hear the will?
Answer:
The common people would run to kiss the dead Caesar’s wounds and dip their handkerchiefs in Caesar’s blood and beg for a hair of Caesar to keep as a memento if they heard the will.

(c) What were the terms of Caesar’s will?
Answer:
Caesar had bequeathed a sum of 75 drachmas from his personal holdings to every man in Rome. Also, Caesar had made his private parks and gardens available for the people’s pleasure.

Question 27.
Antony:
If you have tears, prepare to shed them now.
You all do know this mantle: I remember
The first time ever Caesar put it on;
’Twas on a summer’s evening, in his tent,
That day he overcame the Nervii:
Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through:
See what a rent the envious Casca made:
Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabb’d;

(a) What is the significance of the mantle? Why does ‘unto me’ refer to it?
Answer:
Caesar had worn the mantle for the first time when he defeated the Nervii. The phrase ‘unto me’ reminds the listeners about Caesar’s greatness as a conqueror.

(b) Who were the Nervii?
Answer:
The Nervii were the most warlike of the Gallic tribes who were defeated by Caesar in 57 BCE.

(c) Why does Antony mention the conspirators? Why is Brutus’ stabbing of Caesar said to be ‘the most unkindest cut of all’?
Answer:
Antony mentioned the conspirators to remind the listeners that they had killed their beloved Caesar. Caesar loved Brutus dearly and Brutus had betrayed Caesar and hence was referred to as the ‘the most unkindest cut of all’.

Question  28.
Cassius:
You know not what you do: do not consent
That Antony speak in his funeral:
Know you how much the people may be moved
By that which he will utter?

(a) Who advises whom?
Answer:
Cassius advises Brutus.

(b) Whose ‘funeral’ is referred to?
Answer:
Cassius is referring to Caesar’s funeral.

(c) What light do these words throw on the character of the speaker?
Answer:
The speaker Cassius, is a good judge of character.

Here we are providing The Trees Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

The Trees Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

The Trees Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

The Trees Class 10 Extra Questions Question 1.
Why do the trees need to move out? Where have they been and why?
Answer:
The trees in the forest have been cut and man has planted trees in his courtyard for his selfish decorative purposes. It makes the trees feel suffocated and out of place. So they need to move out into the forest. They have been in the city houses as men have imprisoned them there.

The Trees Class 10 Extra Questions And Answers Question 2.
What makes the forest empty? What cannot happen in a-treeless forest?
Answer:
Man’s cutting the trees of the forest at an uncontrollable speed has resulted in the empty forests. In a treeless forest, birds and insects cannot find shelter and make their homes there. The sun cannot cool its rays in the shadow there.

The Trees Become Leafless Due To Question 3.
How do the trees rebel against their imprisonment at the hand of the man?
Answer:
Man has imprisoned the trees of the forest in his houses in cities. The trees rebel against their imprisonment. The roots come out of the floors by breaking them. The leaves come out of the windows by breaking the glasses. The long cramped branches start expanding themselves. Thus, the trees move out into the forest.

The Trees Poem Class 10 Extra Questions Answers Question 4.
What kind of whispers can the poet hear? Why will these be silent tomorrow?
Answer:
The poet can hear the voices of the trees talking to each other, asserting their right to be free and the sounds of their moving out. It may also be her inner voice that reprimands her for imprisoning the trees. The whispers will be silent tomorrow as the trees will move out into the forest and will be free.

The Trees Extra Questions And Answers Question 5.
What does the poetess compare the bough with and why?
Answer:
The boughs are long and cramped. The poet compares the boughs with the patients who have been recently discharged and are moving out of the clinic doors because the boughs also move out in the same semi-dazed state as if they are under a spell.

The Tree Become Leafless Due To Question 6.
The poem ‘The Trees’ presents a conflict between Man and Nature. Discuss.
Answer:
The poem ‘The Trees’ presents the rebellion of the tree against the human oppression and imprisonment within walls. The forest is the natural habitat of the trees. The trees feel suffocated in houses. They rebel against it and move out.

The Trees Class 10 Questions And Answers Question 7.
Why is the poet writing long letters? Why does she not mention the departure of the trees?
Answer:
The poet can feel the sorrow of the trees imprisoned in the cities. So, she is writing long letters or poems voicing the trees’ right to be in their natural habitat i.e., the forest. She does not mention the departure of the trees in her letters as she is too embarrassed for imprisoning them ever.

Trees Extra Questions Question 8.
How does the changing forms of moon relate to the moving out of the trees?
Answer:
The moon also changes its forms with the moving out of the trees. In a treeless forest it appears as a whole, closed body. But with the trees moving out into the forest, the moon also appears as a broken mirror. Its pieces flash light on the tallest of trees.

Trees Poem Extra Questions Question 9.
Describe the symbolism in the poem “The Trees”.
Answer:
The poet uses trees as a metaphor for human beings. The human beings feel suffocated and sad under the oppression and dependence. They yearn for their freedom and independence. They rebel against the oppression, slavery and exploitation to be free and be on their own. The trees also rebel against imprisonment to return to the forest. Thus, they are apt symbol for human beings.

The Trees Became Leafless Due To Question 10.
Conflict between human and nature is always there. Nature is also rebelling against civilization and becoming destructive. Explain.
OR
A conflict between man and nature is going on, in this civilization pursuit, men are disregarding the natural growth of plants and trees. In total confinement, nature also rebels against civilization and becomes destructive. Elaborate.
Answer:
Man has been destroying nature due to personal and material pursuits. He is endlessly playing havoc with nature. He is trying to harness wind, solar energy and flora. In this pursuit man has forgotten that excessive destruction can carry us to any situation. Man is cutting trees and destroying the natural habitat. This is causing global warming with overall rise in temperature. If these practices go unchecked, we might soon be drowned due to melting of ice from polar caps. Man should wake up and save the planet earth from destructive forces of nature.

The Trees Question Answer Question 11.
The trees in the poem stretch out their branches, break remove common barriers and struggle hard even out in the open in their natural environment. Analyze the efforts one puts into breaking sway captivity and striving for freedom.
OR
Freedom is the basic theme of happiness for all creatures as well as plants. Explain this statement with reference to the struggle of the branches to come out in open in the veranda of the poet’s house.
Answer:
It is true that freedom is the basic theme of happiness in this universe. Freedom is the true law of nature. This idea can be found everywhere and in all spheres, even the palace of gold is useless without freedom. We have read about so many national heroes who have sacrificed their everything for freedom and to make their country free. Freedom is the very first need for all for human beings as well as for animals. “

In this poem, the poet has described the deep feelings of the trees that want to become free from human beings’ prison. The description of struggle made by the branches to come out in open from the floor is too real and heart touching. The trees don’t want to live in these surroundings. So they do their best to come out of the floor and window.

The Trees Class 10 Solutions Question 12.
After reading the poem ‘The Trees’ we come to conclude a definite point that there is clear conflict between nature and human beings and the reason is behaviour of human beings. Describe.
Answer:
Man’s cutting the trees of the forest at an uncontrollable speed has resulted in the empty forests. In a treeless forest, birds and insects cannot find shelter and make their homes there. The sun cannot cool its rays in the shadow there.

Question 13.
(i) Find, in the first stanza, three things that cannot happen in a treeless forest.
(ii) What picture do these words create in your mind: … “sun bury its feet in shadow…”?
(ii) What could the poet mean by the sun’s ‘feet”?
Answer:
(i) The three things that cannot happen in a treeless forest Eire the sitting of a bird on tree, the hiding of insects and the sun burying its feet in the shadow of the forest.

(ii) The sun radiates heat and the given words create a picture of the hot, radiating sun cooling its feet in the cool shadow of the forest. The sun’s feet refer to its rays that reach the earth.

Question 14.
(i) Where are the trees in the poem? What do their roots, their leaves and their twigs do?
(ii) What does the poet compare their branches to?
Answer:
(i) In the poem, the trees are in the poet’s house. Their roots work all night to disengage themselves from the cracks in the veranda floor. The leaves make efforts to move towards the glass, while the small twigs get stiff with exertion.

(ii) The poet compares the ‘long-cramped’ branches that have been shuffling under the roof to newly discharged patients who look half-dazed as they move towards the hospital doors after long ill¬nesses and wait to get out of the hospital. The branches also have cramped under the roof and want to get out into the open to spread themselves in fresh air.

Question 15.
(i) How does the poet describe the moon:
(a) at the beginning of the third stanza, and
(b) at its end? What causes this change?
(ii) What happens to the house when the trees move out Of it?
(iii) Why do you think the poet does not mention “the departure of the forest from the house” in her letters? (Could it be that we are often silent about important happenings that are so unexpected that they embarrass us? Think about this again when you answer the next set of questions.)
Answer:
(i) (a) In the beginning of the third stanza of the poem “The Trees”, the poet describes the moon at its perfection. She tells us that full moon shines in an open sky.

(b) In the end of the third stanza, the poet describes that the moon is broken like a mirror. The cause of this change is that the poet imagines that the forest or trees and plants are moving out from her home. When the forest was in her home the moon seemed full to her. But when the trees are moving out of the house into the forest, the moon seems fragmented to her.

(ii) When the trees move out of the house, the poet feels that the glass is breaking and the trees are partially falling towards the front in the night. Winds rush to meet and welcome the trees.

(iii) When the trees are moving out of the poet’s house, she is writing long letters. But in the letters the poet does not mention about the departure of the forest from the house. I think the poet does not mention about moving out of the trees because howsoever she may not want it, yet it happened so hastily and unexpectedly that she felt embarrassed. That is why she could not mention about it in her letter.

Question 16.
Now that you have read the poem in detail, we can begin to ask what the poem might mean.
Here are two suggestions. Can you think of others?
(i) Does the poem present a conflict between man and nature? Compare it with A Tiger in the Zoo. Is the poet suggesting that plants and trees, used for ‘interior decoration’ in cities while forests are cut down, are ‘imprisoned’, and need to ‘break out’?
(ii) On the other hand, Adrienne Rich has been known to use trees as a metaphor for human beings; this is a recurrent image in her poetry. What new meanings emerge from the poem if you take its trees to be symbolic of this particular meaning?
Answer:
(i) The poem “The Trees’ depicts the serious problem of deforestation worldwide, which causes ecological imbalances and the risk of global warming. The poet means to say that we are depriving the forest of their trees and creating concrete jungles in the cities. The irony of the situation is that we are decorating our homes and cities with trees and plants and cutting the trees from the forest. If we compare this poem to another poem, ‘A Tiger in the Zoo’, we find many similarities.

We imprison the tigers and other animals in the zoo whereas their true places is in the forest. Similarly, we ‘imprison’ the trees and plants in our houses and cities whereas their true place is in the forests. There is nothing wrong with decorating the houses and cities with the plants and trees. But it is something unpardonable to deprive the forests of the trees and plants. That is why the poet imagines that the trees from the houses want to be liberated and move to the forest.

(ii) There is another aspect of this beautiful poem. Adrienne Rich in many of her poems has used trees as a metaphor for human beings. So, if we think of the poem from this point of view, it signifies that human beings are constantly going away from the country life. Everybody seems to settle in big cities where we are deprived of the qualities of enjoying nature in its various forms. Migration of more and more people towards city life creates a vacuum in the minds of such human beings. So, they crave and long for moving to natural surrounding. They earnestly and eagerly desire to go back to nature.

The Trees Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the following stanza and answer the questions that follows:

Question 1.
The trees inside are moving out into the forest,
the forest that was empty all these days where no bird could sit no insect hide
no sun bury its feet in shadow
the forest that was empty all these nights
will be full of trees by morning.

(i) Name of poem and poet.
(ii) From where do the trees move out into the forest?
(iii) Why has the forest been empty all these days?
(iv) How do you think will the forest be full of trees again?
Answer:
(i) These lines have been taken from the poem ‘The Trees’ composed by ‘Adrienne Rich’.
(ii) The trees move out into the forest from the human houses.
(iii) The forest has been empty all these days because trees have been cut and transported to the cities.
(iv) The forest would be again full of trees when men would understand his responsibility towards the nature.

Question 2.
All night the roots work
to disengage themselves from the cracks
in the veranda floor.
The leaves strain towards the glass
small twigs stiff with exertion
long-cramped boughs shuffling under the roof
like newly discharged patients
half-dazed, moving
to the clinic doors.

(i) What are the roots trying to do?
(ii) Why are the small twigs stiff?
(iii) What does the poet mean by ‘the clinic doors”?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) The roots are trying to break the veranda floor.
(ii) The small twigs are stiff as they were straining to break the glass.
(iii) The poetess means that the trees are sick because they are being suffocated and choked in cramped spaces of the veranda.
They need to be cured and become healthy again and for them the clinic is the open spaces of the forest.
(iv) The poem “Trees” composed by ‘Adrienne Rich’.

Question 3.
I sit inside, doors open to the veranda
writing long letters
in which I scarcely mention the departure of the forest from the house.
The night is fresh, the whole moon shines
in a sky still open
the smell of leaves and lichen
still reaches like a voice into the rooms.

(i) Where is the speaker?
(ii) Why does the poet not mention the departure of the forest?
(iii) How do the leaves and lichen talk to each other?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) The speaker (poetess) is sitting inside her house
(ii) The poetess doesn’t mention the departure of the forest because she is embarrassed.
(iii) The leaves and lichen talk to each other through the smell.
(iv) The poem “Trees” composed by Adrienne Rich.

Question 4.
My head is full of whispers
which tomorrow will be silent.
Listen. The glass is breaking.
The trees are stumbling forward
into the night. Winds rush to meet them.
The moon is broken like a mirror,
its pieces flash now in the crown
of the tallest oak.

(i) What are ‘whispers’ that the poetess can hear?
(ii) What does the poet ask us to listen to?
(iii) Which poetic device has been used?
(iv) Name the poem and poet.
Answer:
(i) The whispers that the poetess can hear are the sounds made by the outgoing trees.
(ii) The poetess asks us to listen to the sounds of the breaking glass.
(iii) The poetic device is ‘Personification’. The trees are personified.
(iv) The poem “Trees” written by ‘Adrienne Rich’

Here we are providing From the Diary of Anne Frank Extra Questions and Answers for Class 10 English, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

From the Diary of Anne Frank Extra Questions and Answers for Class 10 English

Friday, June 12,1942 – Wednesday, June 24,1942

Question 1.
Anne began her diary with the line “I hope I will be able to confide everything to you, as I have never been able to confide in anyone.” What did she mean?
Answer:
Anne Frank, a 13-year-old girl living in Amsterdam, received a diary as a present on her thirteenth birthday. This was the first line she wrote in her diary. Anne admitted that she had loving parents and a 16-year-old sister. In addition, there were about 30 people she could call friends. She had a number of admirers too who were enamoured by her. Anne had a loving family and a good home. However, she lacked that one true friend in whom she could confide her innermost thoughts and secrets. Anne felt that “Paper has more patience than people” and hoped that the diary, would be her one true friend who will not judge her.

Question 2.
How did Anne spend her birthday?
Answer:
On her birthday, 12 June, Anne woke up at six o’clock. She was quite excited about her birthday and curious about the many presents she would receive. She controlled her curiosity until quarter to seven. When she couldn’t wait any longer, she went to the dining room, and a little after seven, she opened her presents with her parents. Then she went to school with her friend Hanneli.

During recess, she distributed home-baked cookies to her classmates. After school, she went to the gym where her friends asked her to choose the game they would play. Anne chose volleyball and played with her friends. Afterwards her classmates danced around Anne in a circle and sang ‘Happy Birthday.’ Anne returned home at five with three of her friends – Use Wagner, Hanneli Goslar and Jacqueline van Maarsen. Her fourth friend, Sanne Ledermann was already there. They all gave her gifts.

Question 3.
Briefly describe Anne Frank’s classmates.
Answer:
There were 12 girls in Anne’s class including her. Betty Bloemendaal was quiet, not very smart but hard¬working. Jacqueline van Maarsen believed she was Anne’s best friend, but Anne disagreed. DQ was nervous and forgetful and always got extra homework as punishment. GQ was the prettiest girl in class but not good at studies. ES was very talkative and kept touching the listener’s hair or fiddling with her buttons. ES and Anne did not like each other much. Henny Mets was a girl of cheerful disposition, but she had a loud voice and a childish manner.

Henny was dirty and vulgar because of her friend, Beppy, who Anne thought, was a bad influence. JR, who belonged to a rich family, was a detestable, sneaky, stuck-up, two-faced gossip and a terrible show-off. J and Anne did not like each other either. Ilse Wagner was a nice and cheerful girl, but she was extremely fussy and grumbled a lot. She was very smart, but lazy. Hanneli Goslar was called Lies at school. Though usually shy and reserved around other people, she shared everything with her mother. She was outspoken, therefore Anne appreciated her a great deal. Nannie van Praag-Sigaar was small, funny and sensible. Anne liked Eefje de Jong who was helpful to her, and very lady-like.

There were 17 boys in Anne’s class whom she held in poor regard. Harry Schaap and Werner Joseph were decent boys. Though Maurice Coster and Rob Cohen were among Anne’s many admirers, Anne found Maurice irritating and Rob an unbearable, hypocritical liar with an awfully high opinion of himself. Emiel Bonewit was a bore while Max van de Velde, though a farm boy from Medemblik, was worthy and outstanding. Sallie Springer, Jopie de Beer, Leo Blom and Herman Koopman had filthy minds. Albert de Mesquita was really smart and had skipped a grade but Leo Slager was not as smart. Ru Stoppelmon was short and goofy, CN did whatever he was not supposed to and Jacques Kocemoot was really funny. Sam Salomon and Appie Riem were real brats.

Question 4.
Why had Anne’s family shifted from Frankfurt to Amsterdam?
Answer:
Anne’s family shifted from Frankfurt to Amsterdam to escape the Nazis who considered Jews as inferior. Hitler and his Nazi party rose to power by suppressing their adversaries. They assumed total control of Germany and set up a totalitarian regime where Jews were persecuted. False arrests, tortures, illegal imprisonments and even murders were commonplace.

Hitler created concentration camps to house Jews where hundreds were exterminated through starvation, sickness, beatings, firing squads and gas chambers. Those who were not killed, even the children, were forced into hard labour. The women were often sexually abused. By the time Anne’s family left Germany to live in Holland in 1933, the Nazi persecution of the Jews had already begun and Hitler had started to re-arm Germany Afor a future war.

Question 5.
What persecution did the Jews face in Holland during the war?
Answer:
In the diary entry dated 20 June 1942, Anne describes how the conditions for Jewish people were very difficult. With remarkable detachment and a seeming lack of emotion, she noted the various restrictions imposed on Jews, including the following:

• Jews had to wear a yellow star to distinguish them from others.
• Jews had to hand in their bicycles, which would be given to soldiers and policemen.
• Jews could not travel by train and were forbidden to drive.
• Jews could shop only in Jewish shops and only between 3:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
• Jews had to stay indoors after 8:00 p.m.
• Jews could not visit the theatre, the cinema or sporting events.
• Jews could not visit Christians.
• Jews had to go to Jewish schools.

Question 6.
Anne mentioned some hardships she had to suffer on account of being a Jew. What is her attitude towards the hardships she faces and towards the people who caused these hardships?
Answer:
The Franks had been living in Amsterdam since 1933 and felt the full impact of German aggression in May,
1940 when the German Army invaded Holland. Once the Nazi invasion and occupation of Holland took place, the Nazis began their persecution of Jews and other minorities through discriminatory laws throughout Western Europe.

Anne did not accept the repression but she did not dwell on the reasons why Hitler was persecuting the Jews.
She was grateful that the ferryman at Josef Israelkade let them ride the ferry, and believed that it was not the fault of the Dutch that the Jews were being persecuted. Her omissions and the brisk manner in which she recorded the treatment of Jews in Amsterdam, helped her maintain a semblance of a normal life. She took the hardships in h,er stride and concentrated on her friends, her school and her family.

Question 7.
How did Anne feel about the laws that restricted the Jews’ freedom?
Answer:
After the Germans invaded Holland in 1940, the laws imposed on the Jews in Germany were extended to the Netherlands. Anne believed the laws to be unjust, but she did not completely understand why the Jewish people had been singled out for this discrimination. Anne felt it was unfair that Jews could not use streetcars, had to wear yellow stars and could attend only particular schools. Nonetheless, she was still optimistic about her family’s safety and felt relatively secure about her future. Anne accepted the restrictions as a fact of life in Amsterdam and she was thankful to the Dutch people for their sympathy, especially the ferryman, who let the Jews ride the ferry because they were not allowed to ride streetcars.

Wednesday, July 1,1942- Friday, July 10,1942

Question 1.
Why was Lies’s result not as good as she wanted it to be?
Answer:
Lies’s result was not as good as she wanted it to be as it wasn’t easy for her to study at home. She had a two- year old baby sister whom she was expected to look after. So she found it difficult to do her homework. As a result, even the tutoring she got did not prove to be of much help. Moreover, Lies’s grandparents, who lived next door, ate with them. In addition, there was a hired girl and the always nervous and irritable Mrs Goslar, who was expecting another baby. Despite all the distractions and chaos at her home, Lies managed to pass the exams.

Question 2.
Who was Hello? What role did he play in Anne’s life?
Answer:
Helmuth Silberberg, known to his friends as Hello, was a 16-year-old boy who was close to Anne at the time her family went into hiding, though they had only known each other for about two weeks at that time. Anne met him at her friend Wilma’s place as he was her cousin. Hello’s parents were in Gelsenkirchen in Belgium, but he was living with his grandparents in Amsterdam. He had a girlfriend named Ursula but found her boring. Hello’s grandmother wanted him to go out with Ursula and thought Anne was too young . for him. Hello, on the other hand, felt that he was in love with Anne. However, Anne wrote in her diary that she was “not in love with Hello” and that he was just a friend. Anne also remarked that she really enjoyed Hello’s company.

Question 3.
Why did Otto Frank talk to Anne about the possibility of their going into hiding on the 5th of July?
Answer:
On 5 July 1942, when Otto Frank and Anne were taking a stroll around their neighbourhood square, he began to talk about going into hiding. When Anne asked him why he brought up the matter, he reminded her that for more than a year they had gradually been storing clothes, food and furniture in their hiding place. They did not want to fall into the clutches of the Germans and wished to leave on their own accord. Moreover, by the age of 16, girls were being called up to concentration camps.

Question 4.
Write a brief note on the call-up notice from the SS for Margot.
Answer:
On 5 July 1942 at 3:00 pm, the postman delivered a registered mail for Margot: an official summons by the SS, the elite Nazi guard. She was going to be sent to a Nazi work camp in Germany. This call-up was not . a complete surprise. There had been rumours in the air for weeks and if Margot didn’t register, the whole family would be arrested.

Question 5.
The letter delivered by the postman brought about a change in Anne. Comment.
Answer:
The letter delivered by the postman calling 16-year-old Margot to the work camp brought the Frank family to a critical juncture. This section illustrates the poignant contrast between Anne’s innocence and the gravity of her family’s situation. Prior to the letter Anne focussed on normal concerns such as grades and her • relationships with boys like a typical teenager. However, the letter of the SS trivialized every other subject.

The seriousness of their situation forced Anne to grow up quickly and understand issues that were much bigger than her small social world. Anne quickly abandoned the trappings of her privileged childhood to react in a crisis situation. When Hello visited that day, she did not go down to greet him as her thoughts were fixed on her family’s safety. She also comprehended complicated reasoning about how to evade capture, such as the fact that she should not pack clothes in her bag, because if they were stopped, the clothes would give them away.

Anne leamt some of the hard truths of the adult world. She was horrified that the SS were calling a 16-year-old girl alone. She had to confront the frightening reality that Hitler’s army did not differentiate between men, women and children.

Question 6.
How did the Franks get through their first day in ‘Secret Annex’?
Answer:
On 6 July 1942, the Franks shifted into their hiding place. When they arrived at 263 Prinsengracht, Miep quickly led them into the annex which was crammed with their belongings. Their living room and all the other rooms were full, of the cardboard boxes that had been sent to the office in the last few months. Mrs Frank and Margot were tired and unhappy, so they lay down on their bare mattresses. But Mr Frank and Anne started the cleaning at once. All day long they unpacked boxes, filled cupboards, hammered nails and straightened up the mess, until they fell into their clean beds at night, totally exhausted. They hadn’t eaten a hot meal all day as Mrs Frank and Margot had been too tired and keyed up to eat, and Mr Frank and Anne had been too busy.

Question 7.
Write a brief description of Mr Frank’s office building.
Answer:
Mr Frank’s office building had a large warehouse on the ground floor, which was used as a workroom and storeroom and was divided into several different sections, such as the stockroom and the milling room. Next to the warehouse was another entrance to the office. Just inside the office door was a second door and beyond that, a stairway. At the top of the stairs, on the second floor, was another door, with a frosted window on which the word ‘Office’ was written in black letters. This office was very large and full of light, and Bep, Miep and Mr Kleiman worked there during the day.

There was a small, dark and stuffy back office which was shared by Mr Kugler and Mr van Daan. This could be reached by crossing an alcove or from the hallway through a glass door. The private office, the showpiece of the entire building, was beyond Mr Kugler’s office at the end of the long, narrow hallway. It had elegant mahogany furniture, a linoleum floor covered with throw rugs, a radio and a fancy lamp. Next to it was a spacious kitchen with a hot-water heater and two gas burners, and beside that a bathroom. A wooden staircase led from the second floor hallway to the third floor.

At the top of the stairs was a landing, with doors on either side.; The door on the left went up to the spice . storage area, attic and loft in the front part of the house. A steep flight of stairs ran from the front part of the house to another door opening onto the street. The door to the right of the landing led to ‘Secret Annex’ at the back of the house.

Question 8.
Briefly describe ‘Secret Annex’.
Answer:
From early 1942, Anne’s parents knew that they might have to hide from the Nazis soon. They prepared a secret hiding place for such an eventuality. Their hiding place, which Anne called ‘Secret Annex’ was located in the upper-back portion of Otto Frank’s office at 263 Prinsengracht. To the left, a narrow hallway opened into a room that served as the family’s living room. Next to it was a smaller room, the bedroom and Anne and Margot’s study.

To the right of the stairs was a windowless washroom. One of the doors in the comer led to the toilet and another led to Margot’s and Anne’s room. Up the stairs was a spacious room that contained a stove and a sink. This served as the kitchen and bedroom of Mr and Mrs van Daan, as well as the general living room, dining room and study for all. A tiny side room was Peter van Daan’s bedroom. There was also an attic and a loft similar to the front part of the building.

Saturday, July 11,1942 – Monday, September 21,1942

Question 1.
What contact did the Franks and van Daans have with the outside world?
Answer:
During their time in ‘Secret Annex’, the Franks and the van Daans had very limited contact with the outside world. Their only means were the hidden radio in the private office and their Dutch friends who brought news of the outside world. Broadcasts from England could be heard on the radio and the Franks and the-van Daans heard the radio every evening after 7.30 pm, when the office was closed for the day.

Question 2.
How did the van Daans and the Franks get along? Which of the family members seemed better able to cope with the close quarters? Why?
Answer:
Though the Franks had eagerly awaited the van Daan’s arrival, the Franks and van Daans did not get along well at all afterwards. In the beginning, Anne frequently argued with Mr van Daan, although eventually they got along. Anne and Mrs van Daan argued constantly and their relationship grew progressively worse. Anne also regarded Peter as lazy and stupid. She was frustrated because the van Daans seemed to be of the general opinion that Margot was the better child. Mrs Frank and Mrs van Daan argued over the use of bed linen and crockery. Otto and Margot were the only ones who were mature enough not to get into arguments like the rest of them.

Question 3.
Discuss the relationship Anne shared with her mother and sister.
Answer:
Anne found her own mother and sister difficult to bear for they were always correcting her and telling her to be quiet. She found her mother’s ideas totally opposite to hers. She states, “Margot’s and mummy’s natures are completely strange for me.” Her disagreements with her mother and sister intensified her adolescent rebelliousness. Her emotions were not typical for a teenage girl, especially one confined to a small space with an anxious mother and quibbling sister.

Question 4.
Compare and contrast Anne’s relationship with her mother to that with her father.
Answer:
Anne’s relationship with her mother was not a strong one. She felt that her mother was partial towards Margot whom she never reprimanded. She felt that both her mother and Margot picked on her. Although, she wrote extensively about her feelings towards her mother, she did not describe as many incidents to prove how her mother deserved her criticism. Anne began to argue with her mother more frequently. She found her mother insensitive. She thought that her father was the only one who understood her and she enjoyed spending time with him. Anne really got along better with her father, mostly because he knew how to handle his daughter’s personality better.

Question 5.
Because of their close confinement and constant association with each other, friction among the residents of ‘Secret Annex’ occured frequently. What were some of the clashes?
Answer:
Anne witnessed a terrible quarrel between Mrs and Mr van Daan over a trivial thing. She was shocked by the fight as her parents wouldn’t have dreamt of shouting at each other in that way. Anne also didn’t think very highly of young Peter van Daan, who seemed to be lazy, a hypochondriac and bore. Mrs van Daan was annoyed by Anne’s constant chatter.

The two women, Mrs Frank and Mrs van Daan, fought over everything, from bedsheets to crockery—Mrs van Daan had removed all but three of her sheets from the comjnunal linen closet and Mrs Frank retaliated by doing the same. Mrs van Daan was also angry that her dishes were being used instead of Mrs Frank’s. Anne had broken one of Mrs van Daan’s soup bowls and was reprimanded by her for being careless. Anne also resented Mrs van Daan’s constant criticism of her behaviour.

Friday, September 25,1942 – Friday, October 9,1942

Question 1.
Write a brief note on Anne and Margot’s education before they went into hiding. Did things change after they go into hiding?
Answer:
In February 1934, Edith Frank, Margot and Anne joined their father in Amsterdam, and the two girls were enrolled in school—Margot in a public school and Anne in a Montessori school. Margot demonstrated ability I in arithmetic, and Anne showed aptitude for reading and writing. Due to the implementation of restrictive and
discriminatory laws imposed by the Germans in the Netherlands after the invasion, Margot and Anne were compelled to enroll at the Jewish Lyceum. Margot did really well. Anne, on the other hand, turned out to be an average student. When they shifted into the hiding place, Otto Frank started teaching Anne in September. Anne worked on her French and learned her verbs. She also worked with her father on his family tree. Later (in October) Bep wrote for a correspondence course in shorthand for Margot, Peter and Anne. Anne had trouble with mathematics, but she loved to read. Her passion was mythology.

Question 2.
Anne’s father said to Mrs van Daan, “As far as the vegetables are concerned, all I have to-say is look who’s calling the kettle black.” Why did he say this?
Answer:
One evening, at dinner, Anne took a small helping of vegetables that she loathed, and took potatoes instead. Mrs van Daan admonished her and insisted she eat vegetables, but Anne declined. Mr frank intervened and upheld Anne’s right to refuse a dish she didn’t like. That angered Mrs van Daan who said Anne was terribly spoiled. When she had finished her tirade, Mr Frank replied that in his opinion Anne was very well brought up as she did not answer back. He then reminded Mrs van Daan that she did not eat beans or any kind of cabbage in the evening because they gave her ‘gas’. So he said, “As far as vegetables are concerned, all I have to say is look who’s calling the kettle black.”

Question 3.
Why did Mrs Frank and Mrs van Daan quarrel?
Answer:
Mrs van Daan was a troublemaker who fought over petty matters. She was piqued that her dinner service— and not that of the Franks’, was put into communal use. Mrs Van Daan had removed three of her sheets from the collective linen cupboard. She continually scolded Anne for her chatter, she also shirked household chores. Her parents always defended Anne fiercely whenever Mrs van Daan criticised Anne’s upbringing. Anne’s mother took this as a criticism of her child rearing skills. This also caused a number of quarrels between the two women.

Question 4.
Anne says “Who would have guessed three months ago that quicksilver Anne would have to sit so quietly for hours on end, and what’s more, that she could?” Elaborate.
Answer:
Anne and her family went into hiding in ‘Secret Annex’ at the back of Mr Frank’s office when Margot received a letter from the SS asking her to report to the work camp. The Franks and the van Daans had to take considerable precautions not to be seen or be heard by anyone other than their ‘protectors’—namely, the workers in the office downstairs. Their daily lives changed drastically. No one in the annex was allowed to walk between nine in the morning and seven in the evening. Once, when the plumber was at work downstairs, they could not run water during the day, nor could they use the bathroom. Once, when the doorbell rang at eight o’clock, all they could think of was that someone was coming to get them.

They lived in constant fear of exposure, as Anne said, like “baby mice.” In one of her diary entries, Anne said that she never would have guessed that, with her impatient nature, she would be able to be quiet for long periods of time. Although, with everyone’s life in the balance, Anne was able to control her edginess until the working hours were over. Life, as they knew it, had changed forever.

Question 5.
Write a brief note on the condition of Jews in the Nazi regime.
Answer:
The condition of Jews under the Nazi regime was miserable. The Gestapo was taking away Jews in droves to the labour camps. Miep recounted that the people got almost nothing to eat, much less to drink, as water was available only one hour a day, and there was only one toilet Said sink for several thousand people. Men and women slept in the same room, and women and children often had to have their heads shaved. Escape was almost impossible. The Jews were also being gassed. The Gestapo even punished by executing leading citizens and innocent people, if they couldn’t find the saboteurs.

Question 6.
The war caused Anne to struggle with her identity as both a German and a Jew. Comment.
Answer:
The war caused Anne to struggle with her identity as both a German and a Jew. Anne’s diary demonstrates the impact the Holocaust had on a single girl, which personalises this sprawling historical horror. Anne became preoccupied with questions about who she was and how her once innocent perspective changed considerably. She initially identified herself with the Germans and said that they were “Fine specimens of humanity…”

Although, Anne lived in Holland since she was four and felt a greater connection with the Dutch, she wrestled with the fact of her German background. However, she immediately refuted her own statement, writing “No, that’s not true, Hitler took away our nationality long ago.” Anne’s words demonstrated her confusion and pain at being persecuted by fellow Germans. She was horrified that the SS would call up Margot alone—a 16-year-old girl.

Wednesday, October 14,1942 – Friday, November 20,1942

Question 1.
Write a brief note on the relationship between Margot and Anne.
Answer:
Margot Frank, Anne’s older sister, was 16 at the onset of the story and 18 by the end. At least through Anne’s eyes, Margot was smarter, quieter, prettier and more mature than Anne. The two sisters didn’t often get along, were not close friends and didn’t confide in each other much. The sisters got on each other’s nerves and Anne appears to be jealous of Margot, because of the special attention and privileges the latter received from their father and the relationship she had with their mother. However, they did share sisterly moments. They talked about tjie future, and Anne asked Margot what she wanted to be when she was older, though Margot remained mysterious about her plans.

Question 2.
What happened the day a worker came to fill the fire extinguishers?
Answer:
Nobody had warned the Franks or van Daans that somebody was coming to refill the five fire extinguishers in the building. As a result, they did not bother to be quiet until Anne heard hammering on the landing across from the bookcase. Assuming it was the carpenter, Anne warned Bep who was eating lunch that she could not go back downstairs. After working for a while, the workman banged on their door.

Sounds of knocking, pulling, pushing and jerking the bookcase terrified the unsuspecting, frightened little group, and they feared that the workman may have heard something and wanted to check out this mysterious-looking bookcase. Finally, they heard a knock and feared that their hiding place was discovered. But it was just Mr Kleiman. He . said, “Open up, it’s me.” After the man had left, Mr Kleiman had come to get Bep, but had trouble opening the bookcase. It was he who had made those noises that scared them.

Question 3.
Why do you think did the Jewish occupants of the annex not trust the Jewish chemist?
Answer:
The annex’s residents feared the coming of a Jewish chemist in the building as there were people who were complicit with the Nazis, and some of them were Jewish. By this point in time the Germans were rounding up Jews all over Holland. If the Jewish chemist discovered the annex, he could turn them in to the Nazis in return for his own safety. The combination of not being able to trust her own nation and not being able to trust a man of her own religion must have been confusing and embittering for Anne. She truly belonged to no society that she could name. The oppression and psychological torture of the war was visible on all.

Question 4.
How did Anne react to being confined in the annex?
Answer:
At first, the process of settling in and arranging a daily routine took up most of Anne’s time and energy. The strange situation struck Anne as “more like being on vacation in a very peculiar boarding house” than like being in hiding. Fear, of course, was an ever-present reality, and Anne wrote, “It is the silence that frightens me so in the evenings and at night… I can’t tell you how oppressive it is never to be able to go outdoors.” Once the van Daan’s arrived, even trivial matters were enough to result in ‘squabbles.’ As they were confined within a small space, they got on one another’s nerves so much more easily and for non-issues.

Gradually, for Anne, the early excitement of being in hiding, gave way to frustration at being trapped in such close quarters with the van Daans and her own family. Mr Dussel’s arrival was initially exciting for Anne because it brought a change. However, this sense of excitement soured when Mr Dussel told Anne about the persecution of Jews in the outside world. Anne began to express her inability to understand the injustice of persecution and genocide.

Question 5.
How did Mr Dussel reach ‘Secret Annex’?
Answer:
Everything had gone smoothly. Miep had told Mr Dussel to be at a certain place in front of the post office at 11 am, when a man would meet him, and he was at the appointed place at the appointed time. Mr Kleiman went up to him, announced that the man he was expecting to meet was unable to come and asked him to drop by the office to see Miep. Mr Kleiman took a streetcar back to the office while Mr Dussel followed on foot.

Miep asked him to remove his coat, so the yellow star couldn’t be seen, and brought him to the private office, where Mr Kleiman kept him occupied until the cleaning lady had gone. On the pretext that the private office was needed for something else, Miep took Mr Dussel upstairs, opened the bookcase, and took Mr Dussel inside the annex.

Question 6.
The Franks’ ability to prepare the hidden house and survive living there for two years would have been impossible were it not for a group of protectors. Who were the ‘protectors’? Why did they help those in hiding?
Answer:
Mr Kugler—When Jews were no longer allowed to own a business, he assumed management of Mr Frank’s ‘ and Mr Van Daan’s business. He helped them prepare ‘Secret Annex’ and later provided material supplies as well as psychological support. All of this involved extreme risk to him even though he was not a Jew. Mr Kugler is also referred to as Mr Kraler.

Mr Kleiman—He, along with Mr Kraler, had taken over the running of the business. Like Kraler, he too was a Dutch Gentile. He was especially helpful in arranging the logistics of obtaining food. Johannes Kleiman was arrested in 1944 but released because of poor health. He remained in Amsterdam until his death in 1959. Mr Kleiman is also referred to as Mr Koophuis.

Meip—Meip was a young woman who worked in the office of the business. She too helped to secure food and was particularly good at raising the spirits of those in the annex. Her husband’s name was Jan.

Elli—Elli was another young office worker who helped with collecting food. Like Meip, she also helped keep spirits up.

Bep Voskuijl—A worker in Otto Frank’s office, Elizabeth (Bep) Voskuijl, helped the family by serving as a liaison with the outside world. She, like Miep, at times stayed with the family to raise their spirits.

Mr Voskuijl—Bep’s father was very good with woodwork. He made the bookcase that hid the entrance to the annex.
The ‘protectors’ helped the Franks because they were good people and they loved the family. If caught, these people would have been shot as the Germans would have deemed them traitors. Though they feared the Germans, these courageous people did the right thing out of love and humanity.

Monday, December 7,1942 – Saturday, February 27,1943

Question 1.
What was Mr vaii Daan’s previous occupation? How did he make use of it now?
Answer:
Mr van Daan used to be in the meat, sausage and spice business. He proved his usefulness when they got a lot of meat and he turned it into sausages, in order to preserve them for when times got harder. Anne described the lengthy, prudent process whereby the sausages were prepared by him.

Question 2.
What was Anne Frank’s relationship with Mr Dussel?
Answer:
Mr Dussel was a dentist and an acquaintance of the Franks who hid with them in the annex. At first Anne was happy to have Mr Dussel in the annex and found him to be a very nice man. She was not exactly delighted at having to share her room with a stranger, but she was willing to adjust as it meant saving a life.

Anne had heard Mr Dussel got along very well with children, but sadly for her, he turned out to be an old-fashioned disciplinarian and constantly preached long sermons on manners. Anne patiently explained all the rules and timing of the office and annex to Mr Dussel, but he was slow to catch on. He asked everything twice but still couldn’t remember anything that was told to him.

As time passed Anne found Mr Dussel particularly difficult to deal with as she suffered the brunt of his odd personal hygiene habits, tedious lectures and controlling tendencies. He always told her that she made “too much” noise, and kept shushing her even when she turned in her bed at night. He was quite exasperating and egotistical. On Sundays, he would switch on the light at the crack of dawn to exercise for ten minutes. He would then loudly bump into all of the furniture while getting dressed.

Question 3.
Which two festivals did the group celebrate in December in the annex?
Answer:
The group celebrated the Jewish festival Hanukkah and St Nicholas Day. Hanukkah commemorates the re-dedication of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem following the Jewish victory over the Syrian-Greeks in 165 BCE. Saint Nicholas Day celebrates the life of Saint Nicholas of Myra, a fourth-century bishop best known today as the real-life model for Santa Claus. In 1942, Hanukkah and St Nicholas Day nearly coincided—they were only one day apart. On Hanukkah, the group exchanged a few small gifts, lit candles for only 10 minutes and sang the Hanukkah song.

St Nicholas Day on Saturday was more exciting as it was the first time the Franks, Mr Dussel and the van Daans celebrated this festival. Bep and Miep brought a large basket with little gifts for everyone, including an appropriate verse. Anne received a Kewpie doll, Mr Frank got bookends, Mr van Daan an ashtray and Mr. Dussel a photo frame.

Question 4.
What did Anne witness through the window in the front office?
Answer:
Ope Sunday, Anne peered out through a chink in the curtain in the front office. The people passing all walked fast as if they were in a hurry. Those on bicycles whizzed by so fast that Anne couldn’t even make out who was on the bike. The children were dirty with runny noses. She also saw cars, boats and rain. She could see a houseboat across from the office. A captain lived there with his wife and children. He had a small yapping . dog. When it rained, most of the people were hidden under their umbrellas.

Question 5.
Were conditions better as the year 1943 began?
Answer:
The conditions deteriorated. Anne and the others heard sounds of gunfire. At any time of night and day, poor helpless people Were being dragged out of their homes. Families were tom apart—men, women and children were separated. Children returned home from school to find that their parents had disappeared. Women returned from shopping and found their houses sealed, their families gone.

Dutch young men were sent to fight at the front. The children in that neighbourhood wore thin shirts and wooden shoes. They had no coats, no caps, no stockings and no one to help them. Things had become so bad in Holland that hordes of hungry children stopped passersby in the streets to beg for a piece of bread.

Thursday, March 4,1943 – Tuesday, June 13,1943

Question 1.
In what ways had Anne changed over the last few months that she had been in the annex?
Answer:
When they had come to the annex, Anne had been a high-spirited teenager. Although there were many rules and restrictions, she still managed to have fun. She was a typical teenager, struggling to find her own identity. She was somewhat jealous of Margot, her older sister by three years, for most people considered Margot to be more beautiful, talented and intelligent than her. She also resented her overly protective and critical mother. Anne longed to be independent, to do well in. school, to enjoy life and to have friends.

After six months in hiding, Anne changed considerably. While she continued to struggle with the adult residents of the annex, her responses to the arguments took on a different tone. She no longer attempted to excuse her own behaviour or complain about how unfairly she was treated. Instead, she drew parallels between her behaviour and the behaviour of the adults in the annex, and realised what was unfair was to be compared to Margot as they were very different people. She also leamt how to bottle her rage and expressed anger only on the most important occasions. These were all indications that Anne was now more becoming more mature.

Question 2.
What were the shortages that the family was dealing with? How did they plan to deal with them?
Answer:
The family was dealing with various shortages.There were eight inmates in the annex but they had been able to procure only four ration cards. Bread and butter were also in short supply. Their evening serving of bread had been cancelled. They could have bought more food if they had had enough money as the black market was doing a booming business. They had been eating the beans that they had stored earlier, every day. They decided to start eating the canned food that they had stored in th§ attic. Anne outgrew her shoes. They bought a pair of straw thongs for her for 6.50 guilders but they were worn down to the soles within a week so they had to ask Miep to buy something for her from the black market.

Question 3.
What rule did Mr Dussel break? What warning did Mr Frank give?
Answer:
Mr Dussel, the elderly dentist, joined the group in hiding in November 1942. Mr Dussel was terribly careless and disobeyed the rules of the house by writing to his wife, Charlotte who wasn’t in hiding. Not only did he write letters to his wife, he also carried on correspondence with various other people. Maintaining contact with the outside world was dangerous. He could reveal his hiding place to the people he corresponded with. That would endanger not just him, but would jeopardise the safety of the others too. Mr Frank strictly forbade him to write any more letters and Mr Dussel promised not to write to anyone anymore.

Question 4.
Describe the night Peter heard a burglar in the office.
Answer:
On the night of 25 March, 1942, Peter told Mr Frank that there was a burglar in the office. Peter had heard “someone fiddling with the door.” Mr Frank and Peter went downstairs to investigate and returned looking very upset. They heard a noise as if two doors had been slammed shut inside the house. Then all the inmates of the annex gathered in the van Daans’ room and discussed their suspicions.

Once again they waited and waited, but heard nothing. Finally they came to the conclusion that the burglars had run off when they heard footsteps in an otherwise quiet building. In fact, the more they thought about it, the less likely it seemed that a burglar would force open a door so early in the evening. It also occured to them that the warehouse manager at the Keg Company next door might still have been at work, and the sounds he made-were mistaken for noises made by a burglar. It may have been their imagination playing tricks. However, none of them got much sleep that night. In the morning, the men went downstairs to check and it turned out they were quite safe. ‘

Question 5.
What were the main political happenings in early 1943?
Answer:
The year 1943 witnessed major political events. The allied invasion was expected any day now. Churchill had pneunjonia, but was gradually recovering. Gandhi, the champion of Indian freedom, was on one of his hunger strikes. Jews were being taken from their homes and separated from their families, and non- Jewish children were wandering the streets in hunger. Both Christians and Jews desperately wanted the war to end.

On 10 March, 1943, Anne mentioned the bombing of Amsterdam by the planes of the Allies and the firing of the anti-aircraft guns, which disturbed their sleep almost every night. They were so loud and close that Anne often crawled into bed with her father.

The news from the outside world raised and then dashed the hopes of the group. On 18 March, 1943, Anne wrote excitedly that Turkey had entered the war, but the next day, it was announced that they hadn’t. Anne also described a visit made by Hitler to wounded German soldiers, a visit which was broadcast over the radio.

Question 6.
What were the opinions held by the members of the annex regarding the war?
Answer:
Mr van Daan thought the war would not end until the end of 1943.
Mrs van Daan wanted to get false ID papers made regardless of the expense. She was tired of the war and wanted to get out of Holland and Hitler’s regime. She vacillated between converting into a Christian and remaining a Jew.
Mr Frank was optimistic about the outcome of the war and expected the Allies to liberate them any day. Mr Dussel had no firm opinions and made up everything as he spoke. However, he defended his views with determination. Anne considered the war pointless and was horrified by the cruelty and unfairness of it.

Question 7.
On 1 May, 1943, Anne’s entry took stock of their situation. Had it improved?
Answer:
On 1 May, 1943, Anne commented that the only thing that had gotten better was the weather, otherwise their situation was worsening. Their food was inadequate and verged on being inedible. Breakfast was dry bread and coffee. Dinner was spinach or lettuce and small potatoes that were nearly rotten. Their clothes were frayed, not very clean, and way too small for both Anne and Margot.

All their resources were getting depleted. The comfortable life which they had lived before apd even to some extent, in the annex, had declined rapidly. Their former life contrasted starkly with the privations which they suffered now, ranging from a lack of food, to the inability to change their sheets, or even to renew their diminishing stock of underwear. The nightly air raids continued and fear remained an ever-present reality.

Question 8.
How was Anne’s fourteenth birthday celebrated?
Answer:
Anne’s fourteenth birthday fell on 12 June, 1943; the festivities were greatly subdued in comparison to the previous year. Nonetheless, she was happy as she was ‘spoiled’ with sweets. A small celebration was held in honour of her birthday. She received several small gifts, including some new books. Her father also wrote a poem for her, a German tradition that he honoured. It was a special day for Anne and it brightened her spirits temporarily. Anne was particularly happy with the big book on her favourite subject, Greek and Roman mythology.

Tuesday, June 15,1943 – Tuesday, August 3,1943

Question 1.
As their first year in hiding drew to a close, two more disasters struck the group in the annex. Describe them.
Answer:
Mr Voskuijl was supposed to have had an ulcer operation, but he was diagnosed with cancer which was too advanced to be cured, and he did not have long to live. He was one of the group’s best helpers and security advisors. The second blow was that they had to turn in their big radio as the Nazis had imposed new regulations which prohibited the possession of radio sets with stations other than those of the Nazis. The little group in ‘Secret Annex’ had drawn courage from the news they heard on the BBC regarding the victories of the Allies. MrKleiman, though, promised to provide them with a substitute radio soon.

Question 2.
July of 1943 brought Anne and her 54-year-old roommate into a confrontation. What was the source of this row?
Answer:
Wanting to work a little longer, Anne, with her father’s permission asked her roommate, Mr Dussel whether he would allow her to use the work table in their room for an extra hour-and-a-half twice a week, from four to five-thirty in the afternoons while he took a nap, but he refused. Dussel absolutely refused her request without giving any explanation. Anne held her temper in check and asked him to reconsider, but he just insulted her and walked out of the room.

Eventually, she requested her father to intervene on her behalf. Mr Frank supported Anne and asked Mr Dussel to reconsider and Mr Dussel finally gave in. Mr Dussel didn’t speak to Anne for two days and his behaviour was “frightfully childish.” She commented, “Anyone who’s so petty and pedantic at the age of 54 was bom that way and is never going to change.”

Question 3.
Write a brief account of the burglary in the office.
Answer:
On 16 July, burglars broke into the office for real. Peter discovered the theft when he went down to the warehouse next morning. He noticed at once that both the warehouse doors and the street doors were open. He informed Mr Frank, who at once locked the doors and they both went back upstairs.

They had to remain very quiet and not use any water till eleven-thirty, when Mr Kleiman came upstairs. He informed them that the burglars had forced the outside door and the warehouse door with a crowbar. They had stolen two cashboxes containing 40 guilders, blank cheque books and, and all their ration coupons for sugar, which was a big blow for the group in hiding.

Question 4.
How was the war progressing in the summer of 1943?
Answer:
By the third year of the war, everyone in the fighting countries was experiencing shortages and hardships of all kinds. The Allied air raids were increasing in intensity. At night, the residents cowered from the gunfire. They could not light candles or turn on the light. Anne crept into her father’s bed for comfort many times. She wrote, “We don’t have a single quiet night. I’ve got dark rings under my eyes from lack of sleep.” Italy had surrendered. In Holland, the strikes that Anne mentioned were a sure sign that morale was low among the Dutch. The air raids had increased, sometimes as many as two a day. The happiest war news was that Mussolini had ‘resigned’ and the Fascist party has been outlawed in Italy.

Hitler’s ‘guns, not butter’ campaign ensured that food and other necessities were difficult to obtain. There were food shortages, which lead to rationing at the table. Anne commented on the pefrple in the neighbourhood she lived in—the children, she said, were “real slum kids.” She fretted over how “terrible” it was outside—Jews, Gentiles,
women, men—everyone, was miserably waiting for the end.

Question 5.
Mr Dussel and Mrs van Daan were particularly troublesome to Anne. Elaborate.
Answer:
Anne found Mr Dussel particularly difficult to deal with because he shared a room with her, and she suffered the brunt of his odd personal hygiene habits, pedantic lectures and controlling tendencies. He always told her that she made “too much” noise, and kept shushing her even if she turned in her bed at night. He was quite exasperating and egotistical. On Sundays, he would switch on the light at the crack of dawn to exercise for 10 minutes.

He would then loudly bump into all of the furniture while getting dressed. Wanting to work longer hours, Anne asked him if she could use the work table in their room for an extra hour-and-a-half twice a week, but he categorically refused without any explanation. When she asked him to reconsider, he launched a melodramatic, false and insulting tirade against her. Eventually, he gave in at her father’s intervention.

Another time, Anne’s criticism of the characterisation of a book he had recommended led to another attack on . her upbringing and ideas by him and Mrs van Daan.Mrs van Daan and Anne did not get along at all. Mrs van Daan perpetually called Anne spoilt, immodest and tried to force her to eat more vegetables. Once, after a ‘squabble’, Mrs van Daan told Anne’s father, “I wouldn’t put up with it if Anne were my daughter.”

According to Anne, these always seemed to be Mrs van Daan’s first and last words, “if Anne were my daughter.” Understandably Anne wrote in her diary, “Thank heavens I’m not!” Fed up of the constant bickering and insults, Anne frequently mentioned in her diary about how spoiled and frivolous Mrs van Daan was.

Wednesday, August 4,1943 – Thursday, November 11,1943

Question 1.
What were the dangers that the two families faced while in hiding?
Answer:
Anne Frank and her family, along with the van Daans, went into hiding to escape the Nazis. In her diary, Anne listed the dangers the family faced while in hiding. These included air raids and danger of bombings or fire, food shortages, break-ins and the perpetual fear of being discovered. Then an added worry had been that Mr van Maaren, the stockroom manager was not trustworthy, and would turn them in if he found out about the hiding place.

Amsterdam was bombed by the Allies. Despite the falling bombs, they could not leave their hiding place as being seen on the streets would have been just as dangerous as getting caught in an air raid. Food was rationed in Amsterdam and has to be obtained in the black market. Since they were in hiding and did not have ration books, they had to pay a lot more.

Miep Gies, who procured rations for them had to get extra food ration stamps, which at times aroused suspicions. Burglars were also a danger to the group in hiding. Some burglars had broken in once and stolen some of their supplies. Once they believed they heard one in the attic and were afraid that the burglar had heard them and would report them to the Nazis.

Question 2.
What medication did Anne take while in hiding? Why?
Answer:
Anne had resorted to taking Valerian as by the middle of 1943, she was very depressed. Her moods darkened as her frustration and anger increased. She had-plenty of time to contemplate the war and its outcome and her anxiety grew with each diary entry. Her tone was less cheerful and humorous, despite occasional injections of satire or sarcasm. Anne was just a young girl and could no longer pretend to be strong. Anne gave a cynical description of her discovery that hypocrisy rather than honesty was the only way to get along with people.

She had also lost trust in her parents and had to rely more on her own resourcefulness. She took the Valerian drops to fight the anxiety and depression, but that did not prevent her from being even more miserable the next day. She realised that a good hearty laugh would help better than ten Valerian drops, but being in hiding made them forget how to laugh. It had been so long that she had laughed, she sometimes feared her face was going to sag with sorrow and her mouth was going to permanently droop at the comers.

Question 3.
On 29 September, 1943 Mrs van Daan celebrated her second birthday in hiding. How was this celebration different from the first one?
Answer:
The Franks went into hiding on 9 July 1942 and the van Daans on 13 July. Mrs van Daan had celebrated her first birthday in hiding on 29 September, 1942. Though they did not have a large celebration, she was showered with flowers, simple gifts and good food. Mr van Daan gave her red carnations, which were a family tradition.

However, by her second birthday, the two families, and Mr Dussel had been in hiding for more than a year. Their resources were vastly depleted. Also, a year in hiding had taken its toll emotionally. This birthday celebration was “really nothing very exciting.” Mrs van Daan just received some food rations one ration stamp each for cheese, meat and bread, and ajar of jam from the Frank family, and flowers and food from her husband, Mr Dussel and the office staff.

Question 4.
Anne wrote, “My mind boggles at the profanity this honourable house has had to endure in the past month.” Comment.
Answer:
In the beginning, the atmosphere in the ,annex had been very pleasant, but conflicts arose soon. Conflicts naturally arise whenever people with conflicting natures are forced to live in close confines, but it was inevitable in their circumstances as these eight people lived in extremely cramped quarters without any privacy or peace. Added to that was the fact that they were imprisoned in the annex and could not ever step outside it.

They lived in continual fear of being discovered. Food was in short supply and they were running out of money. It was tough on everyone, and the tension increasingly erupted into arguments. Anne had constant arguments with her mother and Mrs van Daan. The adults, too, squabbled among themselves as their already strained nerves easily took offence. Anne observed, “Whatever is said you either annoy sonjeone or it is misunderstood.” The senior van Daans had the most horrible quarrels that led Anne to write that her mind boggled at the profanity the honourable house had to endure.

Question 5.
“Miep often said she envied us because we have such peace and quiet here.” Elaborate.
Answer:
As Anne described more of Miep’s role in keeping the annex running, we get a sense of the amount of work Miep had to do to bring them their supplies in secret. It was a dangerous and difficult job that required a lot of effort, responsibility and care on her part. Also, the people in the annex did not have to witness the horrors outside, they were sheltered from watching the pain and desolation.

Miep’s comment made Anne realise that the people who protected the annex were under just as much stress as those inside. In understanding Miep’s envy of the people in the annex, and that the situation outside was not favourable for any of the Dutch people or non-Jews, Anne exhibited a maturity beyond her years. Nonetheless, Anne also felt that Miep was unaware of the difficulties of their life in hiding, such as the constant quarrelling and frustration at living in such close quarters. Miep did not understand what it was like to be a young girl, trapped in a small attic with a whole world just out of her reach.

Wednesday, Niovember 7,1943 – Saturday, January 22,1944

Question 1.
Who was Lies? Why did Anne dream of her?
Answer:
Lies Hanneli was Anne Frank’s close friend from school. In her diary entry on 27 November, Anne wrote about one of the nightmares where she dreamt about Lies Hanneli who was clothed in rags, her face thin and worn. Her eyes were very big and she accused Anne of deserting her.

This was an accurate description of the appearance of most of the concentration camp inmates, and what Anne did not know was that Lies actually was in a concentration camp.The recurring image of Lies revealed feelings of guilt on Anne’s part. She was constantly aware that she was far better off than most European Jews, including some of her dearest friends.

Question 2.
In the Netherlands, St Nicholas Day is the traditional day to exchange gifts. A year before, there had been a basket of presents. What did they do this year to celebrate?
Answer:
As St Nicholas Day approached, Anne was determined to make something festive out of the occasion. She composed poems for each person with her father’s help. Remembering the previous year’s festively decorated basket, she decorated a laundry basket with cut-outs and bows made of pink and blue carbon paper. Anne and her father put one verse in each shoe and filled the basket with shoes. Anne read a funny poem about how times were hard but that festive ‘spirit’ remained. As each person took out his or her own shoe out of the basket, there was a roar of surprised laughter as inside each shoe was a little wrapped package addressed to its owner.

Question 3.
What did the ‘family’ members receive at Christmas from their protectors?
Answer:
On Christmas day 1943, for the first time in her life, Anne received a Christmas present. The ‘protectors’ Mr Kleiman, Mr Kugler and the girls, Miep and Bep, had prepared a wonderful surprise for the residents of the annex. Miep baked a delicious Christmas cake for them with ‘Peace 1944’ written on top, and Bep provided a batch of cookies that was up to pre-war standards. There was a jar of yogurt for Peter, Margot and Anne, and a bottle of beer for each of the adults. Everything was wrapped nicely with pretty pictures glued to the packages.

Question 4.
Anne wrote on 24 December, 1943, “Moods have a tendency to affect us quite a bit here, and in my case it’s been getting worse lately.” Comment.
Answer:
Anne’s account of her feelings was almost achingly honest in the entry for 24 December, 1943. Anne had been experiencing mood swings. Anne was sometimes ‘on top of the world’ as she realised that her situation was better than that of other Jewish children, but was ‘in the depths of despair’ when she heard of Mrs Kleiman’s Jopie who played hockey, went on canoe trips, took part in school plays and had afternoon teas with friends.

Though not exactly jealous of Jopie, Anne would have liked to have fun with her friends. Instead she and her family were trapped in the annex like ‘lepers.’ She longed to be allowed to breathe fresh air again, to ride a bike, dance, whistle, look at the world, feel young and know that she-was free. She also longed to have a mother who understood her. This futile wish led her to the sad topic of what she considered to be the inadequacies of her mother, and Anne vowed to behave differently when she had children of her own.

Question 5.
Who was Peter Schiff?
Answer:
When Anne was in sixth grade, she met Peter Schiff. Anne had a crush on him and he liked her too. For one whole summer the two were inseparable. At the end of the summer vacation, he went to the seventh grade at the middle school while Anne was in the sixth grade at the grammar school. He would pick Anne up on the way home, or she would pick him up. Peter was the ideal boy: tall, good-looking and slender, with a serious, quiet and intelligent face. He had dark hair, beautiful brown eyes, ruddy cheeks and a nicely pointed nose. Anne loved his smile, which made him look so boyish and mischievous.

However, during the summer vacation, Anne went away to the countryside, and when she came back, Peter had moved and was living with a much older boy, who told him Anne was just a kid, and Peter stopped seeing her. Not wanting to face the truth, because she loved him, Anne clung to Peter till she realised that if she continued to chase after him, she’d become a laughing stock. Years later, he was still the boy she dreamt of and weaved her fantasies around.

Question 6.
What change came oyer Anne regarding the van Daans? What brought about this change?
Answer:
After writing rather antagonistically about the faults of the van Daans, Anne realised that the faults which she saw in them might not necessarily be theirs alone. She wrote that in the discussions and arguments that. happened in the annex the Franks were not always right apd the van Daans were not always wrong.

Anne realised that.her mother was responsible for some of the quarrels and arguments in the annex. Although Mrs van Daan was selfish, stingy and underhanded, yet half the arguments could have been avoided if Mrs Frank had not been so hard to deal with. One could talk to Mrs van Daan and, unless she was provoked, she was quite reasonable.

Thus, it was a very perceptive and mature Anne who wrote, “Until now I was immovable! I always thought the van Daans were in the wrong, but we too are partly to blame. We have certainly been right over the subject matter; but handling of others from intelligent people (which we consider ourselves to be!) one expects more insight. I hope that I have acquired a bit of insight and will use it well when the occasion arises.”

Question 7.
Comment on Anne’s attitude towards their ‘protectors.’
Answer:
Anne was extremely fond of her protectors and was grateful to them for their help and care. While the group was in hiding, they were instrumental in obtaining supplies, keeping them secret and providing moral and psychological support. They brought news from the outside world and Miep and Bep were there when Anne longed for someone to talk to. They arranged for little gifts and surprises on birthdays and festivals, and generally did their best to make the situation of the group in hiding a little more tolerable. Miep and Jan even spent a night in ‘Secret Annex.’

However, Anne could not help but compare her situation with that of non-Jewish people (their protectors, for example) and feel rightfully jealous. Anne was ‘in the depths of despair’ when she heard of Mrs Kleiman’s Jopie who played hockey, went on canoe trips, took part in school plays and had afternoon teas with friends. Though not exactly jealous of Jopie, Anne would have liked to have fun with her friends. Instead, she and her family were trapped in the annex like ‘lepers,’ especially during winter and the Christmas and New Year’s holidays.

Question 8.
Anne wrote, “I sometimes wonder if anyone will ever understand what I mean, if anyone will ever overlook my ingratitude and not worry about whether or not I’m Jewish and merely see me as a teenager badly in need of some good, plain fun.” Comment.
Answer:
In this passage from 24 December, 1943, Anne reminds us that she was just a normal young girl who had been forced into extraordinary circumstances. She willingly made sacrifices and dealt with the restrictions of the annex without much complaint because she knew that she was more fortunate than her friends who had been arrested and sent to concentration camps.

This attitude demonstrated Anne’s remarkable maturity, but it clearly took a toll on her spirit. Aside from wanting to return to the freedom and comforts she had before the war, Anne simply wanted to experience a normal childhood. She did not want to live in a world that placed such significance on where she was from, what her religion was, or whether she behaved well with adults.

She wanted to be in a place where she did not have to worry about whether she would live or whether her friends were suffering. The diary had such emotional impact because we see Anne not as a saint, but as a normal girl with real human feelings and imperfections who fell victim to the tragedy of the Holocaust.

Monday, January 24,1944 – Monday, February 28,1944

Question 1.
Write a brief note on the Dutch Resistance Movement.
Answer:
After the German occupation of Netherlands in May 1940, the German authorities implemented measures aimed at isolating the Jews from the rest of Dutch society. Jewish children had to study in Jewish schools.Jews were forced to wear a Star of David so that they were easily recognisable in public. In July 1942, the German forces implemented a large-scale operation in the Netherlands to transport Jews to labour camps in Eastern Europe. Many Jewish families went into hiding. A fairly active Dutch Resistance Movement came into being, which played a big part in ensuring that Jews were kept hidden. These groups forged identity cards, provided financial support to those in hiding, and also organised hiding places for Jews.

Question 2.
What did you learn about Peter van Daan?
Answer:
Peter van Daan was the only son of Mr and Mrs Van Daan. He was almost 16 when he came to live in the annex. Shy, awkward and Introspective, he did not arouse Anne’s attention until they had been living in the annex for almost two years. Despite her interest in him, Anne realised that, although he was a nice young man, he was weak-minded and lacked character.

He had an inferiority complex and although he was good at English and Geography, he was stupid. He was insecure and wanted affection which was the reason why he always hugged his cat,’ Mouschi, so tightly. Also, he never wanted to change the pictures on his wall as he thought they were his friends. Although Peter did not want to be a Christian, he wanted to hide his Jewish ancestry when the war got over, which disappointed Anne.

Question 3.
Describe a typical Sunday routine in ‘Secret Annex’.
Answer:
The inmates of the annex spent their Sunday mornings scrubbing, sweeping and doing the laundry. While the rest of them slept on Sundays, Mr Dussel was the first one to get up. He woke up at eight and washed himself for an hour, and then prayed for a quarter of an hour in the room he shared with Anne. By nine- thirty, the stoves were lit, the blackout screen was taken down, and Mr van Daan headed for the bathroom.

By ten-fifteen, the van Daans were done with the bathroom and the Franks had their turn with the bathroom. Anne and Margot did the laundry, while Mr Frank used the bathroom, and then Anne or Margot went to the . bathroom. At eleven-thirty everyone had breakfast together after which they went about their chores. Mr Frank brushed the rugs, Mr Dussel made the beds, Mrs Frank hung up the washing in the attic and Margot and Anne did the dishes and straightened up the rooms.

Question 4.
What, according to Anne, were the reasons that made Peter and her so similar?
Answer:
Anne realised that there were a great many similarities between her and Peter. They were both Jews in hiding, fearful for their survival. Both of them, she felt, had mothers who were inadequate. Mrs van Daan was too superficial, liked to flirt and did not concern herself much with what went on in Peter’s head and while Mrs Frank took an active interest in Anne’s life, she had no tact, sensitivity or motherly understanding. As a result, both were vulnerable emotionally and unsure of themselves. Also, both she and Peter struggled in expressing their inner emotions.

Wednesday, March 1,1944 – Friday, March 31,1944

Question1.
Write a brief account of the second burglary in Gies & Co. Why did it leave the inmates of the annex alarmed?
Answer:
When Mr van Daan went to Mr Kugler’s office at 7:30 pm that day, he found the office doors open and the front office in a mess. However, the front door was locked. He remained in Mr Kugler’s office for some time, then switched off the lamp and returned upstairs without worrying much about the open doors or the messy office.

Early in the morning, Peter discovered the front door open and the projector and Mr Kugler’s new briefcase missing. The only explanation was that the intruder had a skeleton key or a duplicate and did not have to force his way inside. This was unfortunate for the residents of the annex, because that person could report them. It would be especially unfortunate if the burglar was one of the warehouse workers.’

Question 2.
In what ways had Anne changed from the time she entered the annex?
Answer:
The flirtatious Anne Frank who had enjoyed the attention of admirers on every street comer, had numerous friends and was the favourite of most of her teachers was completely different from the one who had grown wise within the walls of the annex. She would amuse and entertain her teachers by her clever answers, her witty remarks, her smiling face and her critical mind. She was hardworking, honest and generous. She would never have, refused anyone who wanted to peek at her answers, she was generous with her candy and wasn’t snobbish. However, the Anne of the present wanted friends, not admirers, people who respected her for her character and her deeds, not her flattering smile.

Question 3.
How did the adults cope with growing food shortages?
Answer:
The people who sold them illegal food coupons were caught, so they had just the five ration books they bought on the black-market—no coupons, fats and oils. With Miep and Mr Kleiman being sick again, Bep couldn’t manage all the shopping. The food was wretched and their stock of fat, butter and margarine was over. So instead of fried potatoes, they had hot cereal for breakfast and mashed potatoes and pickled kale for lunch. The kale was old and stinking. Anne sat with a handkerchief sprayed with perfume to avoid the stench ! in the kitchen.

Question 4.
The years in hiding had matured Anne. Comment.
Answer:
Anne had gained a fuller sense of self and a clearer view of her relationship with the people in the annex. She started signing her diary ‘Anne M. Frank’ instead of simply ‘Anne,’ a sign that she perceived as her own coming of age. Anne had matured significantly during her time in the annex, particularly because her family’s time in hiding coincided with Anne’s puberty. In this confined world, Anne developed her relationships with her family.

The close quarters forced her to understand her parents and sister on a deeper level. Anne found in Peter the confidant for whom she had been longing. She became aware of her feelings for the opposite sex, a new aspect of maturity and development as a young woman that changed her entire experience of living in the annex.

Anne’s growing maturity was also evident in the increased gravity of her discussions of her life and the war. For the first time, Anne wrote seriously about the possibility of her own death, especially as her morale worsened. At the same time, she dreamt about life after the war and about her great fortune in having a hiding place.

She had become highly introspective and insightful about her own nature, and began to reflect on her past development and organise it into stages. Anne used her diary like a literary timeline of her inner development, which she analysed and critiqued. This showed her capacity for personal growth and self¬awareness, two important aspects of coming-of-age. Though maturing into a young woman, she still retained a measure of youthful innocence and idealism.

Question 5.
Write a note on the relationship between Anne and her parents while in hiding.
Answer:
Before going into hiding, Anne viewed her parents as any adolescent did—those people who provided the essential things needed to survive, but once they were in hiding, Anne saw her parents as humans, given to vulnerabilities like everyone else. Anne frequently wrote of her difficult relationship with her mother, and of her ambivalence towards her. Anne felt that her mother was partial towards Margot and always favoured her. She accused her mother of being cold and tactless. Mrs Frank called Anne ‘a useless child’ and did not approve of any of her ideas, thoughts, behaviour, attitude etc. She was continuously finding flaws in Anne.

Anne, therefore, never wanted to say her prayers with her mother or follow the rules her mother laid down for her.Later, when she reached the understanding that their differences resulted from misunderstandings that were as much her fault as her mother’s, Anne began to treat her mother with a degree of tolerance and respect.

Anne had a distant and negative relationship with her mother, Anne became very close to her father Otto with whom she organised the annex. It was him that she turned to for solace once the family was in hiding.Sometimes when she was scared by the bombing during the night, she climbed into bed beside her father, who calmed her down and reassured her. Even in her relationship with Peter, while Mrs Frank told Anne to stop meeting Peter as Mrs van Daan was jealous of their relationship, Mr Frank told her to go ahead and spend time with Peter.

Question 6.
Although Anne was not too interested in politics, one entry in March of 1944 described the various opinions of the group. What were the prevailing viewpoints?
Answer:
The ‘protectors,’ Miep, Mr Kleiman, Bep and Mr Kugler often brought news from outside that proved to be untrue or mere rumour. The adults listened to news broadcasts throughout the day. They listened to the German ‘ Wehrmacht News’ and the English BBC as also to the special air-raid announcements. They dismissed German news as propaganda. They believed the news they heard on BBC.

For example, Anne described one scene where they all sat around the radio, listening to a speech given by Winston Churchill. Following the speech, the heated arguments that ensued, horrified and angered her. However, all seemed to admire Winston Churchill and agreed the Germans lied about many things. They seemed to be divided into two groups: the optimists who said the war was going well and who had great faith in the English, and the pessimists who believed the Germans would win in the end.

Saturday, April 1,1944 – Friday, April 28,1944

Question 1.
What were Anne’s hobbies and interests?
Answer:
Anne’s hobbies included writing which she listed first, though she didn’t look at it as a main occupation. Preparing genealogical charts for the royal families of the French, German, Spanish, English, Austrian, Russian, Norwegian and Putch was another one of her hobbies and Anne had made great progress with many of them by reading biographies and history books.

Her third hobby was history, and though her father had already bought her numerous books, Anne longed to go to the public library. Anne also had a great interest in Greek and Roman mythology and her other hobbies included movie stars and family photographs, reading books and studying the history of the arts.

Question 2.
How did the van Daans and the Franks get along? Which of the family members seemed better able to cope with the close quarters? Why?
Answer:
Though the Franks had eagerly awaited the arrival of the van Daans, they did not get along well at all afterwards. However, living together in cramped quarters was not easy for the two families, and was even more stressful because they feared for their lives. Mrs van Daan disliked sharing her sheets and dishes, especially after Anne broke one of her plates. Anne wrote in her diary that Mrs van Daan was a lax housekeeper, leaving leftover food to spoil instead of storing it properly! Mr van Daan was a chain smoker, and suffered nicotine withdrawal when no cigarettes could be found. This made him edgy and jittery.

Mrs van Daan’s flirtatious manner with Mr Frank upset Mrs Frank. Mrs Frank and Mrs van Daan sometimes had loud arguments or ‘squabbles’ which took long to settle. The van Daans quarrelled frequently and loudly with each other too, sometimes picking on Peter. Eventually, the van Daans were forced to sell some of their possessions, such as Mrs van Daans prized fur coat, in the blaq|c market. The van Daans seemed to have a general consensus that Margot was the better child and Anne was spoiled and obnoxious. Otto Frank and Margot were the two mature ones who did not get into arguments like the rest of them.

Question 3.
How did Anne get along with the van Daans?
Answer:
In the beginning, Anne frequently argued with Mr van Daan although they eventually got along better. Anne couldn’t stand Mrs van Daan who she thought was selfish, belligerent and rarely helpful. She was jealous of Anne’s relationship with her son and wanted Peter to confide in her rather than in Anne.

However, Mrs van Daan did have a few strong points. She occasionally could be reasonable and backed down from fights, was generally neat and tidy, and was often easier for Anne to approach than her own mother. Initially, Anne regarded Peter as lazy and stupid. But after a year and a half in hiding, Anne developed a crush on him, and decided that he was very sweet and needed affection, which she tried to give. They spent a lot of time together and exchanged a few kisses.

Question 4.
Write a brief note on the burglary that took place on 11 April 1944.
Answer:
Anne was talking to Peter one night when another break-in occurred. Mr van Daan tried to scare the burglars away by shouting “Police!” but this only drew attention to them. A married couple shone a flashlight into the warehouse and the residents heard footsteps running away. The men ran upstairs and the residents lay on the floor, petrified. Soon they heard footsteps on the stairs and a rattling at the>bookcase that hid the door to the annex.

The noises stopped but someone had left the light in front of the bookcase on. Mrs van Daan worried about the police finding the radio downstairs, and Otto Frank worried they would find Anne’s diary. For two days, they all huddled upstairs, waiting for the Gestapo to come and take them away. The adults called Mr Kleiman and waited in suspense until Jan and Miep came to repair the entrance to the annex.

Question 5.
Write a note on the growing intimacy between Anne and Peter.
Answer:
As her friendship with Peter progressed, Anne admitted to herself that her feelings for Peter were pretty near to being in love. She often went up to his room where they exchanged a few kisses. As they often sat with their arms around one another, and kissed occassionally, their physical relationship was different from the strict moral standards of the time. The love she felt for Peter liberated her from the horrors and deprivations of war. Although Anne and Peter were emotionally more intimate than ever, she admitted with disappointment that she could never marry him as he didn’t have enough character.

Question 6.
Did Anne consider her family lucky or unfortunate to be living in the annex?
Answer:
Anne’s feelings about the annex constantly changed. Most of the time, Anne realised that she and . her family were very fortunate to have a place to hide. She valued the kindness and generosity of her father’s non-Jewish colleagues who risked their lives to provide them with food and supplies. Anne often complained about living in cramped quarters with eight people under severe conditions

she ate rotten potatoes day after day, had no privacy, dealt with clashing personalities, and lived in constant fear that the family would be discovered. Compared to her formerly comfortable, middle-class life, Anne found this a confined, tedious, and fearful existence. Also, when she thought about her Jewish friends and family members who had probably been arrested and sent to concentration camps, she felt extremely thankful to still be alive.

Question 7.
How had Anne changed while in hiding?
Answer:
At first, life in hiding was more of a vacation for Anne. But as the war dragged on and she realised the seriousness of their situation, her fear and depression increased.
Then Anne began to mature, both physically and emotionally. She learnt how to control her outbursts and emotions. She became stoic about her situation. She acknowledged that the happy, carefree existence of her school days would never return. She even criticised her earlier self as being superficial and empty. Meantime, she tried to notice more about life and nature outside. Although she longed to go outside herself, she accepted that it was presently impossible.

She was also resigned to the pitiful living conditions. Since rations were being strictly enforced and prices had increased drastically, their Dutch protectors were no longer able to give the group regular supplies. They often ate rotten potatoes in order to survive. Anne tried to be optimistic and said that she sometimes still enjoyed the meals. She had become an accepting young woman rather than a spoilt child.

Tuesday, March 2,1944 – Wednesday, May 31,1944

Question 1.
How did Mr Dussel celebrate his birthday?
Answer:
The Franks gave Mr Dussel a bottle of wine and the van Daans presented him with ajar of piccalilli – a pickle made of chopped vegetables and spices – and a package of razor blades, Mr Kugler gave him ajar of lemon syrup (to make lemonade), Miep a book and Bep a plant. In return, Mr Dussel treated everyone to an egg.

Question 2
What letter did Anne write to her father? What was his reaction?
Answer:
Anne wrote a letter to her father saying her life had not been easy in the annex. She had been unhappy, despondent and lonely and had to learn to be very independent, without support from her parents. In fact, all she had ever got from them were admonitions not to be noisy. They did not realise she was noisy only to keep herself from being miserable all the time.

Since she had to become older than she really was, she no longer needed their support and could take her own decisions. Her father was very upset by her letter. Two days after she gave him the letter, they finally talked about the letter and they both cried. He told her that it was the most hurtful letter that he had ever received and that he and her mother did not deserve such harsh criticism since they had always loved, protected and cared for her.

Question 3.
Write a short note on Anne’s parents and their background.
Answer:
Both Mr and Mrs Frank came from rich families and told grand stories about wealth and privilege. Anne’s father, Otto Frank, was bom in Frankfurt to very wealthy parents. His father, Michael Frank, was a self-made man who owned a bank and became a millionaire. Otto’s mother, Alice Stem, came from a prominent and well-to-do family. In his youth, Otto Frank led the life of a rich man’s son.

There were parties every week, balls, banquets, beautiful girls, waltzing, dinners etc. After Michael Frank died, most of the money was lost, and after World War I and inflation there was nothing left at all. However, Mr Frank was extremely well- bred. Mrs Edith Frank’s family wasn’t as wealthy, but still fairly well-off. She often told her daughters stories of private balls, dinners and engagement parties with 250 guests.

Here we are providing The Frog and the Nightingale Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Literature Reader, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

The Frog and the Nightingale Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Literature

The Frog and the Nightingale Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

The Frog And The Nightingale Questions And Answers Question 1.
Bring out the irony in the frog’s statement—“Your song must be your own.”
Answer:
The irony in the statement is that the frog was the one who tried to teach the nightingale to sing differently. He did not let her song be her own.

The Frog And The Nightingale Questions And Answers Class 10 Question 2.
Do you think the end is justified?
Answer:
Yes, the nightingale met a fitting end as she was truly brainless. She believed the frog and came under his influence even though the other creatures appreciated her song and came to hear her sing in large numbers. Moreover, she had no proof of the frog’s talent except for what he himself said.

The Frog And The Bird Questions And Answers Question 3.
Do you think the nightingale is ‘brainless’? Give reasons for your answer.
Answer:
The nightingale was fooled by the frog. She took the frog at his word and followed him blindly and changed her song. She did not realise she had an appreciative audience even before the frog began to train her. She did not have the brains to realise the extent of her own talent.

The Nightingale Question Answers Question 4.
In spite of having a melodious voice and being a crowd puller, the nightingale turns out to be a loser and dies. How far is she responsible for her own downfall?
Answer:
The nightingale was fooled by the frog because she did not realise she had an appreciative audience even before the frog began to train her. She did not have the brains to realise the enormity of her talent even when the audience stopped coming to hear her sing. In fact, she was so under the frog’s influence that she lost her life.

The Frog And The Nightingale Question Answers Pdf Question 5.
Do you agree with the frog’s inference of the nightingale’s character? Give reasons for your answer.
Answer:
Yes, she asks the frog (who claims to be a music critic) his opinion of her song despite having an appreciative audience the previous night; does not show much faith in her own ability. She is gullible and easily influenced.

The Frog and the Nightingale Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

The Frog And The Nightingale Questions And Answers Icse Question 1.
Bring out the character of the frog.
Answer:
He is thick-skinned and impervious to insults. In spite of the creatures throwing stones, sticks and bricks at him, begging him to stop singing, insulting him and complaining about him, he refuses to comply. He is jealous of the nightingale and plots to get rid of her. He is presumptuous and offers to give training to the nightingale. He is possessive and territorial and proclaims that he owns the sumac tree. He is greedy and he exploits the nightingale. He is dismissive and condescending and treats the nightingale as a stupid creature.

The Nightingale Questions And Answers Class 10 Question 2.
Bring out the character of the nightingale.
Answer:
She is nervous as she asks the frog (who claims to be a music critic) his opinion of her song despite having an appreciative audience. She is modest and does not consider her song to be of much merit despite the applause. She lacks in confidence. Despite having an appreciative audience she listens blindly to the frog and does not show much faith in her own ability. She is easily influenced and listens to the frog and believes him despite having no proof of his talent.

The Frog And The Nightingale Question 3.
To some extent the nightingale was herself responsible for her downfall and death. Comment.
Answer:
She is carried away by appreciation and could not understand that she was being fooled by the frog’s greed to gain recognition and fame. She left herself open to exploitation. She felt honoured to be singled out by the frog for appreciation and recognition. She did not see to through him. Despite having an appreciative audience, she did not have much faith in her ability and did not have the brains to realise the enojmity of her talent even when the audience stopped coming.

Question 4.
What is the moral of the poem?
Answer:
We learn that one should exercise one’s individuality and reasoning without letting others lead one blindly. One should realise one’s limitations and capabilities and not leave oneself open for exploitation.

Question 5.
“Far too nervous, far too tense,
Far too prone to influence.
Well, poor bird—she should have known
That your song must be your own.”
Do you agree with the frog’s statement? Justify your answer.
Answer:
The nightingale came under the influence of the frog despite having an appreciative audience. She was completely controlled by him and did not have much faith in her ability and did not have the brains to realise the enormity of her talent. She was carried away by the dream of fame that the frog held out. She could not guess that she was being fooled by his greed to gain recognition and fame. This left her open to exploitation as she felt honoured to be singled out by the frog who was a music critic. She practised day and night in all sorts of weather and lost her melody, thereby losing her audience and eventually she died.

The Frog and the Nightingale Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the extracts given below and answer the questions that follow. Write the answers in one or two lines only.

Question 1.
Once upon a time a frog
Croaked away in Bingle Bog.
Every night from dusk to dawn
He croaked awn and awn and awn.

(a) What did the frog do all night?
Answer:
The frog croaked all night.

(b) How did the other creatures react to his voice?
Answer:
The other creatures hated the frog’s voice. They threw stones, sticks and bricks at him, begged him to stop singing, insulted him, and complained about him, but in vain.

(c) Find a word in the above lines which the poet has made up? Why has he done so?
Answer:
The word is‘Awn’. The poet has done so to create a rhyme scheme with dawn.

Question 2.
Other creatures loathed his voice,
But, alas, they had no choice,
And the crass cacophony
Blared put from the sumac tree
At whose foot the frog each night
Minstrelled on till morning light.

(a) Where did the frog live?
Answer:
The frog lived under the sumac tree in Bingle Bog.

(b) What did the other creatures not have any choice in? Why?
Answer:
The other creatures were forced to listen to the frog’s song all night. All their efforts to make him stop singing were in vain

(c) Explain‘crass cacophony’.
Answer:
The phrase means a very loud and unpleasant noise.

Question 3.
Neither stones nor prayers nor sticks,
Insults or complaints or bricks
Stilled the frog’s determination
To display his heart’s elation.

(a) How did the other creatures try to quieten the frog?
Answer:
The other creatures threw stones, sticks and bricks at the frog, begged him to stop singing, insulted him, and complained about him.

(b) Did they succeed in their efforts?
Answer:
No, they did not succeed in their efforts. The frog continued to sing despite their efforts.

(c) What feature of the frog’s personality is brought out in the above lines?
Answer:
The frog was thick-skinned and impervious to insults. He was determined and stubborn.

Question 4.
But one night a nightingale
In the moonlight cold and pale
Perched upon the sumac tree
Casting forth her melody.

(a) Whose songs had echoed in the bog all night earlier?
Answer:
The frog’s song had echoed in the bog earlier all night.

(b) What did the nightingale do?
Answer:
The nightingale sat on the sumac tree singing her melodious song.

(c) How was the nightingale’s song different from the frog’s?
Answer:
The nightingale’s song was melodious while the frog’s song was crass cacophony. His voice sounded like a foghorn.

Question 5.
Dumbstruck sat the gaping frog,
And the whole admiring Bog
Stared towards the sumac, rapt,
And, when she had ended, clapped.

(a) Explain the phrase ‘whole admiring Bog’.
Answer:
All the creatures of the Bog were struck with admiration for the nightingale’s song.

(b) How did the frog react to the nightingale’s song?
Answer:
The frog was dumbstruck by the beauty of her voice.

(c) What had been the frog’s experience at the sumac tree?
Answer:
When the frog sang, the other creatures threw stones, sticks and bricks at him, begged him to stop singing, insulted him and complained.

Question 6.
Ducks had swum and herons waded
To her as she serenaded,
And a solitary loon
Wept, beneath the summer moon.

(a) Who is ‘she’ in the above lines? Why did the ducks and herons come towards her?
Answer:
The nightingale, is being referred to in these lines. The ducks and herons came to hear her song.

(b) Who was the solitary loon? How was his behaviour different from that of the others?
Answer:
Loons are water birds. A single loon came to listen to the nightingale’s song. He was so overcome by emotions that he wept on hearing her beautiful song.

Question 7.
Toads and teals and tiddlers, captured
By her voice, cheered on, enraptured:
‘Bravo! ’ ‘Too divine!’ ‘Encore! ’
So the nightingale once more,
Quite unused to such applause,
Sang till dawn without a pause.

(a) How do you know that the nightingale s song was a sensation?
Answer:
The creatures of the bog heard her voice and swam towards her. They listened to her song, enraptured and encouraged her to sing the whole night long.

(b) How did the nightingale react to the applause?
Answer:
The nightingale sang the whole night without a pause.

(c) Who are‘toads and teals and tiddlers’?
Answer:
The toads are a type of frog, teals are freshwater ducks and tiddlers are small fish. They were all a part of the nightingale’s adoring audience.

Question 8.
Next night when the Nightingale
Shook her head and twitched her tail,
Closed an eye and fluffed a wing
And had cleared her throat to sing
She was startled by a croak.

(a) Where is the nightingale? Who lived at the foot of the tree?
Answer:
The nightingale is on the sumac tree in Bingle Bog. The frog lived at the foot of the tree.

(b) How do you know that the nightingale was getting ready to sing?
Answer:
The nightingale shook her head and twitched her tail. Then she closed an eye, fluffed a wing and cleared her throat preparing to start singing.

(c) What surprised the nightingale?
Answer:
The frog’s croak surprised the nightingale.

Question 9.
Sorry—was that you who spoke?
She enquired when the frog
Hopped towards her from the bog.
“Yes,” the frog replied. “You see,
I’m the frog who owns this tree.”

(a) Who is ‘she’? What aspect of the frog’s personality is revealed in these lines?
Answer:
‘She’ is the nightingale. The frog is territorial and possessive.

(b) How did the frog introduce himself?
Answer:
The frog introduced himself as the owner of the sumac tree.

Question 10.
“Yes,” the frog replied. “You see,
I’m the frog who owns this tree.
In this bog, I’ve long been known
For my splendid baritone
And, of course, I wield my pen
For Bog Trumpet now and then.”

(a) What quality does the frog reveal in the second line of this extract?
Answer:
The frog is boastful.

(b) What is a baritone?
Answer:
Baritone is a deep male singing voice.

(c) Why does he say this?
Answer:
The frog says this to impress the nightingale and to get her under his influence.

Question 11.
“Did you … did you like my song?”
“Not too bad—but far too long.
The technique was fine, of course,
But it lacked a certain force.”

(a) Who is commenting on whose song? What is his comment?
Answer:
The frog is commenting on the nightingale’s song. He tells her that the song was not too bad but it was too long and it lacked intensity and depth.

(b) Do you think he is a fair judge of the other person’s song? Give reasons.
Answer:
No, the frog is not a fair judge because he is not a good singer himself and so possibly does not know much about singing. Moreover, he is jealous as the creatures who insulted his singing admired the nightingale’s song.

Question12.
“Oh!” the nightingale confessed,
Greatly flattered and impressed
That a critic of such note,
Had discussed her art and throat

(a) What were his comments on the nightingale’s singing?
Answer:
The frog commented that the song was not too bad but it was far too long and it lacked intensity and depth.

(b) How did the nightingale respond to the criticism?
Answer:
The nightingale was dejected to hear that her song was not good enough but flattered and impressed to have been noticed by a great critic.

(c) What impression do you form of the nightingale?
Answer:
The nightingale lacked confidence and was prone to influence. She was naive and gullible.

Question 13.
“I don’t think the song’s divine
But—oh, well—at least it’s mine.”
“That’s not much to boast about,”
Said the heartless frog.

(a) Why does the nightingale feel her song is not divine?
Answer:
The nightingale is a modest creature. She is ready to accept her mistakes and is willing to learn.

(b) Who composed the nightingale’s song?
Answer:
It is the nightingale’s self-composed song.

(c) How does the frog change his own statement: “That’s not much to boast about,” in the end?
Answer:
In the end the frog says that the bird should have realised that ‘your song must be your own.’

Question 14.
“That’s not much to boast about,”
Said the heartless frog. “Without
Proper training such as I
—And few others—can supply,”

(a) Who is the frog speaking to? What does ‘that’ refer to?
Answer:
The frog is speaking to the nightingale. ‘That’ refers to the fact that the song the nightingale sang was her own composition.

(b) Why is the frog referred to as heartless?
Answer:
The frog has been called heartless as he did not appreciate the nightingale’s melodious voice. He is cruel and uncaring about the nightingale’s feelings as he criticises her song.

Question 15.
“You’ll remain a mere beginner,
But with me you’ll be a winner.”

(a) How willihe frog change the nightingale’s singing?
Answer:
By teaching the nightingale the technique of singing, the frog promised to transform her from a mere beginner to a singing sensation.

(b) On what condition does the frog agree to teach the nightingale? What according to the frog was lacking in the nightingale’s song?
Answer:
The frog agreed on the condition of charging a modest fee. According to the frog, the nightingale’s song was too long and lacked intensity and depth.

(c) How will the fee not hurt the nightingale?
Answer:
The frog will not take it directly from her but will charge admission fees from the creatures who come to hear the bird sing.

Question 16.
“Dearest frog,” the nightingale Breathed;
“This is a fairy tale—
And you’re Mozart in disguise
Come to earth before my eyes.”
“Well, I charge a modest fee.”
“Oh! But it won’t hurt, you’ll see.”

(a) What was a fairy tale?
Answer:
The fairy tale was that a famous singer and music critic like the frog was ready to teach the nightingale.

(b) How was the listener ‘Mozart in disguise’?
Answer:
The nightingale is flattered and impressed by the frog who claims to be a famous singer and a critic. She praises the frog by comparing him to the great music composer, Mozart.

(c) Why is the nightingale worried at the mention of the fee?
Answer:
She does not have much money to pay the frog for music lessons.

Question 17.
Now the nightingale, inspired,
Flushed with confidence, and fired
With both art and adoration, A
Sang—and was a huge sensation.

(a) What inspired the nightingale to sing?
Answer:
The appreciation of the audience inspired the nightingale to sing beautifully.

(b) How did the nightingale become a sensation?
Answer:
The melodious song of the nightingale attracted creatures of the bog who came from miles around to hear her sing.

(c) Explain‘flushed with confidence’.
Answer:
The appreciation and success that the nightingale received made her feel confident. She also felt excited and pleased with herself as she began to sing.

Question 18.
Animals for miles around
Flocked towards the magic sound.
And the frog with great precision
Counted heads and charged admission.

(a) Why did the animals come in large numbers?
Answer:
The animals came to hear the nightingale’s song.

(b) What is the magic sound?
Answer:
The magic sound refers to the melodious song of the nightingale.

(c) How did the frog make money? ”
Answer:
The frog charged the other creatures admission fee when they came to hear the nightingale sing and he kept the money as his fee for training the nightingale.

Question 19.
Though next morning it was raining,
He began her vocal training.
“But I can’t sing in this weather.”
“Come, my dear—we’ll sing together.”

(a) What training did the frog give the nightingale?
Answer:
The frog trained the nightingale to sing.

(b) What was the effect of the training?
Answer:
As a result of the training, the nightingale lost her melodious voice and the creatures of the bog lost interest in her. They no longer came to hear her sing.

(c) What was her protest?
Answer:
The nightingale could not sing in the rain.

Question 20.
“Just put on your scarf and sash,
Koo-oh-ah! ko-ash! ko-ash!”
So the frog and nightingale
Journeyed up and down the scale
For six hours, till she was shivering
And her voice was hoarse and quivering.

(a) Why did the frog tell the nightingale to put on her scarf and her sash?
Answer:
As it was raining, the nightingale was a little reluctant but the frog wanted her to practise.

(b) Explain: ‘Journeyed up and down the scale’.
Answer:
It means they sang a number of notes—both high and low ones.

(c) What was the result of the practise on the nightingale?
Answer:
The frog made the nightingale practise in the rain for six hours. As a result she was shivering in the cold. Her throat became hoarse and her voice started shaking.

Question 21.
Though subdued and sleep-deprived,
In the night her throat revived,
And the sumac tree was bowed
With a breathless, titled crowd:
Owl of Sandwich, Duck of Kent,
Mallard and Milady Trent,
Martin Cardinal Mephisto,
And the Coot of Monte Cristo.

(a) Why was the nightingale subdued?
Answer:
The nightingale had had no rest. She had been made to practise for long hours in the rain.

(b) What made the nightingale’s throat revive at night?
Answer:
The appreciative audience revived the nightingale’s throat.

(c) Explain: ‘titled crowd’. Who was the noted critic?
Answer:
The ‘titled crowd’ refers to the aristocratic creatures of the bog. The frog was the noted critic.

Question 22.
Ladies with tiaras glittering
In the interval sat twittering
And the frog observed them glitter
With a joy both sweet and bitter.

(a) Where had all the animals gathered? Why?
Answer:
The animals had gathered near the sumac tree to hear the song of the nightingale.

(b) Why was the frog’s joy both sweet and bitter?
Answer:
The frog’s joy was sweet as he was exploiting the nightingale and charging money from the creatures of ‘ the bog who came to hear her, which he pocketed. At the same time he was bitter because the creatures who came to hear the nightingale were the same ones who had insulted him when he used to sing.

Question 23.
Every day the frog who’d sold her
Songs for silver tried to scold her:
“You must practise even longer
Till your voice, like mine, grows stronger.”

(a) Who is ‘her’?
Answer:
The ‘her’ mentioned here is the nightingale.

(b) How did the frog sell her songs for silver?
Answer:
The frog made the nightingale sing every night and he earned money by charging an admission fee from all the creatures who came to hear her song.

(c) What did the frog tell the bird to do?
Answer:
The frog told her to practise for longer hours till her voice became as strong as his own.
He told her to puff up her lungs and sing with passion and add trills to her song.

Question 24.
“In the second song last night
You got nervous in mid-flight. ,
And, my dear, lay on morfe trills:
Audiences enjoy such frills.”

(a) Who speaks these lines and to whom?
Answer:
The frog speaks these lines to the nightingale.

(b) What advice does the speaker give the listener?
Answer:
The frog advises the nightingale to add trills to her song—that is, to sing two musical notes one after the other, repeatedly and very quickly and to bring variety to her songs.

(c) In what two ways was the speaker benefited by the training he gave?
Answer:
He earned a lot of money and was finally able to get rid of the nightingale.

Question 25.
“You must make your public happier:
Give them something sharper, snappier.
We must aim for better billings
You still owe me sixty shillings.”

(a) Who are the ‘public’? Why was this advice given?
Answer:
The creatures who come to hear the nightingale sing are the public. The frog tells her to sing songs which have a faster beat to impress the public.

(b) What is the meaning of ‘better billings’?
Answer:
It means better publicity for the show.

(c) What aspect of the speaker’s personality is shown in these lines?
Answer:
The lines show his greed for money, his heartlessness and ruthlessness.

Question 26.
Till the birds and beasts grew tired
At a voice so uninspired
And the ticket office gross
Crashed, and she grew more morose

(a) Whose voice is being referred to here? What had happened to make it uninspired?
Answer:
The nightingale’s voice is being referred to here. The frog had been training her and she had lost the natural sweetness of her voice.

(b) What does ‘ticket office gross’ mean?
Answer:
This refers to the money collected as the sale of tickets for a concert or a show.

(c) Why did it crash? Why did the nightingale grow morose?
Answer:
The creatures no longer came to hear the nightingale’s song, so the collections fell. The lack of an audience and the frog’s constant rebukes made her feel unhappy.

Question 27.
For her ears were now addicted
To applause quite unrestricted,
And to sing into the night
All alone gave no delight.

(a) What had the nightingale become used to?
Answer:
The nightingale became used to an appreciative audience who applauded her.

(b) Why was she all alone?
Answer:
The nightingale’s voice was no longer as melodious as it had been earlier and the creatures of the bog no longer came to hear her sing.

(c) What was the result of the lack of applause?
Answer:
The nightingale became sorrowful and pale.

Question 28.
Now the frog puffed up with rage.
“Brainless bird—you’re on the stage—
Use your wits and follow fashion,
Puff your lungs out with your passion.”

(a) Why was the frog angry?
Answer:
The frog was angry as the nightingale’s voice no longer attracted the creatures of the bog as earlier and his earnings had dropped.

(b) Do you think the bird is brainless? Explain.
Answer:
Yes, the nightingale was truly brainless. She believed the frog and came under his influence even though the other creatures appreciated her song and came to hear her sing in large numbers. Moreover, she had no proof of the frog’s talent except for what he had himself said.

(c) What did the nightingale do to please the frog? What happened to her as a result?
Answer:
The nightingale puffed up her lungs to sing, burst a vein and died.

Question 29.
Trembling, terrified to fail,
Blind with tears, the nightingale
Heard him out in silence, tried,
Puffed up, burst a vein, and died.

(a) Why was the nightingale trembling?
Answer:
The nightingale was trembling because of the frog’s scolding.

(b) What did the frog wish the nightingale to do?
Answer:
The frog wanted her to use her wits and sing in a more fashionable style.

(c) Whom is she terrified to fail?
Answer:
The nightingale was terrified to fail her audience who paid to hear her sing and the frog who was training her.

Question 30.
Said the frog: “I tried to teach her,
But she was a stupid creature—
Far too nervous, far too tense.
Far too prone to influence.”

(a) Whose influence did she come under? What was the effect of the influence?
Answer:
The nightingale came under the influence of the frog. She was completely controlled by him. He made her practise day and night in all sorts of weather. She lost the melody in her voice and her audience decreased. One day, as the frog scolded her and told her to puff up her lungs, she burst a vein and died.

(b) What do you learn from the poem?
Answer:
We leant that one should exercise one’s individuality and reasoning without letting others lead one blindly. One should realise one’s limitations and capabilities and not leave oneself open for exploitation.

Question 31.
“Well, poor bird—she should have known
That your song must be your own.
That’s why I sing with panache:
Koo-oh-ah! ko-ash! ko-ash!”
And the foghorn of the frog
Blared unrivalled through the Bog.

(a) Why does the frog call the nightingale ‘poor bird’?
Answer:
The frog calls the nightingale ‘poor bird’ as she had died.

(b) What did the frog think of his own influence on the nightingale?
Answer:
The frog realises he was a bad influence on her. In the end, he confesses she should have realised her song should have been her own

(c) How did the frog gain by the nightingale’s death?
Answer:
Once again the frog was the unrivalled singer in the bog. He had got rid of his competition.

Here we are providing The Third Level Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas, Extra Questions for Class 12 English was designed by subject expert teachers. In this article, we are explained how did charley reach the third level  https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-12-english/

The Third Level Extra Questions and Answers Important Questions Class 12 English Vistas

The Third Level Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

The Third Level Extra Questions And Answers Pdf Class 12 Question 1.
What was the psychiatrist’s reaction when Charley told him about ‘The Third Level’?
Answer:
The psychiatrist told him that it was a walking-dream wish fulfillment. He also told that Charley was unhappy.

The Third Level Question Answers Class 12 Question 2.
What is the world filled up with?
Answer:
The world is filled up with insecurity, fear,war .worry and a lot of tensions. On the other hand, there is joy, satisfaction, security and positivity in the world also.

The Third Level Questions And Answers Class 12 Question 3.
What, according to the author is ‘Stamp Collecting ?
Answer:
According to the author, stamp collecting is a ‘temporary refuge from reality’. Its an escapement from worldly worries.

The Third Level Extra Questions Class 12 Question 4.
What happened with Charley at Grand Central Station?
Answer:
At Grand Central Station, Charley entered into a subway to get the train to his home but he was misdirected and entered into an another way that was, according to him ‘The Third Level’.

The Third Level Important Questions Class 12 Question 5.
What did Charley find there?
Answer:
At the third level, Charley saw the people wearing old-fashiond dress, an old locomotive, newspaper dated June 11, 1894, brass spittoons, flickering gas same lights and many other things related to that century.

The Third Level Question Answer Class 12 Question 6.
What do you understand by escapement?
Answer:
Escapement, in this sense means the saving of oneself from worldly worries like insecurity, fear, war, worry and a lot.

Third Level Extra Questions Class 12 Question 7.
I’ve taken the obvious step’. Explain.
Answer:
Nobody believed on Charley’s statement about ‘The Third Level’. His wife was alarmed and brought him to the psychiatrist. Charley himself needed to meet the psychiatrist. It was an ‘obvious step’.

The Third Level Extract Based Questions Class 12 Question 8.
What was Charley’s vision about Galesburg town?
Answer:
Charley thought that Galesburg was still a wonderful town. In that century in 1894, people used to sit on their lawns, having sufficient time to talk to each other, smoking cigars, women waving palm-leaf fans in very long summer evenings, overall, it was a peaceful and friendly place.

Third Level Important Questions Class 12 Question 9.
Why did Charley return from the third level?
Answer:
With the wings of imagination, Charley returned to collect enough money to buy two tickets to Galesburg town for himself and his wife Louisa. (As the clerk was not accepting the currency which Charley was having related to the modem world.)

Extra Questions Of The Third Level Class 12 Question 10.
When and how did Charley find the letter of Sam?
Answer:
One night, while fussing with his stamp collection, Charley found, among his oldest first-day covers, the letter of Sam with a six-cent stamp mailed to his Granddad earlier into his collection.

Question 11.
How much old currency did Sam buy?
Answer:
Sam bought the old currency worth eight hundred dollars.

Question 12.
What business did Sam want to do?
Answer:
Sam wanted to do the business of hay, feed and grain.

Question 13.
What did the ticket clerk say to Charley?
Answer:
The ticket-clerk scolded Charley that that was not the real currency which he was having. Additionally, he warned Charley that if he was trying to skin him, he would not go very far. He would be prisoned.

Question 14.
‘But now we are both looking….’ What does this refer to? Explain.
Answer:
The above mentioned words were said by Charley as he and his wife Louisa, both every weekend started to search the third level because they had the proof. Charleys friend Sam was disappeared. So, they both Charley Louisa were looking for the third level.

Question 15.
What does the third level refer to?
Answer:
The third level refers to the subway of the Grand Central Station in New York. Though this ‘Third level’ was not present there physically, but Charley claimed it to be present there.

Question 16.
Would Charley ever go back to the ticket- counter on the third level to buy tickets to Galesburg for himself and his wife?
Answer:
No, Charley would never go back to the ticket-counter on the third level to buy tickets to Galesburg for himself and his wife because he would never find that third level again possibly.

Question 17.
Do you think that the third level was a medium of escape for Charley? Why?
Answer:
Yes, The third level was a medium of escape for Charley because he might be unhappy and fearful form worldly worries. He explained that he meant the modern world is full of insecurity, fear, war, worry and all the rest of it, and he just wanted to escape from that and this happens when any person is unable to face and fight such abstract aggressors.

Question 18.
What do you infer from Sam’s letter to Charley?
Answer:
Sam’s letter to Charley proves that Sam has found and reached to the third level. He is staying there in Galesburg since last two weeks and watching various activities and explains to Charley. He invites both Charley and his wife Louisa and motivates them . to continue their search of the third level. So, we can say that Sam was also a victim of worldly worries and seeking the escapement, like Charley.

Question 19.
“The modern world is full of insecurity, fear, war, worry and stress”. What are the ways in which we attempt to overcome them?
Answer:
No doubt, the modern world is full of insecurity, fear,war worry and stress. And to overcome them, people start to adopt their own ways. As some people start to imagine and develop their own unreal world, whereas some people start to use alcoholic products and destroy their lives. These all ways are just only escapement and not the solution.

The Third Level Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Do you think that the third level was a medium of escape for Charley? Why?
Answer:
Actually, the third level did not exist at the Grand Central Station. It was confirmed by the station master. Charley, during returning his home only imagined about the third level to escape himself from the dissonant truth of this world. He often used to think to move to Galesburg which existed in 1894. It was considered that the people at that time were without worldly tensions.

He himself also wanted to reach there and imagined his presence in that century. Once he returned to the real life but was continously thinking about that world. At the same time, his friend Sam’s disappearance compelled him-fo believe about it and then again he as well as his wife Louisa, both started to search the third level. In this way, we can say that the third level was surely a medium of escapement for Charley. Though it was an imagination, but gave him more satisfaction.

Question 2.
Why did Charley again wanted to go to the third level?
Answer:
As once Charley had visited the third level in his imaginations, he found and noticed a big difference and as Galesburg was in his thought since starting to find the peace, he became totally satisfied but after reaching to the ticket-window, he came to know that he was unable to buy tickets or to do any trans¬action due to lack of the currency of those days. He realised it and returned to the real life to buy some old time currency from the exchange and than to return to the third level and Galesburg to stay there permanently.

He, actually wanted to buy two tickets to Galesburg for himself and his wife as he was sure that in Galesburg, people live without worldly worries and have enough time to spend with each other. Things were also very cheap and with the money with him, he would be able to survive there easily. So, Charley wanted to return to the third level for his escapement and satisfaction, though the third level actually did not exist, it was only his imagination.

Question 3.
Philately helps keep the past alive. Discuss other ways in which this is done. What do you think of the human tendency to constantly move between the past, the present and the future?
Answer:
Philately Stamp collecting, the study of postage stamps, postal routes, postal history etc. is a way adopted by many persons to keep the past alive in their minds. Except this way, various other ways keep our past alive as through museums, historical buildings & monuments, things used by the past persons, photographs, old books; we travel into our past.

Its the common tendency of human beings to travel or to constantly move between the past, the present and the future. Actually, we live in present but through the gift of memory given by God, we go years back and through the power of imagination, we try to step into future also. This shifting is controlled by our conscious and unconscious both parts of mind and thus we find satisfaction and enjoy and survive in this world in the present.

Question 4.
You have read ‘Adventure’ by Jayant Narlikar in Hombill Class XI. Compare the inter weaving of fantasy and reality in the two stories.
Answer:
The lesson ‘Adventure’ written by ‘Jayant Narlikar’ describes about the past’s happening and its major effect on history of the world. Professor Gaitonde made transition from one world to another during his unique experience about battle of Panipat and the professor went back to that time, supposing Maratha’s victory, thus he experienced a different world.

In ‘the third level’, Charley and Sam both escaped from the present situations and experienced a different world. Both the stories are the interweaving of fantasy and reality, facing past and present experiences of the characters and define their mental condition and imaginations.

Question 5.
Do you see an intersection of time and space in the story?
Answer:
Yes, an intersection of time and space is seen in the story. Charley, as an escapist moves in past from present. He reaches in the last century in 1894, that is practically impossible but due to his imagination he was shifted to the third level and found himself at Galasburg, Illinois. That seems to be psychological and his psychiatrist friend Sam is also the victim of modem worldly worries and he himself also shifts to the third level. The author Jack Finney is a science fiction writer and presents the intersection of time and space both in a very logical way and proves its possiblity due to escapement.

Question 6.
Apparaut illogicaly sometimes turns out to be a futuristic projection? Discuss.
Answer:
Apparant illogicality sometimes turns out to be a futuristic projection as most of the things we see around, once were in somebody’s thoughts and seemed to be impossible, but later proved possible. Science has made it possible. Our unconcious mind is responsible for such happenings.

With the combination of these, we sometimes able to invent or discover the amazing things and facts that are totally unknown for the world till its physical appearance. ‘So, at its early stage, impossiblity arrives but soon, due to right projection, comes in the view and startles the common mass.

Here we are providing The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English was designed by subject expert teachers. https://ncertmcq.com/extra-questions-for-class-10-english/

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions and Answers Very Short Answer Type

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions And Answers Question 1.
Where did Wanda live?
Answer:
Wanda lived at Boggins Heights.

Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions Question 2.
Where would Peggy and Maddie wait for Wanda?
Answer:
They would wait for Wanda in the school yard.

Extra Questions Of The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Question 3.
Why would they wait for Wanda?
Answer:
They would wait for Wanda to have fun with her.

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Question Answer Question 4.
What would Peggy ask Wanda?
Answer:
Peggy would ask Wanda how many dresses she had.

Extra Questions Of Hundred Dresses Part 2 Question 5.
Why did Maddie call herself coward?
Answer:
Maddie called herself coward because she never stopped Peggy from making fun of Wanda.

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Questions And Answers Question 6.
What did Maddie want?
Answer:
Maddie wanted to find Wanda.

Hundred Dresses 2 Extra Questions Question 7.
What did she study intently?
Answer:
She studied the drawings intently.

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Short Questions And Answers Question 8.
Who made the pictures on the walls of Room Thirteen?
Answer:
Wanda Petronski had made the pictures.

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Hundred Dresses Part 2 Important Questions Question 1.
What did Mr Petronski’s letter say?
Answer:
Mr Petronski’s letter said that Wanda would not come to school anymore. Now they were moving to a big city where no one would ask about her funny name.

The Hundred Dresses 2 Extra Questions Question 2.
Is Miss Mason angry with the class, or is she unhappy and upset?
Ans.
Miss Mason was not ahgry with the class. She only looked upset. She was not happy with the incident.

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Important Questions Question 3.
How does Maddie feel after listening to the note from Wanda’s father?
Answer:
Maddie feels very sad. She could not put her mind to her work. She had a very sick feeling in the bottom of her stomach.

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions Question 4.
What does Maddie want to do?
Answer:
She wants to tell Wanda that she had not meant to hurt her feelings.

Class 10 English The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions Question 5.
What excuses does Peggy think up for her behaviour? Why?
Answer:
Peggy makes an excuse that she never called her a foreigner or made fun of her name. She says that she did not know that Wanda would feel hurt.

Class 10 The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions Question 6.
What are Maddie’s thoughts as they go to Boggins Heights?
Answer:
Maddie was thinking that she would tell Wanda they were sorry for their behaviour and ask her not to move away as everybody would be nice to her.

Hundred Dresses Part 2 Question Answers Question 7.
Why did Mr Petronski write a letter to the school teacher?
Answer:
Mr Petronski wrote a letter to the school teacher because the students of her class made fun of Wanda’s name and dress.

Question 8.
What did Peggy and Maddie want to say to Wanda after meeting her?
Answer:
Peggy and Maddie wanted to say sorry for their behaviour. They hoped that Wanda would not have left the school/city and they would meet her at Boggins Heights.

Question 9.
What happened when Maddie and Peggy recognised Wanda’s house?
Answer:
There was no one in the house. Peggy knocked at the door. But she could not get any answer. Peggy repeated it but all in vain. After this they were confirmed that there was no one in the house.

Question 10.
What did the girls know at the end/last?
Answer:
Maddie and Peggy came to know that Wanda liked them very much. Wanda designed their faces in her dresses. Although they teased her, yet she loved them.

Question 11.
What did Mr Petronski’s letter say?
Answer:
Mr. Petronski wrote a letter informing the school that his daughter, Wanda Petronski would not come to school any more. They were moving to a big city where no one would make fun of her name.

Question 12.
Is Miss Mason angry with the class, or is she unhappy and upset?
Answer:
When Miss Mason came to know that the class had been making fun of Wanda Petronski’s name, she was both unhappy and upset. She was not angry but she was troubled to know the incident.

Question 13.
How does Maddie feel after listening to the note from Wanda’s father?
Answer:
Maddie had a very sick feeling in the bottom of her stomach. She could not put her mind in her work. She thought that she was as bad as Peggy because she never stopped Peggy from asking insulting questions from Wanda about her dress though she did not like that behaviour.

Question 14.
What does Maddie want to do?
Answer:
Maddie wants to tell Wanda that she never meant to insult her. She was sorry for everything. She did not want Wanda to leave that place. She wants to tell her that she was very much troubled over the incident.

Question 15.
What excuses does Peggy think up for her behaviour? Why?
Answer:
Peggy was also upset over the incident. She said that she had never called her a foreigner. She had never made fun of her name. She had never thought that she know were making fun of her. She thought she was too dumb.

Question 16.
What are Maddie’s thoughts while going to Boggins Heights?
Answer:
Maddie thought that she would find Wanda and on meeting her she would tell her that nobody would make fun of her name. The whole school thought that she was wonderful. If anybody made fun of her, Peggy and Maddie would fight with them. She would feel sorry and request her not to move from there.

Question 17.
Why does Wanda’s house remind Maddie of Wanda’s blue dress?
Answer:
Maddie and Peggy reached Wanda’s little house at Boggins Heights. The house and its little yard looked shabby but clean. It reminded Maddie of Wanda’s one dress, her faded blue cotton dress, shabby but clean.

Question 18.
What does Maddie think hard about? What important decision does she come to?
Answer:
Maddie was upset over the incident. She could not meet, Wanda. She came back but could not sleep that night. She thought about Wanda, her faded blue dress, the little house she was living in and the glowing pictures of hundred dresses. After the hardest thinking of her life, Maddie reached an important conclusion. She decided that she was never going to stand by and say nothing again. If she ever heard anybody picking on someone because they were funny looking or because they had strange names, she would speak up. She would never make anybody else unhappy again.

Question 19.
What did the girls write to Wanda?
Answer:
The girls wrote to Wanda about the contest and told her that she had won it. They appreciated her drawings. It was a friendly letter. They asked if she liked her new place and the teachers. They closed the letter with lots of love and wishes for Wanda.

Question 20.
Did they get a reply? Who was more anxious for a replay, Peggy or Maddie? How do you know?
Answer:
Weeks went by and still Wanda did not answer to Peggy and Maddie. After a long period of time, the reply was received by the school. Maddie was more anxious for a reply. Peggy had begun to forget the whole business. But Maddie did not forget Wanda. She used to make speeches about Wanda before going to bed.

Question 21.
How did the girls know that Wanda liked them even though they had teased her?
Answer:
In her letter to school, Wanda wished all the girls Merry Christmas. She offered all the hundred dresses to the girls. She gave the blue one to Maddie and the green one to Peggy. This shows that Wanda liked all of them though they always teased her.

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
What was Miss Mason’s reaction after reading Wanda Petronski’s father’s letter?
OR
Letter from Wanda Petronski’s father made Miss Mason and the students tense. Why?
Answer:
Miss Mason was in Room Thirteen. She got a letter from the principal’s room. It was from Wanda’s father. After reading it, she was very unhappy and upset. She looked at the students and spoke in a low voice that Wanda would not come to that school any more because the students made fun of her and hurt her feelings. On listening the letter the class became silent and Miss Mason called it an unfortunate thing. Maddie could not focus herself in studies. She was deeply hurt and sad. She was thinking to do something. She wanted to tell Wanda that she had never meant to hurt her feelings. She decided to accompany Peggy to see Wanda. There she would tell Wanda that she had won the contest. They would say that she was smart and her hundred dresses were beautiful.

Question 2.
How did Peggy and Maddie realise Wanda’s feelings that she liked them?
OR
What were the feelings of Maddie and Peggy after receiving the sketches of Wanda?
Answer:
Peggy and Maddie realised that Wanda liked them very much through her letter and drawings. Wanda replied to Maddie and Peggy and wished them all a Merry Christmas. She also wrote in the letter that Peggy should be given the drawing of green dress and Maddie should be given the drawing with the blue dress. Maddie saw that Wanda had drawn her picture in the drawing of blue dress and in the same way, the drawing of the green dress had been drawn for Peggy. Thus they came to know that Wanda liked them very much.

Question 3.
Write the character sketch of Wanda Petronski.
Answer:
Wanda Petronski is a Polish girl who-has shifted to America with her parents and younger brother. She is very kind and simple-hearted who never behaves badly with anyone. She feels disturbed when Peggy teases her. But she replies confidently and courageously to what Peggy says to her. She wears the same blue faded dress everyday but she never complains about anything. She is very talented and has good hand at drawing. She also wins the drawing contest and shows her creative side.
She is forgiving and generous as she forgives Peggy and Maddie by giving them two of her drawings in which she draws their faces.
So, it can be said that she is a mature, sensible and loving girl who cares about everyone.

Question 4.
Wanda was a poor girl, in the beginning. She suffered much humiliation. Later she won everyone’s appreciation. What traits of character helped her achieve this? What lesson should we learn from it?
Answer:
“The Hundred Dresses – II” gives out a moral lesson of what a person should be like as Wanda displays herself in the given situation.
Wanda Petronski’s letter enlightens her greatness which gives us a view of her nature as a simple, loving, caring, and friendly human being. She gifts her drawings to Peggy and Maddie though they teased her a lot. It shows how great she is as it requires a lot of courage and patience to do so. An ordinary person can not do that and would definitely hate them but Wanda shows polite and peaceful traits of her character.

In our society it is very difficult to find such a character but such traits are must to be good human being. Here, in our society, people tease others with racist remarks, which are not a sign of good civilisation. A polite and friendly manner is good for society and human beings.
Wanda is portrayed to be a humble person. We all should try to have or acquire such traits in our character so that everyone praises us and we can live peacefully.

Question 5.
Learning to live with differences—cultural, regional, religious, social etc; is the need of the hour. Inability to accept differences brings trouble for us as well as for others. “The Hundred Dresses—‘I and IF beautifully convey this message. Comment.
Answer:
Miss Mason was in Room Thirteen. She got a letter from the principal’s room. It was from Wanda’s father. After reading it, she was very unhappy and upset. She looked at the students and spoke in a low voice that Wanda would not come to that school any more because the students made fun of her and hurt her feelings. On listening the letter the class became silent and Miss Mason called it an unfortunate thing. Maddie could not focus herself in studies. She was deeply hurt and sad. She was thinking to do something. She wanted to tell Wanda that she had never meant to hurt her feelings. She decided to accompany Peggy to see Wanda. There she would tell Wanda that she had won the contest. They would say that she was smart and her hundred dresses were beautiful.

Question 6.
Maddie has served mental conflict and feeling of guilt as she had been a mute spectator to the cruelty being inflicted on Wanda Petronski. Explain/Comment.
Answer:
Maddie, who was herself a poor girl, was feeling guilty because Peggy and other girls used to ask Wanda how many dresses she had and made fun of her. Though she did not like it yet she was passively involved in all this. So, she thought that if only she could see Wanda and say that she had not meant to hurt Wanda’s feelings. She thought that she had to find Wanda. She might not have moved yet.

Maddie thought that if she met Wanda, she would tell her that Wanda had won the contest. She also wanted to tell Wanda that they thought she was smart and the drawings of hundred dresses made by her were beautiful. Maddie also wanted to tell Wanda that they were sorry to tease her and how wonderful the whole school thought she was. She wanted to tell Wanda not to move away and everyone would be nice. She and Peggy would fight anybody who was not nice.

Question 7.
Why do you think Wanda’s family moved to a different city? Do you think life there was going to be different for their family?
Answer:
Wanda Petronski was poor Polish girl. She was studying in an American school with other American girls. Wanda Petronski was different from others. She had an unfamiliar name. She did not have pretty dresses. She had only one faded blue dress. The other students made fun of her unusual name. They used to tease her. Peggy would ask her mockingly how many dresses and pairs of shoes she had. This behaviour of the girl hurt Wanda Petronski. Wanda’s family decided to move to a different big city. Yes, life in a big city was going to be different for their family. Nobody would make fun of their unusual names. There would be many people with different names.

Question 8.
Maddie thought her silence was as bad as Peggy’s teasing. Was she right?
Answer:
Maddie and Peggy were good friends. Maddie was good at heart and could never think of insulting or hurting anyone. Peggy used to make fun of Wanda by asking her how many dress she had. Maddie did not like this but she never opposed Peggy. Once she decided to write a note to Peggy asking her not to insult Wanda but could not muster courage. When Wanda’s family decided to leave the city, Maddie felt bad. She realised that she was also responsible for that unfortunate incident. She was as bad as Peggy. Her silence was as bad as Peggy’s teasing. She should have spoken and stopped Peggy and others from making fun of Wanda.

Question 9.
Peggy says, “I never thought she had the sense to know we were making fun of her anyway. I thought she was too dumb. And gee, look how she can draw!” What led Peggy to believe that Wanda was dumb? Did she change her opinion later?
Answer:
Peggy believed that Wanda Petronski was too dumb. Wanda was a Polish girl. She didn’t have any companion. She always remained reserved. Peggy made fun of her. She asked Wanda how many dresses she had. Wanda replied that she had a hundred dresses in her almirah. Peggy knew that she was telling a lie as Wanda had only one dress. Peggy never understood why she replied in such a way. She concluded that Wanda was a dumb girl.

She changed her opinion when Wanda made beautiful drawings of hundred dresses and won the contest. When Miss, Mason read a letter in the class sent by Wanda’s father telling that Wanda would not come to school any more they were moving away to big city where no one would make fun of her name, she realised her mistake and felt sorry for the unfortunate incident.

Question 10.
What important decision did Maddie make? Why did she have to think hard to do so?
Answer:
Maddie and Peggy were very close friends. Peggy used to make fun of Wanda. Though Maddie never said anything to Wanda but her silence always supported Peggy. She never liked Peggy teasing Wanda and asking about her dresses because she herself was very poor. Wanda Petronski was deeply hurt by Peggy’s remarks and her family decided to leave the city. Peggy and Maddie never expected this incident. Maddie was very upset and could not sleep the whole night. She kept on thinking about Wanda, her faded blue dress, the little house she was living in and glowing pictures of hundred dresses she had made for contest.

She felt that her silence was as bad as Peggy’s teasing. She took an important decision. It was that she was never going to stand by and say nothing again. If she found anybody treating someone unkindly she would speak up. She would not care even for Peggy’s friendship. From now on she would never make anybody else that unhappy again. It was a hard decision because she never wanted to lose Peggy’s friendship.

Question 11.
Why do you think Wanda gave Flscki-o and Peggy the drawings of the drew e? Why aw they
surprised?
Answer:
Wanda Petronski made a hundred drawings of dresses for the contest in the school. She won the contest. She had left the school as Peggy and other girls used to tease her. Peggy always teased her by asking how many dresses she had. Wanda Petronski sent a letter to the school from the city she had moved with her family requesting to gift all the drawings to her classmates. She gave two special designs to Maddie and Peggy. I think she wanted to show her love for Peggy and Maddie. By this she communicated that though they always made fun of her yet she liked them. She wanted to tell them she never told a lie about the dresses. She always meant a hundred dresses meant a hundred designs of dresses. She surprised them by her creativity and open heartedness. She had a broad mind and a kind heart to excuse them all for their teasing.

Question 12.
Do you think Wanda really thought the girls were teasing her? Why or why not?
Answer:
Yes, Wanda was not a dumb girl. She was a sensitive girl who could very well understand what Peggy was trying to do. Whenever Peggy asked her about dresses she used to reply that she had a hundred dresses. She knew that Peggy was making fun of her dress but she never opened her mouth. She was a foreigner in that school and had no friends. She tried to adjust but failed. Later on she decided to leave. the school and shift to a big city. Has she not thought that the girls were teasing her she would not have left the school and the place.

The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions and Answers Reference to Context

Read the following passages and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
While the class was circling the room,    the monitor from the principal’s office brought Miss Mason a note. Miss Mason read it several times and studied it thoughtfully for a while. Then she clapped her hands. “Attention, class. Everyone back to their seat.” When the shuffling of feet had stopped and the room was still and quiet, Miss Mason said, “I’have a letter from Wanda’s father that I want to read to you.” Miss Mason stood there a moment and the silence in the room grew tense and expectant. The teacher adjusted her glasses slowly and deliberately. Her manner indicated that what was coming—this letter from Wanda’s father – was a matter of great importance. Everybody listened closely as Miss Mason read the brief note. (Page 73)
(i) What did the monitor bring?
(ii) Who was Miss Mason?
(iii) What did Miss Mason’s manner indicate?
(iv) Pick out the words from the passage which mean the same as
(a) pointed out
(b) intentionally
Answer:
(i) The monitor brought a note for Miss Mason from the principal’s office.
(ii) Miss Mason was the class teacher of Maddie, Peggy and Wanda Petronski.
(iii) Miss Mason’s manner indicated that the contents of the letter were of great importance.
OR
Her manner indicated that there was something serious in the letter
(iv) (a) indicated
(b) deliberately.

Question 2.
“I am sure that none of the boys and girls in Room Thirteen would purposely and deliberately hurt anyone’s feelings because his or her name happened to be a long, unfamiliar one. I prefer to think that what was said was said in thoughtlessness. I know that all of you feel the way I do, that this is a very unfortunate thing to have happened—unfortunate and sad, both. And I want you all to think about it.”
(i) Who is the speaker in the passage?
(ii) What had been unfortunate?
(iii) Who was mainly responsible for the incident?
(iv) Pick out word from the passage that means the same as ‘unknown’.
Answer:
(i) Miss Mason is the speaker in the passage.
(ii) Wanda had left the school because the children used to make fun of her unfamiliar name.
(iii) Peggy and Maddie were mainly responsible for this incident.
(iv) ‘Unfamiliar’

Question 3.
The first period was a study period. Maddie tried to prepare her lessons, but she could not put her mind on her work. She had a very sick feeling in the bottom of her stomach. True, she had not enjoyed listening to Peggy ask Wanda how many dresses she had in her closet, but she had said nothing. She had stood by silently, and that was just as bad as what Peggy had done. Worse. She was a coward. At least Peggy hadn’t considered they were being mean but she, Maddie, had thought they were doing. wrong. She could put herself in Wanda’s shoes. (Page 74)
(i) What could Maddie not do in the first period?
(ii) How was she feeling?
(iii) Why did she call herself ‘coward’?
(iv) Pick out words from the passage that means the same as
(a) almirah (b) thought
Answer:
(i) Maddie could not concentrate on her studies in the first period.
(ii) Maddie was very disturbed after listening the letter of Wanda’s father. She had a very sick feeling in the bottom of her stomach.
(iii) She called herself coward because she never stopped Peggy from making fun of Wanda.
(iv) (a) closet (b) considered.

Question 4.
If only she could tell Wanda she hadn’t meant to hurt her feelings. She turned around and stole a glance at Peggy, but Peggy did not look up. She seemed to be studying hard. Well, whether Peggy felt badly or not, she, Maddie, had to do something. She had to find Wanda Petronski. Maybe she had not yet moved away. May be Peggy would climb the Heights with her, and they would tell Wanda she had won the contest, that they thought she was smart and the hundred dresses were beautiful.
(i) What did Maddie want to tell Wanda?
(ii) What did Maddie want to do?
(iii) Did Peggy also think in the same way?
(iv) Pickout words from the passage that mean the same as – look, appeared.
Answer:
(i) Maddie wanted to tell Wanda that she had never meant to hurt her feelings.
(ii) Maddie wanted to find Wanda. She wanted to meet her at her home.
(iii) No, Peggy never thought that she had hurt Wanda s feelings.
(iv) Glanced, seemed.

Question 5.
The two girls hurried on. They hoped to get to the top of the hill before dark. “I think that’s where the Petronskis live,” said Maddie, pointing to a little white house. Wisps of old grass stuck up here and there along the pathway like thin kittens. The house and its sparse little yard looked shabby but clean. It reminded Maddie of Wanda’s one dress, her faded blue cotton dress, shabby but clean. There was not a sign of life about the house. Peggy knocked firmly on the door, but there was no answer. She and Maddie went around to the backyard and knocked there. Still there was no answer. There was no doubt about it. The Petronskis were gone. How could they ever make amends?
(i) Who were the two girls?
(ii) What did they find along the pathway of the Petronski home?
(iii) How did they come to know that the Petronskis had moved away.
(iv) Pick out the word/phrase from the passage which means the same as ‘straws’.
Answer:
(i) Peggy and Maddie were the two girls.
(ii) They found straws of old grass stuck up here and there along the pathway.
(iii) Peggy knocked firmly on the front door but there was no response. Then they went around the backyard and knocked there. Still there was no answer. Now they were sure that the Petronskis had moved away.
(iv) Wisps

Question 6.
Maddie turned this idea carefully over in her head, for if there were anything in it she would not have to feel so badly. But that night she could not get to sleep. She thought about Wanda and her faded blue dress and the little house she had lived in. And she thought of the glowing picture those hundred dresses made—all lined up in the classroom. At last Maddie sat up in bed and pressed her forehead tight in her hands and really thought. This was the hardest thinking she had ever done.
(i) Whose idea did Maddie turn over in her head?
(ii) What was the idea?
(iii) Why could she not sleep?
(iv) Pick out the word from the passage which means the same as ‘discoloured’.
Answer:
(i) It was Peggy’s idea which Maddie turned over in her head.
(ii) Peggy argued that when she was asking her about all her dresses Wanda was getting good ideas for her drawings. Otherwise, she might not have won the contest.
(iii) Maddie could not sleep because she was feeling bad for Wanda. She regretted her behaviour towards Wanda.
(iv) Faded.

Question 7.
On Saturday .Maddie spent the afternoon with Peggy. They were writing a letter to Wanda Petronski. It was just a friendly letter telling about the contest and telling Wanda she had won. They told her how pretty her drawings were. And they asked her if she liked where she was living and if she liked her new teacher. They had meant to say they were sorry, but it ended up with their just writing a friendly letter, the kind they would.have written to any good friend, and they signed it with lots of X’s for love. They mailed the letter to Boggins Heights, writing ‘Please Forward’ on the envelope.
(i) What did the Maddie and Peggy decide to do?
(ii) What was their real objective of writing a letter to Wanda?
(iii) How did they close the letter? What does X’s stand for
(iv) Pick out the word from the passage which means the same as – ‘Finished’.
Answer:
(i) Peggy and Maddie decided to write a letter to Wanda Petronski.
(ii) They wanted to say that they were very sorry for their behaviour.
(iii) They closed the letter by signing it with lots of X’s for love. X’s stands for love.
(iv) Ended up.

Question 8.
Tears blurred her eyes and she gazed for a long time at the picture. Then hastily she rubbed her eyes and studied it intently. The colours in the dress were so vivid that she had scarcely noticed the face and head of the drawing. But it looked like her, Maddie! It really looked like her own mouth. Why it really looked like her own self! Wanda had really drawn this for her. Excitedly, she ran over to Peggy’s.
(i) Who is ‘She’ in the passage?
(ii) What did she study intently?
(iii) Who made that picture?
(iv) Pick out the word from the passage which means the same as—deeply.
Answer:
(i) Maddie is ‘She’ in the passage.
(ii) Maddie studied the drawing intently.
(iii) Wanda had made that picture.
(iv) ‘intently’.